Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 2NCT00528996
An Efficacy and Safety Study to Compare Three Doses of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium and Placebo in the Respimat Inhaler.
A Phase 2 study testing BEA 2180 BR and Tiotropium Bromide in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 178 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of three doses (50 µg, 100 µg and 200 µg) of BEA 2180 delivered by the Respimat® once daily to placebo and tiotropium bromide delivered by the Respimat® in patients with COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- BEA 2180 BR and Tiotropium Bromide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2,080 participants
- Where
- 178 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2007to 5 May 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with ICH-GCP guidelines prior to participation in the trial, which includes medication washout and restrictions.
- All patients must have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P95 4381) and must meet the following spirometric criteria:
- Patients must have relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with an FEV1 (post-bronchodilator, 30 minutes post salbutamol/albuterol) <80% of predicted normal and FEV1 less than or equal to 70% of FVC at the PFTs at Visit 1 (screening).
- Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
- Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years. Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded.
- Patients must be able to perform technically acceptable pulmonary function tests and electronic PEFR measurements, and must be able to maintain records (Patient Daily Diary) during the study period as required in the protocol.
- Patients must be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the Respimat® inhaler (Appendix I)
Who cannot join
- Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient ability to participate in the study.
- Patients with clinically relevant abnormal baseline haematology, blood chemistry or urinalysis, if the abnormality defines a significant disease as defined in exclusion criterion No. 1.
- Patients with a recent history (one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
- Patients who have been hospitalized for heart failure within the past 3 years.
- Patients with a malignancy for which the patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the last five years. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients with known symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia or bladder neck obstruction as defined in exclusion criteria No. 1.
- Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma.
- Patients with asthma or a history of asthma.
- Patients with a history of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or a history of cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis.
- Patients with known active tuberculosis.
- Patients with a history of and/or active significant alcohol or drug abuse. See exclusion criterion No. 1.
Trial locations and contacts
178 sites in 10 countries.
178 sites in 10 countries
United States56 sites
1205.14.010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
1205.14.036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
1205.14.007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia
1205.14.013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bay Pines, Florida
1205.14.042 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berkeley, California
1205.14.044 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Brick, New Jersey
1205.14.029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina
1205.14.056 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cherry Hill, New Jersey
1205.14.018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Missouri
1205.14.016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida
1205.14.014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
1205.14.048 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
DeLand, Florida
1205.14.041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado
1205.14.027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fort Collins, Colorado
1205.14.045 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas
1205.14.055 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina
1205.14.025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Houston, Texas
1205.14.061 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jasper, Alabama
1205.14.005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Johnston, Rhode Island
1205.14.060 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Killeen, Texas
1205.14.017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
La Jolla, California
1205.14.022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lakewood, California
1205.14.062 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Larchmont, New York
1205.14.019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Livonia, Michigan
1205.14.031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon
1205.14.028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mineola, New York
1205.14.054 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama
1205.14.001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia
1205.14.030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
New Hyde Park, New York
1205.14.057 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
New Orleans, Louisiana
1205.14.021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
New York, New York
1205.14.012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
1205.14.035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Olathe, Kansas
1205.14.043 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Panama City, Florida
1205.14.003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1205.14.004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
1205.14.033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Reno, Nevada
1205.14.023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia
1205.14.024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia
1205.14.046 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Riverside, California
1205.14.026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Roanoke, Virginia
1205.14.002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas
1205.14.008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Diego, California
1205.14.047 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Diego, California
1205.14.037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sepulveda, California
1205.14.052 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana
1205.14.020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
1205.14.009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington
1205.14.039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington
1205.14.032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri
1205.14.050 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stamford, Connecticut
1205.14.053 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stockbridge, Georgia
1205.14.058 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Summit, New Jersey
1205.14.040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida
1205.14.059 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Toledo, Ohio
1205.14.034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Germany33 sites
1205.14.381 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aschaffenburg
1205.14.164 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.167 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.168 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.172 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.175 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.177 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.178 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.377 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.382 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.387 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.388 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1205.14.165 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bonn
1205.14.176 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cottbus
1205.14.171 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dortmund
1205.14.379 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Geesthacht
1205.14.174 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gelnhausen
1205.14.173 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1205.14.375 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hanover
1205.14.378 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koblenz
1205.14.170 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lübeck
1205.14.162 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mainz
1205.14.384 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Marburg
1205.14.166 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Minden
1205.14.372 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Neumünster
1205.14.386 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Neuruppin
1205.14.385 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oschersleben
