Venous ThromboembolismPhase 2/3NCT00531843
The Use of Fondaparinux in Preventing Thromboembolism in High Risk Trauma Patients
A Phase 2/3 study testing fondaparinux sodium and sequential compression devices in people with Venous Thromboembolism, run by Mary Knudson, M.D. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Trauma patients are at high risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The incidence of DVT varies greatly from 5-63% among studies depending on patient's individual risk factors, modality of prophylaxis, and methods of detection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Thromboembolism
- What is being tested?
- fondaparinux sodium and sequential compression devices
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Jun 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients age ≥ 18 years old admitted to San Francisco General Hospital for injury with at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE).
- Risk factors are: Age ≥ 40 years, pelvic fracture, lower extremity fracture, spinal cord injury, shock or head injury, major operative procedure, mechanical ventilation > 3 days, venous injury
Who cannot join
- prisoners
- pregnant patients
- patients who are anticipated to have a < 5 day length of stay as determined by the admitting trauma surgeon
- patients who decline to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Trauma patients are at high risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The incidence of DVT varies greatly from 5-63% among studies depending on patient's individual risk factors, modality of prophylaxis, and methods of detection. The incidence of PE may be as low (0.3-4.3%) but carries a mortality of 20-50% which makes prevention of DVT of the utmost importance. The current standard of care for DVT prophylaxis in the trauma patient with high risk of DVT is enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, administered twice a day as long as anticoagulation in not contraindicated. Many studies have demonstrated its efficacy when compared to mechanical compression and to unfractionated heparin, however one of the most robust of these studies still reported an DVT incidence of 35% in patients treated with enoxaparin. Another drug, fondaparinux, is a selective factor Xa inhibitor that could offer added benefits over enoxaparin such as once daily dosing and a drastically reduced risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Fondaparinux has been already be widely used in post-operative hip surgery and major knee surgery patients with good results. It has also been shown to be effective in DVT prophylaxis in patients who have had major abdominal surgery and also in acute medical patients. Fondaparinux has yet to be used in trauma patients. Trauma patients are a diverse and distinct population given the acuity of their injuries and their increased risk of bleeding who at this time still do not have a perfect method for DVT prophylaxis. We hypothesize that fondaparinux will be effective in decreasing the risk of DVT when used in the trauma patient population. This is a non randomized prospective cohort study designed to test the efficacy of fondaparinux in the prophylaxis of DVT and PE in trauma patients.
Read the detailed description
Patients with trauma admitted to San Francisco General Hospital and qualify for the study will be assigned to +fondaparinux and no fondaparinux arms based on guidelines that were developed for and are considered the standard of care for the use of low molecular weight heparin in the same group of patients for the same indication. These guidelines will separate patients at risk for DVT into those that are high risk and very high risk. The primary efficacy outcome measures will be DVT and PE. Presence of DVT will be assessed with serial color flow duplex ultrasound during the patients in hospital stay at weekly intervals up to 3 weeks and when the patient has symptoms of DVT. PE will be diagnosed according to clinical suspicion by the patients treating physicians and subsequent imaging by CT. We plan on enrolling approximately 100 patients in the +fondaparinux and 100 patients in the no fondaparinux arm. We will compare both the incidence of DVT and PE in these groups and to the incidences in the literature and historical controls. A second aim of the study is to evaluate the adverse outcomes such as increased bleeding in patients who receive fondaparinux. A third and final aim of the study is to describe the effect of fondaparinux on antifactor Xa levels in trauma patients.
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Being tested
- fondaparinux sodium, sequential compression devices
- Keywords
- deep vein thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thromboembolism, Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
fondaparinux sodiumDrug
Also called Arixtra
fondaparinux 2.5mg SubQ daily for DVT prophylaxis to be started by treating physicians once deemed safe and to be discontinued once patient in discharged from the hospital or at discretion of treating physicians.
