AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary IncontinencePhase 3PERLNCT00506116

Promoting Effective Recovery From Labor Urinary Incontinence (PERL)

A Phase 3 study testing Videotape, routine care, PME instruction, PME practice and record keeping (in diaries) and Non-directed or directed,spontaneous or sustained pushing in people with Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pushing during labor that is controlled by the woman results in less birth-related injury and less postpartum urinary incontinence (UI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Videotape, routine care, PME instruction, PME practice and record keeping (in diaries) and Non-directed or directed,spontaneous or sustained pushing
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 1996to Dec 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women giving birth for the first time who are:
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Less than 20 weeks gestation
  • Expected vaginal birth without use of epidural analgesia
  • Plan to reside in Southeast Michigan for one year following the birth of the infant.

Who cannot join

  • History of genito-urinary or neuro-muscular pathology
  • Previous pregnancy carried beyond 20 weeks gestation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan Health System

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Promoting Effective Recovery From Labor Urinary Incontinence: Prevention Reducing Birthing Risk

The purpose of this study is to determine whether pushing during labor that is controlled by the woman results in less birth-related injury and less postpartum urinary incontinence (UI).

Read the detailed description

Birth related urinary incontinence (UI) is a predictor of UI in older women. Ways to protect the continence mechanism during delivery may diminish a woman's risk of UI later in life. We propose to study the functional anatomy of the pelvic floor as it relates to UI in women who are having their first baby. We hypothesize non-directed, spontaneous pushing is a protective strategy in decreasing the risk of immediate and long term UI. Longitudinal comparisons of pelvic floor characteristics will be taken at 35 week gestation and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum. Study participants will be seen first at 20 weeks gestation for documentation of baseline levels of pelvic floor function, specifically voluntary and involuntary muscle strength, urinary continence status, and urethral support. They will be randomly assigned into non-directed, spontaneous (experimental) and directed, sustained pushing (control) groups. Alterations that may occur in urethral support before and after birth will be described through non-invasive urethral ultrasound.

Being tested
Videotape, routine care, PME instruction, PME practice and record keeping (in diaries), Non-directed or directed,spontaneous or sustained pushing, Data collection
Keywords
Pelvic floor muscle training, Self-directed pushing, Antenatal perineal massage
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Videotape, routine care, PME instructionBehavioural

    A 40 minute videotape about non-directed, spontaneous pushing and/or a videotape of antenatal perineal massage and pelvic muscle exerise (PME) at intake visit. The control women received routine care and PME instruction at intake visit.

  • PME practice and record keeping (in diaries)Behavioural

  • Non-directed or directed,spontaneous or sustained pushingBehavioural

    Non-directed, spontaneous pushing (experimental group) with perineal massage vs. directed, sustained pushing during delivery.

  • Data collectionProcedure or surgery

    Baseline at 20 weeks gestation; longitudinal at 35 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum, 6 months postpartum, and 12 months postpartum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Leakage Index (

    Measured: 20 and 35 weeks gestation, and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Perineal status (Digital, speculum, chart review, ultrasound)

    Measured: 35 week gestation and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

  2. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POPQ)

    Measured: 35 weeks gestation and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 1996
  3. Study completionDec 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00506116
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01NR4007-9
Other IDs
R01NR004007
Acronym
PERL
Status last verified
May 2007
First submitted
23 Jul 2007
Last updated
31 Jul 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • DeLancey JO, Sampselle CM, Punch MR. Kegel dyspareunia: levator ani myalgia caused by overexertion. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 2 Suppl):658-9.

    PubMed 8378003
  • Sampselle CM, Miller JM, Luecha Y, Fischer K, Rosten L. Provider support of spontaneous pushing during the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;34(6):695-702. doi: 10.1177/0884217505281904.

    PubMed 16282227
  • Antonakos CL, Miller JM, Sampselle CM. Indices for studying urinary incontinence and levator ani function in primiparous women. J Clin Nurs. 2003 Jul;12(4):554-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00747.x.

    PubMed 12790869
  • Armstrong SM, Miller JM, Benson K, Jain S, Panagopoulos K, DeLancey JO, Sampselle CM. Revisiting reliability of quantified perineal ultrasound: Bland and Altman analysis of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(7):731-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.20299.

    PubMed 16897749
  • Roberts JM, Gonzalez CBP, Sampselle C. Why do supportive birth attendants become directive of maternal bearing-down efforts in second-stage labor? J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Mar-Apr;52(2):134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.11.005.

    PubMed 17336819

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Videotape, routine care, PME instruction, PME practice and record keeping (in diaries) and Non-directed or directed,spontaneous or sustained pushing in people with Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Leakage Index ( (time frame: 20 and 35 weeks gestation, and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00506116, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in