Choroidal NeovascularizationPhase 2RADICALNCT00492284
Reduced Fluence Visudyne-Anti-VEGF-Dexamethasone In Combination for AMD Lesions (RADICAL)
A Phase 2 study testing verteporfin, ranibizumab and dexamethasone in people with Choroidal Neovascularization and Macular Degeneration, run by QLT Inc. at 26 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to determine if combination therapy (reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis [within 2 hours] or either of two regimens of reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours]) reduces retreatment rates compared with Lucentis monotherapy while… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Choroidal Neovascularization, Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- verteporfin, ranibizumab and dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 26 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Treatment naive for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye except for laser treatment outside the subfoveal area
- Subfoveal CNV due to AMD
- CNV must be = or >50 % of the entire lesion
- All lesion composition types with a lesion greatest linear dimension (GLD) < 5400 microns (approximately = or <9 disc areas [DA])
- Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA score) of 25 - 73 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 - 20/320), inclusive
Who cannot join
- Subfoveal geographic atrophy or subfoveal fibrosis of the study eye
- Intraocular surgery within 3 months of enrollment
- Inability to attend the protocol-required visits
- Known allergies or hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments.
- Other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections that would make subject a poor medical risk
- Uncontrolled glaucoma, defined as (1)subject is on >1 glaucoma medication (includes combination treatments) or (2)subject has glaucoma that could lead to progressive visual field deterioration
- If subject has had a stroke within the last year
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 2 countries.
26 sites in 2 countries
United States21 sites
Study site
Arlington, Texas
Study site
Beverly Hills, California
Study site
Campbell, California
Study site
Davenport, Iowa
Study site
Fort Myers, Florida
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Missoula, Montana
Study site
Mobile, Alabama
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Portsmouth, New Hampshire
Study site
Poway, California
Study site
Sacramento, California
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
Temple, Texas
Study site
Torrance, California
Retina Centers, PC
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
West Mifflin, Pennsylvania
Canada5 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Study site
London, Ontario
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-masked Study Comparing Reduced-fluence Visudyne®-Lucentis® Combination Therapies and Lucentis® Monotherapy in Subjects With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to AMD.
The objective of this study is to determine if combination therapy (reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis [within 2 hours] or either of two regimens of reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours]) reduces retreatment rates compared with Lucentis monotherapy while maintaining similar vision outcomes and an acceptable safety profile.
- Conditions
- Choroidal Neovascularization, Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- verteporfin, ranibizumab, dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Macular Degeneration, AMD, CNV, Choroidal neovascularization, Photodynamic therapy, CNV Secondary to Age Related Macular Degeneration
- Medical subject headings
- Choroidal Neovascularization, Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
verteporfinDrug
Also called Visudyne, photodynamic therapy
Reduced-fluence Visudyne (25 J/cm2, 300 mW/cm2, 83 seconds)
verteporfinDrug
Also called Visudyne, photodynamic therapy
Very-low fluence Visudyne (15 J/cm2, 180 mW/cm2, 83 seconds)
ranibizumabDrug
Also called Lucentis
0.5 mg intravitreal injection
dexamethasoneDrug
0.5 mg intravitreal injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy | Experimental | Very low fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter Receives: Drug: verteporfin; Drug: ranibizumab; Drug: dexamethasone |
| 1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy | Experimental | Reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter Receives: Drug: verteporfin; Drug: ranibizumab; Drug: dexamethasone |
| 1/2 Fluence Double Therapy | Experimental | Reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis double therapy [within 2 hours] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter Receives: Drug: verteporfin; Drug: ranibizumab |
| Ranibizumab | Experimental | Lucentis monotherapy administered on Day 0, Month 1 and Month 2, and then as required monthly thereafter Receives: Drug: ranibizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)
Retreatment was defined in the protocol as study treatment administered after Day 0. For the analyses of retreatment, any study treatment that was administered was considered to be a retreatment, and combination therapy was considered to be one retreatment, even though two or three treatment procedures were done. In the combination therapy groups, if a ranibizumab injection was given because retreatment was indicated and the previous combination treatment was less than 2 months before, the ranibizumab injection was counted as a retreatment.
Measured: Month 1 to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-corrected VA Score (ETDRS Chart)
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method at 4 meters. Worst = 0; best = 100
Measured: Baseline to Month 12
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)
Retreatment was defined in the protocol as study treatment administered after Day 0. For the analyses of retreatment, any study treatment that was administered was considered to be a retreatment, and combination therapy was considered to be one retreatment, even though two or three treatment procedures were done. In the combination therapy groups, if a ranibizumab injection was given because retreatment was indicated and the previous combination treatment was less than 2 months before, the ranibizumab injection was counted as a retreatment.