1205.14.169 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rüdersdorf
1205.14.179 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rüsselsheim am Main
1205.14.376 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saarbrücken
1205.14.374 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Schwetzingen
1205.14.371 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Witten
1205.14.373 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Witten
Hungary19 sites
1205.14.279 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Budakeszi
1205.14.273 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Budapest
1205.14.283 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Budapest
1205.14.287 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Budapest
1205.14.286 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cegléd
1205.14.281 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Debrecen
1205.14.272 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Deszk
1205.14.289 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Deszk
1205.14.271 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Érd
1205.14.276 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gödöllö
1205.14.282 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gyula
1205.14.277 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Komárom
1205.14.278 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mátraháza
1205.14.280 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mosonmagyaróvár
1205.14.285 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sopron
1205.14.275 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Szarvas
1205.14.288 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Százhalombatta
1205.14.284 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tatabánya
1205.14.274 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zalaegerszeg
Poland14 sites
1205.14.251 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chrzanów
1205.14.253 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gdansk
1205.14.254 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gdansk
1205.14.246 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Krakow
1205.14.241 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lodz
1205.14.242 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lodz
1205.14.255 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Miechów
1205.14.248 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ruda Śląska
1205.14.249 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tarnowskie Góry
1205.14.252 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wilkowice
1205.14.243 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wroclaw
1205.14.244 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wroclaw
1205.14.245 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wroclaw
1205.14.247 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zabrze
Russia14 sites
1205.14.301 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1205.14.302 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1205.14.303 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1205.14.304 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1205.14.305 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1205.14.306 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Moscow
1205.14.310 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1205.14.311 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1205.14.312 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1205.14.313 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1205.14.314 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
1205.14.307 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yaroslavl
1205.14.308 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yaroslavl
1205.14.309 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yaroslavl
Canada9 sites
1205.14.143 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario
1205.14.142 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Downsview, Ontario
1205.14.151 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta
1205.14.150 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Grimsby, Ontario
1205.14.149 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mississauga, Ontario
1205.14.146 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec
1205.14.145 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec
1205.14.148 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
1205.14.144 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia
Taiwan9 sites
1205.14.207 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Changhua
1205.14.208 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chiayi City
1205.14.210 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City
1205.14.209 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Kaohsiung County
1205.14.205 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taichung
1205.14.206 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taichung
1205.14.202 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taipei
1205.14.204 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taipei
1205.14.201 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Taoyuan County
Mexico8 sites
1205.14.108 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cuernavaca, Mor. México
1205.14.101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hermosillo, Sonora
1205.14.119 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Metepec
1205.14.117 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mexico City
1205.14.120 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mexico City
1205.14.102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Monterrey
1205.14.116 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León
1205.14.105 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jal.
South Korea8 sites
1205.14.225 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gyeonggi-do
1205.14.228 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Gyeonggi-do
1205.14.227 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seongdong-gu
1205.14.221 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1205.14.222 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1205.14.223 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1205.14.224 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
1205.14.226 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Seoul
Spain8 sites
1205.14.182 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Badajoz
1205.14.186 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cáceres
1205.14.183 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Madrid
1205.14.191 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Málaga
1205.14.181 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Terrassa (Barcelona)
1205.14.190 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Torrevieja
1205.14.189 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Valencia
1205.14.187 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vigo
About this study
Official title: A Multinational, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Comparison Over 24 Weeks of Three Doses (50µg, 100µg, 200µg) of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium 5µg, Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler and Placebo in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
The primary objective of this study is to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of three doses (50 µg, 100 µg and 200 µg) of BEA 2180 delivered by the Respimat® once daily to placebo and tiotropium bromide delivered by the Respimat® in patients with COPD. Additional objectives include comparing the effects on dyspnea and health status.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- BEA 2180 BR, Tiotropium Bromide, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BEA 2180 BRDrug
Solution
Tiotropium BromideDrug
Solution
PlaceboDrug
Solution
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching Placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| BEA 2180 BR low dose | Experimental | Low dose Receives: Drug: BEA 2180 BR |
| BEA 2180 BR medium dose | Experimental | Medium dose Receives: Drug: BEA 2180 BR |
| BEA 2180 BR high dose | Experimental | High dose Receives: Drug: BEA 2180 BR |
| Tiotropium Bromide | Experimental | Tiotropium Bromide Receives: Drug: Tiotropium Bromide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response After 24 Weeks
Trough Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) response was defined as the change from baseline in trough FEV1. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the two FEV1 measurements recorded at the pre-dose measurements (40 and 15 minutes before the drug administration) at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours post previous drug administration from the Respimat® Inhaler). Baseline FEV1 was pre-treatment FEV1 values measured at Day 1 of treatment period (baseline) prior to administration of the first dose of study medication, which was the mean of the measurements recorded from the pulmonary function tests taken at 40 and 15 minutes prior to drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 24.
