End Stage Renal DiseasePhase 4NCT00510549
Comparison of the Impact of Dialysis Treatment Type on Patient Survival
A Phase 4 study testing Modality: Peritoneal Dialysis in people with End Stage Renal Disease, run by Baxter Healthcare Corporation at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
As the influence of type of dialysis on survival of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients remains unanswered, the present study is designed (randomized, prospective, multicenter, interventional) to assess clinical outcomes, and compare mortality, morbidity, Quality of Life (QOL) and cost effectiveness between… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End Stage Renal Disease
- What is being tested?
- Modality: Peritoneal Dialysis
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Aug 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients who are at least 18 years of age.
- Patients who have read, understood and given written informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained.
- Patients who have a diagnosis of ESRD (GFR ≤ 10 ml/min), without a permanent access for dialysis.
- Patients who are able to comprehend a modality education program.
- Patients who are judged as capable of being trained for home based PD.
- Patients as justified by their physicians requiring dialysis treatment within 6 weeks after randomization (Patients who require urgent temporary dialysis before randomization may also be eligible for recruitment after being stabilized with temporary HD or PD)
- Patients who are expected to remain on dialysis for at least 6 months.
- Patients must have a negative HIV test at screening. -
Who cannot join
- Patients that have already received a permanent catheter or access that is intended for permanent therapy use before receiving modality information, or have already received permanent dialysis (If an access is present within 4 weeks prior to screening for back-up purposes, or for acute treatment for life threatening uremic symptoms, electrolyte abnormalities or fluid overload, this does not exclude the patient from enrollment).
- Patients who previously have received renal transplantation and are still prescribed immunosuppressive therapy.
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to follow the protocol.
- Patients with concomitant participation in any other interventional study, or who have received any investigational drug, biologic or device within five half-lives of the physiological action or 30 days, whichever is longer, prior to screening.
- Patients justified as not eligible for either PD or HD due to:
- PD: documented extensive intra-peritoneal adhesions, severe infective skin disorder, or other situation contradicting PD (eg., active inflammatory bowel disease)
Show all 16Show fewer
- HD: severe cardiac instability and inability to a gain permanent vascular access.
- Patients who have a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the six months prior to entering the study
- Patients who have active systemic infections, such as tuberculosis, septicemia or systemic fungal infections.
- Patients who have malignancies requiring active chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
- The presence of other terminal illness likely to cause death within 6 months
- Patients who have any other serious acute or active conditions that in the investigator's opinion would preclude their participation in the study.
- Female patients who are pregnant, lactating or planning on becoming pregnant during the study period.
- Patients who are allergic to starch-based polymers, maltose or isomaltose
- Patients who have glycogen storage disease.
- Patients who have a significant psychiatric disorder or mental disability that could interfere with the patient's ability to provide informed consent and/or comply with protocol procedures -
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label, Interventional Pilot Study To Compare Mortality, Morbidity and QOL in Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects
As the influence of type of dialysis on survival of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients remains unanswered, the present study is designed (randomized, prospective, multicenter, interventional) to assess clinical outcomes, and compare mortality, morbidity, Quality of Life (QOL) and cost effectiveness between maintenance In-center Hemodialysis (ICHD) and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). These data will ultimately bring clarity on whether or not any difference in patient survival exists between the two modalities.
In order to test the feasibility of patients' willingness to be randomized to two different modality groups and retained in the randomized group, a pilot study is planned before the conduct of a main study.
Read more
This pilot study comprises of a 6 months study, plus a 6 months observation if there is possibility to switch the patients into the main study.
All ESRD patients requiring dialysis treatment within 8 weeks after a pre-study visit will be recorded in each site. Patients who provide written inform consent for collecting relevant information will be screened using certain inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible patients will undergo a standardized education regarding ESRD and treatment options. Thereafter the patient will be required to provide a second inform consent allowing for randomization and entrance into the study. Eligible patient will be randomized to either PD or HD treatment.
The patients will be followed for a period of 6 months, during which patients will be treated with PD or HD as prescribed at each site, while meeting the dialysis adequacy and other indicators. For the first 3 months monthly visits are required, after which an every 3 months visit is planned.
In this pilot study, the main objective is to assess the willingness of ESRD patients to be randomized to either PD or HD treatment; thereby determining if an adequate number of eligible patients can be recruited for a future large-scale study.
Read the detailed description
refer to brief summary
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease
- Being tested
- Modality: Peritoneal Dialysis
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Modality: Peritoneal DialysisProcedure or surgery
Peritoneal Dialysis: CAPD; Hemodialysis: 3 times/week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1, PD | Active comparator | Peritoneal Dialysis Receives: Procedure: Modality: Peritoneal Dialysis |
| 2, HD | Active comparator | Hemodialysis Receives: Procedure: Modality: Peritoneal Dialysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To assess willingness of ESRD patients to be randomized to either PD or HD; thereby determining if an adequate number of eligible patients can be recruited for a future large-scale study.
