Chronic Hepatitis CPhase 4NCT00491244
Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin for Treatment-Naïve Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C
A Phase 4 study testing Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2a in people with Chronic Hepatitis C, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis C
- What is being tested?
- Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2a
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 377 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Jun 2007to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-65 years old
- Creatinine clearance (Ccr) < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2
- Anti-HCV (Abbott HCV EIA 3.0, Abbott Diagnostic, Chicago, IL) positive > 6 months
- Detectable serum quantitative HCV-RNA (Cobas Taqman HCV test, version 2, Roche Diagnostics) with a dynamic range of 25-391000000 IU/ml
Who cannot join
- Receiving interferon-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C
- Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or hemoglobinopathy
- Neutropenia (neutrophil count, <1,500/mm3)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet <90,000/ mm3)
- Co-infection with HBV or HIV
- Chronic alcohol abuse (daily consumption > 20 g/day)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Autoimmune liver disease
- Decompensated liver disease (Child classification B or C)
- Neoplastic disease
- An organ transplant
- Immunosuppressive therapy
- Poorly controlled autoimmune diseases, pulmonary diseases, cardiac diseases, psychiatric diseases, neurological diseases, diabetes mellitus
- Evidence of drug abuse
- Unwilling to have contraception
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Versus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Alone for Treatment-naïve Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.
Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment. In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%. In this study, treatment with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin achieved a higher SVR rate that that with pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin (100% vs. 25%).
Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, and the superior response of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin to pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin in treating dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alfa-2a alone in treatment naïve dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Read the detailed description
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients, with the reported prevalence varying from 3% to 80% worldwide. (1-3) Although these patients usually have mild symptoms and moderate elevation of alanine transaminase levels, recent international collaborative survey and prospective studies found that anti-HCV seropositivity and positive HCV RNA were risk factors for mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (4-7) Furthermore, progressive hepatic fibrosis, poor patient and graft survival were observer in dialysis patients with HCV infection who undergo renal transplantation (RT), suggesting immunosuppression following RT may worsen the course of hepatic fibrosis and renal graft function. (8-13) These lines of evidence indicate that HCV infection in the dialysis population is an important issue to be tackled.
Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.(14,15) The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated), (16-21) which may result from different pharmacokinetic profiles between these two pegylated IFNs. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,(22,23) and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents. (24,25) Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment. (26-28) In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%. (29) In this study, treatment with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin achieved a higher SVR rate that that with pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin (100% vs. 25%) Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, and the superior response of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin to pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin in treating dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alfa-2a in treatment naïve dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis C
- Being tested
- Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin, Peginterferon alfa-2a
- Keywords
- Chronic hepatitis C, Hemodialysis, Interferon, Ribavirin
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirinDrug
Also called Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche), Ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks)
Peginterferon alfa-2aDrug
Also called Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin | Experimental | Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks) Receives: Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin |
| Peginterferon alfa-2a | Experimental | Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks) Receives: Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)Rate
Measured: 1.5 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Adverse Event (AE)-Related Withdrawal Rate
Measured: 1.5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2007
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis CStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 377 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chen-Hua Liu, MD, Study chair, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan Universitys Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00491244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200703010M
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P. Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology. 2002 Jul;36(1):3-10. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34613.
PubMed 12085342Kao JH, Huang CH, Chen W, Tsai TJ, Lee SH, Hung KY, Chen DS. GB virus C infection in hemodialysis patients: molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission. J Infect Dis. 1999 Jul;180(1):191-4. doi: 10.1086/314850.
PubMed 10353878Hou CH, Chen WY, Kao JH, Chen DS, Yang Y, Chen JJ, Lee SH, Wu DJ, Yang SC. Intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients. J Med Virol. 1995 Apr;45(4):381-5. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890450405.
PubMed 7545208Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, Stewart JH, Buccianti G, Lowenfels AB, Wolfe RA, Jones E, Disney AP, Briggs D, McCredie M, Boyle P. Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: an international collaborative study. Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06154-1.
PubMed 10408483Nakayama E, Akiba T, Marumo F, Sato C. Prognosis of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients on regular hemodialysis therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Oct;11(10):1896-1902. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V11101896.
PubMed 11004221Stehman-Breen CO, Emerson S, Gretch D, Johnson RJ. Risk of death among chronic dialysis patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Oct;32(4):629-34. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70027-7.
PubMed 9774125Pereira BJ, Natov SN, Bouthot BA, Murthy BV, Ruthazer R, Schmid CH, Levey AS. Effects of hepatitis C infection and renal transplantation on survival in end-stage renal disease. The New England Organ Bank Hepatitis C Study Group. Kidney Int. 1998 May;53(5):1374-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00883.x.