sequential compression devicesDevice
Also called Arixtra
Sequential compression devices at all times during the patient's hospital admission will be used in patients who have a contraindication to pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis. This is already the current standard of care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1A | Experimental | Patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: age>=40, pelvic fracture, lower extremity fracture, shock on presentation, spinal cord injury, head injury with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) >=3). These patients will receive fondaparinux 2.5mg via subcutaneous administration (SubQ) daily. Receives: Drug: fondaparinux sodium |
| 1B | Active comparator | Patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: age>=40, pelvic fracture, lower extremity fracture, shock on presentation, spinal cord injury, head injury with AIS >=3) who also have a contraindication to anticoagulant(enoxaparin)administration such as renal failure with creatine clearance <30 mL/min, head injury with head AIS >=3), uncontrolled hemorrhage, uncorrected coagulopathy, persistent thrombocytopenia. These patients will receive mechanical compression. Receives: Device: sequential compression devices |
| 2A | Experimental | Patients at very high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: major operative procedure, venous injury, ventilator days >3, 2 or more high risk factors). These patients will receive fondaparinux 2.5mg SubQ daily and mechanical compression. Receives: Drug: fondaparinux sodium |
| 2B | Active comparator | Patients at very high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: major operative procedure, venous injury, ventilator days >3, 2 or more high risk factors) who also have a contraindication to anticoagulant(enoxaparin)administration such as renal failure creatine clearance <30 mL/min, head injury with head AIS >=3), uncontrolled hemorrhage, uncorrected coagulopathy, persistent thrombocytopenia. These patients will receive mechanical compression and possibly temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter(as determined by the patient's care givers). Receives: Device: sequential compression devices |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or Pulmonary Embolus (PE)
Color-flow duplex venous ultrasonography examinations of upper and lower extremities were performed within 48 hours of injury, and then weekly until discharge or 3 weeks. DVT was defined as any clot occurring in the subclavian, iliac, femoral, or popliteal location. Patients were examined daily for clinical signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and PE. Small, nonocclusive clots discovered in other locations were observed for progression on sequential ultrasonography examinations.
Measured: within 3 weeks post injury
Secondary outcomes (2)
Normal Trough and Peak Fondaparinux Concentration
Serum samples were collected 30 minutes before (trough) and 2 hours after (peak) the third dose of fondaparinux. Normative data plots comparing study participants with healthy volunteers were supplied by the company outsourced to analyze samples.
Measured: Day 3
Increased Bleeding Attributed to Fondaparinux
Coagulopathic bleeding due to fondaparinux was suspected in patients requiring packed red cell transfusions after initiation of fondaparinux therapy only if the change in hematocrit prompting transfusion was not clinically commensurate with the degree of injuries that the patient had sustained (primarily orthopaedic) and/or the hematocrit did not respond appropriately post-transfusion.
Measured: 3 weeks post injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionJun 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Venous ThromboembolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mary Knudson, M.D.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mary Knudson, M.D., University of California, San Francisco
- Investigators
- M. Margaret Knudson, MD, Principal investigator, The University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00531843
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H6693-30799-01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Agnelli G, Bergqvist D, Cohen AT, Gallus AS, Gent M; PEGASUS investigators. Randomized clinical trial of postoperative fondaparinux versus perioperative dalteparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1212-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5154.
PubMed 16175516Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI, Chen E, Szalai JP, Saibil EA, Hamilton PA. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 5;335(10):701-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351003.
PubMed 8703169Velmahos GC. Posttraumatic thromboprophylaxis revisited: an argument against the current methods of DVT and PE prophylaxis after injury. World J Surg. 2006 Apr;30(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0427-9.
PubMed 16568226Hill AB, Garber B, Dervin G, Howard A. Heparin prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in a patient with multiple injuries: an evidence-based approach to a clinical problem. Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):282-7.
PubMed 12174986Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.338S.
PubMed 15383478Turpie AG, Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, Lassen MR; PENTATHALON 2000 Study Steering Committee. Postoperative fondaparinux versus postoperative enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip-replacement surgery: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1721-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08648-8.
PubMed 12049860Kudsk KA, Fabian TC, Baum S, Gold RE, Mangiante E, Voeller G. Silent deep vein thrombosis in immobilized multiple trauma patients. Am J Surg. 1989 Dec;158(6):515-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90182-7.
PubMed 2589580Knudson MM, Ikossi DG. Venous thromboembolism after trauma. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Dec;10(6):539-48. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000144941.09650.9f.
PubMed 15616398Donat F, Duret JP, Santoni A, Cariou R, Necciari J, Magnani H, de Greef R. The pharmacokinetics of fondaparinux sodium in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41 Suppl 2:1-9. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241002-00001.
PubMed 12383039Knudson MM, Ikossi DG, Khaw L, Morabito D, Speetzen LS. Thromboembolism after trauma: an analysis of 1602 episodes from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):490-6; discussion 496-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137138.40116.6c.
