MelanomaPhase 2NCT00492297
A Phase II, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Given Daily in Combination With Repeated 21-Day Cycles of Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma
A Phase 2 study testing Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC) in people with Melanoma, run by Bayer at 12 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether a new type of anti-cancer drug, known as BAY 43-9006, can be given safely and with good effect in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC). DTIC is the current standard chemotherapy drug given for melanoma that has spread through the body. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 83 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2005to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with advanced, metastatic, histologically confirmed melanoma, for whom treatment with dacarbazine is considered medically acceptable
- Age >= 18 years
- Subject has measurable and evaluable disease defined as at least one metastatic lesion that can be accurately and serially measured by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Cutaneous lesions measuring at least 20mm in longest diameter can be considered measurable (and therefore target lesions) via color photography including a ruler
- Subject has biopsiable disease at baseline and is willing to provide biopsy samples, or does not have biopsiable disease at baseline
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma (cutaneous vulval melanoma is permitted)
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors [Ta, Tis \& T1] or any cancer curatively treated > 3 years prior to study entry
- (Active coronary artery disease or ischemia (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed)
- Uncontrolled hypertension (> grade 2 National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0)
- Active, clinically serious infections (> grade 2 NCI-CTCAE version 3.0)
- Subjects with seizure disorder requiring medication are excluded
Show all 9Show fewer
- History of or suspected Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, or chronic hepatitis B or C
- Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the subject is > 6 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks prior to study entry and is clinically stable with respect to the tumor at the time of study entry. Also the subject must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper (chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 2 countries.
12 sites in 2 countries
United Kingdom8 sites
Study site
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ
Study site
London, London, NW3 2QG
Study site
London, London, SE1 7EH
Study site
London, London, SW3 6JJ
Study site
Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX
Study site
Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN
Study site
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
Study site
Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT
France4 sites
Study site
Bordeaux, 33000
Study site
Lyon, 39373
Study site
Toulouse, 31052
Study site
Villejuif, 94805
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Multi-center, Open-label, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAY 43-9006 Given Daily in Combination With Repeated 21-Day Cycles of Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma.
The purpose of this study is to see whether a new type of anti-cancer drug, known as BAY 43-9006, can be given safely and with good effect in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC). DTIC is the current standard chemotherapy drug given for melanoma that has spread through the body. Although this drug can be effective on its own and is generally well tolerated, not all patients will benefit, so there is a need to test new drugs and drug combinations for treating melanoma.
Read the detailed description
Issues on "Safety" outcomes are addressed in the Adverse Event section.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC)
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC)Drug
Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m^2 on day one of repeated 21 day cycles, in combination with daily continuous oral sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006), 400 mg twice a day (bid)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib + Dacarbazine | Experimental | Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m^2 on day one of repeated 21 day cycles, in combination with daily continuous oral sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006), 400 mg twice a day (bid) Receives: Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Best Response
Best Overall Response (BOR): Best tumor response achieved during or within 30 days after active therapy confirmed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response (CR): The disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions.
Measured: during or within 30 days after active therapy
Secondary outcomes (10)
Progression-free Survival
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.
Measured: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression (median 259 days)
Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-points
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of combination therapy to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). PFS for subjects without tumor progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor evaluation.
Measured: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression after 3, 6 and 12 months
Overall Survival
Overall Survival was the number of days from the date that combination treatment started until the date of death.
Measured: from start of treatment until death (median 259 days)
Duration of Response
Duration of Response was assessed in subjects who showed a Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR). It was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to Progressive Disease (PD), or death if before documented progression. Duration of response for subjects who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
Measured: from confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) until Progressive Disease (PD) (median 259 days)
Duration of Complete Response
Duration of complete response was the number of days from the date that a complete response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes).
Measured: from confirmed CR until PD (median 259 days)
Duration of Partial Response
Duration of partial response was the number of days from the date that a partial response was first documented to the date that recurrent or progressive disease was first objectively documented (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to last observation (if patient did not progress then censored=yes).
Measured: from confirmed PR until PD (median 259 days)
Disease Control (DC)
DC was defined as the total number of subjects whose best response was not progressive disease (PD) (total number of CRs + total number of PRs + total number of Stable Diseases (SD)). The DC at specific time points could also be calculated as the total number of subjects whose response was not PD at that time point.
Measured: after start of treatment, at 6 months and 12 months
Duration of Stable Disease
Duration of Stable Disease (DSD), defined as the time from the first documented objective evidence of Stable Disease (SD) to disease progression (DP) or death if death occurred before DP, was assessed in subjects who showed SD as best response. DSD for subjects who had not progressed or died was censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
Measured: from start of therapy to PD, only in non-responders (median 259 days)
Time to Response
Time to Response in subjects who achieved an objective response (PR or CR with confirmation) was measured from the date of starting study combination treatment until the earliest date that the response was first documented.
