Cardiovascular DiseasesPhase 3IowaCOCNCT00513903
Expanding the Role of Pharmacists in Treating Persons With Cardiovascular or Lung Diseases
A Phase 3 study testing Minimal intervention and Enhanced Intervention in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Lung Diseases, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will test whether enhanced continuity of pharmacy care that includes increased communication between inpatient and outpatient settings will improve the appropriateness of medication therapy and reduce the number of serious adverse drug events, hospitalizations and unscheduled office visits in vulnerable… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Lung Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Minimal intervention and Enhanced Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 954 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2008to Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Speaks either English or Spanish
- Willing to obtain all long-term prescriptions from one community pharmacy during the 90-day study period
- Diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions: high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, coronary artery disease, heart attack, stroke, transient ischemic attack, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, or receiving oral anticoagulation therapy
- Admitted to the general medicine, family medicine, cardiology, or orthopedics services hospital department
Who cannot join
- Does not have a working telephone
- Has a hearing impairment that does not allow the use of a telephone
- Enrolled in Iowa Care (i.e., individual has no community physician or community pharmacist following hospital discharge)
- Life expectancy estimated at less than 6 months at the time of study entry
- Dementia or cognitive impairment
- Severe psychiatric or psychosocial factors, including substance abuse, that may impair the desire or ability to complete all aspects of the study
- Admission to the psychiatric, surgery, or hematology/oncology services hospital department
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Enhanced Continuity of Pharmacy Care for Cardiovascular or Pulmonary Diseases
This study will test whether enhanced continuity of pharmacy care that includes increased communication between inpatient and outpatient settings will improve the appropriateness of medication therapy and reduce the number of serious adverse drug events, hospitalizations and unscheduled office visits in vulnerable patients with cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease or diabetes.
Read the detailed description
Drugs used to treat cardiovascular and lung diseases are the most frequent cause of hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to inadequate therapy or ADEs. ADEs occur in 25% of patients who are able to walk and may cause up to 17% of hospital admissions among the elderly. A lack of communication and coordination between the hospital setting and the patient's own community setting, upon patient discharge, may contribute to the high number of ADEs. By expanding the role of pharmacists and encouraging communication between hospitals and pharmacists, the number of ADEs may be reduced. There have been a few small studies that have examined the way patient information is transferred between hospital and community pharmacists, but these studies did not involve the patients' primary care physicians nor did they fully evaluate the effect of communication between hospital and community pharmacists. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of providing a pharmacist case manager to hospitalized patients with cardiovascular or lung disease at reducing the number of ADEs, re-hospitalizations, and unscheduled medical visits.
This study will enroll individuals with certain conditions or diseases who are admitted to the hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a control group, a minimal treatment group, or an enhanced treatment group. Participants in the minimal and enhanced treatment groups will meet with a pharmacist case manager while in the hospital to conduct a medication history review. The case manager will also meet with participants at the time of hospital discharge and provide them with a discharge summary and educational materials. Additionally, for participants in the enhanced treatment group, the case manager will do the following: transfer the discharge summary data to the participant's community physician and pharmacist; call the participant 3 to 5 days following discharge from the hospital and as needed thereafter to resolve medication problems; and communicate with and make recommendations to the participant's community physician and pharmacist. All participants will meet with a study research nurse immediately after study entry to complete questionnaires. Study nurses will also call all participants 30 and 90 days following hospital discharge to collect adverse event information. Surveys will be completed by each participant's pharmacist and primary care physician 90 days following the participant's discharge from the hospital.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Lung Diseases
- Being tested
- Minimal intervention, Enhanced Intervention
- Keywords
- Pulmonary Diseases, Continuity of Pharmacy Care
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Lung Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Minimal interventionBehavioural
Minimal intervention patients will be seen by a clinical pharmacist during the hospitalization period to improve continuity of pharmacy care following hospital discharge.
