Malaria ParasitaemiaNCT00494416
Different Approaches for Delivery of IPT in Pregnancy in Burkina Faso
A study testing delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy in people with Malaria Parasitaemia and Birth Weight, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
Trial summary
IPT/SP was adopted in 2005 by The Ministry of Health (MoH) of Burkina Faso to replace chemoprophylaxis with CQ in pregnancy. The new strategy is being implemented but no delivery approach was defined and presumably IPT/SP will only be delivered to pregnant women presenting at ANC visits. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria Parasitaemia, Birth Weight, Anaemia
- What is being tested?
- delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11,523 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBurkina Faso
- Study dates
- Jun 2007to Nov 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women of all parities
- Second trimester
Who cannot join
- Severely ill pregnant women
- Pregnant women in first trimester
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Different Approaches for Delivery of Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT)to Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso With Regard to Coverage and Compliance
IPT/SP was adopted in 2005 by The Ministry of Health (MoH) of Burkina Faso to replace chemoprophylaxis with CQ in pregnancy. The new strategy is being implemented but no delivery approach was defined and presumably IPT/SP will only be delivered to pregnant women presenting at ANC visits. It would be of extreme importance to ensure a better coverage and higher compliance to make the new strategy effective. In order to obtain a more efficient IPT/SP programme with a good level of compliance and coverage, several delivery approaches beside ANC should be explored.
The study site will be in Pissy health district covering both peri-urban Ouagadougou city and rural areas. Participants include pregnant women irrespective of gravidity residing in the study area.
Read more
The study is a prospective comparative study of 3 different approaches of delivering IPT/SP in the catchment areas of rural health facilities. The approaches will be the following:
- Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visits.
- Joint, with an advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits.
- Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to achieve the required sample size. The zones will be randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT, b) compliance, c) infection prevalence, d) Hb level, e) difficulties and constraints of each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. to be able to identify a significant increase in coverage of 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women.
Cross sectional surveys will be carried out at the beginning, during and at the end of the study period. The study will be carried out over 24 months from June 2007.
Read the detailed description
Pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria than non-pregnant women, in particular during the first pregnancies. Malaria infection in pregnant women may cause anaemia, illness and abortion or stillbirth. It may also cause low birth weight through placental infection. In Africa the burden of malaria in pregnancy is highest in remote rural areas. IPT with sulphadoxine - pyrimethamine (SP) has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing pregnancy related malaria (anaemia, clinical cases and placenta infection), and to be beneficial to both babies and pregnant women, and increasing ANC attendance. In many Sub - Saharan African countries, IPT / SP is being adopted to replace chloroquine (CQ) as chemoprophylaxis was shown to be no longer efficacious. IPT/SP was adopted in 2005 by The Ministry of Health (MoH) of Burkina Faso to replace chemoprophylaxis with CQ. The new strategy is being implemented but no delivery approach was defined and presumably IPT/SP will only be delivered to pregnant women presenting at ANC visits. Although the expected compliance should be better than for the previous CQ weekly regime, it would be of importance to ensure a better coverage and higher compliance to make the new strategy effective. Therefore, in order to obtain a more efficient IPT / SP programme with a good level of compliance and coverage, several delivery approaches beside use of ANC alone will be explored. It is hypothesized that the IPT strategy using SP will be as inefficient as chemoprophylaxis with CQ if an effective delivery approach is not used.
General Objective: to assess different IPT/SP delivery approaches in rural Burkina Faso with the aim of improving coverage and compliance among pregnant women.
Specific objectives:
- To implement three approaches of IPT/SP delivery to pregnant women based on health centre distribution, and in addition community based distribution either by health services or by community members;
- To compare the effects of the approaches on compliance to and coverage of IPT / SP and their feasibility.
Material \& Methods
The research will be implemented in Burkina Faso. Malaria is endemic with seasonal transmission and is responsible for considerable ill health among pregnant women. The study site will be situated in the rural area of the Pissy health district which covers both the western peri-urban zone of Ouagadougou city and adjacent rural areas. There are a total of 25 health facilities in the district (both rural and urban) and a reference hospital at Ouagadougou. In 2004 the population of the district was approx. 542000 inhabitants. The estimated number of pregnancies was 27000. There is generally low attendance for antenatal care (ANC) and 15% of babies are born with LBW. In a study carried out in the Boromo rural district, only 51% of pregnant women had 2 ANC visits before delivery (Coulibaly, personal communication). HIV infection prevalence was found around 4% for the whole country (MoH, 2005) and there is no indication that it is different for the Pissy district catchment area.
The study participants will include pregnant women irrespective of gravidity residing in the study area and reachable by the approach that is applied in the zone.
