AzTrials
AzTrials

Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaPET-ChopNCT00530179

FDG-PET-Stratified R-DICEP and R-Beam/ASCT For Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

A study testing Autologous Blood Stem Transplantation and R-CHOP in people with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 3 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate: 1. whether an imaging test called a PET (Positron emission tomography) scan performed after two cycles of standard chemotherapy is able to identify patients who have a high cure rate after completing standard chemotherapy alone; and 2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
What is being tested?
Autologous Blood Stem Transplantation and R-CHOP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
3 sitesCanada
Study dates
Jul 2007to 19 May 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
  • Adverse Prognosis = Stage 3 or 4 and elevated LDH
  • No more than one prior cycle of R-CHOP chemotherapy
  • Adequate cardiac function
  • No central nervous system involvement by lymphoma

Who cannot join

  • Histological diagnosis other than Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Use of other anti-cancer therapies
  • Other serious illness that would compromise study participation
  • Prior malignancy
  • Prior stem cell transplant or radiotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Canada3 sites
  • Tom Baker Cancer Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T4C 2H5

  • Ottawa General Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

    Regina, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: FDG-PET-Stratified R-DICEP and R-BEAM/ASCT For Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate:

  1. whether an imaging test called a PET (Positron emission tomography) scan performed after two cycles of standard chemotherapy is able to identify patients who have a high cure rate after completing standard chemotherapy alone; and
  2. whether high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) when used in combination with an antibody called Rituximab results in high cure rates for those patients predicted to do poorly with standard chemotherapy by the PET scan.
Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:

Although the addition of Rituximab anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy to standard CHOP chemotherapy (R-CHOP) results in a 15-20% increase in absolute EFS rate over CHOP alone for DLBCL patients, it is likely that 40-50% of patients with poor prognosis DLBCL will not be cured by R-CHOP. High dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to salvage a substantial proportion of patients with relapsed DLBCL. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing standard-dose chemotherapy (SDCT) alone to SDCT followed by HDCT/ASCT as initial treatment for poor prognosis DLBCL demonstrated a significant benefit for HDCT over SDCT in terms of EFS and OS. A single centre prospective phase II study was conducted in Calgary to assess feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of two cycles of HDCT following just one cycle of CHOP induction therapy for patients under 65 years of age who were diagnosed with aggressive histology lymphoma and 2-3 Age Adjusted International Prognostic Index (AAIPI) risk factors. The study was conducted prior to the widespread use of Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP). The treatment protocol involved one cycle of standard dose CHOP followed by one cycle of dose-intensive cyclophosphamide 5.25 g/m2, etoposide 1.05 g/m2, cisplatin 105 mg/m2 (DICEP), then autologous blood stem cell collection, followed by one cycle of high dose BCNU 300 mg/m2, etoposide 800 mg/m2, Ara-C 1600 mg/m2, melphalan 140 mg/m2 (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and radiotherapy to prior bulk. With a median follow up of 49 months, 4 year event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for the 55 patients accrued to the study were 72% (95% CI=60-84%) and 79% (95% CI=69-90%), respectively.

The two major advances in lymphoma management that have occurred since the design of our CHOP-DICEP-BEAM/ASCT phase II study are the addition of Rituximab anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy to chemotherapy (as described above), and the use of FDG-PET functional imaging/response assessment. Several studies have reported the strong correlation of early response assessment using FDG-PET with PFS and OS following standard chemotherapy for aggressive NHL. In one of the largest, best designed studies, PET-negativity following 2 cycles of RCHOP was associated with higher 2-year estimates of EFS (82% vs 43% , p < .001) and OS (90% vs 61%, p = .006). The incorporation of Rituximab and PET-guided HDCT/ASCT into our intensive chemotherapy protocol may lead to further improvements in EFS while decreasing the overall need for HDCT/ASCT by targeting those patients destined to fail R-CHOP by early PET-based response assessment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To determine if negative FDG-PET imaging following 2 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy is able to identify a group of patients with excellent prognosis (80% 3-year EFS) following standard 6 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone.
  2. To determine if a group of patients with positive FDG-PET imaging following 2 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy are able to achieve excellent outcome (80% 3-year EFS) following intensive chemotherapy with R-DICEP and R-BEAM/ASCT.
  3. To determine if PET-guided R-DICEP and R-BEAM/ASCT is feasible and associated with acceptable toxicity rates in a multi-centre study.

STUDY DESIGN:

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Give written informed consent
  2. Age 18-65 years
  3. Histological diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma including:
  4. Diffuse Large B-cell
  5. Immunoblastic B-cell
  6. Primary Mediastinal Diffuse Large B-cell
  7. T-cell Rich, Diffuse Large B-cell
  8. Anaplastic Large B-Cell
  9. Diffuse Large B-cell with areas of follicular lymphoma in same biopsy
  10. No central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
  11. No more than 1 prior cycle of R-CHOP chemotherapy
  12. At least 1 adverse International Prognostic Index factor at diagnosis:
  13. Age > 60 years b. ECOG performance status 2-4 c. Elevated serum LDH level d. More than 1 extranodal site involved by lymphoma e. Stage 3 or 4
  14. Adequate organ function:
  15. Cardiac: LVEF >45%
  16. Pulmonary: FVC, FEV1 and DLCO >50% predicted
  17. Renal: creatinine <120µmol/L unless caused by ureteric obstruction from lymphoma
  18. Liver: ALT, AlkP, Bilirubin <3 x upper limit of normal unless caused by biliary tract obstruction from lymphoma EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
  19. Histological diagnosis other than Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma 2. Pregnant or lactating females 3. Concurrent use of other anti-cancer therapies 4. Other serious co-morbid illness that would compromise study participation. 5. Prior malignancy unless non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix (CIN) or breast, or malignancy treated more than 5 years previously with no evidence of recurrent disease since initial treatment.
  20. More than 1 prior cycle of Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, or doxorubicin. 7. Prior HDCT/ASCT or prior radiotherapy. STUDY ENDPOINTS Primary:
  • 3 year EFS for patients receiving 6 cycles R-CHOP (PET-negative response) and for patients receiving RCHOP x2 followed by R-DICEP then R-BEAM/ASCT (PET-positive response) Secondary:
  • Complete and Partial Response Rates
  • PET/CT response rates following RCHOP x 2 cycles
  • Overall Survival
  • Safety (type, frequency, severity, and relationship of adverse events to study treatment) STUDY DURATION: Three years TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE: 70-80 patients DOSING REGIMEN(S):

