AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary CalcificationPhase 4NCT00502268

Vitamin D and Carboxy PTH Fragments in Coronary Calcification

A Phase 4 study testing Doxercalciferol administration and Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84 in people with Coronary Calcification and Endstage Renal Disease, run by Southeast Renal Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Arterial calcification within the coronaries and other vessels is greatly accelerated among patients with chronic or end-stage kidney disease. The mechanisms leading to increased calcification are unknown, but include hyperphosphatemia, hyperparathyroidism and altered vitamin D metabolism. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Doxercalciferol administration and Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2008to Jul 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient age > 18 and < 80 years of age
  • Patients receiving outpatient hemodialysis for > 3 or <24 months duration
  • Patients must have baseline coronary calcification defined as at one ROI (regions of interest with >130 Hounsfield units) in 1 or more coronary vessels
  • Patients must have a stable dose of phosphate binder for 30 days prior to study enrollment

Who cannot join

  • Patients intact PTH < 100 or > 1000 pg/ml
  • Patients on peritoneal dialysis
  • Patients with a previous parathyroidectomy
  • Patients with dry weight > 300 lbs
  • Patients with chronic atrial flutter or fibrillation
  • Patients receiving chronic coumadin therapy
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Patients with known allergies to contrast dyes
  • Patients receiving current Cinacalcet therapy or during previous 30 days
  • Patients unable to take Metoprolol therapy
  • Patients with resting heart rate >100 and unresponsive to beta blockade
  • Patients with known pregnancy or unwilling to use contraception during the course of the study
  • Patients unable to tolerate the confines of CT scanner
  • Patients with a renal transplant within the previous 5 years
  • Patients with known aluminum toxicity
  • Patients undergoing recent PTCA or CABG within the previous 12 months
  • Patients with ESRD secondary to Sarcoidosis
  • Patients unwilling to use Selevamer as a primary phosphate binder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Davita East Charlotte Dialysis Unit

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28208

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial Investigating the Effect of 1 Alpha Hydroxy Vitamin D2 on the Development of Coronary Calcification in New ESRD Patients Using the 1-84/7-84 PTH Ratio to Determine Dosing

Arterial calcification within the coronaries and other vessels is greatly accelerated among patients with chronic or end-stage kidney disease. The mechanisms leading to increased calcification are unknown, but include hyperphosphatemia, hyperparathyroidism and altered vitamin D metabolism. Moreover, recent data demonstrates that circulating carboxy fragments of PTH (7-84) are physiologic antagonists of intact PTH (1-84) and may directly contribute to vascular calcification. Current PTH assays no not distinguish between intact and carboxy PTH fragments leading to an overestimation of intact PTH levels. Because second generation PTH assays detect both 1-84 and 7-84 PTH fragments, the use of vitamin D analogues to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism could lead to excessive suppression of 1-84 and a preponderance of carboxy PTH fragments. Moreover, increased administration of vitamin D analogues amy contribute to vascular calcifications. To investigate these questions, we plan to investigate the effect of managing new ESRD patients using conventional and third generation PTH assays on vitamin D administration and the development of coronary calcification. Hypothesis #1: Clinical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in new hemodialysis patients using the Scantibodies 1-84/7-84 PTH ratio for one year will reduce the amount of Vitamin D administration resulting in reduced coronary calcification compared to patients in which PTH management is accomplished by conventional, second generation PTH assay.

Read the detailed description

Patients with chronic renal failure are at increased risk for vascular calcification and cardiovascular complications. For example, data from the USRDS database demonstrates that 42% of all deaths among chronic dialysis patients are cardiovascular in origin with 22% of those deaths due to arrhythmias or overt acute myocardial infarction. While numerous factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes contribute to both renal failure and coronary disease, recent studies find that patients with CKD experience an accelerated rate of coronary calcification. Medial calcification reduces compliance of medium to large elastic arteries such as the aorta and common carotids. The resulting loss of elasticity is thought to contribute to the high prevalence of systolic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) among patients with ESRD 15.

The type of vascular calcification associated with diabetes and ESRD is histologically distinct from that found in atherosclerotic plaques. In patients with CKD or diabetes calcium deposits are concentric and uniformly distributed within the medial layer of the vessel wall. The deposition of calcium does not require the presence of atherosclerotic lesions and occurs in the absence of intimal hyperplasia. Infiltration of the adventia by T cells and activated macrophages leads to expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and osteopontin (OPN) by pericytic myofibroblasts. In diabetics, BMP-2 expression is enhanced by the simultaneous upregulation of two BMP-2 associated transcription factors Msx1 and Msx2 3. The resulting transcription of BMP-2 genes leads to mineralization of non-endochondrial matrix. The expression of OPN is a consistent feature of medial calcification 4. Osteopontin or "bone bridge" is a highly phosphorylated glycoprotein that binds calcium and integrin receptors. The expression of osteopontin can be stimulated by vitamin D and increased circulating levels of phosphate.