It is a prospective comparative study of 3 different approaches of delivering IPT / SP in the catchment areas of rural health facilities. The approaches will be the following:
- Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to all pregnant women presenting to the health centre either for ANC visit or for care seeking consultation. Drugs will be administered as a directly observed treatment (DOT). Some collation may be given to women as some of them refuse to take drugs because they have not eaten before. This approach, which is the most likely to be applied by the MOH, will serve as the control one.
- Joint methods, with an advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits. The women will be asked to present to the health staff for treatment and IPT/SP administered as DOT.
- Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). The IPT/SP is then delivered also as DOT.
The two community - directed approaches will be further developed through workshops with health staff, communities, and resource persons to adapt them to the local situation. Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to cover the required sample size. The zones will be selected in order to avoid contamination between them and randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT (proportion of pregnant women who are administered the treatment), b) the compliance (number of administered doses per pregnant woman), c) the infection prevalence, d) the Hb rate, e) the most relevant difficulties and constraints to each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. The sample size is calculated to measure a difference between groups of 10% in IPT administration coverage. Assuming we require 80% power (zβ = 0.84) of detecting a significant difference (P<0.05; zα/2 =1.96) if the intervention increases coverage by 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women. Assuming a design effect of 1.5, n = 5762 women. The 3 geographical zones will be defined to each cover 5800 expected pregnancies.
Cross sectional surveys will be carried out at the beginning, during and at the end of the study period. The first will aim to ensure the study zones are comparable regarding the outcomes a) b) c) and d) and later on for comparison between zones. Furthermore, SP will be measured in urine using dipsticks for compliance measurement. An anthropological component will assess part of main outcomes e) and f) in health staff, communities, and pregnant women. Questionnaires, focus group discussions (FGD) and in-depth interviews (IDI) will be used for cross-sectional survey data collection. Data about pregnancy and IPT will be recorded from personal ANC book to be credible. The sample sizes will be calculated to be representative of the populations of different villages and zones.
Data on IPT / SP delivery will be also collected from records hold by health centre and TBAs / RWAs to measure main outcome e). Specific records different from the health centre's own records will be opened at each IPT/SP delivery site, including TBAs / RWAs, to register information on treated pregnant women. The information will be personal data (name, age, village, marital status, and profession), data on the current and previous pregnancies (rank of pregnancy, children, ANC visits, drugs given) and medical history (previous adverse reactions to drugs, fever, and malaria attacks), and the administered IPT/SP doses. As usual, the IPT / SP treatment received will be recorded in the women's personal ANC book as proof for further use, including the cross sectional surveys.
Quantitative data will be regularly entered with Epi Info software and analysed using Stata version 9. Qualitative data will be processed and reports produced. Proportions will be compared by ANOVA and means by student t test.
Training sessions will be organized for caregivers to harmonize IPT administration (as it is not yet in practice in Burkina Faso) and study implementation in each study zone. The PI will undertake monthly supervision in each zone. During the preparation phase, more information will be gathered to better understand the health district and centres organization and functioning system regarding ANC and malaria prevention.
Study period The study will be carried out over 24 months from June 2007.
- Conditions
- Malaria Parasitaemia, Birth Weight, Anaemia
- Being tested
- delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy
- Medical subject headings
- Birth Weight, Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancyOther
Health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visit.
Joint with advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ANC approach | No intervention | Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visit. |
| advanced strategies SP | Other | Joint with advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery of IPT/sulphadoxine pyrimethamine (SP) at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits. Receives: Other: delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy |
| Community based | Other | Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to achieve the required sample size. The zones will be randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT, b) compliance, c) infection prevalence, d) Hb level, e) difficulties and constraints of each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. Coverage by 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women. Receives: Other: delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
compliance
Measured: 24 month after study start
coverage
Measured: 24 month after study start
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2007
- Primary completionNov 2009
- Study completionNov 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Malaria ParasitaemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11,523 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- DBL -Institute for Health Research and Development
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian Greenwood, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Investigators
- Sheick O Coulibaly, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Laboratoire National de Sante Publique
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00494416
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PD 010607
- Other IDs
- REG-10
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Different Approaches for Delivery of Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT)to Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso With Regard to Coverage and Compliance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00494416
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PD 010607
- Conditions
- Malaria Parasitaemia, Birth Weight, Anaemia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 11,523 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- DBL -Institute for Health Research and Development
- Study start
- Jun 2007
- Primary completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
IPT/SP was adopted in 2005 by The Ministry of Health (MoH) of Burkina Faso to replace chemoprophylaxis with CQ in pregnancy. The new strategy is being implemented but no delivery approach was defined and presumably IPT/SP will only be delivered to pregnant women presenting at ANC visits. It would be of extreme importance to ensure a better coverage and higher compliance to make the new strategy effective. In order to obtain a more efficient IPT/SP programme with a good level of compliance and coverage, several delivery approaches beside ANC should be explored.
