AzTrials
AzTrials

SpondylolisthesisPhase 4SpineRSANCT00493558

Spine Research With Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis

A Phase 4 study testing Trabecular Metal Intervertebral Cage with RSA beads in people with Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the effectiveness of a new spine implant for patients who require spinal fusion surgery. Based on this information, we hope to create a standard of good performance, or benchmark, against which future studies on this spine implant can be compared. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Trabecular Metal Intervertebral Cage with RSA beads
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2007to Jun 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must be at least 20 years of age
  • Clinical and radiologic history of spondylolisthesis (no greater than grade 1)
  • Spinal stenosis for which conservative treatment has failed
  • Degenerative disc disease, characterized by one or more of the following:
  • instability (defined as angular motion > 5° and/or translation > 4mm, based on Flex/Ext radiographs)
  • osteophyte formation
Show all 10Show fewer
  • decreased disc height
  • thickening of ligamentous tissue
  • disc degeneration or herniation
  • facet joint degeneration

Who cannot join

  • Fusion at more than one level
  • Non-fusion surgery at the involved level
  • Previously diagnosed with osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated
  • Patients with a highly-communicable disease, inflammatory or auto-immune based joint disease
  • Those with a history of endocrine or metabolic disorders known to affect osteogenesis (e.g. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, Ehlers-Danios syndrome or osteogenesis imperfecta)
  • Patients with a documented titanium or tantalum alloy allergy or intolerance
  • Patients currently receiving active treatment for cancer or treatment with steroids such as cortisone
  • Patients with significant medical history that, in the Investigator's opinion, would not make them a good study candidate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Capital District Health Authority, QEII Health Sciences Centre,& Dalhousie University

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H-3A7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Consecutive Case Series of One-Level Lumbar Fusions With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation and the Trabecular Metal™ Intervertebral Cage Using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the effectiveness of a new spine implant for patients who require spinal fusion surgery. Based on this information, we hope to create a standard of good performance, or benchmark, against which future studies on this spine implant can be compared. By creating this benchmark we hope to improve care for patients who require spinal fusion surgery.

Read the detailed description

For patients in whom a spinal fusion is indicated, the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be recommended to restore stability to the affected spinal segment1. Pioneered by a Dr.Cloward in the 1940s to treat painful intervertebral discs damaged by degeneration, PLIF involves removal of the entire nuclear portion of the disc and subsequent replacement with multiple blocks of transplanted bone. The purpose of the fusion is to eliminate or reduce the amount of the motion at the affected site, and, therefore, the source of pain.

Four major intervertebral cages have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in humans: the Brantigan Interbody fusion Cage, the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage, the Bagby and Kuslich cage, and, most recently, the Trabecular Metal™ Cage. Comprised of 98 percent tantalum and 2 percent vitreous carbon, Trabecular Metal™ has the highest coefficient of friction of any implant material on the market, allowing for optimal initial implant-bone fit. Furthermore, the unique porous structure of Trabecular Metal™ provides significantly more space for tissue ingrowth to occur, facilitating a more cohesive implant-bone interface as well as long-term stability of the implant.

Long-term follow up data on the efficacy of the Brantigan Interbody fusion cage, Ray Threaded Fusion cage, and Bagby and Kuslich cages are limited, with the most rigorous studies (i.e. controlled prospective studies) typically providing outcomes approximately 2 years post-surgery. Overall, these studies show that, while existing intervertebral cages have made significant advances in terms of addressing the disadvantages associated with traditional bone grafting/fixation techniques, problems continue to persist. Through comprehensive and accurate clinical evaluation of the Trabecular Metal™ intervertebral cage, the Research Team hopes to document advances in the PLIF technique, thereby informing current research as well as clinical practice.

The primary goal of the proposed research is to gather data on the clinical efficacy of the Trabecular Metal™ Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) cage with pedicle screw instrumentation for the treatment of one-level lumbar spine fusions. Based on this pilot data, we hope to establish a level of acceptable clinical performance for the Trabecular Metal™ cage, a benchmark against which subsequent investigations can be compared.

Direct surgical exploration is considered the most reliable method for accurately determining fusion success, both from a structural and functional perspective, following spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, this method is highly invasive, costly and seldom used. Furthermore, surgical exploration does not provide any longitudinal information as to the stability of the implant, including the monitoring of any occurrence of migration.

In contrast, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis(RSA)can detect the presence or absence of mobility between intervertebral segments (i.e. functional stability of the fusion) with a high degree of accuracy. RSA is a radiographic technique that uses small tantalum balls implanted into the patient's bone to measure micromotion (<1 mm) at the bone - implant interface, something which is not possible to do reliably using regular x-ray techniques. RSA provides a method for detecting inferior implant designs or cement formulations using only a small number of patients before release of these products into large clinical trials.

RSA has been in use for several decades,and its safety is well documented.A computerized, digital RSA system has recently been installed and calibrated at our center. Its measurement capabilities have been rigorously validated, and it is currently being used to assess a new knee implant design. Expansion of the system to include spine RSA can be easily accomplished.

Being tested
Trabecular Metal Intervertebral Cage with RSA beads
Keywords
Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis, Trabecular Metal Posterior Lumbar Interbody Cage, Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage, Posterior Lumbar spine fusion surgery
Medical subject headings
Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Trabecular Metal Intervertebral Cage with RSA beadsDevice

    Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis beads will be inserted at time of implant of the Trabecular Metal Intervertebral Cage.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Spinal fusion and the rate of fusion and maintenance of spinal alignment will be assessed

    Measured: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24months.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Subjective outcome questionnaires will be used to characterize the patient sample used for the study to allow for comparisons to other treatments for this condition in the future.

    Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jun 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2007
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00493558
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDHA018
Acronym
SpineRSA
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
27 Jun 2007
Last updated
20 Feb 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Trabecular Metal Intervertebral Cage with RSA beads in people with Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Spinal fusion and the rate of fusion and maintenance of spinal alignment will be assessed (time frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in