InfluenzaM-FLUNCT00490633
Intervention Study of Face Mask and Hand Sanitizer to Reduce Influenza Transmission
A study testing Ear Loop Procedure Mask and 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand Sanitizer in people with Influenza, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Pharmaceutical interventions, particularly vaccination, have been the principal public health method of preventing and controlling seasonal influenza. Other less invasive non-pharmaceutical interventions include the use of face masks and hand hygiene. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- Ear Loop Procedure Mask and 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand Sanitizer
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,420 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to Apr 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Residence in selected University of Michigan Residence Halls
Who cannot join
- Non-residence in selected Residence Halls
- Unwillingness to utilize face mask and hand sanitizer and complete online surveys
- Already study employee
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Reducing the Transmission of Influenza by Face Masks
Pharmaceutical interventions, particularly vaccination, have been the principal public health method of preventing and controlling seasonal influenza. Other less invasive non-pharmaceutical interventions include the use of face masks and hand hygiene. In Asia, masks are used extensively, especially in Japan, but with only circumstantial evidence of efficacy. Although there are numerous studies that support hand hygiene as an effective measure for decreasing transmission of enteric infections, there are fewer data assessing the effect of hand hygiene on respiratory illnesses. Therefore it is proposed that a study be conducted on the use of face masks with and without the use of hand hygiene in comparison to no intervention in residence housing units of the University of Michigan. The interventions will be carried out during a period of influenza transmission that is defined by surveillance conducted at the University Health Service. Data will be collected on use of the interventions and the occurrence of influenza and other illnesses. When illness occurs meeting a case definition, specimens for viral isolation will be collected in all intervention settings. Face masks could theoretically lead to a large reduction in transmission frequency of influenza, especially if most transmission occurs by the airborne (large or small droplet) route. Even a modest reduction could have a major effect during an influenza pandemic.
Read the detailed description
Objective:
The overall objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of various non-pharmaceutical interventions on the occurrence of influenza in residence units of the University of Michigan.
Specific Aims:
The three specific aims of this study are to: (1) determine the feasibility of using face masks and hand hygiene education among students living in residence hall units at the University of Michigan, (2) estimate the reduction of influenza infection and illness during laboratory documented influenza outbreaks in individuals and groups using one or more interventions compared to those not using such interventions, and (3) track occurrence of influenza cases in the participating residence units of the University.
Background:
Community based intervention studies that target prevention of droplet transmission, via face masks in addition to hand-to-hand transmission along with alcohol-based antiseptic use, are needed along with culture confirmed respiratory illness data.
Methodology:
The proposed study is a randomized intervention designed to examine the effectiveness of face masks alone and layered face masks and hand hygiene interventions for reducing transmission of influenza among students residing in University of Michigan residence halls during laboratory defined influenza seasons. Randomization will be by geographically separate housing unit. In the first year, residence halls will be assigned to each of the interventions and to the observed comparison to bring the total number of participants to 750 in each of the interventions and the comparison (total number: 2250). For year two, randomization was performed at the residence house level to increase clustering units and also aimed for 750 students in each intervention. Students living in each of the residence halls will be asked if they wish to participate in the study. Those giving informed consent will be asked to complete a survey each week to ascertain illness occurrences. When influenza illness is documented to be occurring in the University setting, the interventions will be implemented. During that period, the survey will be expanded to include questions on intervention use, as appropriate for the particular housing unit. Also during this period, those with illnesses meeting a case definition will be asked to provide specimens for virus identification. This collection will not be limited to those agreeing to the use of the interventions, since informed consent will be obtained for all specimen collections.
Intervention Methods:
Randomization will be clustered by residence hall since it is likely that incidence of influenza infection will be correlated among subjects within residence halls. In year 2, clustering was done by residence house to increase the clustering units. The intervention residence halls will receive one of the following two interventions: (i) masks alone or (ii) masks plus alcohol-based hand sanitizers (62% ethyl alcohol) and hygiene education. The remaining halls will serve as comparison units. The control dorms will be similar to the intervention dorms on basic demographic distributions, such as age range and geographical proximity. Residence halls that are randomized to the control arm will not receive any masks, hygiene education materials, or alcohol-based hand sanitizer.