The study site will be in Pissy health district covering both peri-urban Ouagadougou city and rural areas. Participants include pregnant women irrespective of gravidity residing in the study area.
The study is a prospective comparative study of 3 different approaches of delivering IPT/SP in the catchment areas of rural health facilities. The approaches will be the following:
- Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visits.
- Joint, with an advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits.
- Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to achieve the required sample size. The zones will be randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT, b) compliance, c) infection prevalence, d) Hb level, e) difficulties and constraints of each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. to be able to identify a significant increase in coverage of 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women.
Cross sectional surveys will be carried out at the beginning, during and at the end of the study period. The study will be carried out over 24 months from June 2007.
Detailed description
Pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria than non-pregnant women, in particular during the first pregnancies. Malaria infection in pregnant women may cause anaemia, illness and abortion or stillbirth. It may also cause low birth weight through placental infection. In Africa the burden of malaria in pregnancy is highest in remote rural areas. IPT with sulphadoxine - pyrimethamine (SP) has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing pregnancy related malaria (anaemia, clinical cases and placenta infection), and to be beneficial to both babies and pregnant women, and increasing ANC attendance. In many Sub - Saharan African countries, IPT / SP is being adopted to replace chloroquine (CQ) as chemoprophylaxis was shown to be no longer efficacious. IPT/SP was adopted in 2005 by The Ministry of Health (MoH) of Burkina Faso to replace chemoprophylaxis with CQ. The new strategy is being implemented but no delivery approach was defined and presumably IPT/SP will only be delivered to pregnant women presenting at ANC visits. Although the expected compliance should be better than for the previous CQ weekly regime, it would be of importance to ensure a better coverage and higher compliance to make the new strategy effective. Therefore, in order to obtain a more efficient IPT / SP programme with a good level of compliance and coverage, several delivery approaches beside use of ANC alone will be explored. It is hypothesized that the IPT strategy using SP will be as inefficient as chemoprophylaxis with CQ if an effective delivery approach is not used.
General Objective: to assess different IPT/SP delivery approaches in rural Burkina Faso with the aim of improving coverage and compliance among pregnant women.
Specific objectives:
- To implement three approaches of IPT/SP delivery to pregnant women based on health centre distribution, and in addition community based distribution either by health services or by community members;
- To compare the effects of the approaches on compliance to and coverage of IPT / SP and their feasibility.
Material \& Methods
The research will be implemented in Burkina Faso. Malaria is endemic with seasonal transmission and is responsible for considerable ill health among pregnant women. The study site will be situated in the rural area of the Pissy health district which covers both the western peri-urban zone of Ouagadougou city and adjacent rural areas. There are a total of 25 health facilities in the district (both rural and urban) and a reference hospital at Ouagadougou. In 2004 the population of the district was approx. 542000 inhabitants. The estimated number of pregnancies was 27000. There is generally low attendance for antenatal care (ANC) and 15% of babies are born with LBW. In a study carried out in the Boromo rural district, only 51% of pregnant women had 2 ANC visits before delivery (Coulibaly, personal communication). HIV infection prevalence was found around 4% for the whole country (MoH, 2005) and there is no indication that it is different for the Pissy district catchment area.
The study participants will include pregnant women irrespective of gravidity residing in the study area and reachable by the approach that is applied in the zone.
It is a prospective comparative study of 3 different approaches of delivering IPT / SP in the catchment areas of rural health facilities. The approaches will be the following:
- Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to all pregnant women presenting to the health centre either for ANC visit or for care seeking consultation. Drugs will be administered as a directly observed treatment (DOT). Some collation may be given to women as some of them refuse to take drugs because they have not eaten before. This approach, which is the most likely to be applied by the MOH, will serve as the control one.
- Joint methods, with an advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits. The women will be asked to present to the health staff for treatment and IPT/SP administered as DOT.
- Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). The IPT/SP is then delivered also as DOT.
The two community - directed approaches will be further developed through workshops with health staff, communities, and resource persons to adapt them to the local situation. Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to cover the required sample size. The zones will be selected in order to avoid contamination between them and randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT (proportion of pregnant women who are administered the treatment), b) the compliance (number of administered doses per pregnant woman), c) the infection prevalence, d) the Hb rate, e) the most relevant difficulties and constraints to each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. The sample size is calculated to measure a difference between groups of 10% in IPT administration coverage. Assuming we require 80% power (zβ = 0.84) of detecting a significant difference (P<0.05; zα/2 =1.96) if the intervention increases coverage by 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women. Assuming a design effect of 1.5, n = 5762 women. The 3 geographical zones will be defined to each cover 5800 expected pregnancies.