Enhanced InterventionBehavioural
Enhanced intervention patients will be visited in the hospital and will also be called by the clinical pharmacist following discharge to follow-up on any problems that might have developed after discharge.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal intervention | Active comparator | Minimal intervention group patients will be seen by a clinical pharmacist in the hospital but will not receive followup after hospital discharge. Receives: Behavioral: Minimal intervention |
| Enhanced intervention | Experimental | Enhanced intervention patients will receive care from a clinical pharmacist during hospitalization and followup by phone after hospitalization. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention |
| Control | No intervention | Control arm patients will not be seen by the clinical pharmacist. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ADEs
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Medication appropriateness
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge by the Hanlon et al. Medication Appropriateness Index
Complications related to medications, including the number of hospital readmissions, unscheduled visits to emergency departments or urgent care facilities, and physician visits related to a medication problem or ADE
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Cost-effectiveness of the minimal or enhanced treatment compared to usual care
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Secondary outcomes (5)
Number of medications
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Complete medication list
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Community physician and pharmacist surveys
Measured: Measured 90 days after participant's hospital discharge
Medication adherence
Measured: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Barriers to patient adherence
Measured: Measured at baseline by scores on the following questionnaires: self-efficacy, cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer Mental Status Questionnaire), medication management skills and the Katz index of activities of daily living
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2008
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionOct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of IowaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 954 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Iowa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barry L. Carter, PharmD, Principal investigator, University of Iowa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00513903
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 498
- Other IDs
- R01HL082711, R01HL082711-01A2
- Acronym
- IowaCOC
- Status last verified
- Aug 2014
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Carter BL, Farris KB, Abramowitz PW, Weetman DB, Kaboli PJ, Dawson JD, James PA, Christensen AJ, Brooks JM. The Iowa Continuity of Care study: Background and methods. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Sep 1;65(17):1631-42. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070600.
PubMed 18714110Farley TM, Shelsky C, Powell S, Farris KB, Carter BL. Effect of clinical pharmacist intervention on medication discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Apr;36(2):430-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9917-x. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
PubMed 24515550Israel EN, Farley TM, Farris KB, Carter BL. Underutilization of cardiovascular medications: effect of a continuity-of-care program. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Sep 15;70(18):1592-600. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120786.
PubMed 23988600Anderegg SV, Demik DE, Carter BL, Dawson JD, Farris K, Shelsky C, Kaboli P. Acceptance of recommendations by inpatient pharmacy case managers: unintended consequences of hospitalist and specialist care. Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jan;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/phar.1164.
PubMed 23307540Farris KB, Carter BL, Xu Y, Dawson JD, Shelsky C, Weetman DB, Kaboli PJ, James PA, Christensen AJ, Brooks JM. Effect of a care transition intervention by pharmacists: an RCT. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:406. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-406.
PubMed 25234932
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhanced Continuity of Pharmacy Care for Cardiovascular or Pulmonary Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00513903
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IowaCOC / 498
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Lung Diseases
- Keywords
- Pulmonary Diseases, Continuity of Pharmacy Care
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 954 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of IowaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Mar 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will test whether enhanced continuity of pharmacy care that includes increased communication between inpatient and outpatient settings will improve the appropriateness of medication therapy and reduce the number of serious adverse drug events, hospitalizations and unscheduled office visits in vulnerable patients with cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease or diabetes.
Detailed description
Drugs used to treat cardiovascular and lung diseases are the most frequent cause of hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to inadequate therapy or ADEs. ADEs occur in 25% of patients who are able to walk and may cause up to 17% of hospital admissions among the elderly. A lack of communication and coordination between the hospital setting and the patient's own community setting, upon patient discharge, may contribute to the high number of ADEs. By expanding the role of pharmacists and encouraging communication between hospitals and pharmacists, the number of ADEs may be reduced. There have been a few small studies that have examined the way patient information is transferred between hospital and community pharmacists, but these studies did not involve the patients' primary care physicians nor did they fully evaluate the effect of communication between hospital and community pharmacists. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of providing a pharmacist case manager to hospitalized patients with cardiovascular or lung disease at reducing the number of ADEs, re-hospitalizations, and unscheduled medical visits.
