Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation4ANCT00506870
Benefit of Self-monitoring of Anticoagulation Instrument
A study testing INRatio / Coaguchek XS in people with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation and Patient Self Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulent Therapy, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation, Patient Self Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulent Therapy
- What is being tested?
- INRatio / Coaguchek XS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 919 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jun 2007to Feb 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adults
- patients fitted with one or more mechanical heart valves either alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization
- oral anticoagulant treatment
- patients with social security cover
- written informed consent signed by both patient and investigator
Who cannot join
- women pregnant or liable to become pregnant during the study
- nursing women
- patients unable to master the self-monitoring procedures
- individuals under judicial control or enquiry
- patients consuming excessive amounts of alcohol ((>40g/j for men et >30g/j for women femmes ; 1 glass = 10g)
- patients on dialysis
Show all 9Show fewer
- patients with incomplete understanding of instructions
- blind patients and those unable to read
- presence of circulating anticoagulant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Pôle Cardio-Thoracique - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux - Avenue de Magellan
Pessac, 33604
About this study
Official title: Economic and Medical Evaluation of Self-monitoring of Anticoagulation in a Population of Patients Recently Fitted With a Mechanical Heart Valve Compared to Conventional Anticoagulation Follow-up
To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Read the detailed description
Rationale/context:
Long term management of anticoagulant treatment is not straightforward, especially in patients bearing mechanical heart valves due to the requirement of maintaining a high INR over a narrow range.
Due to the narrow therapeutic window of AVK, undesirable events (hemorrhages, thromboembolic accidents) tend to be both serious and common leading to frequent admissions to hospital The self-monitoring of AVK, in addition to conventional monitoring of INR in the laboratory, is now being introduced in several countries (USA and Europe).
Main objective To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Secondary objectives
To compare over one year the effect of self-monitoring of coagulation with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation on:
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death
- the proportion of monthly values of INR within the target range,
- the inherent cost of each strategy of monitoring of anticoagulation,
- the incidence of death, bleeding and thromboembolic episodes (each studied separately)
- The quality of life and the satisfaction of the patient To evaluate the patients' learning to be autonomous Diagram of the study Progress of the trial
A national, multicenter, randomized, blind trial, designed to examine the type of strategy used for monitoring anticoagulation in two parallel groups:
- a conventional follow-up of anticoagulation (monthly checks and adjustment of INR by the family doctor (GP))
- a self-measurement of anticoagulation by the patient at home using a Roche Diagnostics Laboratories test CoaguChek XS® or the Hemosense laboratories test INRatio® (weekly measurements and adjustment of INR by the family doctor) + a monthly laboratory check of INR
Inclusion criteria:
- adults (age ≥ 18 years), either sex
- patients fitted with one or more mechanical heart valves either alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization
- oral anticoagulant treatment
- patients with social security cover
- written informed consent signed by both patient and investigator Exclusion criteria
- women pregnant or liable to become pregnant during the study
- nursing women
- patients unable to master the self-monitoring procedures
- individuals under judicial control or enquiry
- patients consuming excessive amounts of alcohol ((>40g/j for men et >30g/j for women femmes ; 1 glass = 10g)
- patients on dialysis
- patients with incomplete understanding of instructions
- blind patients and those unable to read
- presence of circulating anticoagulant
Treatments/Strategies/Procedures:
1.1. Strategies of anticoagulation monitoring
After signature of informed consent and verification of criteria of eligibility, patients are randomly allocated into the following groups:
1.1.1. Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use of oral anticoagulants. INR is measured once a month in the laboratory. INR must lie in the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts INR on the day of the blood test and a new measurement is taken 48 hours later if dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range.
1.1.2. Self-measurement of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use and monitoring of oral anticoagulants. They are further trained in the use of the self-monitoring test system.
Reference INR will be INR labo during first post operatives weeks up to the return at home because the self-measurement of anticoagulation maybe for lack of the fact of the anaemia, the inflammatory syndrome and the residues of heparin.