Cross sectional surveys will be carried out at the beginning, during and at the end of the study period. The first will aim to ensure the study zones are comparable regarding the outcomes a) b) c) and d) and later on for comparison between zones. Furthermore, SP will be measured in urine using dipsticks for compliance measurement. An anthropological component will assess part of main outcomes e) and f) in health staff, communities, and pregnant women. Questionnaires, focus group discussions (FGD) and in-depth interviews (IDI) will be used for cross-sectional survey data collection. Data about pregnancy and IPT will be recorded from personal ANC book to be credible. The sample sizes will be calculated to be representative of the populations of different villages and zones.
Data on IPT / SP delivery will be also collected from records hold by health centre and TBAs / RWAs to measure main outcome e). Specific records different from the health centre's own records will be opened at each IPT/SP delivery site, including TBAs / RWAs, to register information on treated pregnant women. The information will be personal data (name, age, village, marital status, and profession), data on the current and previous pregnancies (rank of pregnancy, children, ANC visits, drugs given) and medical history (previous adverse reactions to drugs, fever, and malaria attacks), and the administered IPT/SP doses. As usual, the IPT / SP treatment received will be recorded in the women's personal ANC book as proof for further use, including the cross sectional surveys.
Quantitative data will be regularly entered with Epi Info software and analysed using Stata version 9. Qualitative data will be processed and reports produced. Proportions will be compared by ANOVA and means by student t test.
Training sessions will be organized for caregivers to harmonize IPT administration (as it is not yet in practice in Burkina Faso) and study implementation in each study zone. The PI will undertake monthly supervision in each zone. During the preparation phase, more information will be gathered to better understand the health district and centres organization and functioning system regarding ANC and malaria prevention.
Study period The study will be carried out over 24 months from June 2007.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ANC approach | No intervention | –Passive health centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visit. |
| advanced strategies SP | Other | Other: delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancyJoint with advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery of IPT/sulphadoxine pyrimethamine (SP) at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages, such as immunization, health promotion, and even ANC visits. |
| Community based | Other | Other: delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancyCommunity based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). Each approach will be implemented in a zone constituted by the catchment area of a number of health centres to achieve the required sample size. The zones will be randomly assigned to a delivery approach. The main outcomes to be measured are: a) the coverage of IPT, b) compliance, c) infection prevalence, d) Hb level, e) difficulties and constraints of each approach, f) the acceptability to population and health staff and g) the performance of each approach to deliver IPT /SP. Coverage by 10%, each group should be composed of n = 3841 pregnant women. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant women of all parities
- Second trimester
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Severely ill pregnant women
- Pregnant women in first trimester
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancyHealth centre based delivery approach (PHC). IPT/SP will be delivered to pregnant women presenting to the health centre for ANC visit. Joint with advanced strategies delivery approach (JAS). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached during preventive activities the health staff carry out regularly in villages Community based distribution delivery approach (CBD). In addition to passive delivery at health centres, the pregnant women will be reached by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or representatives of village women's associations (RWAs). | Other | Community based, advanced strategies SP |
Primary outcome
compliance
Time frame: 24 month after study start
coverage
Time frame: 24 month after study start
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2017.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- DBL-Centre for Health Research and DevelopmentLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Malaria Parasitaemia
RecruitingObservational study
Community-Based Cohort Study of Hidden Malaria Infections, Diagnostic Gaps, & Mosquito Vector Dynamics in Odisha, India
Malaria, Asymptomatic Parasitaemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and PK of MMV371 LAI in Healthy Adults and Adolescents in Rwanda
Malaria (Plasmodium Falciparum), Malaria Falciparum
Recruiting
Assessing the Feasibility of Combining Dihydroartemisinin Piperaquine and Primaquine for Malaria Mass Drug Administration in High Endemic Communities in the Eastern Region of Ghana
Malaria Asymptomatic Parasitaemia, Malaria Falciparum
Active, not recruiting
MDA and Targeted Control Against Plasmodium Carriage in the Sahel
Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria, Asymptomatic Parasitaemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sheick O Coulibaly, MD, PhD principal investigator
Laboratoire National de Sante Publique
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing delivery approaches of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy in people with Malaria Parasitaemia and Birth Weight, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Burkina Faso. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
compliance (time frame: 24 month after study start). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2017.