AzTrials
AzTrials

Meniere's DiseaseEDSSNCT00500474

Effects of Endolymphatic Sac Drainage With Steroids for Meniere's Disease

A study testing endolymphatic sac drainage with steroids in people with Meniere's Disease, run by Osaka University at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Meniere's disease is a common inner ear disease with an incidence of 15-50 per 100,000 population. Since Meniere's disease is thought to be triggered by an immune insult to inner ear, we examined intra-endolymphatic sac application of large doses of steroids as de novo treatment for intractable Meniere's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Meniere's Disease
What is being tested?
endolymphatic sac drainage with steroids
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
197 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Apr 1996to Mar 2005
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of Meniere's Disease, who did not respond to various forms of medical and psychological managements for at least 6 months, i.e. intractable Meniere's disease.

Who cannot join

  • Other known causes of vertigo including central lesion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Department of Otolaryngology, Osaka University, School of Medicine

    Suita, Osaka, 565-0871

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Clinical Study of Endolymphatic Sac Drainage With or Without Steroids for Intractable Meniere's Disease

Meniere's disease is a common inner ear disease with an incidence of 15-50 per 100,000 population. Since Meniere's disease is thought to be triggered by an immune insult to inner ear, we examined intra-endolymphatic sac application of large doses of steroids as de novo treatment for intractable Meniere's disease.

Read the detailed description

Meniere's disease characterized by recurrent attacks of vertigo, fluctuating hearing loss and tinnitus, is a common disease with an incidence of 15-50 per 100,000 population. Some patients with Meniere's disease are strongly prevented from participating in activities of daily life and interaction with their social environment, such as work and schooling, due to frequent attacks of vertigo especially with progressive sensorineural hearing loss, in spite of various kinds of medication. This type of Meniere's disease is called intractable Meniere's disease. Although the oto-pathology in Meniere's temporal bones was revealed in 1938 to be inner ear endolymphatic hydrops, the definitive pathogenesis of Meniere's disease is still unknown and there is no radical treatment for this disease.

It has, however, been reported that Meniere's disease is usually triggered by immune, metabolic, infectious, traumatic or other insults to the inner ear, associated with a small misplaced malfunctioning endolymphatic sac. Among these insults, immune-mediated responses in the inner ear endo-organs such as the endolymphatic sac, stria vascularis and spiral ligament, are thought to be the main reason for the development of symptoms in Meniere's disease. Thus, systemic administration and/or local perfusion of corticosteroids into the middle ear have been adopted as an anti-immune or anti-inflammatory therapy for patients with intractable Meniere's disease. These treatments were reported to result in good relief from vertigo and improvement of hearing in some cases. However, these results especially for hearing did not last long enough to discontinue additional repetitive applications of steroids. Since Meniere's disease is characterized by repeated attacks of vertigo with fluctuating and/or progressive hearing loss unlike other inner ear diseases without recurrence such as sudden deafness and vestibular neuritis, it is necessary to refrain from repetitive applications of steroids for the long-term follow-up with Meniere's patients because of side effects.

For inner ear drug delivery, we noted another hopeful but unevaluated route, the longitudinal route from the endolymphatic sac to the cochlea and vestibule, suggested by several lines of evidence in animal studies. Morgenstern et al. and Lee et al. demonstrated that the intra-endolymphatic sac materials could reach the cochlear endolymphatic site through the vestibular aqueduct using a test marker and an oto-toxic drug, respectively. Recently, Yamasoba et al. suggested the possibility of gene therapy through the vestibular aqueduct route. We also revealed that intra-endolymphatic sac steroids could up-regulate a water channel molecule, aquaporin-3 mRNA in the cochlea.

In the present study, we examined the intra-endolymphatic sac application of large doses of steroids as de novo treatment for intractable Meniere's disease.

Being tested
endolymphatic sac drainage with steroids
Keywords
Meniere's disease, inner ear, endolymphatic sac drainage, steroids, declined surgery, natural course, Efficacy of steroids via endolymphatic sac, for intractable Meniere's disease
Medical subject headings
Meniere Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • endolymphatic sac drainage with steroidsProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the ratio of patients in vertigo supression and hearing improvement

    Measured: post-operative 2-7 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the ratio of patients in canal improvement

    Measured: post-operative 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 1996
  3. Study completionMar 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
197 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00500474
Sponsor's protocol ID
tk19661217
Other IDs
tk20090401
Acronym
EDSS
Status last verified
Jul 2007
First submitted
11 Jul 2007
Last updated
25 Jul 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kitahara T, Fukushima M, Uno Y, Mishiro Y, Kubo T. Up-regulation of cochlear aquaporin-3 mRNA expression after intra-endolymphatic sac application of dexamethasone. Neurol Res. 2003 Dec;25(8):865-70. doi: 10.1179/016164103771953989.

    PubMed 14669532
  • Kitahara T, Horii A, Imai T, Ohta Y, Morihana T, Inohara H, Sakagami M. Effects of endolymphatic sac decompression surgery on vertigo and hearing in patients with bilateral Meniere's disease. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1852-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000469.

    PubMed 24979126

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing endolymphatic sac drainage with steroids in people with Meniere's Disease, run by Osaka University at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the ratio of patients in vertigo supression and hearing improvement (time frame: post-operative 2-7 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00500474, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in