Measured: August 2008
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionAug 2008
- Study completionAug 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for End Stage Renal DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Jia-Qi QIAN, Prof, Principal investigator, Center for one Baxter -Tel: 8004229837Tao Wang, Prof, Principal investigator, Center for one Baxter -Tel: 8004229837
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00510549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SurvivalHD/PDFinal 28/03/2007
- Status last verified
- Sep 2008
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2007
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2008
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Ethier I, Hayat A, Pei J, Hawley CM, Johnson DW, Francis RS, Wong G, Craig JC, Viecelli AK, Htay H, Ng S, Leibowitz S, Cho Y. Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
PubMed 38899545
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open Label, Interventional Pilot Study To Compare Mortality, Morbidity and QOL in Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00510549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SurvivalHD/PDFinal 28/03/2007
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baxter Healthcare CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
As the influence of type of dialysis on survival of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients remains unanswered, the present study is designed (randomized, prospective, multicenter, interventional) to assess clinical outcomes, and compare mortality, morbidity, Quality of Life (QOL) and cost effectiveness between maintenance In-center Hemodialysis (ICHD) and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). These data will ultimately bring clarity on whether or not any difference in patient survival exists between the two modalities.
In order to test the feasibility of patients' willingness to be randomized to two different modality groups and retained in the randomized group, a pilot study is planned before the conduct of a main study.
This pilot study comprises of a 6 months study, plus a 6 months observation if there is possibility to switch the patients into the main study.
All ESRD patients requiring dialysis treatment within 8 weeks after a pre-study visit will be recorded in each site. Patients who provide written inform consent for collecting relevant information will be screened using certain inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible patients will undergo a standardized education regarding ESRD and treatment options. Thereafter the patient will be required to provide a second inform consent allowing for randomization and entrance into the study. Eligible patient will be randomized to either PD or HD treatment.
The patients will be followed for a period of 6 months, during which patients will be treated with PD or HD as prescribed at each site, while meeting the dialysis adequacy and other indicators. For the first 3 months monthly visits are required, after which an every 3 months visit is planned.
In this pilot study, the main objective is to assess the willingness of ESRD patients to be randomized to either PD or HD treatment; thereby determining if an adequate number of eligible patients can be recruited for a future large-scale study.
Detailed description
refer to brief summary
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1, PD | Active comparator | Procedure: Modality: Peritoneal DialysisPeritoneal Dialysis |
| 2, HD | Active comparator | Procedure: Modality: Peritoneal DialysisHemodialysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male or female patients who are at least 18 years of age.
- Patients who have read, understood and given written informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained.
- Patients who have a diagnosis of ESRD (GFR ≤ 10 ml/min), without a permanent access for dialysis.
- Patients who are able to comprehend a modality education program.
- Patients who are judged as capable of being trained for home based PD.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patients that have already received a permanent catheter or access that is intended for permanent therapy use before receiving modality information, or have already received permanent dialysis (If an access is present within 4 weeks prior to screening for back-up purposes, or for acute treatment for life threatening uremic symptoms, electrolyte abnormalities or fluid overload, this does not exclude the patient from enrollment).
- Patients who previously have received renal transplantation and are still prescribed immunosuppressive therapy.
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to follow the protocol.
- Patients with concomitant participation in any other interventional study, or who have received any investigational drug, biologic or device within five half-lives of the physiological action or 30 days, whichever is longer, prior to screening.
- Patients justified as not eligible for either PD or HD due to:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Modality: Peritoneal DialysisPeritoneal Dialysis: CAPD; Hemodialysis: 3 times/week | Procedure or surgery | 1, PD, 2, HD |
Primary outcome
To assess willingness of ESRD patients to be randomized to either PD or HD; thereby determining if an adequate number of eligible patients can be recruited for a future large-scale study.
Time frame: August 2008
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38899545Ethier I, Hayat A, Pei J, Hawley CM, Johnson DW, Francis RS, Wong G, Craig JC, Viecelli AK, Htay H, Ng S, Leibowitz S, Cho Y. Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD013800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.
Related trials for End Stage Renal Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Microbiota Changes Related to Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation
End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplantation
Recruiting
Laser Acupuncture for Fatigue in Hemodialysis Patients
ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease), Dialysis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Acetoacetate and Acetate Metabolism in Patients With Chronic Kidney Failure.(RENO-TEP)
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Central Blood Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity in Kidney Transplant Recipients
End Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Sensor-based Congestion ALert for Events in Peritoneal Dialysis (SCALE-PD)
Kidney Disease, Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jia-Qi QIAN, Prof principal investigator
Center for one Baxter -Tel: 8004229837
Tao Wang, Prof principal investigator
Center for one Baxter -Tel: 8004229837
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Modality: Peritoneal Dialysis in people with End Stage Renal Disease, run by Baxter Healthcare Corporation at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To assess willingness of ESRD patients to be randomized to either PD or HD; thereby determining if an adequate number of eligible patients can be recruited for a future large-scale study. (time frame: August 2008). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00510549, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2008.