Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 3MDTforHCCNCT00501813
Multimodality Therapy for Palliative Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intrahepatic Vessels Invasion
A Phase 3 study testing Hepatectomy and TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomy in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different multimodality therapy strategies (initial hepatectomy followed by transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and/or local regional treatments compare with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Hepatectomy and TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients > 18 years and <=70 years of age.
- Patients with palliative resectable HCC (all macroscopic tumor tissue can be removed), which have been histologically or cytologically documented. Documentation of original biopsy for diagnosis is acceptable if tumor tissue is unavailable at screening.
- Patients must have at least one lesion that meets both of the following criteria:
- The lesion can be accurately measured in at least one dimension according to RECIST (Section 10.7).
- The lesion has not been previously treated with local therapy (such as surgery, radiation therapy, hepatic arterial therapy, chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection or cryoablation).
- Patients must have the tumor in the liver with intrahepatic vessels(portal vein/hepatic vein/bile duct) invasion, but all the tumor can be macroscopically removed.
- Patients who have an ECOG PS of 0 or 1.
- Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only. Child-Pugh status should be calculated based on clinical findings and laboratory results during the screening period.
Who cannot join
- Patient compliance is poor.
- The blood supply of tumor lesions is absolutely poor or arterial-venous shunt that TACE can not be performed.
- The vessels invasion beyond the following extent:
- the main branch of portal vein;
- the inferior vena cava;
- the common hepatic duct.
Show all 26Show fewer
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC, EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta, Tis \& T1). Any cancer curatively treated > 3 years prior to entry is permitted.
- History of cardiac disease:
- congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2;
- active coronary artery disease (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is permitted);
- cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy other than beta blockers, calcium channel blocker or digoxin;
- uncontrolled hypertension (failure of diastolic blood pressure to fall below 90 mmHg, despite the use of 3 antihypertensive drugs).
- Active clinically serious infections (> grade 2 National Cancer Institute [NCI]-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 3.0).
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- Known Central Nervous System tumors including metastatic brain disease.
- Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
- Distantly extrahepatic metastasis.
- History of organ allograft.
- Drug abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study or evaluation of the study results.
- Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this trial.
- Any condition that is unstable or which could jeopardize the safety of the patient and his/her compliance in the study.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within seven days prior to the start of study drug. Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial.
- Excluded therapies and medications, previous and concomitant:
- Prior use of any systemic anti-cancer treatment for HCC, eg. chemotherapy, immunotherapy or hormonal therapy (except that hormonal therapy for supportive care is permitted). Antiviral treatment is allowed, however interferon therapy must be stopped at least 4 weeks prior randomization.
- Prior use of systemic investigational agents for HCC
- Autologous bone marrow transplant or stem cell rescue within four months of start of study drug
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University,
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 86-20
ming shi, MD, 86-2087343582 ext. 86-2087343582, shiming@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Min-Shan Chen, MD, 86-2087343117 ext. 86-2087343117, Chminsh@mail.sysu.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Multimodality Therapy in the Treatment of Palliative Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intrahepatic Vessels Invasion
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different multimodality therapy strategies (initial hepatectomy followed by transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and/or local regional treatments compare with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without hepatectomy)in the treatment of palliative resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic vessels invasion.
Read the detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common neoplasm and the third cause of cancer-related death. At initial diagnosis, surgical resection is considered a potentially curative modality for HCC[1, 2], with the five-year survival rates for resectable patients 50-60%, however, only about 15% of patients have resectable disease and post-operative recurrence is common, remaining the main obstacle to long-term survival. On the one hand, the reason may be the multicentric genesis of HCC or the preoperatively micrometastasis that can not be resected during operation. Shi M, et al [3] reported that the appropriate resection margin was >= 2cm. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) defined[4]: absolute curative resection included liver resection with 1 cm of free surgical margin in patients with solitary tumor <= 2cm; relative curative resection included liver resection without 1 cm of free surgical margin but with the excised tumor tissue in patients with solitary tumor <= 2cm or liver resection with 1 cm of free surgical margin in patients with tumor >= 2cm (in either instance, no tumor thrombus may remain in the portal vein, hepatic vein, or bile duct in images of the remnant liver); relative non-curative resection, in which all macroscopic tumor tissue is removed; and absolute non-curative resection, which is liver resection with part of the macroscopic tumor tissue remaining. Either overall survival rates (OS) or disease-free survival rates (DFS) of HCC patients are higher in curative resection than in non-curative resection[4]. According to this definition, when the giant tumor located in middle liver, tumor with lymph nodes adjacent to abdominal aorta metastasis, multiple lesions (>= 3) or tumor with intrahepatic vessels invasion, the surgery will be non-curative. On the other hand, post-operative adjuvant therapy is one of the most effective treatment strategies in improving the survival rates of HCC patients[5]. Unfortunately, only about 15 randomized controlled trials have been reported on the post-operative adjuvant therapy until now. Most of them were single center, little sample clinical trials.