Secondary outcomes (30)
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response After 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 18 Weeks
Trough Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) response was defined as the change from baseline in trough FEV1. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the two FEV1 measurements recorded at the pre-dose measurements (40 and 15 minutes before the drug administration) at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours post previous drug administration from the Respimat® Inhaler). Baseline FEV1 was pre-treatment FEV1 values measured at Day 1 of treatment period (baseline) prior to administration of the first dose of study medication, which was the mean of the measurements recorded from the pulmonary function tests taken at 40 and 15 minutes prior to drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18.
Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Response After 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 Weeks
Trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response was defined as the change from baseline in trough FVC. Trough FVC was defined as the mean of the two FVC measurements recorded at the pre-dose measurements (40 and 15 minutes before drug administration) at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours post previous drug administration from the Respimat® Inhaler), which were obtained through spirometry at the same time points as for forced expiratory volume in one second. Baseline FVC was the mean of the two measurements of FVC taken at 40 and 15 minutes before drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response After 0, 4, 12 and 24 Weeks
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours (AUC0-3h) response after 0, 4, 12 and 24 weeks are reported. The FEV1 AUC0-3h response is the area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours post drug administration for change from baseline values of FEV1. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated as the area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24 using the trapezoidal rule and using planned time, divided by the full duration (3 hours) to report in litres. The mean of the pre-dose values (at 40 minutes and 15 minutes before dosing) are used with a time value of zero for calculating the AUC values starting at zero. The baseline FEV1 is the mean of the two measurements taken at 40 and 15 minutes before drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response After 0, 4, 12 and 24 Weeks
Forced vital capacity (FVC) area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours (AUC0-3h) response after 0, 4, 12 and 24 weeks are reported. The FVC AUC0-3h response is the area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours post drug administration for change from baseline values of FVC. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated as the area under the curve from 0 to 3 hours at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24 using the trapezoidal rule and using planned time, divided by the full duration (3 hours) to report in litres. The mean of the pre-dose values (at 40 minutes and 15 minutes before dosing) are used with a time value of zero for calculating the AUC values starting at zero. The baseline FVC is the mean of the two measurements taken at 40 and 15 minutes before drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Peak Response After 0, 4, 12, and 24 Weeks
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) peak response after 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks were reported. Peak FEV1 response was the maximum change from baseline for the post-dose measurements of FEV1. Baseline FEV1 is the mean of the two measurements taken at 40 and 15 minutes before drug administration.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Peak Response After 0, 4, 12, and 24 Weeks
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) peak response after 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks were reported. Peak FVC response was the maximum change from baseline for the post-dose measurements of FVC. Baseline FVC is the mean of the two measurements taken at 40 and 15 minutes before drug administration.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Individual Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Measurements at Each Time Point
Individual Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values measured at each time points at Week 0, 4, 12, and 24 were reported.
Measured: 15 minutes (min), 30 min, 1 hour (h), 2 h, 3 h after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24. At 0 min (at drug administration) at Week 4, 12, and 24.
Individual Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Measurements at Each Time Point
Individual Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) values measured at each time point at Week 0, 4, 12, and 24 were reported.
Measured: 15 minutes (min), 30 min, 1 hour (h), 2 h, 3 h after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24. At 0 min (at drug administration) at Week 4, 12, and 24.
