Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00495287
A Remission Induction Therapy and Risk-oriented Postremission Strategy for Adult Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
A Phase 3 study testing cytosine arabinoside in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Northern Italy Leukemia Group at 17 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The study was set up to assess: 1. Standard-dose versus high-dose remission induction therapy. A standard ICE chemotherapy vs sequential high-dose cytarabine, with appropriate supportive/prophylactic measures, followed by morphological, cytogenetic and molecular monitoring of remission. 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- cytosine arabinoside
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 573 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 16+ years
- Diagnosis of untreated (or only hydroxyurea/cyclophosphamide) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML, including myeloid sarcoma) or high-risk myelodysplasia (RAEB-2), either de novo or following an antecedent hematological disorder, or secondary to chemo-radiotherapy for other cancer
- Signed informed consent
- Adequate sampling for full cytological, cytochemical, cytogenetic and immunobiological disease characterization by revised FAB, EGIL and WHO criteria
- ECOG performance status 0-2 or reversible ECOG 3 score following intensive care of complications.
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Pre-existing, uncontrolled pathology such as cardiac disease (congestive/ischemic, acute myocardial infarction within the past 3 months, untreatable arrythmias, NYHA classes III and IV), severe liver disease with serum bilirubin >3 mg/dL and/or ALT >3 x upper normal limit (unless attributable to AML), kidney function impairment with serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (unless attributable to AML), and severe neuropsychiatric disorder that impairs the patient's ability to understand and sign the informed consent, or to cope with the intended treatment plan
- Known HIV positive serology
- Other active hematological or non-hematological cancers with life expectancy <1 year
- Pregnancy (fertile women will be advised not to become pregnant while on treatment; and male patients to adopt contraceptive methods)
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
Italy17 sites
Dipartimento di Ematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale - Azienda Osp. Nazionale Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Alessandria, AL
USC Ematologia Azienda Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, BG
Ospedale Generale di Bolzano
Bolzano, Bz
Ospedale Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, Brescia
Istituti Ospitalieri
Cremona, Cremona
S.C. Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle
Cuneo, CN
Ematologia - AOU Careggi
Florence, FI
Ospedale dell'Angelo
Mestre, Venezia
Ematologia Centro TMO - Fondazione IRCSS Ospedale Maggiore
Milan, MI
Ematologia e TMO - Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, MI
Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori
Milan, MI
Ematologia - TMO - Ospedale San Gerardo
Monza, MI
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milano
A.O.U San Giovanni Battista-Divisione Ematologica dell'Università
Torino, TO
Ematologia 2 - Osp. Molinette San Giovanni Battista
Torino, TO
Ospedale Mauriziano
Torino, TO
Ospedale di Circolo di Varese
Varese, Varese
About this study
Official title: Phase III Trial in AML Comparing Standard-dose vs High-dose Remission Induction and, Within a Risk-oriented Postremission Strategy, Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplantation vs Blood Stem Cell-supported Multicycle High-dose Program
The study was set up to assess:
- Standard-dose versus high-dose remission induction therapy. A standard ICE chemotherapy vs sequential high-dose cytarabine, with appropriate supportive/prophylactic measures, followed by morphological, cytogenetic and molecular monitoring of remission.
- A risk-oriented postremission therapy: HR patients will be electively submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), whenever possible (related/unrelated donor/cord blood; ablative/non-ablative conditioning according to national and local protocols and guidelines). Provided sufficient blood stem cells were previously collected (>2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells), SR patients and HR patients excluded from allo-SCT and aged 65 years or less will be randomized to: myeloablative autologous blood stem cell transplantation vs non-myeloablative, multicycle, autologous blood stem cell-supported high-dose cytarabine-based therapy.
- HR/SR patients unable to be randomized because of inadequate blood stem cell yield will receive intermediate-dose consolidation; patients aged >65 years will be treated with age-adapted therapy.
Read the detailed description
Adult AML is a difficult-to-treat illness because of both biological and therapeutic reasons. Most patients are aged >50 years and/or present with comorbid conditions and/or display high-risk AML-related features (poor risk, cytogenetics, prior myelodysplasia, secondary AML). This results in unsatisfactory response to conventional first-line therapy and makes it difficult to apply the most effective post-remission consolidation options (allo-SCT in younger patients with HR features, autologous blood stem cell transplantation and high-dose cytarabine-based therapy in the remainder).