Recently, a series of studies have been reported that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is effective in HCC[6, 7]. Best results are seen in patients with small tumors and good liver function and 1 year survival has been shown to be of 30-50%. A recent meta-analysis showed a significant benefit of chemo-embolization with improvement in two-year survival[6]. TACE is one of most important therapy strategies on HCC. The 2007' NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology has included the TACE throughout the treatment guideline of unresectable HCC or resectable HCC (for some reason, hepatectomy was not carried out) or adjuvant therapy post-operative. But there are still lack of RCT studies.
In the patients with palliative resectable HCC, the presence of intrahepatic vessels invasion was usually regarded as the symbol of cancer cells hematogenous dissemination, which is associate with short-term recurrence and worse survival. For this special group patients, some authors insisted that aggressive therapy strategy-initial palliative hepatectomy followed by TACE and/or local regional treatments was most effective to prolong the survival of patients.While other authors,however,believed that too aggressive therapy was not best choice for these patients because of the suppression of immune system after palliative hepatectomy may potentially accelerate the growth of residual cancer cells. A relative conservative strategy-transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without hepatectomy should be used. The optimal therapy strategies are still in controversial.Only the multiple-center, great sample clinical RCT studies can answer this question[8]. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different multimodality therapy strategies (initial hepatectomy followed by transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and/or local regional treatments compare with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without hepatectomy)in the treatment of palliative resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic vessels invasion.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Hepatectomy, TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomy
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, Intrahepatic vessels invasion, Hepatectomy, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Local regional treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HepatectomyProcedure or surgery
irregular Hepatectomy
TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called TACE combined with local regional treatment without hepatectomy
TACE combined with RFA, MCT, PEI, and so on.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| surgery | Active comparator | initial palliative hepatectomy followed by TACE and/or local regional treatment Receives: Procedure: Hepatectomy |
| no surgery | Experimental | TACE combined with local regional treatment without hepatectomy Receives: Procedure: TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival rate
Measured: 1-, 3- and 5-year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Quality of live
Measured: 1- and 3- month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionDec 2009 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, China
- Investigators
- Jin-Qing Li, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRong-Ping Guo, MD, Study director, Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00501813
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- hcc-002
- Acronym
- MDTforHCC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2010
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi K, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Nakamura Y, Okita K, Yamada R. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology. 2000 Dec;32(6):1224-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.20456.
PubMed 11093728Mise K, Tashiro S, Yogita S, Wada D, Harada M, Fukuda Y, Miyake H, Isikawa M, Izumi K, Sano N. Assessment of the biological malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship to clinicopathological factors and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Jun;4(6):1475-82.
PubMed 9626465Shi M, Zhang CQ, Zhang YQ, Liang XM, Li JQ. Micrometastases of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma and appropriate resection margin. World J Surg. 2004 Apr;28(4):376-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7308-x. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
PubMed 15022021Ikai I, Arii S, Kojiro M, Ichida T, Makuuchi M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Okita K, Omata M, Takayasu K, Yamaoka Y. Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey. Cancer. 2004 Aug 15;101(4):796-802. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20426.
PubMed 15305412Lau WY, Yu SC, Lai EC, Leung TW. Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):155-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.06.263. Epub 2005 Oct 19. No abstract available.
PubMed 16377509Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):429-42. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047.
PubMed 12540794Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available.
PubMed 16250051Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM. Systematic review: evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma--an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jun 1;23(11):1535-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02932.x.
PubMed 16696801
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Multimodality Therapy in the Treatment of Palliative Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intrahepatic Vessels Invasion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00501813
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MDTforHCC / hcc-002
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma, Intrahepatic vessels invasion, Hepatectomy, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Local regional treatment
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, China
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different multimodality therapy strategies (initial hepatectomy followed by transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and/or local regional treatments compare with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without hepatectomy)in the treatment of palliative resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic vessels invasion.
Detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common neoplasm and the third cause of cancer-related death. At initial diagnosis, surgical resection is considered a potentially curative modality for HCC[1, 2], with the five-year survival rates for resectable patients 50-60%, however, only about 15% of patients have resectable disease and post-operative recurrence is common, remaining the main obstacle to long-term survival. On the one hand, the reason may be the multicentric genesis of HCC or the preoperatively micrometastasis that can not be resected during operation. Shi M, et al [3] reported that the appropriate resection margin was >= 2cm. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) defined[4]: absolute curative resection included liver resection with 1 cm of free surgical margin in patients with solitary tumor <= 2cm; relative curative resection included liver resection without 1 cm of free surgical margin but with the excised tumor tissue in patients with solitary tumor <= 2cm or liver resection with 1 cm of free surgical margin in patients with tumor >= 2cm (in either instance, no tumor thrombus may remain in the portal vein, hepatic vein, or bile duct in images of the remnant liver); relative non-curative resection, in which all macroscopic tumor tissue is removed; and absolute non-curative resection, which is liver resection with part of the macroscopic tumor tissue remaining. Either overall survival rates (OS) or disease-free survival rates (DFS) of HCC patients are higher in curative resection than in non-curative resection[4]. According to this definition, when the giant tumor located in middle liver, tumor with lymph nodes adjacent to abdominal aorta metastasis, multiple lesions (>= 3) or tumor with intrahepatic vessels invasion, the surgery will be non-curative. On the other hand, post-operative adjuvant therapy is one of the most effective treatment strategies in improving the survival rates of HCC patients[5]. Unfortunately, only about 15 randomized controlled trials have been reported on the post-operative adjuvant therapy until now. Most of them were single center, little sample clinical trials.