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response on Day 3 and 5
Trough Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) response on Day 3 and 5 are reported, for which the FEV1 response is the change from baseline in trough FEV1. Trough FEV1 for respective day (Day 3 or Day 5)was defined as the mean of the two FEV1 measurements recorded at the pre-dose measurements (40 and 15 minutes before the drug administration) at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours post previous drug administration from the Respimat® Inhaler) at that day. Baseline FEV1 was pre-treatment FEV1 values measured at Day 1 of treatment period (baseline) prior to administration of the first dose of study medication, which was the mean of the measurements recorded from the pulmonary function tests taken at 40 and 15 minutes prior to drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
Measured: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at Day 1 (baseline) and Day 3 and 5 of treatment period.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at 3 Minutes and 10 Minutes Following Drug Administration
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) values at 3 minutes and 10 minutes following drug administration at Week 0, 4, 12, and 24 are reported.
Measured: 3 minutes (min) and 10 after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 3 Minutes and 10 Minutes Following Drug Administration
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) values at 3 minutes and 10 minutes following drug administration at Week 0, 4, 12, and 24 are reported.
Measured: 3 minutes (min) and 10 min after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24.
Weekly Mean Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
The patient recorded twice daily peak flow measurements with an electronic peak flow meter throughout the entire evaluation period. Morning measurements were performed immediately upon arising after the patient had cleared out mucus, prior to administration of trial and/or rescue medication. The evening measurements were performed at bedtime. The weekly mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is reported.
Measured: Assessed before drug administration per day during 24 weeks with weekly mean values reporting.
Weekly Mean Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
The patient recorded twice daily peak flow measurements with an electronic peak flow meter throughout the entire evaluation period. Morning measurements were performed immediately upon arising after the patient had cleared out mucus, prior to administration of trial and/or rescue medication. The evening measurements were performed at bedtime. The weekly mean of evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is reported.
Measured: Assessed at bed time per day during 24 weeks with weekly mean values reporting.
Weekly Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Therapy Used Per Day (as Occasion Requires (PRN) Salbutamol [Albuterol])
The patient recorded the number of occasions salbutamol (albuterol) Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) was used each day and night during the entire evaluation period. The weekly mean number of occasions of rescue therapy used per day (PRN salbutamol [albuterol]) is reported.
Measured: Assessed once per day during 24 weeks with weekly mean values reporting.
Physician's Global Evaluation
Physicians make a global evaluation reflecting the physician's global opinion of the overall clinical condition of the patient as "poor" (score 1 or 2), "fair" (score 3 or 4), "good" (score 5 or 6), or "excellent" (score 7 or 8). These assessments are made prior to pulmonary function testing and are summarized on pulmonary function test days. This evaluation was based on the need for concomitant medication, number and severity of exacerbations since the last visit, severity of cough, ability to exercise, amount of wheezing, and other relevant clinical observations. The score ranges from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating better overall clinical condition.
Measured: At Week 0, 4, 12, and 24.
Transition Dyspnea Index - Functional Impairment Domain Score
The transitional dyspnea index (TDI) evaluates the patient's condition related to breathlessness. The TDI includes three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. The TDI domain score of functional impairment is reported, which domain score ranges from -3 (major deterioration in the ability of working and doing activities due to shortness of breath; the worst score) to 3 (major improvement in the ability of working and doing activities; mild restriction on full activities due to the improvement of shortness of breath; the best score).
Measured: At Week 0 (baseline), 4, 12 and 24.
Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task Domain Score
The transitional dyspnea index (TDI) evaluates the patient's condition related to breathlessness. The TDI includes three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. The TDI domain score of magnitude of task is reported, which domain score ranges from -3 (major deterioration from baseline status; the worst score) to 3 (major improvement from baseline status; the best score).
Measured: At week 0 (baseline), 4, 12 and 24
Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort Domain Score
The transitional dyspnea index (TDI) evaluates the patient's condition related to breathlessness. The TDI includes three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort. The TDI domain score of magnitude of effort is reported, which sub-score ranges from -3 (severe decrease in effort from baseline to avoid shortness of breath. Activities now take 50-100% longer to complete than required at baseline; the worst score) to 3 (Able to do things with much greater effort than previously with few pauses. Activities may be performed 50- 100% more rapidly than at baseline; the best score).
Measured: At Week 0 (baseline), 4, 12 and 24
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a well-established, self-completed tool measuring health-related quality of life in patients with diseases of airways obstruction on three aspects of symptoms, activity, and impacts. The total SGRQ score is reported, which ranges from 0 (the best score) to 100 (the worst score) with smaller score value indicating less limitations due to breathlessness and better quality of life.