In a prior, phase II uncontrolled NILG trial (registered NCT 00400637),a two-step increasing intensity induction was adopted in order to optimize induction results. 51% of ICE-refractory cases responded to the salvage regimen, irrespective of risk class. In the same study, all HR patients had to be sent to allografting whereas SR patients (by clinico-cytogenetics criteria) were to receive up to three high-dose cytarabine-based cycles, each one supported by a fixed amount of autologous blood-stem cells (1-2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells cells), to minimize the risks of high-dose cytarabine-related myelosuppression and to increase treatment intensity by reducing intercycle delays. DFS was 41% at 5 years, 58% in SR patients aged <55 years, 47% in SR patients aged >55 years, and 47% in HR patients with an identifiable donor. No treatment-related death occurred during the pancytopenic phase in 118 patients receiving 299 blood stem-cell supported high-dose cytarabine cycles.
These facts led to the present trial, in which 1) high-dose induction formerly used as salvage is directly compared to standard ICE chemotherapy and 2) the blood-stem cell supported multicycle high-dose cytarabine program is directly compared to a standard autologous blood stem cell transplantation.
RANDOM 1 CYCLE 1
- Standard ICE (all drugs by IV route): idarubicin 12 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, etoposide 100 mg/m2/d on dd 1-5, G-CSF from d 11.
- High-dose sequential (all drugs by IV route): cytarabine 2* g/m2/bd on dd 1-2 and 8-9, idarubicin 18 mg/m2/d on dd 3 and 10, G-Colony Stimulating Factory (G-CSF) from d 11. *1 g/m2 in frail patients aged 60-65 and in all those aged >65 years.
CYCLE 2 (if CR achieved after cycle 1): Standard IC: idarubicin 10 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, G-CSF.
CYCLE 3: Intermediate-dose cytarabine 1 g/m2/bd on dd 1-4 followed by G-CSF and by stem cell collection (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells in three separate bags)
ALLO-SCT (Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation): All HR patients are eligible to allo-SCT as first therapeutic option. Allo-SCT procedure: any type according to local protocols/guidelines.
RANDOM 2
All SR patients and HR ones excluded from allo-SCT:
- Autologous blood stem cell transplantation after BU-CY2 regimen (Busulfan 0.8 mg/kg IV on dd -8 to -5, Cy 60 mg/kg/d on dd -4 to -3, autograft on d 0 (2-6x10e6/kg CD34+ cells) and G-CSF from d +1.
- Autologous blood stem cell supported multicycle therapy (x3, monthly) with cytarabine 2 g/m2/bd on dd 1-5, idarubicin 8 mg/m2/d on dd 1-2, autograft on d 6 (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells) and G-CSF from d 8.
Patients excluded from Random 2 as well as from allo-SCT receive attenuated, unsupported consolidation with 1-2 intermediate-dose cytarabine cycles. Patients aged >65 years are excluded from Random 2.
RISK CLASSIFICATION Cytogenetic risk classification is based on MRC/ECOG-SWOG/CALGB criteria (cytogenetic risk classes: favorable, normal/intermediate, unfavorable, other, unknown); clinical risk classification is based on selected diagnostic criteria and response to chemotherapy cycle 1. The final risk model integrates cytogenetic and clinical risk to encompass two broad risk classes (SR and HR).
- Standard risk (SR): favorable cytogenetics, CR achieved after cycle 1; or normal/intermediate cytogenetics, CR achieved after cycle 1, lack of high-risk characteristics.
- High risk (HR): unfavorable cytogenetics; or normal/intermediate cytogenetics with any high-risk characteristic (WBC >50x10e9/l,FAB M0,6,7 or corresponding WHO, secondary AML, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)-associated AML, hepatosplenomegaly, FLT3 mutation, CR) not achieved with cycle, persistent cytogenetic abnormality at CR), or other/unknown cytogenetics.
- Conditions
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Being tested
- cytosine arabinoside
- Keywords
- Acute myelogenous leukemia, Adult patients, Cytogenetic risk class, Clinico-cytogenetic risk model, Risk-oriented therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cytosine arabinosideDrug
Also called Aracytin, Cytarabine, Cytosar
Arm A: use of standard-dose cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/m2/bd iv. on days 1-7) in association with idarubicin and etoposide.
Arm B: use of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (1000-2000 mg/m2/bd according to age +/-65 years iv. on days 1-2 and 8-9) in association with idarubicin.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Remission induction arm A is with conventional chemotherapy cycle ("ICE": idarubicin, standard-dose cytarabine, etoposide) Receives: Drug: cytosine arabinoside |
| B | Experimental | Remission induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine sequential regimen (HD-Ara-C, idarubicin) Receives: Drug: cytosine arabinoside |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Remission induction (R1): Complete remission (CR) rate after cycle 1
Measured: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy.
