Chronic Hepatitis BPhase 4NCT00531167
Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil Versus Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
A Phase 4 study testing combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Korea University at 2 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
Antiviral resistance mutations limit the efficacy of therapy for chronic hepatitis B. At year 2, resistance to adefovir may occur as high as 25% in patients with history of lamivudine resistance. Resistance to entecavir is reported to be 10% in lamivudine refractory patients during the same period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 219 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic hepatitis B patients (positive HBsAg > 6 months)
- Age > 16 year old
- Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 x ULN
- History of treatment with lamivudine more than 6 months
- Proven lamivudine resistant mutation
- HBV DNA level> 20000 IU/mL
- Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh-Turcotte score over 7; prothrombin time prolonged more than 3 sec above ULN or INR over 1.5; serum albumin >3 g/dL; total bilirubin <2.5 mg/dL; No history of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy)
- Patients willing to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Out of inclusion criteria
- Any one of following
- Serum phosphorus level under 2.4 mg/dL
- Serum creatinine level over 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance <50 mL/min
- Absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000 cell/mL
- Hb level under 10 g/dL (male), under 9 g/dL (female)
Show all 13Show fewer
- Serum AFP >100 ng/mL
- History of treatment with interferon-a, thymosin-alfa 1, or nucleos(t)ide analogue other than lamivudine in 6 months of screening
- Recipient of organ transplantation
- Positive antibody test to HIV, HCV or HDV
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or uncontrolled malignant disease
- Habitual alcohol drinker (>140 g/week for men, >70 g/week for women)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
South Korea2 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan, Gyeonggi-do
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Study for the Comparison of Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil and Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
Antiviral resistance mutations limit the efficacy of therapy for chronic hepatitis B. At year 2, resistance to adefovir may occur as high as 25% in patients with history of lamivudine resistance. Resistance to entecavir is reported to be 10% in lamivudine refractory patients during the same period. However, combination of lamivudine and adefovir decreased the adefovir resistance rate as low as 0% in the recent studies. By overcoming the antiviral resistance, the efficacy of therapy will be maximized. This study is intended to compare the efficacy of two strategies, combination of lamivudine and adefovir vs. entecavir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine resistance.
Read the detailed description
Recently, published data showed combination of lamivudine and adefovir lead to PCR negativity (<1000 copies/mL) up to 80% in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B at year 2 [Rapti et al. Hepatology 2007 Feb;45(2):307-13.]. Other studies also showed 76% and 69% PCR negativity in mostly HBeAg negative subjects [Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:556A-557A, Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:693A-694A].
In the study for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients which included HBeAg positive subjects more predominantly, entecavir monotherapy showed 34% of PCR negativity (<300 copies/mL) at year 2 [Tenney DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):902-11].
Although it is assumed that combination of lamivudine and adefovir would be more effective than entecavir monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients, we cannot verify the assumption, because there is no data directly comparing these two strategies until now.
The aim of this study is to determine the most effective therapy for the patients with lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B. We will compare the PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 2 in patients receiving 'the combination of lamivudine and adefovir' and 'entecavir monotherapy'.
Since we are planning to include lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients regardless of HBeAg status, we assumed the PCR negativity (<300 copies/mL or <60 IU/mL) in adefovir-lamivudine combination and entecavir monotherapy group as 55% and 34%, respectively, considering HBeAg status and lower detection limit of PCR.
The result of this study will be able to clearly demonstrate the superiority of combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir to entecavir monotherapy, which provide us the guide to rescue therapy for patients with lamivudine resistant HBV.
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir
- Keywords
- lamivudine resistant mutations, rescue therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavirDrug
Also called Zeffix, Hepsera, Baraclude
Lamivudine 100 mg/day, Adefovir 10 mg/day, Entecavir 0.5 mg/day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | combination therapy Receives: Drug: combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir |
| B | Active comparator | entecavir Receives: Drug: combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA
Measured: At the end of year 2 (since starting rescue therapy for lamivudine resistance)
Secondary outcomes (1)
1. PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 1 (interim analysis) 2. Degrees of HBV DNA reduction 3. ALT normalization 4. HBeAg seroconversion 5. Development of resistant mutation 6. Virologic breakthrough 7. Biochemical breakthrough
Measured: At the end of year 2 except interim analysis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionApr 2011
- Study completionOct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 219 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hyung Joon Yim, Korea University
- Investigators
- Hyung Joon Yim, M.D., Principal investigator, Korea UniversityEileen Yoon, Study director, Korea UniversityYeon Seok Seo, M.D, Study director, Korea UniversitySoon Ho Um, M.D, Study director, Korea UniversityChang Wook Kim, M.D, Study director, The Catholic University of KoreaChang Don Lee, Study director, The Catholic University of KoreaSang Hoon Park, M.D, Study director, Hallym UniversityMyung Seok Lee, M.D, Study director, Hallym University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00531167
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRT 111098
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007 Feb;45(2):507-39. doi: 10.1002/hep.21513. No abstract available.
PubMed 17256718Rapti I, Dimou E, Mitsoula P, Hadziyannis SJ. Adding-on versus switching-to adefovir therapy in lamivudine-resistant HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007 Feb;45(2):307-13. doi: 10.1002/hep.21534.
