AzTrials
AzTrials

Common Variable ImmunodeficiencyPhase 4NCT00520494

Efficacy and Safety of Vivaglobin® in Previously Untreated Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency

A Phase 4 study testing Vivaglobin in people with Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Agammaglobulinemia, run by CSL Behring at 6 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Vivaglobin in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with primary immunodeficiency (PID) over a 25-week observation period. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 70 years
What is being tested?
Vivaglobin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
6 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Mar 2007to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent, age-adapted
  • Male or female aged 1 to 70 years
  • Diagnosis of primary humoral immunodeficiency
  • No prior immunoglobulin substitution therapy
  • IgG level of <5 g/L at screening
  • Women of childbearing potential must use medically approved contraception and must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of serious infection between screening and first treatment
  • Bleeding disorders that require medical treatments
  • Any medical disorder causing secondary immune disorders, autoimmune neutropenia, or a clinically significant defect in cell mediated immunity
  • Any condition likely to interfere with evaluation of the study drug or satisfactory conduct of the trial

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 4 countries.

6 sites in 4 countries

Canada2 sites
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7

  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details

    Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3

Other trials in Canada

Italy2 sites
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details

    Brescia, 25123

  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details

    Roma, 00186

Other trials in Italy

Germany1 site
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details

    Leipzig, 04129

Other trials in Germany

Spain1 site
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details

    Madrid, 28007

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Vivaglobin® in Previously Untreated Patients (PUPs) With Primary Immunodeficiency (PID)

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Vivaglobin in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with primary immunodeficiency (PID) over a 25-week observation period. The purpose is to investigate whether PUPs will respond to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) treatment with adequate trough levels without first receiving immunoglobulins by the intravenous route by demonstrating that 100 mg immunoglobulin G/kg body weight (IgG/kg bw) administered on 5 consecutive days (i.e. resulting in a total dose of 500 mg IgG/kg bw) results in an IgG increase to ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12 after initiation of SCIG therapy.

Being tested
Vivaglobin
Keywords
Previously Untreated Patient (PUP), Primary Immunodeficiency (PID), CVID, XLA, Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG), IgG trough level, Quality of life, Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA)
Medical subject headings
Common Variable Immunodeficiency, Agammaglobulinemia, Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases, Bruton type agammaglobulinemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VivaglobinDrug

    Human normal immunoglobulin G (IgG) for subcutaneous (SC) use.

Study groups in NCT00520494
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VivaglobinExperimentalVivaglobin: 16% (160 mg/mL) liquid formulation of human IgG for SC use. Loading dose: 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days; maintenance dose: 100 mg/kg 1 to 2 times a week for 24 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Vivaglobin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12

    Measured: On Day 12

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 19

    Measured: On Day 19

  2. Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 26

    Measured: On Day 26

  3. IgG Increase (Change From Baseline) on Day 12

    Measured: Baseline to Day 12

  4. Overall Rate of Infections

    Annualized rate of any infection. The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of patient study days for all patients in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days.

    Infections were classified as all AEs with the system organ class "infections and infestations".

    Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  5. Total Serum IgG Trough Levels on Day 12

    Measured: On Day 12

  6. Total Serum IgG Trough Levels at Week 25

    Measured: At Week 25

  7. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles on Day 12

    Measured: On Day 12

  8. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles at Week 25

    Measured: At Week 25

  9. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae On Day 12

    Measured: On Day 12

  10. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae at Week 25

    Measured: At Week 25

  11. Use of Antibiotics for Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment

    Number of patients. Medications were classified as antibiotics according to the anatomic therapeutic chemical code.

    Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  12. Quality of Life as Measured by the Adapted Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36; Age ≥ 14 Years)

    The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that measures generic health concepts that are relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The questions are grouped into eight domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.

    Measured: At study completion, approximately Week 25

  13. Quality of Life as Measured by the Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form-50 (CHQ-PF50; Age ≤ 13 Years)

    The CHQ-PF50 is a 50-item questionnaire that measures generic health concepts and is suitable for patients younger than 14 years of age. The questions are grouped into 15 domains: global health, physical functioning, role/social limitations - emotional/behavioral, role/social limitations - physical, bodily pain, behavior, global behavior, mental health, self esteem, general health perceptions, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.

    Measured: At study completion, approximately Week 25

  14. Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity and Relatedness

    Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.

    Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  15. Rate of AEs by Severity and Relatedness

    The rate was the number of AEs over the number of infusions administered.

    Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.

    Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  16. Number of Patients With Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness

    Local reactions included: infusion site erythema, infusion site pain, infusion site pruritus, infusion site rash, infusion site reaction, infusion site swelling, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, edema peripheral, tenderness, erythema, pruritus, and skin swelling.

    Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.

    Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  17. Rate of Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness

    The rate was the number of local reactions over the number of infusions administered.

    Local reactions included:

    • infusion site: erythema, pain, pruritus, rash, reaction, swelling;
    • injection site: bruising, erythema, irritation, pruritus, swelling;
    • edema peripheral;
    • tenderness;
    • erythema;
    • pruritus; and
    • skin swelling.

    Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities.

    Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Measured: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  18. Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters

    Laboratory parameters included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis parameters, and were assessed at screening, Week 12 (hematology and serum chemistry) and at the completion visit (approximately Week 25).

    Measured: At Weeks 12 and 25

  19. Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body temperature.

    Measured: At the screening visit, before and after infusions (Days 1 to 5), and at the completion visit (Week 25)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00520494
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZLB06_005CR
Other IDs
2006-006522-25, 1461
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
23 Aug 2007
Last updated
20 Jun 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Borte M, Quinti I, Soresina A, Fernandez-Cruz E, Ritchie B, Schmidt DS, McCusker C. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous vivaglobin(R) replacement therapy in previously untreated patients with primary immunodeficiency: a prospective, multicenter study. J Clin Immunol. 2011 Dec;31(6):952-61. doi: 10.1007/s10875-011-9588-5. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

    PubMed 21932110

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Vivaglobin in people with Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Agammaglobulinemia, run by CSL Behring at 6 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Canada, Italy, Germany, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 May 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Patients Achieving Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12 (time frame: On Day 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00520494, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in