AzTrials
AzTrials

AnalgesiaNCT00529074

Epidural Anesthesia /Analgesia Versus PCA for Laparoscopic Complex Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Epidural Catheter for Analgesia in people with Analgesia, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We plan to demonstrate the superiority of epidural anaesthesia/analgesia in repairs of large ventral hernias as compared with a conventional narcotic analgesia regimen. We hypothesize that: 1. Primary outcome measures will improve. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Analgesia
What is being tested?
Epidural Catheter for Analgesia
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2006to Feb 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-80 years of age
  • ASA grades I-III
  • Patients with large hernias
  • requiring mesh greater than or equal to 18cmx 30cm
  • with a known hernia of at least 10cm x 8cm
  • Or several smaller hernias that require or may require the coverage referred to in #1

Who cannot join

  • Age<18 or >80
  • Poor candidacy for operative treatment
  • Previous spinal operations
  • Sepsis
  • Incarcerated ventral hernias requiring anticoagulation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics

    Columbia, Missouri, 65212

Other trials in United States

About this study

We plan to demonstrate the superiority of epidural anaesthesia/analgesia in repairs of large ventral hernias as compared with a conventional narcotic analgesia regimen.

We hypothesize that:

  1. Primary outcome measures will improve. Patients will have a shorter length of stay (1 day less) with pre and post-operative epidural analgesia.
  2. Secondary outcome measures will also improve. Among them will be VAS pain scores, time to first flatus and bowel movement as well as major and minor complications.
Read the detailed description

Epidural anesthesia and analgesia has shown benefits over standard anesthesia/analgesia in many types of Vascular, GI, and Thoracic surgeries. The benefits extended are varied, and include: improvements in cardiac and pulmonary function, decreases in hypercoagulability, reduction of post-operative ileus and decreases in post-operative pain. 1 Epidural pain relief works by exposing the epidural space, with its network of nerve roots, to a flood of analgesics and/or local anesthetic. This is thought to prevent the release of neurotransmitters from afferent pain fibers or interrupt the transmission of pain related information to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. 2 Several studies have been done on patients undergoing GI surgery with adjunct epidurals (particularly colorectal procedures) and they have shown that ileus and length of stay, is greatly reduced. 3No one has yet extended these benefits to patients undergoing hernia repair.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has recently become a popular choice for both patients and surgeons alike, and has been shown in some studies to reduce wound complications and length of hospital stay. But improvements in post-operative pain, ileus and return to work have been less than hoped for, and as such, adjuncts are being investigated to improve some of these outcomes. In one study of 850 patients in 4 different academic institutions patients had a mean hospital stay of 2.3 days (although a great portion of cases were small ventral hernias that resulted in same-day discharges) and 3% remained hospitalized with a prolonged ileus. The proportion of patients who had prolonged ileus and subsequently longer hospital stays was much greater amongst the patients with larger ventral hernia repairs as well as the patients with recurrences.4 Moreover there has been some suggestion by Ramshaw and colleagues that Laparoscopic Ventral hernia repair is more painful than the classical open hernia operation. 5 One of the explanations is that there may be a component of parietal as well as visceral pain to this procedure; with the visceral pain accompanying the counter-traction on the herniated contents of the sac when taking down adhesions, and the parietal pain from the many full thickness sutures and 3mm tacks used to secure the prosthesis into the abdominal wall.6 In this study, we will test the benefits of epidural anesthesia/analgesia on these patients with complicated Laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.

As of yet there have been no studies that compare the use of epidural analgesia/anesthesia to conventional anesthesia and narcotics for these patients in relation to their expected length of stay, post-op pain, ileus, or other complications.

  1. Moraca RJ, Sheldon DG, Thirlby RC The role of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia in Surgical Practice. Annals of Surgery 2003;238 663-673.
  2. R. J. Fotiadis1, S. Badvie1, M. D.Weston2 and T. G. Allen-Mersh1 Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery British Journal of Surgery 2004; 91: 828-841
  3. Rodgers A, Walker N et al. Reduction of Post Operative Mortality and Morbidity With Epidural or Spinal Anaesthesia: Results From an Overview of Randomized Trials. Br Med Journal 2000; 321: 1493-1497
  4. Heniford BT. Park A. Ramshaw BJ. Voeller G. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Annals of Surgery. 238(3):391-9; discussion 399-400, 2003 Sep
  5. Ramshaw B, Esartia Et Al.Comparison of Laparoscopic and open Ventral Hernia Repair; The American Surgeon; Sept 1999; Vol 65: 9 pg 827
  6. Heniford BT, Park, A, ramshaw BJ, Voeller G Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in 407 Patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Vol 190: 6 PP 645-650 June 2000
Conditions
Analgesia
Being tested
Epidural Catheter for Analgesia
Keywords
Epidural Analgesia
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epidural Catheter for AnalgesiaDevice

    Patients enrolled will be placed into one of two groups of 30 patients. The decision to place the patients in either one of the two groups will be randomized as above. The Epidural group will have a thoracic epidural catheter placed pre-operatively at the T6-T7 level before general anesthesia is given. (using a .1% Marcaine and .1% Meperidine solution) A dose of Ketorolac will be given 15 minutes before the patient will be awakened from anesthesia (provided that there is good renal function and the patient is not hypovolemic) The catheter will be used preoperatively as an adjunct for general anesthesia as well as used postoperatively for continuous epidural analgesia(CEA). The control group will be given general anesthesia alone and post-operative PCA along with NSAIDS before leaving for the recovery room (as above).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary outcome measures will improve. Patients will have a shorter length of stay (1 day less) with pre and post-operative epidural analgesia.

    Measured: Post-operatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary outcome measures will also improve. Among them will be VAS pain scores, time to first flatus and bowel movement as well as major and minor complications.

    Measured: Post-operatively.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2006
  3. Primary completionFeb 2006
  4. Study completionFeb 2006

Why it stopped: never activated

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00529074
Sponsor's protocol ID
MO-1053537
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
11 Sep 2007
Last updated
16 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epidural Catheter for Analgesia in people with Analgesia, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary outcome measures will improve. Patients will have a shorter length of stay (1 day less) with pre and post-operative epidural analgesia. (time frame: Post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in