Measured: At Week 0, 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) 8 Domain Scores at Baseline
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function (10 questions), role physical (4 questions), Bodily pain (2 questions), General physical health (5 questions), Vitality (4 questions), Social functioning (2 questions), role emotional (3 questions), and General mental health (5 questions). Each domain score is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score value, the better the health condition.
Measured: At baseline (Week 0, Day 1 of treatment period).
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Physical Function Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of physical function (based on 10 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the better the physical function.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Role Physical Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of role limitations due to physical health problems (based on 4 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the less limitations in roles due to physical health problems.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Bodily Pain Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of bodily pain (based on 2 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the less severer the bodily pain.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - General Physical Health Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of general physical health (based on 5 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the better the physical health in general.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Vitality Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of vitality (based on 4 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the more vitality and less fatigue one has.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Social Functioning Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of Social functioning (based on 2 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the better the social functioning.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Role Emotional Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of role emotional (based on 4 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the less limitation in roles due to emotional problems.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - General Mental Health Domain Score
The 36-item-health Survey (SF-36) is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions evaluating patient's physical and mental health. Among the 36 questions, 1 is on the health comparing to 1 year ago and the remaining 35 questions are divided into 8 domains: Physical function, role limitations physical, Bodily pain, General physical health, Vitality, Social functioning, role limitations emotional, and General mental health.
The domain score of general mental health (based on 5 questions) is reported, which is the weighted sum of the questions in the corresponding domain with the domain score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the domain score, the better the mental health in general.
Measured: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
Number of Patients With at Least One Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation
Number of patients with at least one Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation is reported. Incidence rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation is reported. A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation is defined as "a complex of lower respiratory events / symptoms (increase or new onset) related to the underlying COPD, with a duration of three days or more, requiring a change in treatment", where a "complex of lower respiratory events / symptoms" means at least two of the following: Shortness of breath, Sputum production (volume), Occurrence of purulent sputum, Cough, Wheezing, Chest tightness.
Measured: From first does until 30 days after the end of treatment, up to 205 days.
Incidence Rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation
Incidence rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation is reported. A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation is defined as "a complex of lower respiratory events / symptoms (increase or new onset) related to the underlying COPD, with a duration of three days or more, requiring a change in treatment", where a "complex of lower respiratory events / symptoms" means at least two of the following: Shortness of breath, Sputum production (volume), Occurrence of purulent sputum, Cough, Wheezing, Chest tightness.
Measured: From first does until 30 days after the end of treatment, up to 205 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study start6 Sep 2007
- Primary completion5 May 2009
- Study completion5 May 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,080 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00528996
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1205.14
- Other IDs
- 2007-007946-42
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 24 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Abrahams R, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Ramsdell J, Schmidt H, Joseph E, Karpel J. Safety and efficacy of the once-daily anticholinergic BEA2180 compared with tiotropium in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2013 Jun;107(6):854-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PubMed 23490224
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multinational, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Comparison Over 24 Weeks of Three Doses (50µg, 100µg, 200µg) of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium 5µg, Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler and Placebo in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00528996
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1205.14
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,080 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 May 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Aug 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of three doses (50 µg, 100 µg and 200 µg) of BEA 2180 delivered by the Respimat® once daily to placebo and tiotropium bromide delivered by the Respimat® in patients with COPD. Additional objectives include comparing the effects on dyspnea and health status.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching Placebo |
| BEA 2180 BR low dose | Experimental | Drug: BEA 2180 BRLow dose |
| BEA 2180 BR medium dose | Experimental | Drug: BEA 2180 BRMedium dose |
| BEA 2180 BR high dose | Experimental | Drug: BEA 2180 BRHigh dose |
| Tiotropium Bromide | Experimental | Drug: Tiotropium BromideTiotropium Bromide |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with ICH-GCP guidelines prior to participation in the trial, which includes medication washout and restrictions.
- All patients must have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P95 4381) and must meet the following spirometric criteria:
- Patients must have relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with an FEV1 (post-bronchodilator, 30 minutes post salbutamol/albuterol) <80% of predicted normal and FEV1 less than or equal to 70% of FVC at the PFTs at Visit 1 (screening).
- Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
- Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years. Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient ability to participate in the study.