PubMed 9573555Mathurin P, Mouquet C, Poynard T, Sylla C, Benalia H, Fretz C, Thibault V, Cadranel JF, Bernard B, Opolon P, Coriat P, Bitker MO. Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome. Hepatology. 1999 Jan;29(1):257-63. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290123.
PubMed 9862875Legendre C, Garrigue V, Le Bihan C, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Chaix ML, Landais P, Kreis H, Pol S. Harmful long-term impact of hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1998 Mar 15;65(5):667-70. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199803150-00011.
PubMed 9521201Vosnides GG. Hepatitis C in renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1997 Sep;52(3):843-61. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.403. No abstract available.
PubMed 9291208Izopet J, Rostaing L, Sandres K, Cisterne JM, Pasquier C, Rumeau JL, Duffaut M, Durand D, Puel J. Longitudinal analysis of hepatitis C virus replication and liver fibrosis progression in renal transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 2000 Mar;181(3):852-8. doi: 10.1086/315355.
PubMed 10720504Zylberberg H, Nalpas B, Carnot F, Skhiri H, Fontaine H, Legendre C, Kreis H, Brechot C, Pol S. Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Jan;17(1):129-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.129.
PubMed 11773476Fabrizi F, Dulai G, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Martin P. Meta-analysis: interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Dec;18(11-12):1071-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01780.x.
PubMed 14653826Russo MW, Goldsweig CD, Jacobson IM, Brown RS Jr. Interferon monotherapy for dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: an analysis of the literature on efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul;98(7):1610-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07526.x.
PubMed 12873587Kokoglu OF, Ucmak H, Hosoglu S, Cetinkaya A, Kantarceken B, Buyukbese MA, Isik IO. Efficacy and tolerability of pegylated-interferon alpha-2a in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;21(3):575-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04008.x.
PubMed 16638102
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Low Dose Ribavirin Versus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Alone for Treatment-naïve Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00491244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 200703010M
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis C
- Keywords
- Chronic hepatitis C, Hemodialysis, Interferon, Ribavirin
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 377 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)
- Study start
- Jun 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Dec 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients. Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents.
Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment. In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%. In this study, treatment with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin achieved a higher SVR rate that that with pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin (100% vs. 25%).
Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, and the superior response of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin to pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin in treating dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alfa-2a alone in treatment naïve dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Detailed description
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients, with the reported prevalence varying from 3% to 80% worldwide. (1-3) Although these patients usually have mild symptoms and moderate elevation of alanine transaminase levels, recent international collaborative survey and prospective studies found that anti-HCV seropositivity and positive HCV RNA were risk factors for mortality and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (4-7) Furthermore, progressive hepatic fibrosis, poor patient and graft survival were observer in dialysis patients with HCV infection who undergo renal transplantation (RT), suggesting immunosuppression following RT may worsen the course of hepatic fibrosis and renal graft function. (8-13) These lines of evidence indicate that HCV infection in the dialysis population is an important issue to be tackled.
Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for chronic hepatitis C has been the mainstay therapy in immunocompetent patients. In dialysis patients, treatment with conventional or pegylated interferon has also received much attention recently. Two meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of conventional IFN alfa monotherapy showed that the sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 37% and 33%, respectively; and the corresponding dropout rates were 17% and 29.6%, respectively.(14,15) The efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a and 2b in treating dialysis patients showed conflicting results, with a more favorable outcome of patients treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2a (135-180 μg/week: SVR 33-75%, well tolerated) than those treated with pegylated IFN alfa-2b (0.5-1.0 μg/week: SVR 12.5%, poorly tolerated), (16-21) which may result from different pharmacokinetic profiles between these two pegylated IFNs. Currently, IFN-based therapy to treatment HCV infection should be initiated in dialysis stages, because the use of IFN in RT patients harbors high risks of acute graft rejection,(22,23) and have low response rates under the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents. (24,25) Ribavirin, which has been used in combination with IFN to treat chronic hepatitis C in the general patients and achieve a higher SVR rate than IFN monotherapy, is considered contraindicated in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C due to the risk of severe hemolytic anemia. However, some pilot studies evaluating combined conventional IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin (170-300 mg/day) showed SVR rates of 17%-66% after 24-48 weeks of treatment. (26-28) In addition, a recent study including 6 patients with combination of pegylated IFN alfa plus low dose ribavirin also showed a SVR rate of 50%. (29) In this study, treatment with pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin achieved a higher SVR rate that that with pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin (100% vs. 25%) Based on the long-term favorable outcome in dialysis patients who eradicate HCV, and the superior response of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin to pegylated IFN alfa-2b plus low dose ribavirin in treating dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C, the aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated IFN alfa-2a plus low dose ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alfa-2a in treatment naïve dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin | Experimental | Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirinPegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks) |
| Peginterferon alfa-2a | Experimental | Drug: Peginterferon alfa-2aPegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18-65 years old
- Creatinine clearance (Ccr) < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2
- Anti-HCV (Abbott HCV EIA 3.0, Abbott Diagnostic, Chicago, IL) positive > 6 months
- Detectable serum quantitative HCV-RNA (Cobas Taqman HCV test, version 2, Roche Diagnostics) with a dynamic range of 25-391000000 IU/ml
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Receiving interferon-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C
- Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or hemoglobinopathy
- Neutropenia (neutrophil count, <1,500/mm3)
- Thrombocytopenia (platelet <90,000/ mm3)
- Co-infection with HBV or HIV
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirinAlso: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche), Ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week plus ribavirin (Copegus, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 200 mg/day for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks) | Drug | Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin |
| Peginterferon alfa-2aAlso: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche)Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys, F. Hoffman-LaRoche) 135 ug/week for 24 to 48 weeks (genotype 1: 48 weeks, genotype 2: 24 weeks) | Drug | Peginterferon alfa-2a |
Primary outcome
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)Rate
Time frame: 1.5 year
1 secondary outcome
Adverse Event (AE)-Related Withdrawal Rate
Time frame: 1.5 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12085342Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P. Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology. 2002 Jul;36(1):3-10. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34613.
