AzTrials
AzTrials

Otitis Media With EffusionOOMRSNCT00520039

Osteopathic Otitis Media Research Study

A study testing osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in people with Otitis Media With Effusion, run by West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the application of osteopathic manipulative medicine speeds the rate of resolution of middle ear effusion (fluid) in children following an episode of acute otitis media. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 months to 2 years
Conditions the study is for
Otitis Media With Effusion
What is being tested?
osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2007to Aug 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 months to 2 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age 6 months up to second birthday
  • Documented presence of acute otitis media following the 2004 AAP/AAFP Guidelines within 3 days of entry into the study

Who cannot join

  • Chromosomal abnormalities
  • Major congenital malformations of the head and neck, including torticollis
  • Immunologic abnormalities or deficiencies
  • Any prior ear-nose-throat surgery performed as a treatment for otitis media
  • Any tube placement surgery scheduled during the four weeks of the study.
  • Normal tympanograms at entry into study

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine

    Biddeford, Maine, 04005

  • West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine

    Lewisburg, West Virginia, 24901

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) on the Duration of Middle Ear Effusion in Children Following Diagnosis of Acute Otitis Media, as Measured by Tympanograms and Acoustic Reflectometry

The purpose of this study is to determine if the application of osteopathic manipulative medicine speeds the rate of resolution of middle ear effusion (fluid) in children following an episode of acute otitis media.

Read the detailed description

Acute otitis media is a significant world wide problem commonly affecting children between 6 and 18 months, and is the most frequent reason for childhood illness visits to a physician in the US. By three years of age, 50-70% of children will have had one episode, while one-third will have had more than three. Persistence of middle ear effusion following an episode of acute otitis media is thought to predispose the child to recurrent infection. The standard care for recurrent acute otitis media includes long term antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery. The risks of standard care are recognized, and alternative means of treating acute disease and preventing recurrent otitis media are needed.

For over a century, osteopathic physicians have reported favorable clinical outcomes in children treated with osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in addition to standard medical care. To determine if a standardized OMM protocol will reduce the duration of middle ear effusion (MEE) after onset of acute otitis media, we outline a prospective, randomized, blinded, multi-center efficacy study of children ages six months to two years with a single episode of acute otitis media. Subjects will be randomized into one of two treatment groups: standard care plus OMM and standard care only. Subjects will be followed for one month to determine rate of resolution of middle ear effusion following onset of the acute otitis media. Statistical analysis will determine any differences between subjects in the two treatment groups.

Being tested
osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM)
Keywords
Otitis Media, Effusion, OMM, OMT, Resolution
Medical subject headings
Otitis Media with Effusion, Otitis Media

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM)Procedure or surgery

    At each of the first three study visits, all subjects in the osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) group will receive OMM using the prescribed protocol.

Study groups in NCT00520039
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Care Plus OMMExperimentalSubjects will receive active intervention with osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) using a prescribed standardized treatment protocol which is age appropriate. Subjects will also receive standard care for otitis media from their referring physician.
Receives: Procedure: osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM)
Standard Care OnlyNo interventionSubjects will receive standard care only for otitis media from their regular referring physician

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Middle Ear Effusion Over Four Weeks Following an Episode of Acute Otitis Media

    For this study, the tympanogram was chosen to measure middle ear effusion. Three tympanogram readings from each ear included in the study were taken at the beginning of each of 5 Study Visits. For the intervention group, a second set of 3 tympanograms was taken immediately after the OMM on Visits 1, 2 and 3. All tympanograms were sent to a blinded audiologist, who chose the most healthy of the 3 tympanogram readings for interpretation, rating it according to standard protocols. "A" and "C1" readings were considered "normal" and "B" and "C2" readings were considered "abnormal". The extent to which the tympanogram readings of each ear included in the study changed from baseline over 4 weeks was computed by crosstabulating the intervention group by the normal/abnormal changes in tympanograms.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in Middle Ear Effusion Immediately After OMM at Study Visit 2

    For this study, the tympanogram was chosen to measure middle ear effusion. For the SC+OMT Group during study visit 2, three tympanogram readings from each ear included in the study were taken prior to, and immediately after the intervention. The tympanograms were sent to the blinded audiologist, who chose the most healthy of the 3 tympanogram readings for interpretation, rating it according to standard protocols. "A" and "C1" readings were considered "normal" and "B" and "C2" readings were considered "abnormal". The extent to which the tympanogram readings of each ear included in the study changed between "normal" and "abnormal" from before and after the OMM was computed.

    Measured: Before and immediately after OMM at study visit 2

  2. Change in Middle Ear Effusion Immediately After OMM at Study Visit 3

    For this study, the tympanogram was chosen to measure middle ear effusion. For the SC+OMT Group during study visit 3, three tympanogram readings from each ear included in the study were taken prior to, and immediately after the intervention. The tympanograms were sent to the blinded audiologist, who chose the most healthy of the 3 tympanogram readings for interpretation, rating it according to standard protocols. "A" and "C1" readings were considered "normal" and "B" and "C2" readings were considered "abnormal". The extent to which the tympanogram readings of each ear included in the study changed between "normal" and "abnormal" from before and after the OMM was computed.

    Measured: Before and immediately after OMM at study visit 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2007
  3. Primary completionAug 2009
  4. Study completionAug 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00520039
Sponsor's protocol ID
KS5172007
Acronym
OOMRS
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
22 Aug 2007
Last updated
26 Mar 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Steele KM, Carreiro JE, Viola JH, Conte JA, Ridpath LC. Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on middle ear effusion following acute otitis media in young children: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Jun;114(6):436-47. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.094.

    PubMed 24917631
  • Steele KM, Viola J, Burns E, Carreiro JE. Brief report of a clinical trial on the duration of middle ear effusion in young children using a standardized osteopathic manipulative medicine protocol. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 May;110(5):278-84.

    PubMed 20538749

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in people with Otitis Media With Effusion, run by West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Middle Ear Effusion Over Four Weeks Following an Episode of Acute Otitis Media (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00520039, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in