Within each of the randomized residence halls assigned to receive an intervention, our goal is to assess the use of face masks and hand sanitizer. The intervention will be put into effect only when two or more virus positive illnesses are detected in a single week. Rapid tests will be available to help in identifying cases if laboratory confirmation may be delayed. The use of face masks will continue until the outbreak is recognized by virology to be coming to a close or after the passage of 6 weeks, whichever occurs first. It is felt that there needs to be a guaranteed duration in order to assure compliance with face mask use.
Face Mask:
Residence halls receiving interventions (i) and (ii) will receive face masks and will be asked to comply with their use at least while in the residence hall when it is known that influenza virus is transmitting on campus. A week's supply of face masks and plastic bags for disposal will be bundled along with instructions for use. They will be requested to wear the masks when out of the halls, but this may be more difficult to implement. As indicated below, we will ask what proportion of time the masks are worn. The choice of the specific face masks will be carried out in conjunction with the CDC project officers. The face mask intervention would require a once a day change during use to ensure proper protection and a hygienic barrier. It is clear from the recent Institute of Medicine report that little is known about long term use or reuse of face masks, so variations in the number of times in which a face mask is changed is a variable that could be assessed in this study.
The use of face masks will continue for 6 weeks. Instructions will be given as to the correct and incorrect way to utilize surgical masks. As part of the evaluation of level of use, staff observers in each facility will estimate what proportion of individuals actually use them properly. This will take place in common rooms, hallways, and residence hall dining facilities to supplement the self reports that will be collected by e-mail from all participants.
Hand Hygiene Education and Antiseptic Product Use:
All students in residence halls receiving intervention (ii) will be provided with a comprehensive hand hygiene education component in addition to mask use. The educational component will include posters and pamphlets that provide background information on transmission of influenza, an explanation of the effectiveness of hand hygiene for reducing transmission, and guidelines for proper hand hygiene, including the need for hand hygiene at critical locations throughout the residence halls. The hand washing campaign will consist of posters on bulletin boards and weekly email hand hygiene reminder messages to participants in the intervention residence halls. The educational component of the study will include a video for both the control arm and the intervention arms. The control video will address information on influenza and an overview of the study. The intervention video will address both information on influenza and an overview of the study, in addition to hand hygiene education and the use of hand sanitizer and the use of face masks. Both videos are available on the website (www.mflu.org) and on Survey Monkey linked to the consent form.
The intervention dorms will be given a portable alcohol-based hand sanitizer and a large stationary pump alcohol-based hand sanitizer to use throughout the study period in addition to basic hand hygiene education materials and messages. In order to quantify the effect of the alcohol-based hand sanitizer use on influenza virus transmission, regular self reports of hand-sanitizer use will be collected and the products provided will be monitored for use (by weighing) and re-supplied as needed on a weekly basis during the influenza season. Control participants will also be required to provide information on type and name of product used and daily frequency of use, should they be using any.
Control Residence Halls:
Students residing in the control housing units will be asked to participate in the disease surveillance aspect of the study. They will be contacted by e-mail, be asked to consent to participate in a wellness study in which they will report on respiratory and enteric illness symptoms on a weekly basis. The students will be compensated for this participation but not at the level of those who are in the intervention arms.
Hand Hygiene, Face Mask and Illness Surveillance:
Participants in both the intervention and control housing units will be asked to report information on a weekly basis concerning use of the interventions (where appropriate) and the occurrence of respiratory and enteric illness symptoms. Questions on the health attitudes and knowledge will be collected at the start and end of the study season. This survey will be modified for residence hall participants so that frequency of use of face masks can be similarly determined, including attitudes about wearing them.
Both intervention compliance and outcome measures will be collected via electronic survey. This will include mask use, alcohol-based hand sanitizer use, and details regarding respiratory symptoms and enteric symptoms. During the first year, the survey instruments will be assessed for reliability for use among our target student populations in residence halls and may be modified in the second year. Honoraria will be calculated based on the weeks the report is completed, and paid at the end of the season.
