AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney CancerPhase 2NCT00514215

Cryotherapy and GM-CSF in Treating Patients With Lung Metastases or Primary Lung Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing sargramostim, flow cytometry and immunoenzyme technique in people with Kidney Cancer and Lung Cancer, run by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Cryotherapy kills tumor cells by freezing them. Giving an injection of GM-CSF before cryotherapy and inhaling GM-CSF after cryotherapy may interfere with the growth of tumor cells and shrink the tumor. Giving cryotherapy together with GM-CSF may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Cancer, Lung Cancer, Metastatic Cancer
What is being tested?
sargramostim, flow cytometry and immunoenzyme technique
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2006to Mar 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of 1 of the following:
  • Primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Any stage nonoperative NSCLC or patient refuses surgery
  • Any cancer with pulmonary metastatic disease (including renal cell cancer)
  • Stage IV disease (any T, any N, M1)
  • Must have 1-10 pulmonary or mediastinal masses meeting the following criteria:
  • At least 1 mass is appropriate for 2 sessions of core biopsy and cryotherapy with relatively easy access/low risk in nonoperative patients (or those refusing surgery)
  • The two dominant masses are defined as either the largest and/or those that may cause imminent morbidity from continued local progression, thereby potentially benefiting from thoracic cryotherapy alone
  • Optimal tumor size > 1.0 cm
  • Dominant masses up to 6 cm in diameter may be considered if thorough cryotherapy coverage can be anticipated with minimal additional treatment morbidity
  • Measurable disease, defined as tridimensional measurements of up to 6 different pulmonary or mediastinal masses ≥ 0.5 cm by CT scan
  • No active pleural effusion that could be related to respiratory infection or requires further work-up
  • No untreated and/or unstable brain metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Karnofsky performance status 70-100%
  • Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
  • Granulocyte count ≥ 1,500/mm³
  • Platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm³
  • INR < 1.5 (i.e., normal PT/PTT)
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
  • Bilirubin ≤ 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST ≤ 3 times ULN
  • Satisfactory pulmonary function test as determined by supervising oncologist, thoracic surgeon, or pulmonologist
  • Not pregnant or lactating
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No other active malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Inactive history of cancer allowed if the patient has been disease-free for > 2 years
  • No serious medical or psychiatric illnesses that would preclude informed consent or limit survival to < 12 wks
  • No uncontrollable cough or inability to lie flat
  • No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
  • No known immunodeficiency state
  • No uncontrolled infection
  • No uncontrolled coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
  • No advance directive that would prevent the investigator from treating the participant in the event of a complication occurring during or after the procedure
  • No medical contraindication or potential problem that would preclude protocol compliance

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • More than 4 weeks since prior biologic therapy
  • More than 4 weeks since prior immunotherapy
  • More than 4 weeks since prior filgrastim (G-CSF) or sargramostim (GM-CSF)
  • More than 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin)
  • More than 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy
  • More than 2 weeks since prior corticosteroids
  • More than 1 week since prior parenteral antibiotics
  • At least 1 week since prior aspirin or aspirin-like medications
  • At least 3 days since prior warfarin, clopidogrel bisulfate, or similar compounds
  • No concurrent GM-CSF other than study drug
  • No concurrent G-CSF
  • No concurrent radiotherapy
  • No concurrent glucocorticosteroids
  • No concurrent parenteral antibiotics
  • No concurrent immunosuppressive agents
  • No concurrent drugs that cause bleeding tendencies
  • No other concurrent biologic therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201-1379

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Percutaneous Cryotherapy and Aerosolized GM-CSF for Pulmonary Metastases and Primary Lung Cancer

RATIONALE: Cryotherapy kills tumor cells by freezing them. Giving an injection of GM-CSF before cryotherapy and inhaling GM-CSF after cryotherapy may interfere with the growth of tumor cells and shrink the tumor. Giving cryotherapy together with GM-CSF may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving cryotherapy together with GM-CSF works in treating patients with lung metastases or primary lung cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine whether percutaneous cryotherapy in combination with aerosolized sargramostim (GM-CSF) has any demonstrable immunologic effect in patients with pulmonary metastases or primary lung cancer.
  • Determine whether any systemic immune response is detectable by the combination of cryotherapy as the antigen presentation source and GM-CSF as the immunologic adjuvant.
  • Determine whether low morbidities will be maintained in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Determine whether effective immunization is associated with a drop in CD4+, CD25+, LTP(TGF-β1)+, Tr cells as measured by flow cytometry or ELISPOT assay for TGF-β1-secreting cells.

