AzTrials
AzTrials

End Stage Renal DiseaseArMORRNCT00505180

Accelerated Mortality on Renal Replacement

An observational study of End Stage Renal Disease, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively identify blood markers that identify chronic hemodialysis patients at risk for early (<90 days) and late (>= 1 year) mortality Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
End Stage Renal Disease
How many people
10,018 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 2004to Jun 2006
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • End stage renal disease on hemodialysis at Fresenius Medical Center
  • New initiation of hemodialysis

Who cannot join

  • Death with 14 days of initiation of hemodialysis

About this study

The purpose of this study is to prospectively identify blood markers that identify chronic hemodialysis patients at risk for early (<90 days) and late (>= 1 year) mortality

Read the detailed description

The annual incidence of patients initiating chronic hemodialysis (HD) will double (~100K→~200K) over the next decade. Despite several advances, HD mortality rates remain extremely high and have not dramatically changed over the past several years. The United States Renal Data System (USRDS) is the largest epidemiological database of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) throughout the US, and studies utilizing the USRDS and similar studies emanating from large dialysis providers have served as the benchmark for guiding the care of all dialysis patients in the US While these databases have been an excellent resource for testing hypotheses, lack of concomitant blood samples has prevented a large-scale clinical trial testing of hypotheses necessitating biological samples. To overcome this limitation, we established a 'USRDS-like' clinical trial with the largest US dialysis provider to prospectively acquire research quality demographic data and concomitant biological samples to test two specific aims:

AIM 1: HD patients are profoundly vitamin D deficient, yet ~60% of incident hemodialysis patients in the US are not treated with active vitamin D. Vitamin D is linked with cardiovascular health, and although higher serum vitamin D levels are associated with improved survival in different settings (e.g., cancer, infection), no large study has examined whether baseline vitamin D levels are associated with HD mortality. Measuring serum vitamin D levels among HD patients is sporadic since the utility of this measurement as it relates to dialysis mortality is unclear.

Hypothesis: Higher vitamin D levels at initiation of HD are associated with lower risk of 90-day and 1-year mortality among patients who do not receive vitamin D therapy.

AIM 2: Among diabetic non-HD patients, blood levels of HbA1c predict all cause and cardiovascular related mortality. Diabetes is the leading cause of ESRD in the US (~50% of all ESRD patients) and mortality rates of diabetics on HD are ~10-20% higher than non-diabetics. Leading Nephrology thought leaders and regulatory bodies (tied to reimbursement and quality control) suggest HbA1c levels must be routinely checked in diabetic HD patients. Importantly, the association between HbA1c levels and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among HD patients is unclear (in contrast to non-HD data), and erythropoietin therapy and shortened red-cell survival (common in HD patients) render measurements of HbA1c less meaningful.

Hypothesis: Elevated HbA1c levels (among diabetics) at the initiation of HD are associated with increased 90 day mortality, however, HbA1c measurements performed thereafter, e.g., at 90 days following the initiation of HD, are not associated with subsequent 1 year survival.

These aims are examined in a prospective cohort study (of incident HD patients living throughout the US (>1000 centers) with detailed demographic data updated daily, and research quality blood samples collected every 3 months from the initiation of chronic HD. We initiated this "USRDS-like" study to overcome one of the largest limitations of existing epidemiological dialysis datasets - lack of concomitant biological samples in a nationally representative cohort. The study will be available for data sharing and patient protection measures are in place.

Keywords
Hemodialysis, Mortality
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2004
  3. Study completionJun 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Defined population
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10,018 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00505180
Sponsor's protocol ID
2003P000373
Other IDs
5R21DK71674-2, 5R21DK071674
Acronym
ArMORR
Status last verified
Jul 2007
First submitted
19 Jul 2007
Last updated
23 Jul 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of End Stage Renal Disease, run by Massachusetts General Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2007.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in