Collection of Specimens for Virus Identification:
All residents in the intervention and comparison residences will receive small magnetic cards, modified after those currently used in the vaccine study, describing the case definition. An individual will be asked to have a specimen collected for virus identification whenever an illness that meets the case definition occurs. Information on symptoms, duration of illnesses and other relevant characteristics will be obtained.
Laboratory Methods for Virus Identification:
All specimens for virus identification will be collected by throat swab and placed in veal infusion broth transport medium. This transport medium has been found to protect viruses for days during shipment from remote sites and to be suitable for PCR tests as well.
Positives are passed to additional tubes of cell culture. Initial typing is carried out by fluorescent antibody techniques. Subtyping of type A viruses are carried out by hemagglutination-inhibition. For specimens collected in the influenza vaccine efficacy study, specimens are also processed by real time PCR. By collecting data on vaccination use among participants, we will be able to control for vaccine use in our study analyses. Given the low rate of vaccination uptake among college age individuals, we do not expect vaccine use to be a significant confounder in our study design.
Statistical Design:
To estimate the reduction of influenza infection and illness during laboratory documented influenza outbreaks in individuals and groups using one or more interventions compared to those not using such interventions. The effect of the intervention will be tested through the use of generalized estimating equations (GEE) as applied to statistical regression models for clustered data. The main outcome for this aim will be the rate of influenza cases and rates of secondary influenza transmission comparing the intervention and control dormitories. Additional outcomes will include other non-influenza respiratory illnesses and enteric illness symptoms. Predictor variables will include the main effects of the intervention and control for potential confounders depending upon balance of the known confounders across intervention and control residence halls.
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- Ear Loop Procedure Mask, 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand Sanitizer
- Keywords
- Influenza, Non Pharmaceutical Intervention, Face Mask, Hand Hygiene
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ear Loop Procedure MaskBehavioural
Also called TECNOL™ procedure masks, Kimberly-Clark, Roswell GA
Facemasks were requested to be worn while participants were in the residence hall for year one, and while they were in residence halls for a minimum of six hours per day in year two.
62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand SanitizerBehavioural
Also called Purell, 62% ethyl alcohol in a gel base
Hand sanitizer was provided to participants in the facemask and hand hygiene arm for year one and year two of the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Facemask and hand hygiene | Experimental | Facemask and hand hygiene provided for participants. Receives: Behavioral: Ear Loop Procedure Mask; Behavioral: 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand Sanitizer |
| Facemask only | Experimental | Facemask only provided for participants. Receives: Behavioral: Ear Loop Procedure Mask |
| Control | No intervention | Control, no intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of laboratory confirmed cases of Influenza
Measured: 8 weeks, including the 6 weeks of intervention and two weeks post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of cases of Influenza Like Illness
Measured: 6 weeks of intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionApr 2008
- Study completionApr 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,420 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Investigators
- Arnold S Monto, MD, Principal investigator, University of MichiganAllison E Aiello, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00490633
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00008566
- Acronym
- M-FLU
- Status last verified
- Jun 2007
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Aiello AE, Murray GF, Perez V, Coulborn RM, Davis BM, Uddin M, Shay DK, Waterman SH, Monto AS. Mask use, hand hygiene, and seasonal influenza-like illness among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. J Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 15;201(4):491-8. doi: 10.1086/650396.
PubMed 20088690Jefferson T, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Al-Ansary LA, van Driel ML, Bawazeer GA, Jones MA, Hoffmann TC, Clark J, Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Conly JM. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
PubMed 36715243Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Al-Ansary LA, Bawazeer GA, van Driel ML, Jones MA, Thorning S, Beller EM, Clark J, Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Conly JM. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5.