- Background: PubMed 10353878Kao JH, Huang CH, Chen W, Tsai TJ, Lee SH, Hung KY, Chen DS. GB virus C infection in hemodialysis patients: molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission. J Infect Dis. 1999 Jul;180(1):191-4. doi: 10.1086/314850.
- Background: PubMed 7545208Hou CH, Chen WY, Kao JH, Chen DS, Yang Y, Chen JJ, Lee SH, Wu DJ, Yang SC. Intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients. J Med Virol. 1995 Apr;45(4):381-5. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890450405.
- Background: PubMed 10408483Maisonneuve P, Agodoa L, Gellert R, Stewart JH, Buccianti G, Lowenfels AB, Wolfe RA, Jones E, Disney AP, Briggs D, McCredie M, Boyle P. Cancer in patients on dialysis for end-stage renal disease: an international collaborative study. Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06154-1.
- Background: PubMed 11004221Nakayama E, Akiba T, Marumo F, Sato C. Prognosis of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients on regular hemodialysis therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Oct;11(10):1896-1902. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V11101896.
- Background: PubMed 9774125Stehman-Breen CO, Emerson S, Gretch D, Johnson RJ. Risk of death among chronic dialysis patients infected with hepatitis C virus. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Oct;32(4):629-34. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70027-7.
- Background: PubMed 9573555Pereira BJ, Natov SN, Bouthot BA, Murthy BV, Ruthazer R, Schmid CH, Levey AS. Effects of hepatitis C infection and renal transplantation on survival in end-stage renal disease. The New England Organ Bank Hepatitis C Study Group. Kidney Int. 1998 May;53(5):1374-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00883.x.
- Background: PubMed 9862875Mathurin P, Mouquet C, Poynard T, Sylla C, Benalia H, Fretz C, Thibault V, Cadranel JF, Bernard B, Opolon P, Coriat P, Bitker MO. Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome. Hepatology. 1999 Jan;29(1):257-63. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290123.
- Background: PubMed 9521201Legendre C, Garrigue V, Le Bihan C, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Chaix ML, Landais P, Kreis H, Pol S. Harmful long-term impact of hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1998 Mar 15;65(5):667-70. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199803150-00011.
- Background: PubMed 9291208Vosnides GG. Hepatitis C in renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1997 Sep;52(3):843-61. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.403. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10720504Izopet J, Rostaing L, Sandres K, Cisterne JM, Pasquier C, Rumeau JL, Duffaut M, Durand D, Puel J. Longitudinal analysis of hepatitis C virus replication and liver fibrosis progression in renal transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 2000 Mar;181(3):852-8. doi: 10.1086/315355.
- Background: PubMed 11773476Zylberberg H, Nalpas B, Carnot F, Skhiri H, Fontaine H, Legendre C, Kreis H, Brechot C, Pol S. Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002 Jan;17(1):129-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.1.129.
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis C
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
"Constitution of a Biological Collection to Establish Preclinical Translational Models for the Study of Tumors and Chronic Liver Diseases".
Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C During Pregnancy
Hepatitis C, Chronic, Pregnancy; Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparative Autoantibody and Immunologic Cell Marker Study
Autoimmune Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chen-Hua Liu, MD study chair
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan Universitys Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2a in people with Chronic Hepatitis C, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Dec 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR)Rate (time frame: 1.5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00491244, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2014.