When the patients return at home, they take a measurement every week and if the result is abnormal, inform their family doctor. The INR must lie within the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts the INR on the same day as the self-measurement. A measurement is taken 48 hours later if the dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range. INR is measured in the laboratory every month.
Main evaluation criteria:
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Main secondary evaluation criteria:
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death) within a population recently fitted with a mechanical hear valve.
- the proportion of monthly measurements of INR within the designated range,
- the inherent cost of each strategy of anticoagulation monitoring,
- the impact of death, bleeding and thromboembolic episodes (each studied separately),
- Evaluation of patients' learning of monitoring procedures.
Planned population size: 1050 patients, i.e.
- 350 in the group "Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation"
- 700 in the group "Self-measurement of anticoagulation" :
- 350 using the Roche Diagnostics laboratories test CoaguChek XS®
- 350 using the Hemosense laboratories test INRatio®
Time-line:
- Period of inclusion: 12-18 months
- Duration of participation by patients: 12 months
- Duration of trial: 30 months
- Conditions
- Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation, Patient Self Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulent Therapy
- Being tested
- INRatio / Coaguchek XS
- Keywords
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, INR self monitoring, cost benefit evaluation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
INRatio / Coaguchek XSDevice
INR measured by patient himself using INRation or Coaguchek device. And one follow-up of INR per month, measured in laboratory.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No intervention | Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation |
| 2 | Experimental | Self-monitoring of anticoagulation Receives: Device: INRatio / Coaguchek XS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death) within a population recently fitted with a mechanical hear valve.
Measured: 12 months
the proportion of monthly measurements of INR within the designated range
Measured: 12 months
the inherent cost of each strategy of anticoagulation monitoring
Measured: 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2010
- Study completionFeb 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve ImplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 919 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Biodis
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Raymond ROUDAUT, Pr, Study director, University Hospital, BordeauxGeneviève CHENE, Pr, Study chair, University Hospital, BordeauxRaymond ROUDAUT, Pr, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00506870
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUBX2006/04
- Other IDs
- 2006-A00460-51
- Acronym
- 4A
- Status last verified
- Dec 2010
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Economic and Medical Evaluation of Self-monitoring of Anticoagulation in a Population of Patients Recently Fitted With a Mechanical Heart Valve Compared to Conventional Anticoagulation Follow-up
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00506870
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4A / CHUBX2006/04
- Conditions
- Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation, Patient Self Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulent Therapy
- Keywords
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, INR self monitoring, cost benefit evaluation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 919 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Biodis
- Study start
- Jun 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Detailed description
Rationale/context:
Long term management of anticoagulant treatment is not straightforward, especially in patients bearing mechanical heart valves due to the requirement of maintaining a high INR over a narrow range.
Due to the narrow therapeutic window of AVK, undesirable events (hemorrhages, thromboembolic accidents) tend to be both serious and common leading to frequent admissions to hospital The self-monitoring of AVK, in addition to conventional monitoring of INR in the laboratory, is now being introduced in several countries (USA and Europe).
Main objective To evaluate the benefit economic and medical of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Secondary objectives
To compare over one year the effect of self-monitoring of coagulation with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation on:
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death
- the proportion of monthly values of INR within the target range,
- the inherent cost of each strategy of monitoring of anticoagulation,
- the incidence of death, bleeding and thromboembolic episodes (each studied separately)
- The quality of life and the satisfaction of the patient To evaluate the patients' learning to be autonomous Diagram of the study Progress of the trial
A national, multicenter, randomized, blind trial, designed to examine the type of strategy used for monitoring anticoagulation in two parallel groups:
- a conventional follow-up of anticoagulation (monthly checks and adjustment of INR by the family doctor (GP))
- a self-measurement of anticoagulation by the patient at home using a Roche Diagnostics Laboratories test CoaguChek XS® or the Hemosense laboratories test INRatio® (weekly measurements and adjustment of INR by the family doctor) + a monthly laboratory check of INR
Inclusion criteria:
- adults (age ≥ 18 years), either sex
- patients fitted with one or more mechanical heart valves either alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization
- oral anticoagulant treatment
- patients with social security cover
- written informed consent signed by both patient and investigator Exclusion criteria
- women pregnant or liable to become pregnant during the study
- nursing women
- patients unable to master the self-monitoring procedures
- individuals under judicial control or enquiry
- patients consuming excessive amounts of alcohol ((>40g/j for men et >30g/j for women femmes ; 1 glass = 10g)
- patients on dialysis
- patients with incomplete understanding of instructions
- blind patients and those unable to read
- presence of circulating anticoagulant
Treatments/Strategies/Procedures:
1.1. Strategies of anticoagulation monitoring
After signature of informed consent and verification of criteria of eligibility, patients are randomly allocated into the following groups:
1.1.1. Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use of oral anticoagulants. INR is measured once a month in the laboratory. INR must lie in the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts INR on the day of the blood test and a new measurement is taken 48 hours later if dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range.
