Chronic Hepatitis CPhase 4NCT00491179
Retreatment of Dialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin
A Phase 4 study testing Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in people with Chronic Hepatitis C and Hemodialysis, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis C, Hemodialysis
- What is being tested?
- Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-responders or relapsers of dialysis patients to conventional interferon or pegylated interferon monotherapy
- Age 18~65 years old
- Creatinine clearance (Ccr) < 10 ml/min/1.73 m2
- Anti-HCV (Abbott HCV EIA 2.0, Abbott Diagnostic, Chicago, IL) positive > 6 months
- Detectable serum quantitative HCV-RNA (Cobas Taqman HCV Monitor v2.0, Roche Diagnostics) with dynamic range 25- 391000000 IU/ml
Who cannot join
- Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or hemoglobinopathy
- Neutropenia (neutrophil count, <1,500/mm3)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet <90,000/ mm3)
- Co-infection with HBV or HIV
- Chronic alcohol abuse (daily consumption > 20 g/day)
- Autoimmune liver disease
Show all 13Show fewer
- Decompensated liver disease (Child classification B or C)
- Neoplastic disease
- An organ transplant
- Immunosuppressive therapy
- Poorly controlled autoimmune diseases, pulmonary diseases, cardiac diseases, psychiatric diseases, neurological diseases, diabetes mellitus
- Evidence of drug abuse
- Unwilling to have contraception
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Retreatment of Dialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Who Fail Interferon Alfa or Pegylated Interferon Alfa Monotherapy - a Pilot Study
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively. The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated), Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.
Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment.In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%.
Although dialysis patients have a higher SVR rate to conventional IFN or pegylated IFN monotherapy than patients with normal renal function for HCV therapy. More than half of these patients are relapsers or non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Retreatment of HCV-patients with normal renal function by combined pegylated IFN alfa plus ribavirin who fail to response to IFN monotherapy has achieved a SVR rate of 28%. Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment by pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin in dialysis patients who fail to achieve HCV eradication by conventional or pegylated IFN alfa.
Read the detailed description
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients, with the reported prevalence varying from 3% to 80% worldwide.(1-3) Although these patients usually have mild symptoms and moderate elevation of alanine transaminase levels, recent international collaborative survey and prospective studies found that anti-HCV seropositivity and positive HCV RNA were risk factors for mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).(4-7) Furthermore, progressive hepatic fibrosis, poor patient and graft survival were observer in dialysis patients with HCV infection who undergo renal transplantation (RT), suggesting immunosuppression following RT may worsen the course of hepatic fibrosis and renal graft function.(8-13) These lines of evidence indicate that HCV infection in the dialysis population is an important issue to be tackled.
Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.(14,15) The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated),(16-21) which may result from different pharmacokinetic profiles between these two pegylated IFNs. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,(22,23) and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.(24,25) Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment.(26-28) In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%.(29) Although dialysis patients have a higher SVR rate to conventional IFN or pegylated IFN monotherapy than patients with normal renal function for HCV therapy. More than half of these patients are relapsers or non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Retreatment of HCV-patients with normal renal function by combined pegylated IFN alfa plus ribavirin who fail to response to IFN monotherapy has achieved a SVR rate of 28%.(30) Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment by pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin in dialysis patients who fail to achieve HCV eradication by conventional or pegylated IFN alfa.