Moreover, physiologic concentrations of 1, 25, dihydroxyvitamin D increases calcium deposition in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and is associated with reduced expression of PTH related peptide (1-34 PTH) suggesting that amino PTH fragments are not only involved in regulating bone turnover, but also function to prevent dystrophic vascular calcification. Indeed, these observations raise the question of whether carboxy PTH fragments can accelerate vascular calcification.

Because second generation PTH assays detect both 1-84 and 7-84 PTH fragments, the use of vitamin D analogues to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism could lead to excessive suppression of 1-84 and a preponderance of carboxy PTH fragments. As observed by Jono et.al accumulation of 7-84 could contribute to excessive vascular calcification. We hypothesize that limiting the accumulation of 7-84 PTH fragments by maintaining a 1-84/7-84 ratio above 1.6 will reduce the amount of vitamin D analogues administered and ultimately reduce the development of coronary calcification. To investigate this hypothesis, we propose to prospectively treat 50 patients with 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D2 where doses are determined by maintaining a 1-84/7-84 ration > 1.6 or by maintaining intact PTH levels between 150-350 pg/ml using existing second generation PTH assays.

4.0 Hypothesis \& Objectives

4.1 Hypothesis #1: Clinical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in new hemodialysis patients using the Scantibodies 1-84/7-84 PTH ratio for one year will reduce the amount of Vitamin D administration resulting in reduced coronary calcification compared to patients in which PTH management is accomplished by conventional, second generation PTH assay.

4.1a Specific Aim #1 Specific Aim #1 will compare the amount of coronary calcification and the percentage of patients with at least one coronary lesion > 50% luminal obstruction at baseline and after one-year therapy following randomization to one of two treatment groups.

[Group 1] Patients randomized to group 1 will have the administration of 1alpha OH vitamin D2 (Hectorol) targeted to achieve serum PTH levels between 150-300 ng/ml using a Bayer Centaur iPTH assay.

[Group 2] Patients randomized to group 2 will have the administration of vitamin D analogues targeted to achieve a ratio of 1-84/7-84 PTH fragments between ranges of 1.4-1.6 using the Scantibodies IRMA PTH assay. (Hectorol).

Rationale: Coronary calcification is a frequent complication of end stage renal disease (ESRD) with recent estimates of up to 80% of chronic hemodialysis patients exhibiting moderate to severe vascular calcification 1. Numerous clinical factors have been associated with the development of arterial calcification including hyperphosphatemia 2, diabetes mellitus 3 and calcium containing phosphate binders 4. More recently, the increased use of vitamin D analogues to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism has been implicated as a major contributor to vascular calcification among ESRD patients.

These clinical practices are complicated by the observation that carboxy fragments of PTH (e.g. 7-84) cross react with second generation PTH assays. Because carboxy PTH fragments are either inert or antagonize functional bio-intact PTH (1-84), clinicians have used excessive doses of vitamin D analogues to regulate PTH levels. Moreover, there are animal model studies that suggest that carboxy PTH fragments directly contribute to vascular calcification 16.We propose that clinical decision making using the incomplete information provided the currently available second generation PTH assays leads to excessive vitamin D administration and subsequent acceleration of coronary calcification.

Anticipated Results: We anticipate that prolonged (1 year) management of PTH levels using a second generation of PTH assays will lead to an increase in the total administered dose of vitamin D analogues. Moreover, this increase in vitamin D administration will result in increased coronary calcification at the end of one year of therapy. Conversely, maintaining a 1-84/7-84 PTH ratio between 1.4-1.6 using the Scantibodies third generation assay will reduce the amount of administered vitamin D analogues and subsequently reduce the amount of coronary calcification at one year.

Being tested
Doxercalciferol administration, Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84
Keywords
Coronary Calcification, Endstage Renal Disease, Parathyroid hormone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Doxercalciferol administrationDrug

    Doxercalciferol administration

  • Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84Drug

    Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84

Study groups in NCT00502268
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Placebo comparatorDoxercalciferol administration by DOQI and 2nd Gen PTH assay
Receives: Drug: Doxercalciferol administration
Group 2Active comparatorDoxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84 ratio between 1.4-1.6
Receives: Drug: Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change in Hounsfield units of coronary calcification between baseline and after one year of therapy

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mean dose of Vitamin D2 administered over 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2008
  3. Primary completionFeb 2009
  4. Study completionJul 2009

Why it stopped: study never initiated

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00502268
Sponsor's protocol ID
SBPTH-CC1
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
16 Jul 2007
Last updated
23 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Doxercalciferol administration and Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84 in people with Coronary Calcification and Endstage Renal Disease, run by Southeast Renal Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change in Hounsfield units of coronary calcification between baseline and after one year of therapy (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in