MalariaPhase 3NCT00529620
Three Alternative Drug Regimens for Malaria Seasonal Preventive Treatment in Senegal
A Phase 3 study testing sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine and sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquine in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Senegal.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare the acceptability, efficacy and safety of three alternative drug regimens for use for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment to prevent malaria in children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine and sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,833 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSenegal
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Dec 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 59 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- age 2 to 59 months in September 2007
Who cannot join
- history of allergy to study drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Senegal1 site
Departement de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Universite Cheikh Anta Diop
Dakar
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial of Effectiveness and Acceptability of Three Alternative Regimens for Malaria Seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Senegal
The purpose of this trial is to compare the acceptability, efficacy and safety of three alternative drug regimens for use for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment to prevent malaria in children. Children aged 2 months to 5 years will be randomized to receive IPT with one of three regimens during the transmission season: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine, show to be highly effective for IPT in a recent trial; SP plus piperaquine, used for malaria prophylaxis in China for many years; or Duocotexcin (a combination of piperaquine with an artemisinin).
Read the detailed description
In areas of seasonal malaria transmission the burden of severe disease and mortality due to malaria is mainly among children under 5 years of age. Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with antimalarial drugs given to all children once a month during the transmission season is a promising new strategy for malaria prevention. Seasonal IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and one dose of artesunate resulted in a 90% reduction in incidence of clinical malaria in a recent trial in Senegal (Cisse et al., Lancet 2006). An important consideration is the possible impact of seasonal IPT on the emergence and spread of drug resistant parasite genotypes, the choice of drug regimen is therefore critical. A second trial in Senegal showed that a combination of two non-artemisinin drugs with relatively long half lives (SP and amodiaquine (AQ) over three days) was more effective than SP with artesunate and more effective than AQ with artesunate, in preventing malaria; and very few children developed parasitaemia, so that the potential for drug resistant genotypes to emerge and spread was low. Although SP+AQ was more efficacious than the artemisinin-containing regimens tested, it was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events, especially vomiting, and AQ has a bitter unpleasant taste, and therefore we have concerns about the acceptability of AQ for widespread use for IPT. It is important to select a drug regimen that is not only effective but safe and acceptable to the community. Each treatment is a 3-dose regimen over 3 days, the first dose will be supervised and the other 2 doses given by the mother or carer. One month after each treatment round, children will be visited at home to check for malaria symptoms, children with fever or a history of fever in the last 48 hours will be asked to give a finger prick blood sample for malaria diagnosis. One month after the last treatment all children will be asked to give a finger prick blood sample for parasitology and haemoglobin, axillary temperature will be measured. The child's carer will be interviewed about compliance and adverse events. The endpoints will be the cumulative incidence of malaria, the proportion of children experiencing moderate and severe adverse events, compliance with and acceptability of the regimen, the prevalence of parasitaemia, and the proportion of children carrying parasite genotypes associated with resistance to sulfadoxine or pyrimethamine at the end of the transmission season. Since acceptability is difficult to assess in the formal setting of a trial, and because the method of delivery may affect compliance and acceptability, drug treatments will be delivered by community workers replicating the conditions under IPT would be delivered routinely in Senegal. Treatments will be administered at home by local community workers, each worker covering a circuit of approximately 60-80 children. The community worker circuit will be the unit of randomization, for simplicity in the field to minimise allocation errors, and to avoid contamination due to sharing of tablets within a household.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine, sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquine
- Keywords
- Malaria, IPT, preventive treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquineDrug
Also called Dualkin
Monthly treatments during the malaria transmission season
dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquineDrug
Also called Duo cotexcin
Monthly treatments during the transmission season
sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquineDrug
Also called sulfadoxine pyrimethamine, piperaquine phosphate
Monthly treatments during the malaria transmission season
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | sulfalene pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine Receives: Drug: sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine |
| 2 | Active comparator | dihydroartemisinin piperaquine Receives: Drug: dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine |
| 3 | Active comparator | sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus piperaquine Receives: Drug: sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of malaria
Measured: Four months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Adverse events reported by the mother: vomiting, headache, fever, nausea, diarrhea
Measured: within 4 days of the start treatment
Prevalence of P.falciparum parasitaemia
Measured: Measured by microscopy 1 month after the last treatment, in December
Haemoglobin concentration
Measured: Measured 1 month after the last treatment, in December
The proportion of children carrying P.falciparum genotypes associated with resistance to sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine
Measured: Measured in December
Compliance with the treatment regimen
Measured: Recorded 4 days after the start of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionDec 2007
- Study completionDec 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,833 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal
- Investigators
- Badara Cisse, PhD, Principal investigator, Universite Cheikh Anta DiopPaul J Milligan, PhD, Principal investigator, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00529620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5184
- Status last verified
- May 2010
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 27 May 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Cisse B, Cairns M, Faye E, NDiaye O, Faye B, Cames C, Cheng Y, NDiaye M, Lo AC, Simondon K, Trape JF, Faye O, NDiaye JL, Gaye O, Greenwood B, Milligan P. Randomized trial of piperaquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or dihydroartemisinin for malaria intermittent preventive treatment in children. PLoS One. 2009 Sep 28;4(9):e7164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007164.