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis C, Hemodialysis
- Being tested
- Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin
- Keywords
- Chronic hepatitis C, hemodialysis, interferon, ribavirin
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirinDrug
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 48 weeks
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirinDrug
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pegylated IFN + RBV for HCV genotype 1 | Experimental | Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 48 weeks for HCV genotype 1 Receives: Drug: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin |
| Pegylated IFN + RBV for HCV genotype 2 | Experimental | Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 weeks for HCV genotype 2 Receives: Drug: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1.Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 2.Number of Participants Who Droppoed Out of the Study Prematurely Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
- Number of participants with sustained virologic response (SVR): number of patients with undetectable HCV RNA 6 months off therapy by real-time PCR test (Cobas TaqMan HCV Test v2.0, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany, limit of detection < 25 IU/mL)
- Number of participants who droppoed out of the study prematurely due to adverse events (AEs): number of patients who prematurely withdrew from the study due to any adverse events
Measured: 1.5 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Histologic Response(HR)
Number of participants with histologic response (HR): number of patients who had improvement of as least 2 scores at the end of follow-up liver biopsy compared to baseline liver biopsy by Ishak scoring system (the sum of Ishak necroinflammation score (0-18) and Ishak fibrosis score (0-6); the higher the total scores, the severer the histologic changes)
Measured: 1.5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis CStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)
- Investigators
- Chen-Hua Liu, MD, Study chair, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan Universitys Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00491179
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200703032M
- Status last verified
- Oct 2009
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2009
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P. Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology. 2002 Jul;36(1):3-10. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34613.
PubMed 12085342Kao JH, Huang CH, Chen W, Tsai TJ, Lee SH, Hung KY, Chen DS. GB virus C infection in hemodialysis patients: molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission. J Infect Dis. 1999 Jul;180(1):191-4. doi: 10.1086/314850.
PubMed 10353878Hou CH, Chen WY, Kao JH, Chen DS, Yang Y, Chen JJ, Lee SH, Wu DJ, Yang SC. Intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients. J Med Virol. 1995 Apr;45(4):381-5. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890450405.
PubMed 7545208Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, Stewart JH, Buccianti G, Lowenfels AB, Wolfe RA, Jones E, Disney AP, Briggs D, McCredie M, Boyle P. Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: an international collaborative study. Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06154-1.
PubMed 10408483Nakayama E, Akiba T, Marumo F, Sato C. Prognosis of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients on regular hemodialysis therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Oct;11(10):1896-1902. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V11101896.
PubMed 11004221Stehman-Breen CO, Emerson S, Gretch D, Johnson RJ. Risk of death among chronic dialysis patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Oct;32(4):629-34. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70027-7.
PubMed 9774125Pereira BJ, Natov SN, Bouthot BA, Murthy BV, Ruthazer R, Schmid CH, Levey AS. Effects of hepatitis C infection and renal transplantation on survival in end-stage renal disease. The New England Organ Bank Hepatitis C Study Group. Kidney Int. 1998 May;53(5):1374-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00883.x.
PubMed 9573555Mathurin P, Mouquet C, Poynard T, Sylla C, Benalia H, Fretz C, Thibault V, Cadranel JF, Bernard B, Opolon P, Coriat P, Bitker MO. Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome. Hepatology. 1999 Jan;29(1):257-63. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290123.
PubMed 9862875Hanafusa T, Ichikawa Y, Kishikawa H, Kyo M, Fukunishi T, Kokado Y, Okuyama A, Shinji Y, Nagano S. Retrospective study on the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on kidney transplant patients over 20 years. Transplantation. 1998 Aug 27;66(4):471-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199808270-00010.
PubMed 9734490Legendre C, Garrigue V, Le Bihan C, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Chaix ML, Landais P, Kreis H, Pol S. Harmful long-term impact of hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1998 Mar 15;65(5):667-70. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199803150-00011.
PubMed 9521201Izopet J, Rostaing L, Sandres K, Cisterne JM, Pasquier C, Rumeau JL, Duffaut M, Durand D, Puel J. Longitudinal analysis of hepatitis C virus replication and liver fibrosis progression in renal transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 2000 Mar;181(3):852-8. doi: 10.1086/315355.
PubMed 10720504Zylberberg H, Nalpas B, Carnot F, Skhiri H, Fontaine H, Legendre C, Kreis H, Brechot C, Pol S. Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Jan;17(1):129-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.129.
PubMed 11773476Fabrizi F, Dulai G, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Martin P. Meta-analysis: interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Dec;18(11-12):1071-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01780.x.