1.1.2. Self-measurement of anticoagulation In this group, the patients are instructed in the use and monitoring of oral anticoagulants. They are further trained in the use of the self-monitoring test system.
Reference INR will be INR labo during first post operatives weeks up to the return at home because the self-measurement of anticoagulation maybe for lack of the fact of the anaemia, the inflammatory syndrome and the residues of heparin.
When the patients return at home, they take a measurement every week and if the result is abnormal, inform their family doctor. The INR must lie within the therapeutic range designated by the investigative center as a function of the type and the location of the valve and any associated risk factors. If necessary, the family doctor adjusts the INR on the same day as the self-measurement. A measurement is taken 48 hours later if the dosage has been changed.
This algorithm is applied until the INR comes into the designated range. INR is measured in the laboratory every month.
Main evaluation criteria:
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Main secondary evaluation criteria:
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death) within a population recently fitted with a mechanical hear valve.
- the proportion of monthly measurements of INR within the designated range,
- the inherent cost of each strategy of anticoagulation monitoring,
- the impact of death, bleeding and thromboembolic episodes (each studied separately),
- Evaluation of patients' learning of monitoring procedures.
Planned population size: 1050 patients, i.e.
- 350 in the group "Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation"
- 700 in the group "Self-measurement of anticoagulation" :
- 350 using the Roche Diagnostics laboratories test CoaguChek XS®
- 350 using the Hemosense laboratories test INRatio®
Time-line:
- Period of inclusion: 12-18 months
- Duration of participation by patients: 12 months
- Duration of trial: 30 months
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No intervention | –Conventional follow-up of anticoagulation |
| 2 | Experimental | Device: INRatio / Coaguchek XSSelf-monitoring of anticoagulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adults
- patients fitted with one or more mechanical heart valves either alone or in combination with myocardial revascularization
- oral anticoagulant treatment
- patients with social security cover
- written informed consent signed by both patient and investigator
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- women pregnant or liable to become pregnant during the study
- nursing women
- patients unable to master the self-monitoring procedures
- individuals under judicial control or enquiry
- patients consuming excessive amounts of alcohol ((>40g/j for men et >30g/j for women femmes ; 1 glass = 10g)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| INRatio / Coaguchek XSINR measured by patient himself using INRation or Coaguchek device. And one follow-up of INR per month, measured in laboratory. | Device | 2 |
Primary outcome
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves.
Time frame: 12 months
3 secondary outcomes
- the impact of complications stemming from oral anticoagulant treatment (bleeding, thromboembolic episodes or death) within a population recently fitted with a mechanical hear valve.
Time frame: 12 months
the proportion of monthly measurements of INR within the designated range
Time frame: 12 months
the inherent cost of each strategy of anticoagulation monitoring
Time frame: 12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raymond ROUDAUT, Pr study director
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Geneviève CHENE, Pr study chair
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Raymond ROUDAUT, Pr principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing INRatio / Coaguchek XS in people with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Implantation and Patient Self Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulent Therapy, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Economic and medical evaluation of self-monitoring of coagulation compared with conventional follow-up of anticoagulation in a population recently fitted with mechanical heart valves. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.