Secondary

  • Determine clinical response (i.e., tumor control in the dominant masses undergoing cryotherapy or in other metastatic sites) as measured by CT criteria.
  • Determine the toxicity of this regimen in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients undergo CT-guided core biopsy of a dominant lung mass and placement of at least 2 cryoprobes. Prior to initiating the freeze, patients receive an interstitial injection of sargramostim (GM-CSF) near the tumor. Patients then undergo percutaneous cryotherapy over 2 hours utilizing a freeze-thaw-freeze cycle. Beginning within 3 days of cryotherapy, patients receive aerosolized GM-CSF twice daily for 1 week. Beginning on day 32, patients may elect to undergo a second course of treatment as described above in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo blood and tumor tissue collection at baseline and periodically during study for immunological correlative studies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from blood samples are analyzed for antigen-specific CD4-positive or CD8-positive T-cell response by flow cytometry or by TGF-β1 ELISPOT assay to measure TGF-β1- secreting cells. Tumor cell lysates extracted from tumor samples are pulsed with autologous dendritic cells and analyzed by ELISPOT assay to measure T-cell reactivity in tumor specimens.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 6 and 12 months.

Being tested
sargramostim, flow cytometry, immunoenzyme technique, biopsy, cryosurgery
Keywords
lung metastases, stage I non-small cell lung cancer, stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, recurrent renal cell cancer, stage IV renal cell cancer, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
Medical subject headings
Kidney Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • sargramostimBiological

    Also called GM-CSF (Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor), Leukine

    250 μg, inhaled, two times a day, on days 4-10 and days 36-42

  • flow cytometryOther

    Days 1 \& 32

  • immunoenzyme techniqueOther

    Days 1 \& 32

  • biopsyProcedure or surgery

    CT guided biopsy on days 1 \& 32

  • cryosurgeryProcedure or surgery

    Days 1 and 32

Study groups in NCT00514215
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sargramostim, Flow Cytometry, Biopsy. CryosurgeryExperimentalSargramostim-250 μg, inhaled, two times a day, on days 4-10 and days 36-42 Flow cytometry-Days 1 \& 32 Immunoenzyme technique-Days 1 \& 32 CT guided biopsy-Days 1 \& 32 Cryosurgery-Days 1 and 32
Receives: Biological: sargramostim; Other: flow cytometry; Other: immunoenzyme technique; Procedure: biopsy; Procedure: cryosurgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Immunologic Response as Measured by ELISPOT Assay and Flow Cytometry

    CT-guided biopsy \& Peritumoral GM-CSF. a CR was defined as involution of the prior tumor and/or ablation site to only a thin, non-enhancing scar within the pulmonary parenchyma on enhanced chest CT. A PR was defined as incomplete resolution of an otherwise thoroughly hypovascular resolving ablation zone which had reached a diameter smaller than the original tumor size. Stable disease (SD) reflects no significant change in size of ablation site and/or overall tumor burden, while the standard definition for progressive disease (PD) remains as evidence of neTw or growing tumors.

    Measured: Days 1 & 32

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Clinical Response as Measured by CT Criteria

    CT-guided biopsy. a CR was defined as involution of the prior tumor and/or ablation site to only a thin, non-enhancing scar within the pulmonary parenchyma on enhanced chest CT. A PR was defined as incomplete resolution of an otherwise thoroughly hypovascular resolving ablation zone which had reached a diameter smaller than the original tumor size. Stable disease (SD) reflects no significant change in size of ablation site and/or overall tumor burden, while the standard definition for progressive disease (PD) remains as evidence of neTw or growing tumors.

    Measured: Days 1 & 32

  2. Toxicity of Grade 1 or Higher

    Number of Participants with Toxicity of Grade 1 or Higher as defined by CTCAE v2

    Measured: Days 11, 32, 43, & 63

  3. Immune Function and Cancer-specific Response

    Number of Participants with CT-guided biopsy \& Peritumoral GM-CSF. The number of IFNγ secreting T-cells was measured by a direct EliSpots at 10:1 E:T ratio to define the kinetics of the CTL responses from pre-CI to day 63 post CI.

    Measured: Days 1 & 63

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00514215
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000559667
Other IDs
P30CA022453, WSU-C-2795, WSU-HIC-050304M1(R)F
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
8 Aug 2007
Last updated
5 Mar 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing sargramostim, flow cytometry and immunoenzyme technique in people with Kidney Cancer and Lung Cancer, run by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Immunologic Response as Measured by ELISPOT Assay and Flow Cytometry (time frame: Days 1 & 32). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in