PubMed 33215698Aiello AE, Perez V, Coulborn RM, Davis BM, Uddin M, Monto AS. Facemasks, hand hygiene, and influenza among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029744. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
PubMed 22295066Perez V, Uddin M, Galea S, Monto AS, Aiello AE. Stress, adherence to preventive measures for reducing influenza transmission and influenza-like illness. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jul;66(7):605-10. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.117002. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
PubMed 21224242
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing the Transmission of Influenza by Face Masks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00490633
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M-FLU / HUM00008566
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- Influenza, Non Pharmaceutical Intervention, Face Mask, Hand Hygiene
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,420 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- Apr 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pharmaceutical interventions, particularly vaccination, have been the principal public health method of preventing and controlling seasonal influenza. Other less invasive non-pharmaceutical interventions include the use of face masks and hand hygiene. In Asia, masks are used extensively, especially in Japan, but with only circumstantial evidence of efficacy. Although there are numerous studies that support hand hygiene as an effective measure for decreasing transmission of enteric infections, there are fewer data assessing the effect of hand hygiene on respiratory illnesses. Therefore it is proposed that a study be conducted on the use of face masks with and without the use of hand hygiene in comparison to no intervention in residence housing units of the University of Michigan. The interventions will be carried out during a period of influenza transmission that is defined by surveillance conducted at the University Health Service. Data will be collected on use of the interventions and the occurrence of influenza and other illnesses. When illness occurs meeting a case definition, specimens for viral isolation will be collected in all intervention settings. Face masks could theoretically lead to a large reduction in transmission frequency of influenza, especially if most transmission occurs by the airborne (large or small droplet) route. Even a modest reduction could have a major effect during an influenza pandemic.
Detailed description
Objective:
The overall objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of various non-pharmaceutical interventions on the occurrence of influenza in residence units of the University of Michigan.
Specific Aims:
The three specific aims of this study are to: (1) determine the feasibility of using face masks and hand hygiene education among students living in residence hall units at the University of Michigan, (2) estimate the reduction of influenza infection and illness during laboratory documented influenza outbreaks in individuals and groups using one or more interventions compared to those not using such interventions, and (3) track occurrence of influenza cases in the participating residence units of the University.
Background:
Community based intervention studies that target prevention of droplet transmission, via face masks in addition to hand-to-hand transmission along with alcohol-based antiseptic use, are needed along with culture confirmed respiratory illness data.
Methodology:
The proposed study is a randomized intervention designed to examine the effectiveness of face masks alone and layered face masks and hand hygiene interventions for reducing transmission of influenza among students residing in University of Michigan residence halls during laboratory defined influenza seasons. Randomization will be by geographically separate housing unit. In the first year, residence halls will be assigned to each of the interventions and to the observed comparison to bring the total number of participants to 750 in each of the interventions and the comparison (total number: 2250). For year two, randomization was performed at the residence house level to increase clustering units and also aimed for 750 students in each intervention. Students living in each of the residence halls will be asked if they wish to participate in the study. Those giving informed consent will be asked to complete a survey each week to ascertain illness occurrences. When influenza illness is documented to be occurring in the University setting, the interventions will be implemented. During that period, the survey will be expanded to include questions on intervention use, as appropriate for the particular housing unit. Also during this period, those with illnesses meeting a case definition will be asked to provide specimens for virus identification. This collection will not be limited to those agreeing to the use of the interventions, since informed consent will be obtained for all specimen collections.
Intervention Methods:
Randomization will be clustered by residence hall since it is likely that incidence of influenza infection will be correlated among subjects within residence halls. In year 2, clustering was done by residence house to increase the clustering units. The intervention residence halls will receive one of the following two interventions: (i) masks alone or (ii) masks plus alcohol-based hand sanitizers (62% ethyl alcohol) and hygiene education. The remaining halls will serve as comparison units. The control dorms will be similar to the intervention dorms on basic demographic distributions, such as age range and geographical proximity. Residence halls that are randomized to the control arm will not receive any masks, hygiene education materials, or alcohol-based hand sanitizer.