This study will enroll individuals with certain conditions or diseases who are admitted to the hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a control group, a minimal treatment group, or an enhanced treatment group. Participants in the minimal and enhanced treatment groups will meet with a pharmacist case manager while in the hospital to conduct a medication history review. The case manager will also meet with participants at the time of hospital discharge and provide them with a discharge summary and educational materials. Additionally, for participants in the enhanced treatment group, the case manager will do the following: transfer the discharge summary data to the participant's community physician and pharmacist; call the participant 3 to 5 days following discharge from the hospital and as needed thereafter to resolve medication problems; and communicate with and make recommendations to the participant's community physician and pharmacist. All participants will meet with a study research nurse immediately after study entry to complete questionnaires. Study nurses will also call all participants 30 and 90 days following hospital discharge to collect adverse event information. Surveys will be completed by each participant's pharmacist and primary care physician 90 days following the participant's discharge from the hospital.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Minimal interventionMinimal intervention group patients will be seen by a clinical pharmacist in the hospital but will not receive followup after hospital discharge. |
| Enhanced intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Enhanced InterventionEnhanced intervention patients will receive care from a clinical pharmacist during hospitalization and followup by phone after hospitalization. |
| Control | No intervention | –Control arm patients will not be seen by the clinical pharmacist. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Speaks either English or Spanish
- Willing to obtain all long-term prescriptions from one community pharmacy during the 90-day study period
- Diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions: high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, coronary artery disease, heart attack, stroke, transient ischemic attack, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, or receiving oral anticoagulation therapy
- Admitted to the general medicine, family medicine, cardiology, or orthopedics services hospital department
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Does not have a working telephone
- Has a hearing impairment that does not allow the use of a telephone
- Enrolled in Iowa Care (i.e., individual has no community physician or community pharmacist following hospital discharge)
- Life expectancy estimated at less than 6 months at the time of study entry
- Dementia or cognitive impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal interventionMinimal intervention patients will be seen by a clinical pharmacist during the hospitalization period to improve continuity of pharmacy care following hospital discharge. | Behavioural | Minimal intervention |
| Enhanced InterventionEnhanced intervention patients will be visited in the hospital and will also be called by the clinical pharmacist following discharge to follow-up on any problems that might have developed after discharge. | Behavioural | Enhanced intervention |
Primary outcome
ADEs
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Medication appropriateness
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge by the Hanlon et al. Medication Appropriateness Index
Complications related to medications, including the number of hospital readmissions, unscheduled visits to emergency departments or urgent care facilities, and physician visits related to a medication problem or ADE
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Cost-effectiveness of the minimal or enhanced treatment compared to usual care
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
5 secondary outcomes
Number of medications
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Complete medication list
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Community physician and pharmacist surveys
Time frame: Measured 90 days after participant's hospital discharge
Medication adherence
Time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
Barriers to patient adherence
Time frame: Measured at baseline by scores on the following questionnaires: self-efficacy, cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer Mental Status Questionnaire), medication management skills and the Katz index of activities of daily living
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2014.
- Background: PubMed 18714110Carter BL, Farris KB, Abramowitz PW, Weetman DB, Kaboli PJ, Dawson JD, James PA, Christensen AJ, Brooks JM. The Iowa Continuity of Care study: Background and methods. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Sep 1;65(17):1631-42. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070600.
- Results publication: PubMed 24515550Farley TM, Shelsky C, Powell S, Farris KB, Carter BL. Effect of clinical pharmacist intervention on medication discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Apr;36(2):430-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9917-x. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 23988600Israel EN, Farley TM, Farris KB, Carter BL. Underutilization of cardiovascular medications: effect of a continuity-of-care program. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Sep 15;70(18):1592-600. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120786.
- Results publication: PubMed 23307540Anderegg SV, Demik DE, Carter BL, Dawson JD, Farris K, Shelsky C, Kaboli P. Acceptance of recommendations by inpatient pharmacy case managers: unintended consequences of hospitalist and specialist care. Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jan;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/phar.1164.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25234932Farris KB, Carter BL, Xu Y, Dawson JD, Shelsky C, Weetman DB, Kaboli PJ, James PA, Christensen AJ, Brooks JM. Effect of a care transition intervention by pharmacists: an RCT. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 18;14:406. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-406.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barry L. Carter, PharmD principal investigator
University of Iowa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Minimal intervention and Enhanced Intervention in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Lung Diseases, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ADEs (time frame: Measured 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00513903, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2014.