Remission consolidation (R2): Length of remission (DFS, disease-free survival)
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
R1: CR with incomplete hematological recovery
Measured: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy
R1:Complete cytogenetic remission
Measured: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy
R1: Treatment-related death (TRD)
Measured: 2 months
R2: Overall survival (OS)
Measured: 5 years
Remission duration and cumulative incidence of relapse
Measured: 5 years
Treatment-related death
Measured: 5 years
Quality of Life
Measured: 1 year and 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 573 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northern Italy Leukemia Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, DR RENATO BASSAN, Northern Italy Leukemia Group
- Investigators
- Renato Bassan, MD, Principal investigator, Norther Italy Leukemia Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00495287
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NILG-AML 02/06
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Caprioli C, Lussana F, Salmoiraghi S, Cavagna R, Buklijas K, Elidi L, Zanghi' P, Michelato A, Delaini F, Oldani E, Intermesoli T, Grassi A, Gianfaldoni G, Mannelli F, Ferrero D, Audisio E, Terruzzi E, De Paoli L, Cattaneo C, Borlenghi E, Cavattoni I, Tajana M, Scattolin AM, Mattei D, Corradini P, Campiotti L, Ciceri F, Bernardi M, Todisco E, Cortelezzi A, Falini B, Pavoni C, Bassan R, Spinelli O, Rambaldi A. Clinical significance of chromatin-spliceosome acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) randomized trial 02/06. Haematologica. 2021 Oct 1;106(10):2578-2587. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.252825.
PubMed 32855275Gianfaldoni G, Mannelli F, Intermesoli T, Bencini S, Giupponi D, Farina G, Cutini I, Bonetti MI, Masciulli A, Audisio E, Ferrero D, Pavoni C, Scattolin AM, Bosi A, Rambaldi A, Bassan R. Early peripheral clearance of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in AML: centralized analysis of a randomized trial. Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):301-311. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000406.
PubMed 31978214Bassan R, Intermesoli T, Masciulli A, Pavoni C, Boschini C, Gianfaldoni G, Marmont F, Cavattoni I, Mattei D, Terruzzi E, De Paoli L, Cattaneo C, Borlenghi E, Ciceri F, Bernardi M, Scattolin AM, Todisco E, Campiotti L, Corradini P, Cortelezzi A, Ferrero D, Zanghi P, Oldani E, Spinelli O, Audisio E, Cortelazzo S, Bosi A, Falini B, Pogliani EM, Rambaldi A. Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML. Blood Adv. 2019 Apr 9;3(7):1103-1117. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026625.
PubMed 30948365
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Trial in AML Comparing Standard-dose vs High-dose Remission Induction and, Within a Risk-oriented Postremission Strategy, Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplantation vs Blood Stem Cell-supported Multicycle High-dose Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00495287
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NILG-AML 02/06
- Conditions
- Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Keywords
- Acute myelogenous leukemia, Adult patients, Cytogenetic risk class, Clinico-cytogenetic risk model, Risk-oriented therapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 573 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northern Italy Leukemia GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study was set up to assess:
- Standard-dose versus high-dose remission induction therapy. A standard ICE chemotherapy vs sequential high-dose cytarabine, with appropriate supportive/prophylactic measures, followed by morphological, cytogenetic and molecular monitoring of remission.
- A risk-oriented postremission therapy: HR patients will be electively submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), whenever possible (related/unrelated donor/cord blood; ablative/non-ablative conditioning according to national and local protocols and guidelines). Provided sufficient blood stem cells were previously collected (>2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells), SR patients and HR patients excluded from allo-SCT and aged 65 years or less will be randomized to: myeloablative autologous blood stem cell transplantation vs non-myeloablative, multicycle, autologous blood stem cell-supported high-dose cytarabine-based therapy.
- HR/SR patients unable to be randomized because of inadequate blood stem cell yield will receive intermediate-dose consolidation; patients aged >65 years will be treated with age-adapted therapy.
Detailed description
Adult AML is a difficult-to-treat illness because of both biological and therapeutic reasons. Most patients are aged >50 years and/or present with comorbid conditions and/or display high-risk AML-related features (poor risk, cytogenetics, prior myelodysplasia, secondary AML). This results in unsatisfactory response to conventional first-line therapy and makes it difficult to apply the most effective post-remission consolidation options (allo-SCT in younger patients with HR features, autologous blood stem cell transplantation and high-dose cytarabine-based therapy in the remainder).