Within each of the randomized residence halls assigned to receive an intervention, our goal is to assess the use of face masks and hand sanitizer. The intervention will be put into effect only when two or more virus positive illnesses are detected in a single week. Rapid tests will be available to help in identifying cases if laboratory confirmation may be delayed. The use of face masks will continue until the outbreak is recognized by virology to be coming to a close or after the passage of 6 weeks, whichever occurs first. It is felt that there needs to be a guaranteed duration in order to assure compliance with face mask use.
Face Mask:
Residence halls receiving interventions (i) and (ii) will receive face masks and will be asked to comply with their use at least while in the residence hall when it is known that influenza virus is transmitting on campus. A week's supply of face masks and plastic bags for disposal will be bundled along with instructions for use. They will be requested to wear the masks when out of the halls, but this may be more difficult to implement. As indicated below, we will ask what proportion of time the masks are worn. The choice of the specific face masks will be carried out in conjunction with the CDC project officers. The face mask intervention would require a once a day change during use to ensure proper protection and a hygienic barrier. It is clear from the recent Institute of Medicine report that little is known about long term use or reuse of face masks, so variations in the number of times in which a face mask is changed is a variable that could be assessed in this study.
The use of face masks will continue for 6 weeks. Instructions will be given as to the correct and incorrect way to utilize surgical masks. As part of the evaluation of level of use, staff observers in each facility will estimate what proportion of individuals actually use them properly. This will take place in common rooms, hallways, and residence hall dining facilities to supplement the self reports that will be collected by e-mail from all participants.
Hand Hygiene Education and Antiseptic Product Use:
All students in residence halls receiving intervention (ii) will be provided with a comprehensive hand hygiene education component in addition to mask use. The educational component will include posters and pamphlets that provide background information on transmission of influenza, an explanation of the effectiveness of hand hygiene for reducing transmission, and guidelines for proper hand hygiene, including the need for hand hygiene at critical locations throughout the residence halls. The hand washing campaign will consist of posters on bulletin boards and weekly email hand hygiene reminder messages to participants in the intervention residence halls. The educational component of the study will include a video for both the control arm and the intervention arms. The control video will address information on influenza and an overview of the study. The intervention video will address both information on influenza and an overview of the study, in addition to hand hygiene education and the use of hand sanitizer and the use of face masks. Both videos are available on the website (www.mflu.org) and on Survey Monkey linked to the consent form.
The intervention dorms will be given a portable alcohol-based hand sanitizer and a large stationary pump alcohol-based hand sanitizer to use throughout the study period in addition to basic hand hygiene education materials and messages. In order to quantify the effect of the alcohol-based hand sanitizer use on influenza virus transmission, regular self reports of hand-sanitizer use will be collected and the products provided will be monitored for use (by weighing) and re-supplied as needed on a weekly basis during the influenza season. Control participants will also be required to provide information on type and name of product used and daily frequency of use, should they be using any.
Control Residence Halls:
Students residing in the control housing units will be asked to participate in the disease surveillance aspect of the study. They will be contacted by e-mail, be asked to consent to participate in a wellness study in which they will report on respiratory and enteric illness symptoms on a weekly basis. The students will be compensated for this participation but not at the level of those who are in the intervention arms.
Hand Hygiene, Face Mask and Illness Surveillance:
Participants in both the intervention and control housing units will be asked to report information on a weekly basis concerning use of the interventions (where appropriate) and the occurrence of respiratory and enteric illness symptoms. Questions on the health attitudes and knowledge will be collected at the start and end of the study season. This survey will be modified for residence hall participants so that frequency of use of face masks can be similarly determined, including attitudes about wearing them.
Both intervention compliance and outcome measures will be collected via electronic survey. This will include mask use, alcohol-based hand sanitizer use, and details regarding respiratory symptoms and enteric symptoms. During the first year, the survey instruments will be assessed for reliability for use among our target student populations in residence halls and may be modified in the second year. Honoraria will be calculated based on the weeks the report is completed, and paid at the end of the season.
Collection of Specimens for Virus Identification:
All residents in the intervention and comparison residences will receive small magnetic cards, modified after those currently used in the vaccine study, describing the case definition. An individual will be asked to have a specimen collected for virus identification whenever an illness that meets the case definition occurs. Information on symptoms, duration of illnesses and other relevant characteristics will be obtained.