PubMed 19784374
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 May 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial of Effectiveness and Acceptability of Three Alternative Regimens for Malaria Seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Senegal
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00529620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5184
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Malaria, IPT, preventive treatment
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,833 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cheikh Anta Diop University, Senegal
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to compare the acceptability, efficacy and safety of three alternative drug regimens for use for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment to prevent malaria in children. Children aged 2 months to 5 years will be randomized to receive IPT with one of three regimens during the transmission season: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine, show to be highly effective for IPT in a recent trial; SP plus piperaquine, used for malaria prophylaxis in China for many years; or Duocotexcin (a combination of piperaquine with an artemisinin).
Detailed description
In areas of seasonal malaria transmission the burden of severe disease and mortality due to malaria is mainly among children under 5 years of age. Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with antimalarial drugs given to all children once a month during the transmission season is a promising new strategy for malaria prevention. Seasonal IPT with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and one dose of artesunate resulted in a 90% reduction in incidence of clinical malaria in a recent trial in Senegal (Cisse et al., Lancet 2006). An important consideration is the possible impact of seasonal IPT on the emergence and spread of drug resistant parasite genotypes, the choice of drug regimen is therefore critical. A second trial in Senegal showed that a combination of two non-artemisinin drugs with relatively long half lives (SP and amodiaquine (AQ) over three days) was more effective than SP with artesunate and more effective than AQ with artesunate, in preventing malaria; and very few children developed parasitaemia, so that the potential for drug resistant genotypes to emerge and spread was low. Although SP+AQ was more efficacious than the artemisinin-containing regimens tested, it was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events, especially vomiting, and AQ has a bitter unpleasant taste, and therefore we have concerns about the acceptability of AQ for widespread use for IPT. It is important to select a drug regimen that is not only effective but safe and acceptable to the community. Each treatment is a 3-dose regimen over 3 days, the first dose will be supervised and the other 2 doses given by the mother or carer. One month after each treatment round, children will be visited at home to check for malaria symptoms, children with fever or a history of fever in the last 48 hours will be asked to give a finger prick blood sample for malaria diagnosis. One month after the last treatment all children will be asked to give a finger prick blood sample for parasitology and haemoglobin, axillary temperature will be measured. The child's carer will be interviewed about compliance and adverse events. The endpoints will be the cumulative incidence of malaria, the proportion of children experiencing moderate and severe adverse events, compliance with and acceptability of the regimen, the prevalence of parasitaemia, and the proportion of children carrying parasite genotypes associated with resistance to sulfadoxine or pyrimethamine at the end of the transmission season. Since acceptability is difficult to assess in the formal setting of a trial, and because the method of delivery may affect compliance and acceptability, drug treatments will be delivered by community workers replicating the conditions under IPT would be delivered routinely in Senegal. Treatments will be administered at home by local community workers, each worker covering a circuit of approximately 60-80 children. The community worker circuit will be the unit of randomization, for simplicity in the field to minimise allocation errors, and to avoid contamination due to sharing of tablets within a household.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquinesulfalene pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquinedihydroartemisinin piperaquine |
| 3 | Active comparator | Drug: sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquinesulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus piperaquine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age 2 to 59 months in September 2007
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- history of allergy to study drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquineAlso: DualkinMonthly treatments during the malaria transmission season | Drug | 1 |
| dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquineAlso: Duo cotexcinMonthly treatments during the transmission season | Drug | 2 |
| sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquineAlso: sulfadoxine pyrimethamine, piperaquine phosphateMonthly treatments during the malaria transmission season | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Incidence of malaria
Time frame: Four months
5 secondary outcomes
Adverse events reported by the mother: vomiting, headache, fever, nausea, diarrhea
Time frame: within 4 days of the start treatment
Prevalence of P.falciparum parasitaemia
Time frame: Measured by microscopy 1 month after the last treatment, in December
Haemoglobin concentration
Time frame: Measured 1 month after the last treatment, in December
The proportion of children carrying P.falciparum genotypes associated with resistance to sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine
Time frame: Measured in December
Compliance with the treatment regimen
Time frame: Recorded 4 days after the start of treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 May 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19784374Cisse B, Cairns M, Faye E, NDiaye O, Faye B, Cames C, Cheng Y, NDiaye M, Lo AC, Simondon K, Trape JF, Faye O, NDiaye JL, Gaye O, Greenwood B, Milligan P. Randomized trial of piperaquine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine or dihydroartemisinin for malaria intermittent preventive treatment in children. PLoS One. 2009 Sep 28;4(9):e7164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007164.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Badara Cisse, PhD principal investigator
Universite Cheikh Anta Diop
Paul J Milligan, PhD principal investigator
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing sulfalene-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine and sulfadoxine pyrimethamine plus piperaquine in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Senegal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Senegal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of malaria (time frame: Four months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00529620, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2010.