Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3CAPPA-2NCT00526643
CAPPA-2: Cisplatin Added to Gemcitabine in Poor Performance Advanced NSCLC Patients
A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine and cisplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by National Cancer Institute, Naples at 15 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) of the addition of cisplatin to gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced NSCLC in poor clinical condition (PS 2), not previously treated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- gemcitabine and cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced non small cell lung cancer, not amenable to surgical or curative radiation therapy (stage IIIB or IV);
- No prior or concomitant chemotherapy (adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy permitted if concluded at least one year prior to enrollment);
- ECOG performance status 2;
- Age: > or = 18 and < 70 years;
- Life expectancy at least 4 weeks;
- Normal bone marrow, hepatic and renal function defined as: neutrophils > or = 2000/mm3, PLT > or = 100,000/mm3, Hb > or = 10.0 g/dl, Bilirubin > or = 1.5 times the upper normal limit (UNL), AST and ALT < or = 3 times the UNL (5 times in the presence of liver metastases), creatinine within normal limits;
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Active systemic infections;
- Severe concomitant illness (congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction within previous 6 months, cardiac arrhythmias under treatment, severe arterial hypertension, severe or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus);
- Inadequate hepatic or renal function;
- Radiation therapy ongoing or concluded within two weeks prior to enrollment;
- Symptomatic cerebral metastases;
- Previous chemotherapy for advanced disease;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Any condition that would, in the investigator's opinion, limit the patients ability to provide informed consent or to comply with study procedures;
- Pregnant or nursing females;
- Any malignancy within the past 5 years (except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non melanoma skin cancer)
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
Italy15 sites
Ospedale Regionale Miulli, Divisione Medicina Interna Sezione Oncologica
Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, 70021
Istituto Oncologico di Bari, U.O. di Oncologia Medica e Sperimentale
Bari, BA, 70126
Ospedale Senatore Antonio Perrino
Brindisi
A.O. Ospedale Mater Domini, Oncoematologia Università Magna Grecia
Catanzaro
Ospedale F. Veneziale
Isernia
A.O. Vito Fazzi
Lecce
Azienda Ospedaliera C. Poma
Mantua, MN, 46100
Istituto Scientifico S. Raffaele
Milan, MI, 20132
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giuseppe Moscati, U.O. di Oncologia Medica
Monteforte Irpino, AV, 83024
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori , Divisione di Oncologia Medica B
Naples, 80131
Istituto Oncologico Veneto
Padova, PD
Ospedale Regional, Unità Operative di Oncologia
Parma
Ospedale San Camillo - Forlanini
Rome
Ospedale S. Felice a Cancello
San Felice A Cancello
Ospedale E. Morelli
Sondalo, SO, 23039
About this study
Official title: Gemcitabine Versus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in First-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Poor Physical Condition (Performance Status 2)
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) of the addition of cisplatin to gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced NSCLC in poor clinical condition (PS 2), not previously treated.
Read the detailed description
Performance status is one of the most important prognostic factors for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of treatment received. Chemotherapy is recommended for advanced NSCLC patients in good clinical condition, but it is not clear how much benefit is gained from giving chemotherapy to patients in poor general condition (performance status 2). This category of patients represents about 20% of all patients at initial diagnosis of NSCLC, and remains a treatment challenge for the clinician. There have been very few studies that have evaluated the impact of chemotherapy for this group of patients, and there is no established standard therapy. Studies evaluating single agent and combination two-agent chemotherapy regimens' impact on survival and improving symptoms are needed.
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- gemcitabine, cisplatin
- Keywords
- stage IIIB, Stage IV, chemotherapy, monotherapy, combination chemotherapy, poor performance status
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
gemcitabineDrug
1200 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles
cisplatinDrug
cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 for 4 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm B | Experimental | combination chemotherapy Receives: Drug: gemcitabine; Drug: cisplatin |
| Arm A | Active comparator | monochemotherapy Receives: Drug: gemcitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall survival
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (5)
change in performance status
Measured: each cycle of chemotherapy
toxicity
Measured: each cycle of chemotherapy and every 3 months thereafter
quality of life
Measured: chemotherapy cycles 1 and 2
objective response
Measured: at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
progression free survival
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Why it stopped: scarce enrolment and presentation of positive results of similar study in June 2012.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Institute, Naples
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Trials Promoting Group (APRIC/CTPG), Gruppo Oncologico del Lazio (GOL), Gruppo Italiano per lo studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato Digerente, Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca Clinica, Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale, Northwest Oncology Cooperative Group(GONO)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cesare Gridelli, M.D., Principal investigator, APRIC/CTPGLuciano Frontini, M.D., Principal investigator, Gruppo Italiano per lo studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato DigerenteVittorio Gebbia, M.D., Principal investigator, Gruppo Oncologico Italia MeridionaleAndrea Ardizzoni, M.D., Principal investigator, Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca ClinicaFilippo de Marinis, M.D., Principal investigator, GOLEnrico Aitini, M.D., Principal investigator, Gruppo Oncologico del Nord-OvestFrancesco Perrone, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, National Cancer Institute, NaplesCiro Gallo, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00526643
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAPPA-2
- Other IDs
- 2005-005631-97, 2005
- Acronym
- CAPPA-2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Morabito A, Gebbia V, Di Maio M, Cinieri S, Vigano MG, Bianco R, Barbera S, Cavanna L, De Marinis F, Montesarchio V, Costanzo R, Sandomenico C, Montanino A, Mancuso G, Russo P, Nacci A, Giordano P, Daniele G, Piccirillo MC, Rocco G, Gridelli C, Gallo C, Perrone F. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: the CAPPA-2 study. Lung Cancer. 2013 Jul;81(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 1.