Laboratory Methods for Virus Identification:
All specimens for virus identification will be collected by throat swab and placed in veal infusion broth transport medium. This transport medium has been found to protect viruses for days during shipment from remote sites and to be suitable for PCR tests as well.
Positives are passed to additional tubes of cell culture. Initial typing is carried out by fluorescent antibody techniques. Subtyping of type A viruses are carried out by hemagglutination-inhibition. For specimens collected in the influenza vaccine efficacy study, specimens are also processed by real time PCR. By collecting data on vaccination use among participants, we will be able to control for vaccine use in our study analyses. Given the low rate of vaccination uptake among college age individuals, we do not expect vaccine use to be a significant confounder in our study design.
Statistical Design:
To estimate the reduction of influenza infection and illness during laboratory documented influenza outbreaks in individuals and groups using one or more interventions compared to those not using such interventions. The effect of the intervention will be tested through the use of generalized estimating equations (GEE) as applied to statistical regression models for clustered data. The main outcome for this aim will be the rate of influenza cases and rates of secondary influenza transmission comparing the intervention and control dormitories. Additional outcomes will include other non-influenza respiratory illnesses and enteric illness symptoms. Predictor variables will include the main effects of the intervention and control for potential confounders depending upon balance of the known confounders across intervention and control residence halls.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Facemask and hand hygiene | Experimental | Behavioral: Ear Loop Procedure Mask, Behavioral: 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand SanitizerFacemask and hand hygiene provided for participants. |
| Facemask only | Experimental | Behavioral: Ear Loop Procedure MaskFacemask only provided for participants. |
| Control | No intervention | –Control, no intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Residence in selected University of Michigan Residence Halls
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Non-residence in selected Residence Halls
- Unwillingness to utilize face mask and hand sanitizer and complete online surveys
- Already study employee
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ear Loop Procedure MaskAlso: TECNOL™ procedure masks, Kimberly-Clark, Roswell GAFacemasks were requested to be worn while participants were in the residence hall for year one, and while they were in residence halls for a minimum of six hours per day in year two. | Behavioural | Facemask and hand hygiene, Facemask only |
| 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand SanitizerAlso: Purell, 62% ethyl alcohol in a gel baseHand sanitizer was provided to participants in the facemask and hand hygiene arm for year one and year two of the study. | Behavioural | Facemask and hand hygiene |
Primary outcome
Number of laboratory confirmed cases of Influenza
Time frame: 8 weeks, including the 6 weeks of intervention and two weeks post-intervention
1 secondary outcome
Number of cases of Influenza Like Illness
Time frame: 6 weeks of intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2011.
- Results publication: PubMed 20088690Aiello AE, Murray GF, Perez V, Coulborn RM, Davis BM, Uddin M, Shay DK, Waterman SH, Monto AS. Mask use, hand hygiene, and seasonal influenza-like illness among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. J Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 15;201(4):491-8. doi: 10.1086/650396.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36715243Jefferson T, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Al-Ansary LA, van Driel ML, Bawazeer GA, Jones MA, Hoffmann TC, Clark J, Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Conly JM. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33215698Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Al-Ansary LA, Bawazeer GA, van Driel ML, Jones MA, Thorning S, Beller EM, Clark J, Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Conly JM. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22295066Aiello AE, Perez V, Coulborn RM, Davis BM, Uddin M, Monto AS. Facemasks, hand hygiene, and influenza among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029744. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21224242Perez V, Uddin M, Galea S, Monto AS, Aiello AE. Stress, adherence to preventive measures for reducing influenza transmission and influenza-like illness. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jul;66(7):605-10. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.117002. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arnold S Monto, MD principal investigator
University of Michigan
Allison E Aiello, PhD principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ear Loop Procedure Mask and 62% Ethyl Alcohol Hand Sanitizer in people with Influenza, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of laboratory confirmed cases of Influenza (time frame: 8 weeks, including the 6 weeks of intervention and two weeks post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00490633, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2011.