Measured: start of therapy to confirmed CR or PR (median 259 days)
Time to Progression
Time to Progression was the number of days from the start of therapy to progression (if patient progressed then censored=no) or to the last observation at which the patient was known to have not progressed, that is, the last observation with a best response of CR, PR, or SD.
Measured: From start of treatment until progression (median 259 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2005
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BayerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 83 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bayer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bayer Study Director, Study director, Bayer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00492297
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11538
- Other IDs
- 2004-000725-30, 2004
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Eisen T, Marais R, Affolter A, Lorigan P, Robert C, Corrie P, Ottensmeier C, Chevreau C, Chao D, Nathan PD, Jouary T, Harries M, Negrier S, Montegriffo E, Ahmad T, Gibbens I, James MG, Strauss UP, Prendergast S, Gore ME. Sorafenib and dacarbazine as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma: phase I and open-label phase II studies. Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 26;105(3):353-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.257. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PubMed 21750549
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Multi-center, Open-label, Uncontrolled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BAY 43-9006 Given Daily in Combination With Repeated 21-Day Cycles of Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00492297
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11538
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 83 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BayerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jan 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to see whether a new type of anti-cancer drug, known as BAY 43-9006, can be given safely and with good effect in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC). DTIC is the current standard chemotherapy drug given for melanoma that has spread through the body. Although this drug can be effective on its own and is generally well tolerated, not all patients will benefit, so there is a need to test new drugs and drug combinations for treating melanoma.
Detailed description
Issues on "Safety" outcomes are addressed in the Adverse Event section.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib + Dacarbazine | Experimental | Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC)Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m^2 on day one of repeated 21 day cycles, in combination with daily continuous oral sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006), 400 mg twice a day (bid) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects with advanced, metastatic, histologically confirmed melanoma, for whom treatment with dacarbazine is considered medically acceptable
- Age >= 18 years
- Subject has measurable and evaluable disease defined as at least one metastatic lesion that can be accurately and serially measured by Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Cutaneous lesions measuring at least 20mm in longest diameter can be considered measurable (and therefore target lesions) via color photography including a ruler
- Subject has biopsiable disease at baseline and is willing to provide biopsy samples, or does not have biopsiable disease at baseline
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma (cutaneous vulval melanoma is permitted)
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors [Ta, Tis \& T1] or any cancer curatively treated > 3 years prior to study entry
- (Active coronary artery disease or ischemia (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed)
- Uncontrolled hypertension (> grade 2 National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0)
- Active, clinically serious infections (> grade 2 NCI-CTCAE version 3.0)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC)Dacarbazine 1000 mg/m^2 on day one of repeated 21 day cycles, in combination with daily continuous oral sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006), 400 mg twice a day (bid) | Drug | Sorafenib + Dacarbazine |
Primary outcome
Overall Best Response
Time frame: during or within 30 days after active therapy
Best Overall Response (BOR): Best tumor response achieved during or within 30 days after active therapy confirmed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response (CR): The disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was defined as steady state of disease, PD was defined as an increase of at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions.
10 secondary outcomes
Progression-free Survival
Time frame: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression (median 259 days)
Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival at Specific Time-points
Time frame: from start of treatment until progression or death before progression after 3, 6 and 12 months
Overall Survival
Time frame: from start of treatment until death (median 259 days)
Duration of Response
Time frame: from confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) until Progressive Disease (PD) (median 259 days)
Duration of Complete Response
Time frame: from confirmed CR until PD (median 259 days)
Duration of Partial Response
Time frame: from confirmed PR until PD (median 259 days)
Disease Control (DC)
Time frame: after start of treatment, at 6 months and 12 months
Duration of Stable Disease
Time frame: from start of therapy to PD, only in non-responders (median 259 days)
Time to Response
Time frame: start of therapy to confirmed CR or PR (median 259 days)
Time to Progression
Time frame: From start of treatment until progression (median 259 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 21750549Eisen T, Marais R, Affolter A, Lorigan P, Robert C, Corrie P, Ottensmeier C, Chevreau C, Chao D, Nathan PD, Jouary T, Harries M, Negrier S, Montegriffo E, Ahmad T, Gibbens I, James MG, Strauss UP, Prendergast S, Gore ME. Sorafenib and dacarbazine as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma: phase I and open-label phase II studies. Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 26;105(3):353-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.257. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
- Click here and search for information of Bayer products for EuropeLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibitor Sarilumab in Combination With Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Patients With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
Melanoma, Unresectable Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC026 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor, Advanced Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Study of ACC-1898 in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bayer Study Director study director
Bayer
12 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine (DTIC) in people with Melanoma, run by Bayer at 12 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in United Kingdom, France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jan 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Best Response (time frame: during or within 30 days after active therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00492297, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.