In a prior, phase II uncontrolled NILG trial (registered NCT 00400637),a two-step increasing intensity induction was adopted in order to optimize induction results. 51% of ICE-refractory cases responded to the salvage regimen, irrespective of risk class. In the same study, all HR patients had to be sent to allografting whereas SR patients (by clinico-cytogenetics criteria) were to receive up to three high-dose cytarabine-based cycles, each one supported by a fixed amount of autologous blood-stem cells (1-2x10e6/kg Cluster of Differentiation 34 cells cells), to minimize the risks of high-dose cytarabine-related myelosuppression and to increase treatment intensity by reducing intercycle delays. DFS was 41% at 5 years, 58% in SR patients aged <55 years, 47% in SR patients aged >55 years, and 47% in HR patients with an identifiable donor. No treatment-related death occurred during the pancytopenic phase in 118 patients receiving 299 blood stem-cell supported high-dose cytarabine cycles.
These facts led to the present trial, in which 1) high-dose induction formerly used as salvage is directly compared to standard ICE chemotherapy and 2) the blood-stem cell supported multicycle high-dose cytarabine program is directly compared to a standard autologous blood stem cell transplantation.
RANDOM 1 CYCLE 1
- Standard ICE (all drugs by IV route): idarubicin 12 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, etoposide 100 mg/m2/d on dd 1-5, G-CSF from d 11.
- High-dose sequential (all drugs by IV route): cytarabine 2* g/m2/bd on dd 1-2 and 8-9, idarubicin 18 mg/m2/d on dd 3 and 10, G-Colony Stimulating Factory (G-CSF) from d 11. *1 g/m2 in frail patients aged 60-65 and in all those aged >65 years.
CYCLE 2 (if CR achieved after cycle 1): Standard IC: idarubicin 10 mg/m2/d on dd 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/bd on dd 1-7, G-CSF.
CYCLE 3: Intermediate-dose cytarabine 1 g/m2/bd on dd 1-4 followed by G-CSF and by stem cell collection (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells in three separate bags)
ALLO-SCT (Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation): All HR patients are eligible to allo-SCT as first therapeutic option. Allo-SCT procedure: any type according to local protocols/guidelines.
RANDOM 2
All SR patients and HR ones excluded from allo-SCT:
- Autologous blood stem cell transplantation after BU-CY2 regimen (Busulfan 0.8 mg/kg IV on dd -8 to -5, Cy 60 mg/kg/d on dd -4 to -3, autograft on d 0 (2-6x10e6/kg CD34+ cells) and G-CSF from d +1.
- Autologous blood stem cell supported multicycle therapy (x3, monthly) with cytarabine 2 g/m2/bd on dd 1-5, idarubicin 8 mg/m2/d on dd 1-2, autograft on d 6 (1-2x10e6/kg CD34+ cells) and G-CSF from d 8.
Patients excluded from Random 2 as well as from allo-SCT receive attenuated, unsupported consolidation with 1-2 intermediate-dose cytarabine cycles. Patients aged >65 years are excluded from Random 2.
RISK CLASSIFICATION Cytogenetic risk classification is based on MRC/ECOG-SWOG/CALGB criteria (cytogenetic risk classes: favorable, normal/intermediate, unfavorable, other, unknown); clinical risk classification is based on selected diagnostic criteria and response to chemotherapy cycle 1. The final risk model integrates cytogenetic and clinical risk to encompass two broad risk classes (SR and HR).
- Standard risk (SR): favorable cytogenetics, CR achieved after cycle 1; or normal/intermediate cytogenetics, CR achieved after cycle 1, lack of high-risk characteristics.
