AzTrials
AzTrials

Corneal DiseasesNCT00491439

Using in Vivo Confocal Microscope to Evaluate the Corneal Wound Healing After Various Ocular Surgeries

An observational study of Corneal Diseases, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although epi-keratome laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK), penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy are surgeries commonly performed, the time-sequential, in vivo microscopic wound healing process is not fully understood. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Corneal Diseases
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Apr 2007to Sep 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients receiving Epi-LASIK, penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectioy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy

Who may be able to join

  • patients receiving various ocular surgeries
  • no previous ocular surgery
  • tear break up time longer than 10 seconds
  • Shirmer test II larger than 5 mm
  • no presurgical corneal disease confirmed by slit lamp and in vivo confocal
  • no limbus defect
  • proliferative retinopathy underwent vitrectomy combining corneal epithelial scrating

Who cannot join

  • can not complete follow up
  • ineligible for ocular surgery
  • eyelid closure incomplete
  • glaucoma
  • corneal defect or oculoneuropathy not caused by diabetes
  • severe dry eye disease
  • limbus defect
  • pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Wei-Li Chen

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Phase 1 Study of in Vivo Confocal Microscope to Evaluate the Corneal Wound Healing After Various Ocular Surgeries

Although epi-keratome laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK), penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy are surgeries commonly performed, the time-sequential, in vivo microscopic wound healing process is not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to study the healing of corneal wounds after Epi-LASIK, penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy by in vivo confocal microscopy, an easily performed and non-invasive procedure. We plan to enroll 40 eyes of 40 patients in each of these three surgeries. In Epi-LASIK, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy, and visual acuity are recorded before and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery. The eyes are examined weekly in the first month and at 3 and 6 months. For penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy, and visual acuity are recorded before and weekly in the first month after surgeries and at 3 and 6 months. Selected images of the corneal basal/apical surface epithelia, stromal reactions and corneal endothelial conditions by in vivo confocal microscopy are evaluated qualitatively for the cellular morphology and density.

Read the detailed description

Although epi-keratome laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK), penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy are surgeries commonly performed, the time-sequential, in vivo microscopic wound healing process is not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to study the healing of corneal wounds after Epi-LASIK, penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy by in vivo confocal microscopy, an easily performed and non-invasive procedure. We plan to enroll 40 eyes of 40 patients in each of these three surgeries. In Epi-LASIK, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy, and visual acuity are recorded before and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery. The eyes are examined weekly in the first month and at 3 and 6 months. For penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy with corneal epithelial debridement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy, and visual acuity are recorded before and weekly in the first month after surgeries and at 3 and 6 months. Selected images of the corneal basal/apical surface epithelia, stromal reactions and corneal endothelial conditions by in vivo confocal microscopy are evaluated qualitatively for the cellular morphology and density.

Keywords
in vivo confocal microscopy, vitrectomy, corneal transplantation, Epi-LASIK, wound healing
Medical subject headings
Corneal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00491439
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Corneal wounds after Epi-LASIKCorneal wounds after Epi-LASIK
penetrating keratoplastyCorneal wound after penetrating keratoplasty
corneal epithelial debridementCorneal wound after pars plana vitrectioy with corneal epithelial debridement for diabetic retinopathy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cellular morphology and density

    Measured: before surgery and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgeryfirst month and at 3 and 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. corneal basal/apical surface epithelia, stromal reactions and corneal endothelial conditions

    Measured: before and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery, first month and at 3 and 6 months

  2. visual acuity

    Measured: before and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery, first month and at 3 and 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2007
  3. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00491439
Sponsor's protocol ID
200702038R
Status last verified
Nov 2010
First submitted
23 Jun 2007
Last updated
3 Apr 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Chen WL, Shen EP, Hsieh YT, Yeh PT, Wang TJ, Hu FR. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopic findings between epi-LASIK procedures with different management of the epithelial flaps. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 1;52(6):3640-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6390.

    PubMed 21357404

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Corneal Diseases, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cellular morphology and density (time frame: before surgery and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgeryfirst month and at 3 and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00491439, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in