PubMed 17256746Tenney DJ, Rose RE, Baldick CJ, Levine SM, Pokornowski KA, Walsh AW, Fang J, Yu CF, Zhang S, Mazzucco CE, Eggers B, Hsu M, Plym MJ, Poundstone P, Yang J, Colonno RJ. Two-year assessment of entecavir resistance in Lamivudine-refractory hepatitis B virus patients reveals different clinical outcomes depending on the resistance substitutions present. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):902-11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00833-06. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
PubMed 17178796Peters MG, Hann Hw Hw, Martin P, Heathcote EJ, Buggisch P, Rubin R, Bourliere M, Kowdley K, Trepo C, Gray Df Df, Sullivan M, Kleber K, Ebrahimi R, Xiong S, Brosgart CL. Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1):91-101. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.051.
PubMed 14699491
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Study for the Comparison of Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil and Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00531167
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRT 111098
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- lamivudine resistant mutations, rescue therapy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 219 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Korea UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Apr 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Antiviral resistance mutations limit the efficacy of therapy for chronic hepatitis B. At year 2, resistance to adefovir may occur as high as 25% in patients with history of lamivudine resistance. Resistance to entecavir is reported to be 10% in lamivudine refractory patients during the same period. However, combination of lamivudine and adefovir decreased the adefovir resistance rate as low as 0% in the recent studies. By overcoming the antiviral resistance, the efficacy of therapy will be maximized. This study is intended to compare the efficacy of two strategies, combination of lamivudine and adefovir vs. entecavir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine resistance.
Detailed description
Recently, published data showed combination of lamivudine and adefovir lead to PCR negativity (<1000 copies/mL) up to 80% in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B at year 2 [Rapti et al. Hepatology 2007 Feb;45(2):307-13.]. Other studies also showed 76% and 69% PCR negativity in mostly HBeAg negative subjects [Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:556A-557A, Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:693A-694A].
In the study for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients which included HBeAg positive subjects more predominantly, entecavir monotherapy showed 34% of PCR negativity (<300 copies/mL) at year 2 [Tenney DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):902-11].
Although it is assumed that combination of lamivudine and adefovir would be more effective than entecavir monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients, we cannot verify the assumption, because there is no data directly comparing these two strategies until now.
The aim of this study is to determine the most effective therapy for the patients with lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B. We will compare the PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 2 in patients receiving 'the combination of lamivudine and adefovir' and 'entecavir monotherapy'.
Since we are planning to include lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients regardless of HBeAg status, we assumed the PCR negativity (<300 copies/mL or <60 IU/mL) in adefovir-lamivudine combination and entecavir monotherapy group as 55% and 34%, respectively, considering HBeAg status and lower detection limit of PCR.
The result of this study will be able to clearly demonstrate the superiority of combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir to entecavir monotherapy, which provide us the guide to rescue therapy for patients with lamivudine resistant HBV.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavircombination therapy |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavirentecavir |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Chronic hepatitis B patients (positive HBsAg > 6 months)
- Age > 16 year old
- Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 x ULN
- History of treatment with lamivudine more than 6 months
- Proven lamivudine resistant mutation
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Out of inclusion criteria
- Any one of following
- History of treatment with interferon-a, thymosin-alfa 1, or nucleos(t)ide analogue other than lamivudine in 6 months of screening
- Recipient of organ transplantation
- Positive antibody test to HIV, HCV or HDV
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavirAlso: Zeffix, Hepsera, BaracludeLamivudine 100 mg/day, Adefovir 10 mg/day, Entecavir 0.5 mg/day | Drug | A, B |
Primary outcome
PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA
Time frame: At the end of year 2 (since starting rescue therapy for lamivudine resistance)
1 secondary outcome
1. PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 1 (interim analysis) 2. Degrees of HBV DNA reduction 3. ALT normalization 4. HBeAg seroconversion 5. Development of resistant mutation 6. Virologic breakthrough 7. Biochemical breakthrough
Time frame: At the end of year 2 except interim analysis
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2012.
- Background: PubMed 17256718Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007 Feb;45(2):507-39. doi: 10.1002/hep.21513. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17256746Rapti I, Dimou E, Mitsoula P, Hadziyannis SJ. Adding-on versus switching-to adefovir therapy in lamivudine-resistant HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007 Feb;45(2):307-13. doi: 10.1002/hep.21534.
- Background: PubMed 17178796Tenney DJ, Rose RE, Baldick CJ, Levine SM, Pokornowski KA, Walsh AW, Fang J, Yu CF, Zhang S, Mazzucco CE, Eggers B, Hsu M, Plym MJ, Poundstone P, Yang J, Colonno RJ. Two-year assessment of entecavir resistance in Lamivudine-refractory hepatitis B virus patients reveals different clinical outcomes depending on the resistance substitutions present. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):902-11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00833-06. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
- Background: PubMed 14699491Peters MG, Hann Hw Hw, Martin P, Heathcote EJ, Buggisch P, Rubin R, Bourliere M, Kowdley K, Trepo C, Gray Df Df, Sullivan M, Kleber K, Ebrahimi R, Xiong S, Brosgart CL. Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1):91-101. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.051.
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hyung Joon Yim, M.D. principal investigator
Korea University
Eileen Yoon study director
Korea University
Yeon Seok Seo, M.D study director
Korea University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Korea University at 2 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA (time frame: At the end of year 2 (since starting rescue therapy for lamivudine resistance)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00531167, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2012.