Recently, a series of studies have been reported that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is effective in HCC[6, 7]. Best results are seen in patients with small tumors and good liver function and 1 year survival has been shown to be of 30-50%. A recent meta-analysis showed a significant benefit of chemo-embolization with improvement in two-year survival[6]. TACE is one of most important therapy strategies on HCC. The 2007' NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology has included the TACE throughout the treatment guideline of unresectable HCC or resectable HCC (for some reason, hepatectomy was not carried out) or adjuvant therapy post-operative. But there are still lack of RCT studies.
In the patients with palliative resectable HCC, the presence of intrahepatic vessels invasion was usually regarded as the symbol of cancer cells hematogenous dissemination, which is associate with short-term recurrence and worse survival. For this special group patients, some authors insisted that aggressive therapy strategy-initial palliative hepatectomy followed by TACE and/or local regional treatments was most effective to prolong the survival of patients.While other authors,however,believed that too aggressive therapy was not best choice for these patients because of the suppression of immune system after palliative hepatectomy may potentially accelerate the growth of residual cancer cells. A relative conservative strategy-transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without hepatectomy should be used. The optimal therapy strategies are still in controversial.Only the multiple-center, great sample clinical RCT studies can answer this question[8]. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different multimodality therapy strategies (initial hepatectomy followed by transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization and/or local regional treatments compare with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined local regional treatments without hepatectomy)in the treatment of palliative resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic vessels invasion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Hepatectomyinitial palliative hepatectomy followed by TACE and/or local regional treatment |
| no surgery | Experimental | Procedure: TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomyTACE combined with local regional treatment without hepatectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male or female patients > 18 years and <=70 years of age.
- Patients with palliative resectable HCC (all macroscopic tumor tissue can be removed), which have been histologically or cytologically documented. Documentation of original biopsy for diagnosis is acceptable if tumor tissue is unavailable at screening.
- Patients must have at least one lesion that meets both of the following criteria:
- Patients must have the tumor in the liver with intrahepatic vessels(portal vein/hepatic vein/bile duct) invasion, but all the tumor can be macroscopically removed.
- Patients who have an ECOG PS of 0 or 1.
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- Patient compliance is poor.
- The blood supply of tumor lesions is absolutely poor or arterial-venous shunt that TACE can not be performed.
- The vessels invasion beyond the following extent:
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC, EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta, Tis \& T1). Any cancer curatively treated > 3 years prior to entry is permitted.
- History of cardiac disease:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatectomyirregular Hepatectomy | Procedure or surgery | surgery |
| TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomyAlso: TACE combined with local regional treatment without hepatectomyTACE combined with RFA, MCT, PEI, and so on. | Procedure or surgery | no surgery |
Primary outcome
Overall survival rate
Time frame: 1-, 3- and 5-year
1 secondary outcome
Quality of live
Time frame: 1- and 3- month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2010.
- Background: PubMed 11093728Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, Inoue K, Kobayashi K, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Nakamura Y, Okita K, Yamada R. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology. 2000 Dec;32(6):1224-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.20456.
- Background: PubMed 9626465Mise K, Tashiro S, Yogita S, Wada D, Harada M, Fukuda Y, Miyake H, Isikawa M, Izumi K, Sano N. Assessment of the biological malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship to clinicopathological factors and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Jun;4(6):1475-82.
- Background: PubMed 15022021Shi M, Zhang CQ, Zhang YQ, Liang XM, Li JQ. Micrometastases of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma and appropriate resection margin. World J Surg. 2004 Apr;28(4):376-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-7308-x. Epub 2004 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 15305412Ikai I, Arii S, Kojiro M, Ichida T, Makuuchi M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Okita K, Omata M, Takayasu K, Yamaoka Y. Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey. Cancer. 2004 Aug 15;101(4):796-802. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20426.
- Background: PubMed 16377509Lau WY, Yu SC, Lai EC, Leung TW. Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):155-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.06.263. Epub 2005 Oct 19. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12540794Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):429-42. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047.
- Background: PubMed 16250051Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16696801Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM. Systematic review: evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma--an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jun 1;23(11):1535-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02932.x.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jin-Qing Li, MD principal investigator
Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Rong-Ping Guo, MD study director
Department of Hepatobilliary Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Hepatectomy and TACE combined with local regional therapies without hepatectomy in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact shi ming, MD (86-2087343582 ext. 86-2087343582, shiming@mail.sysu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival rate (time frame: 1-, 3- and 5-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00501813, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2010.