PubMed 23643177Gijtenbeek RG, de Jong K, Venmans BJ, van Vollenhoven FH, Ten Brinke A, Van der Wekken AJ, van Geffen WH. Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
PubMed 37419867
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gemcitabine Versus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in First-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Poor Physical Condition (Performance Status 2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00526643
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAPPA-2 / CAPPA-2
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IIIB, Stage IV, chemotherapy, monotherapy, combination chemotherapy, poor performance status
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: scarce enrolment and presentation of positive results of similar study in June 2012.
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Institute, NaplesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Trials Promoting Group (APRIC/CTPG), Gruppo Oncologico del Lazio (GOL), Gruppo Italiano per lo studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato Digerente, Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca Clinica, Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale, Northwest Oncology Cooperative Group(GONO)
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) of the addition of cisplatin to gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced NSCLC in poor clinical condition (PS 2), not previously treated.
Detailed description
Performance status is one of the most important prognostic factors for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of treatment received. Chemotherapy is recommended for advanced NSCLC patients in good clinical condition, but it is not clear how much benefit is gained from giving chemotherapy to patients in poor general condition (performance status 2). This category of patients represents about 20% of all patients at initial diagnosis of NSCLC, and remains a treatment challenge for the clinician. There have been very few studies that have evaluated the impact of chemotherapy for this group of patients, and there is no established standard therapy. Studies evaluating single agent and combination two-agent chemotherapy regimens' impact on survival and improving symptoms are needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm B | Experimental | Drug: gemcitabine, Drug: cisplatincombination chemotherapy |
| Arm A | Active comparator | Drug: gemcitabinemonochemotherapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced non small cell lung cancer, not amenable to surgical or curative radiation therapy (stage IIIB or IV);
- No prior or concomitant chemotherapy (adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy permitted if concluded at least one year prior to enrollment);
- ECOG performance status 2;
- Age: > or = 18 and < 70 years;
- Life expectancy at least 4 weeks;
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Active systemic infections;
- Severe concomitant illness (congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction within previous 6 months, cardiac arrhythmias under treatment, severe arterial hypertension, severe or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus);
- Inadequate hepatic or renal function;
- Radiation therapy ongoing or concluded within two weeks prior to enrollment;
- Symptomatic cerebral metastases;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gemcitabine1200 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles | Drug | Arm A, Arm B |
| cisplatincisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 for 4 cycles | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
overall survival
Time frame: one year
5 secondary outcomes
change in performance status
Time frame: each cycle of chemotherapy
toxicity
Time frame: each cycle of chemotherapy and every 3 months thereafter
quality of life
Time frame: chemotherapy cycles 1 and 2
objective response
Time frame: at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
progression free survival
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: scarce enrolment and presentation of positive results of similar study in June 2012.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 23643177Morabito A, Gebbia V, Di Maio M, Cinieri S, Vigano MG, Bianco R, Barbera S, Cavanna L, De Marinis F, Montesarchio V, Costanzo R, Sandomenico C, Montanino A, Mancuso G, Russo P, Nacci A, Giordano P, Daniele G, Piccirillo MC, Rocco G, Gridelli C, Gallo C, Perrone F. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: the CAPPA-2 study. Lung Cancer. 2013 Jul;81(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37419867Gijtenbeek RG, de Jong K, Venmans BJ, van Vollenhoven FH, Ten Brinke A, Van der Wekken AJ, van Geffen WH. Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Phase 2 Trial of Adagrasib Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab and a Phase 3 Trial of Adagrasib in Combination in Patients With a KRAS G12C Mutation KRYSTAL-7
Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Adjuvant Intismeran (V940) With or Without Pembrolizumab Coformulated With Berahyaluronidase Alfa (MK-3475A) in High-Risk Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (V940-014)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Understanding the Feasibility of a Co-designed Pre-radiotherapy Exercise Programme - A Single-arm Study
Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Adjuvant ctDNA-Adapted Personalized Treatment in Early Stage NSCLC (ADAPT-E)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cesare Gridelli, M.D. principal investigator
APRIC/CTPG
Luciano Frontini, M.D. principal investigator
Gruppo Italiano per lo studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato Digerente
Vittorio Gebbia, M.D. principal investigator
Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing gemcitabine and cisplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by National Cancer Institute, Naples at 15 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: scarce enrolment and presentation of positive results of similar study in June 2012.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall survival (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00526643, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2017.