- High risk (HR): unfavorable cytogenetics; or normal/intermediate cytogenetics with any high-risk characteristic (WBC >50x10e9/l,FAB M0,6,7 or corresponding WHO, secondary AML, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)-associated AML, hepatosplenomegaly, FLT3 mutation, CR) not achieved with cycle, persistent cytogenetic abnormality at CR), or other/unknown cytogenetics.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Drug: cytosine arabinosideRemission induction arm A is with conventional chemotherapy cycle ("ICE": idarubicin, standard-dose cytarabine, etoposide) |
| B | Experimental | Drug: cytosine arabinosideRemission induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine sequential regimen (HD-Ara-C, idarubicin) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 16+ years
- Diagnosis of untreated (or only hydroxyurea/cyclophosphamide) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML, including myeloid sarcoma) or high-risk myelodysplasia (RAEB-2), either de novo or following an antecedent hematological disorder, or secondary to chemo-radiotherapy for other cancer
- Signed informed consent
- Adequate sampling for full cytological, cytochemical, cytogenetic and immunobiological disease characterization by revised FAB, EGIL and WHO criteria
- ECOG performance status 0-2 or reversible ECOG 3 score following intensive care of complications.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Pre-existing, uncontrolled pathology such as cardiac disease (congestive/ischemic, acute myocardial infarction within the past 3 months, untreatable arrythmias, NYHA classes III and IV), severe liver disease with serum bilirubin >3 mg/dL and/or ALT >3 x upper normal limit (unless attributable to AML), kidney function impairment with serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (unless attributable to AML), and severe neuropsychiatric disorder that impairs the patient's ability to understand and sign the informed consent, or to cope with the intended treatment plan
- Known HIV positive serology
- Other active hematological or non-hematological cancers with life expectancy <1 year
- Pregnancy (fertile women will be advised not to become pregnant while on treatment; and male patients to adopt contraceptive methods)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cytosine arabinosideAlso: Aracytin, Cytarabine, CytosarArm A: use of standard-dose cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/m2/bd iv. on days 1-7) in association with idarubicin and etoposide. Arm B: use of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (1000-2000 mg/m2/bd according to age +/-65 years iv. on days 1-2 and 8-9) in association with idarubicin. | Drug | A, B |
Primary outcome
Remission induction (R1): Complete remission (CR) rate after cycle 1
Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy.
Remission consolidation (R2): Length of remission (DFS, disease-free survival)
Time frame: 5 years
7 secondary outcomes
R1: CR with incomplete hematological recovery
Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy
R1:Complete cytogenetic remission
Time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy
R1: Treatment-related death (TRD)
Time frame: 2 months
R2: Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 5 years
Remission duration and cumulative incidence of relapse
Time frame: 5 years
Treatment-related death
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of Life
Time frame: 1 year and 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32855275Caprioli C, Lussana F, Salmoiraghi S, Cavagna R, Buklijas K, Elidi L, Zanghi' P, Michelato A, Delaini F, Oldani E, Intermesoli T, Grassi A, Gianfaldoni G, Mannelli F, Ferrero D, Audisio E, Terruzzi E, De Paoli L, Cattaneo C, Borlenghi E, Cavattoni I, Tajana M, Scattolin AM, Mattei D, Corradini P, Campiotti L, Ciceri F, Bernardi M, Todisco E, Cortelezzi A, Falini B, Pavoni C, Bassan R, Spinelli O, Rambaldi A. Clinical significance of chromatin-spliceosome acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) randomized trial 02/06. Haematologica. 2021 Oct 1;106(10):2578-2587. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.252825.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31978214Gianfaldoni G, Mannelli F, Intermesoli T, Bencini S, Giupponi D, Farina G, Cutini I, Bonetti MI, Masciulli A, Audisio E, Ferrero D, Pavoni C, Scattolin AM, Bosi A, Rambaldi A, Bassan R. Early peripheral clearance of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes in AML: centralized analysis of a randomized trial. Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):301-311. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000406.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30948365Bassan R, Intermesoli T, Masciulli A, Pavoni C, Boschini C, Gianfaldoni G, Marmont F, Cavattoni I, Mattei D, Terruzzi E, De Paoli L, Cattaneo C, Borlenghi E, Ciceri F, Bernardi M, Scattolin AM, Todisco E, Campiotti L, Corradini P, Cortelezzi A, Ferrero D, Zanghi P, Oldani E, Spinelli O, Audisio E, Cortelazzo S, Bosi A, Falini B, Pogliani EM, Rambaldi A. Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML. Blood Adv. 2019 Apr 9;3(7):1103-1117. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026625.
Related trials for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
A Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients With ARD103 CAR-T Cell Therapies
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapsed or Refractory
RecruitingPhase 2
MYELOMATCH: A Screening Study to Assign People With Myeloid Cancer to a Treatment Study or Standard of Care Treatment Within myeloMATCH (MyeloMATCH Screening Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
225Ac-DOTA-Anti-CD38 Daratumumab Monoclonal Antibody With Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation as Conditioning Treatment for Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of Venetoclax or Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) to Usual Treatment Regimen (Cytarabine and Daunorubicin, "7+3") for Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia (CBF-AML) to Improve Response (A MYELOMATCH Treatment Trial)
Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Trial: Engineered Donor Graft (Orca Q) for Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Renato Bassan, MD principal investigator
Norther Italy Leukemia Group
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cytosine arabinoside in people with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Northern Italy Leukemia Group at 17 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Remission induction (R1): Complete remission (CR) rate after cycle 1 (time frame: 30 days after beginning chemotherapy.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00495287, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2016.