- Patients with clinically relevant abnormal baseline haematology, blood chemistry or urinalysis, if the abnormality defines a significant disease as defined in exclusion criterion No. 1.
- Patients with a recent history (one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia.
- Patients who have been hospitalized for heart failure within the past 3 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BEA 2180 BRSolution | Drug | BEA 2180 BR high dose, BEA 2180 BR low dose, BEA 2180 BR medium dose |
| Tiotropium BromideSolution | Drug | Tiotropium Bromide |
| PlaceboSolution | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response After 24 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 24.
Trough Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) response was defined as the change from baseline in trough FEV1. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the two FEV1 measurements recorded at the pre-dose measurements (40 and 15 minutes before the drug administration) at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours post previous drug administration from the Respimat® Inhaler). Baseline FEV1 was pre-treatment FEV1 values measured at Day 1 of treatment period (baseline) prior to administration of the first dose of study medication, which was the mean of the measurements recorded from the pulmonary function tests taken at 40 and 15 minutes prior to drug administration at Day 1 of treatment period.
30 secondary outcomes
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response After 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 18 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 18.
Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Response After 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response After 0, 4, 12 and 24 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve From 0 to 3 Hours (AUC0-3h) Response After 0, 4, 12 and 24 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Peak Response After 0, 4, 12, and 24 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Peak Response After 0, 4, 12, and 24 Weeks
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration and 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 hours, 3 hours after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, 24.
Individual Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Measurements at Each Time Point
Time frame: 15 minutes (min), 30 min, 1 hour (h), 2 h, 3 h after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24. At 0 min (at drug administration) at Week 4, 12, and 24.
Individual Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Measurements at Each Time Point
Time frame: 15 minutes (min), 30 min, 1 hour (h), 2 h, 3 h after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24. At 0 min (at drug administration) at Week 4, 12, and 24.
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response on Day 3 and 5
Time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at Day 1 (baseline) and Day 3 and 5 of treatment period.
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at 3 Minutes and 10 Minutes Following Drug Administration
Time frame: 3 minutes (min) and 10 after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 3 Minutes and 10 Minutes Following Drug Administration
Time frame: 3 minutes (min) and 10 min after drug administration at Week 0 (Day 1 of treatment period), 4, 12, and 24.
Weekly Mean Pre-dose Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
Time frame: Assessed before drug administration per day during 24 weeks with weekly mean values reporting.
Weekly Mean Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR)
Time frame: Assessed at bed time per day during 24 weeks with weekly mean values reporting.
Weekly Mean Number of Occasions of Rescue Therapy Used Per Day (as Occasion Requires (PRN) Salbutamol [Albuterol])
Time frame: Assessed once per day during 24 weeks with weekly mean values reporting.
Physician's Global Evaluation
Time frame: At Week 0, 4, 12, and 24.
Transition Dyspnea Index - Functional Impairment Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 0 (baseline), 4, 12 and 24.
Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Task Domain Score
Time frame: At week 0 (baseline), 4, 12 and 24
Transition Dyspnea Index - Magnitude of Effort Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 0 (baseline), 4, 12 and 24
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
Time frame: At Week 0, 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) 8 Domain Scores at Baseline
Time frame: At baseline (Week 0, Day 1 of treatment period).
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Physical Function Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Role Physical Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Bodily Pain Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - General Physical Health Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Vitality Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Social Functioning Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - Role Emotional Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
36-item-health Survey (SF-36) - General Mental Health Domain Score
Time frame: At Week 4, 12, and 24.
Number of Patients With at Least One Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation
Time frame: From first does until 30 days after the end of treatment, up to 205 days.
Incidence Rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation
Time frame: From first does until 30 days after the end of treatment, up to 205 days.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23490224Abrahams R, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Ramsdell J, Schmidt H, Joseph E, Karpel J. Safety and efficacy of the once-daily anticholinergic BEA2180 compared with tiotropium in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2013 Jun;107(6):854-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Axatilimab and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Multidisciplinary Care, Structured and Targeted on the COPD Patient's Clinical Pathway.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
The AIRWARD Study: A Study to Test Whether Verducatib Helps People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating and Promoting Resilience in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
178 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing BEA 2180 BR and Tiotropium Bromide in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 178 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 178 sites in United States, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Response After 24 Weeks (time frame: 40 minutes (min) and 15 min before drug administration at baseline (Day 1 of treatment period) and Week 24.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00528996, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2021.