PubMed 14653826Russo MW, Goldsweig CD, Jacobson IM, Brown RS Jr. Interferon monotherapy for dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: an analysis of the literature on efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul;98(7):1610-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07526.x.
PubMed 12873587Kokoglu OF, Ucmak H, Hosoglu S, Cetinkaya A, Kantarceken B, Buyukbese MA, Isik IO. Efficacy and tolerability of pegylated-interferon alpha-2a in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;21(3):575-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04008.x.
PubMed 16638102
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Retreatment of Dialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C With Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Who Fail Interferon Alfa or Pegylated Interferon Alfa Monotherapy - a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00491179
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 200703032M
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis C, Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- Chronic hepatitis C, hemodialysis, interferon, ribavirin
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Nov 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively. The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated), Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.
Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment.In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%.
Although dialysis patients have a higher SVR rate to conventional IFN or pegylated IFN monotherapy than patients with normal renal function for HCV therapy. More than half of these patients are relapsers or non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Retreatment of HCV-patients with normal renal function by combined pegylated IFN alfa plus ribavirin who fail to response to IFN monotherapy has achieved a SVR rate of 28%. Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment by pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin in dialysis patients who fail to achieve HCV eradication by conventional or pegylated IFN alfa.
Detailed description
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients, with the reported prevalence varying from 3% to 80% worldwide.(1-3) Although these patients usually have mild symptoms and moderate elevation of alanine transaminase levels, recent international collaborative survey and prospective studies found that anti-HCV seropositivity and positive HCV RNA were risk factors for mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).(4-7) Furthermore, progressive hepatic fibrosis, poor patient and graft survival were observer in dialysis patients with HCV infection who undergo renal transplantation (RT), suggesting immunosuppression following RT may worsen the course of hepatic fibrosis and renal graft function.(8-13) These lines of evidence indicate that HCV infection in the dialysis population is an important issue to be tackled.
Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.(14,15) The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated),(16-21) which may result from different pharmacokinetic profiles between these two pegylated IFNs. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,(22,23) and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.(24,25) Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment.(26-28) In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%.(29) Although dialysis patients have a higher SVR rate to conventional IFN or pegylated IFN monotherapy than patients with normal renal function for HCV therapy. More than half of these patients are relapsers or non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Retreatment of HCV-patients with normal renal function by combined pegylated IFN alfa plus ribavirin who fail to response to IFN monotherapy has achieved a SVR rate of 28%.(30) Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment by pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin in dialysis patients who fail to achieve HCV eradication by conventional or pegylated IFN alfa.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pegylated IFN + RBV for HCV genotype 1 | Experimental | Drug: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirinPegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 48 weeks for HCV genotype 1 |
| Pegylated IFN + RBV for HCV genotype 2 | Experimental | Drug: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirinPegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 weeks for HCV genotype 2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non-responders or relapsers of dialysis patients to conventional interferon or pegylated interferon monotherapy
- Age 18~65 years old
- Creatinine clearance (Ccr) < 10 ml/min/1.73 m2
- Anti-HCV (Abbott HCV EIA 2.0, Abbott Diagnostic, Chicago, IL) positive > 6 months
- Detectable serum quantitative HCV-RNA (Cobas Taqman HCV Monitor v2.0, Roche Diagnostics) with dynamic range 25- 391000000 IU/ml
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or hemoglobinopathy
- Neutropenia (neutrophil count, <1,500/mm3)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet <90,000/ mm3)
- Co-infection with HBV or HIV
- Chronic alcohol abuse (daily consumption > 20 g/day)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirinPegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 48 weeks | Drug | Pegylated IFN + RBV for HCV genotype 1 |
| Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirinPegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 weeks | Drug | Pegylated IFN + RBV for HCV genotype 2 |
Primary outcome
1.Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 2.Number of Participants Who Droppoed Out of the Study Prematurely Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: 1.5 year
1. Number of participants with sustained virologic response (SVR): number of patients with undetectable HCV RNA 6 months off therapy by real-time PCR test (Cobas TaqMan HCV Test v2.0, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany, limit of detection < 25 IU/mL) 2. Number of participants who droppoed out of the study prematurely due to adverse events (AEs): number of patients who prematurely withdrew from the study due to any adverse events
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants With Histologic Response(HR)
Time frame: 1.5 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2009.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12085342Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P. Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology. 2002 Jul;36(1):3-10. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34613.
