AzTrials
AzTrials

MammoplastyPhase 1NCT00505557

Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation: Axillary Approach With Assistant of Endoscope

A Phase 1 study testing Transaxillary dual plane technique in people with Mammoplasty, run by Chinese Academy of Sciences at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of performing dual plane breast augmentation with assistant of endoscope by axillary approach. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Mammoplasty
What is being tested?
Transaxillary dual plane technique
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
Not given
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
May 2006to Apr 2008
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • All women who want breast augmentation using the implants.Especially for the patients with
  • glandular ptotic (< I degree) breasts
  • thick soft tissues (> 10 mm) in the low pole of the breast

Who cannot join

  • With thin soft tissues (< 9 mm) in the low pole of the breast

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Plastic Surgery Hospital Affilicated to Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

    Beijing, 100041

Other trials in China

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of performing dual plane breast augmentation with assistant of endoscope by axillary approach.

Read the detailed description

Dual plane augmentation mammoplasty is a logical approach to realize the benefits of retromammary and partial retropectoral implant placement while minimizing the tradeoffs of other pocket locations. Traditionally, dual plane augmentation has been performed using transareolar or inframammary fold approach. However, the approach is unacceptable to Chinese patients because of the front scar formation. For aesthetic reasons, the axillary incision is more acceptable approach for augmentation mammoplasty.

The endoscope assistant technique has been widely used in transaxillary breast augmentation. It provides the feasibility to perform dual plane breast augmentation by axillary approach.

In this research, at least 40 patients with light degree of glandular ptotic and constricted lower pole breasts are selected to receive soft cohesive gel microtextured anatomic style silicone implants. Portions of the pectoralis major muscle is split without its release from the costal margin with the help of a 10mm, 30°endoscope and endoscopic diathermy scissors through a 4-cm incision in the axilla each side. Bleeding during surgery is kept to the minimum. The results of outcomes, operative time, bleeding volume, drainage volume, complications are observed.

Conditions
Mammoplasty
Being tested
Transaxillary dual plane technique
Keywords
augmentation mammoplasty, Dual plane, Endoscope, Transaxillary incision

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transaxillary dual plane techniqueProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 98% of the patient satisfied with softer, more natural breasts. The procedure provided more accurate bleeding control, faster postoperative coverage.

    Measured: within half year after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2006
  3. Primary completionApr 2007
  4. Study completionApr 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00505557
Sponsor's protocol ID
621125-1
Status last verified
Jun 2009
First submitted
20 Jul 2007
Last updated
24 Jun 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Yu L, Wang J, Zhang B, Zhu C. Endoscopic transaxillary capsulectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006 May-Jun;30(3):282-5. doi: 10.1007/s00266-005-0159-0.

    PubMed 16733771
  • Villafane O, Garcia-Tutor E, Taggart I. Endoscopic transaxillary subglandular breast augmentation using silicone gel textured implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):212-5. doi: 10.1007/s002660010035.

    PubMed 10890950
  • Howard PS. The role of endoscopy and implant texture in transaxillary submuscular breast augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Mar;42(3):245-8. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199903000-00003.

    PubMed 10096613
  • Howard PS, Oslin BD, Moore JR. Endoscopic transaxillary submuscular augmentation mammaplasty with textured saline breast implants. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Jul;37(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199607000-00002.

    PubMed 8826586
  • Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Dec;118(7 Suppl):81S-98S; discussion 99S-102S. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200612001-00012.

    PubMed 17099485
  • Tebbetts JB. Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Dec;118(7 Suppl):53S-80S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000247314.92351.99.

    PubMed 17099484
  • Tofield JJ. Dual plane breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Dec;108(7):2162-4. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00069. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11743433
  • Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Apr 15;107(5):1255-72. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200104150-00027.

    PubMed 11373572

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Transaxillary dual plane technique in people with Mammoplasty, run by Chinese Academy of Sciences at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

98% of the patient satisfied with softer, more natural breasts. The procedure provided more accurate bleeding control, faster postoperative coverage. (time frame: within half year after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00505557, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in