<!-- -->

  1. Induction: Standard R-CHOP chemotherapy q21days x 2 cycles R-CHOP x 2 cycles q21days: Rituximab 375mg/ m2 IV day 1 Cyclophosphamide 750mg/ m2 IV day 1 Adriamycin 50mg/ m2 IV day 1 Vincristine 1.4mg/ m2 (max 2mg) IV day 1 Prednisone 100mg po days 1-5
  2. FDG-PET/CT imaging between days 10-15 following R-CHOP cycle #2.

Sites of disease will be scored for intensity based on the following scale:

  1. Absent
  2. Minimal (low grade but greater than in regional lymph nodes of similar size or surrounding interstitial tissues)
  3. Low (readily visible but less than liver)
  4. Medium (comparable to liver)
  5. High (greater than liver) Interim post therapy scans will be considered as negative (showing a favorable response) if no more than one site shows an intensity score of greater than 3. The treatment protocol will be dictated by the result of the interim FDG-PET/CT scan following 2 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy as follows:
  6. If FDG-PET scan negative: 4 more cycles R-CHOP (total 6 cycles R-CHOP)
  7. If FDG-PET scan positive: one cycle of R-DICEP then within 5-8 weeks administer R-BEAM and autologous blood stem cell transplantation as outlined below:
  8. For PET-positive patients ONLY: R-DICEP CHEMOTHERAPY (begin 3-5 weeks following day 1 CHOP #2). ½NS+20meq KCL/L IV at 150ml/h start 19:00h day 1 then decrease to 75ml/h at 08:00am day 2, continue to day 5 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 1 and 8 (day 1 on a Wednesday) Cyclophosphamide 1.75 g/ m2 d2,3,4 in 500ml D5W over 2 hrs Etoposide 350 mg/ m2 d2,3,4 in 1 L over 2 hrs daily Cisplatin 35 mg/m2 d2,3,4 in 500ml N/S +25g mannitol over 2 hrs Mesna 1.75g/m2 d2,3,4 by continuous infusion over 24 hrs G-CSF 300 (<70kg), 480 (70-100kg), or 600mcg/d (>100kg) SC from day 15 until apheresis completed AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD STEM CELL COLLECTION: Apheresis approximately day 20-22 of R-DICEP, after ANC>5 x 109/L, platelets increasing >50 x109/L , and peripheral blood CD34 count >20 x106/L (if measurement available). Apheresis to proceed according to standards set at each study centre until at least 3x106CD34+ cells/kg have been collected (>5x106 CD34+ cells/kg preferred). R-BEAM + Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (5-8weeks post-d1 R-DICEP) Day - 6 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV BCNU 300mg/m2 IV Day -5 to -2 Etoposide 100mg/m2 IV q12h x 8 doses Ara-C 200mg/m2 IV q12h x 8 doses Day -1 Melphalan 140mg/m2 IV Day 0 Stem Cell Infusion Day 14 Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV
Being tested
Autologous Blood Stem Transplantation, R-CHOP
Keywords
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Positron Emission Tomography, CHOP Chemotherapy protocol, Stem Cell Transplantation, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Autologous Blood Stem TransplantationProcedure or surgery

    2 CYCLES OF R-CHOP + R-DICEP/R-BEAM FOLLOWED BY AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION

  • R-CHOPDrug

    6 - 21 DAY Cycles of R-CHOP

Study groups in NCT00530179
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm AActive comparatorStandard R-CHOP chemotherapy every 21 days X 2 Cycles followed by PET/CT scan. If scan is determined negative for disease intensity patient receives 4 more cycles R-CHOP (total 6 cycles R-CHOP) Assigned interventions: Drug: R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Cisplatin, Mesna, G-CSF 6 - 21 DAY Cycles of R-CHOP
Receives: Drug: R-CHOP
Arm BActive comparatorStandard R-CHOP chemotherapy every 21 days X 2 Cycles followed by PET/CT scan. If scan is determined positive for disease intensity the patient receives one cycle or R-DICEP/R-BEAM the autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Assigned Interventions: Procedure/Surgery: Autologous Blood Stem Transplantation 2 CYCLES OF R-CHOP + R-DICEP/R-BEAM FOLLOWED BY AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Receives: Procedure: Autologous Blood Stem Transplantation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Sep 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2007
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completion19 May 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00530179
Sponsor's protocol ID
0307003
Acronym
PET-Chop
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
13 Sep 2007
Last updated
22 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Autologous Blood Stem Transplantation and R-CHOP in people with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 3 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in