- Background: PubMed 10353878Kao JH, Huang CH, Chen W, Tsai TJ, Lee SH, Hung KY, Chen DS. GB virus C infection in hemodialysis patients: molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission. J Infect Dis. 1999 Jul;180(1):191-4. doi: 10.1086/314850.
- Background: PubMed 7545208Hou CH, Chen WY, Kao JH, Chen DS, Yang Y, Chen JJ, Lee SH, Wu DJ, Yang SC. Intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients. J Med Virol. 1995 Apr;45(4):381-5. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890450405.
- Background: PubMed 10408483Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, Stewart JH, Buccianti G, Lowenfels AB, Wolfe RA, Jones E, Disney AP, Briggs D, McCredie M, Boyle P. Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: an international collaborative study. Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06154-1.
- Background: PubMed 11004221Nakayama E, Akiba T, Marumo F, Sato C. Prognosis of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients on regular hemodialysis therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Oct;11(10):1896-1902. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V11101896.
- Background: PubMed 9774125Stehman-Breen CO, Emerson S, Gretch D, Johnson RJ. Risk of death among chronic dialysis patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Oct;32(4):629-34. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70027-7.
- Background: PubMed 9573555Pereira BJ, Natov SN, Bouthot BA, Murthy BV, Ruthazer R, Schmid CH, Levey AS. Effects of hepatitis C infection and renal transplantation on survival in end-stage renal disease. The New England Organ Bank Hepatitis C Study Group. Kidney Int. 1998 May;53(5):1374-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00883.x.
- Background: PubMed 9862875Mathurin P, Mouquet C, Poynard T, Sylla C, Benalia H, Fretz C, Thibault V, Cadranel JF, Bernard B, Opolon P, Coriat P, Bitker MO. Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome. Hepatology. 1999 Jan;29(1):257-63. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290123.
- Background: PubMed 9734490Hanafusa T, Ichikawa Y, Kishikawa H, Kyo M, Fukunishi T, Kokado Y, Okuyama A, Shinji Y, Nagano S. Retrospective study on the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on kidney transplant patients over 20 years. Transplantation. 1998 Aug 27;66(4):471-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199808270-00010.
- Background: PubMed 9521201Legendre C, Garrigue V, Le Bihan C, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Chaix ML, Landais P, Kreis H, Pol S. Harmful long-term impact of hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1998 Mar 15;65(5):667-70. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199803150-00011.
- Background: PubMed 10720504Izopet J, Rostaing L, Sandres K, Cisterne JM, Pasquier C, Rumeau JL, Duffaut M, Durand D, Puel J. Longitudinal analysis of hepatitis C virus replication and liver fibrosis progression in renal transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 2000 Mar;181(3):852-8. doi: 10.1086/315355.
- Background: PubMed 11773476Zylberberg H, Nalpas B, Carnot F, Skhiri H, Fontaine H, Legendre C, Kreis H, Brechot C, Pol S. Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Jan;17(1):129-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.129.
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis C
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
"Constitution of a Biological Collection to Establish Preclinical Translational Models for the Study of Tumors and Chronic Liver Diseases".
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C During Pregnancy
Hepatitis C, Chronic, Pregnancy; Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparative Autoantibody and Immunologic Cell Marker Study
Autoimmune Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chen-Hua Liu, MD study chair
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan Universitys Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in people with Chronic Hepatitis C and Hemodialysis, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1.Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 2.Number of Participants Who Droppoed Out of the Study Prematurely Due to Adverse Events (AEs) (time frame: 1.5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00491179, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2009.