Measured: Month 1 to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-Corrected VA Score
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method at 4 meters. Worst = 0; best = 100
Measured: Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Gained From Baseline
Measured: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=0 Letter Gain of Visual Acuity From Baseline
Measured: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Lost From Baseline
Measured: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness
Measured: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Lesion Size
Mean change from baseline in lesion size measured as greatest linear dimension (GLD) of the lesion
Measured: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionMay 2009
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Choroidal NeovascularizationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- QLT Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Henry Hudson, MD, Principal investigator, Retina Centers, PCAllen Ho, MD, Principal investigator, Retina Diagnostic & Treatment Associates, LLCAndrew Strong, Ph.D, Study chair, QLT Inc.Oscar Cuzzani, MD, Study director, QLT Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00492284
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BPD OCR 022
- Acronym
- RADICAL
- Status last verified
- May 2011
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 2 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-masked Study Comparing Reduced-fluence Visudyne®-Lucentis® Combination Therapies and Lucentis® Monotherapy in Subjects With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to AMD.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00492284
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RADICAL / BPD OCR 022
- Conditions
- Choroidal Neovascularization, Macular Degeneration
- Keywords
- Macular Degeneration, AMD, CNV, Choroidal neovascularization, Photodynamic therapy, CNV Secondary to Age Related Macular Degeneration
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- QLT Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Jun 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to determine if combination therapy (reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis [within 2 hours] or either of two regimens of reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours]) reduces retreatment rates compared with Lucentis monotherapy while maintaining similar vision outcomes and an acceptable safety profile.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy | Experimental | Drug: verteporfin, Drug: ranibizumab, Drug: dexamethasoneVery low fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter |
| 1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy | Experimental | Drug: verteporfin, Drug: ranibizumab, Drug: dexamethasoneReduced-fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy [within 2 hours] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter |
| 1/2 Fluence Double Therapy | Experimental | Drug: verteporfin, Drug: ranibizumabReduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis double therapy [within 2 hours] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter |
| Ranibizumab | Experimental | Drug: ranibizumabLucentis monotherapy administered on Day 0, Month 1 and Month 2, and then as required monthly thereafter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Treatment naive for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye except for laser treatment outside the subfoveal area
- Subfoveal CNV due to AMD
- CNV must be = or >50 % of the entire lesion
- All lesion composition types with a lesion greatest linear dimension (GLD) < 5400 microns (approximately = or <9 disc areas [DA])
- Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA score) of 25 - 73 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 - 20/320), inclusive
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subfoveal geographic atrophy or subfoveal fibrosis of the study eye
- Intraocular surgery within 3 months of enrollment
- Inability to attend the protocol-required visits
- Known allergies or hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments.
- Other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections that would make subject a poor medical risk
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| verteporfinAlso: Visudyne, photodynamic therapyReduced-fluence Visudyne (25 J/cm2, 300 mW/cm2, 83 seconds) | Drug | 1/2 Fluence Double Therapy, 1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy |
| verteporfinAlso: Visudyne, photodynamic therapyVery-low fluence Visudyne (15 J/cm2, 180 mW/cm2, 83 seconds) | Drug | 1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy |
| ranibizumabAlso: Lucentis0.5 mg intravitreal injection | Drug | 1/2 Fluence Double Therapy, 1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy, 1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy, Ranibizumab |
| dexamethasone0.5 mg intravitreal injection | Drug | 1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy, 1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy |
Primary outcome
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)
Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12
Retreatment was defined in the protocol as study treatment administered after Day 0. For the analyses of retreatment, any study treatment that was administered was considered to be a retreatment, and combination therapy was considered to be one retreatment, even though two or three treatment procedures were done. In the combination therapy groups, if a ranibizumab injection was given because retreatment was indicated and the previous combination treatment was less than 2 months before, the ranibizumab injection was counted as a retreatment.
Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-corrected VA Score (ETDRS Chart)
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method at 4 meters. Worst = 0; best = 100
7 secondary outcomes
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)
Time frame: Month 1 to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-Corrected VA Score
Time frame: Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Gained From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=0 Letter Gain of Visual Acuity From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Lost From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Lesion Size
Time frame: Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jun 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Choroidal Neovascularization
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of ADVM-022 in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration [LUNA]
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial of EYE201/MK-8748 in People With Macular Degeneration (MK-8748-002)
Macular Degeneration, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruiting
Speculum-Free Intravitreal Injection Using Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction: Pain, Procedure Time, Patient Satisfaction, and Safety
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD), Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
NG101 AAV Gene Therapy in Subjects With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Henry Hudson, MD principal investigator
Retina Centers, PC
Allen Ho, MD principal investigator
Retina Diagnostic & Treatment Associates, LLC
Andrew Strong, Ph.D study chair
QLT Inc.
26 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing verteporfin, ranibizumab and dexamethasone in people with Choroidal Neovascularization and Macular Degeneration, run by QLT Inc. at 26 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jun 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded) (time frame: Month 1 to Month 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2011.