PubMed 15319720Eriksson BI, Bauer KA, Lassen MR, Turpie AG; Steering Committee of the Pentasaccharide in Hip-Fracture Surgery Study. Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip-fracture surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 1;345(18):1298-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011100.
PubMed 11794148Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, Lassen MR, Turpie AG; Steering Committee of the Pentasaccharide in Major Knee Surgery Study. Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective major knee surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 1;345(18):1305-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011099.
PubMed 11794149Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, Chen E, Szalai JP. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 15;331(24):1601-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412153312401.
PubMed 7969340Allen TL, Carter JL, Morris BJ, Harker CP, Stevens MH. Retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients for high-risk prophylaxis and prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.003.
PubMed 15910715Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS, Lassen MR, Prins MH, Tomkowski W, Turpie AG, Egberts JF, Lensing AW; ARTEMIS Investigators. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2006 Feb 11;332(7537):325-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38733.466748.7C. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
PubMed 16439370
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Fondaparinux in Preventing Thromboembolism in High Risk Trauma Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00531843
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H6693-30799-01
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Keywords
- deep vein thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mary Knudson, M.D.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Dec 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trauma patients are at high risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The incidence of DVT varies greatly from 5-63% among studies depending on patient's individual risk factors, modality of prophylaxis, and methods of detection. The incidence of PE may be as low (0.3-4.3%) but carries a mortality of 20-50% which makes prevention of DVT of the utmost importance. The current standard of care for DVT prophylaxis in the trauma patient with high risk of DVT is enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, administered twice a day as long as anticoagulation in not contraindicated. Many studies have demonstrated its efficacy when compared to mechanical compression and to unfractionated heparin, however one of the most robust of these studies still reported an DVT incidence of 35% in patients treated with enoxaparin. Another drug, fondaparinux, is a selective factor Xa inhibitor that could offer added benefits over enoxaparin such as once daily dosing and a drastically reduced risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Fondaparinux has been already be widely used in post-operative hip surgery and major knee surgery patients with good results. It has also been shown to be effective in DVT prophylaxis in patients who have had major abdominal surgery and also in acute medical patients. Fondaparinux has yet to be used in trauma patients. Trauma patients are a diverse and distinct population given the acuity of their injuries and their increased risk of bleeding who at this time still do not have a perfect method for DVT prophylaxis. We hypothesize that fondaparinux will be effective in decreasing the risk of DVT when used in the trauma patient population. This is a non randomized prospective cohort study designed to test the efficacy of fondaparinux in the prophylaxis of DVT and PE in trauma patients.
Detailed description
Patients with trauma admitted to San Francisco General Hospital and qualify for the study will be assigned to +fondaparinux and no fondaparinux arms based on guidelines that were developed for and are considered the standard of care for the use of low molecular weight heparin in the same group of patients for the same indication. These guidelines will separate patients at risk for DVT into those that are high risk and very high risk. The primary efficacy outcome measures will be DVT and PE. Presence of DVT will be assessed with serial color flow duplex ultrasound during the patients in hospital stay at weekly intervals up to 3 weeks and when the patient has symptoms of DVT. PE will be diagnosed according to clinical suspicion by the patients treating physicians and subsequent imaging by CT. We plan on enrolling approximately 100 patients in the +fondaparinux and 100 patients in the no fondaparinux arm. We will compare both the incidence of DVT and PE in these groups and to the incidences in the literature and historical controls. A second aim of the study is to evaluate the adverse outcomes such as increased bleeding in patients who receive fondaparinux. A third and final aim of the study is to describe the effect of fondaparinux on antifactor Xa levels in trauma patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1A | Experimental | Drug: fondaparinux sodiumPatients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: age>=40, pelvic fracture, lower extremity fracture, shock on presentation, spinal cord injury, head injury with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) >=3). These patients will receive fondaparinux 2.5mg via subcutaneous administration (SubQ) daily. |
| 1B | Active comparator | Device: sequential compression devicesPatients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: age>=40, pelvic fracture, lower extremity fracture, shock on presentation, spinal cord injury, head injury with AIS >=3) who also have a contraindication to anticoagulant(enoxaparin)administration such as renal failure with creatine clearance <30 mL/min, head injury with head AIS >=3), uncontrolled hemorrhage, uncorrected coagulopathy, persistent thrombocytopenia. These patients will receive mechanical compression. |
| 2A | Experimental | Drug: fondaparinux sodiumPatients at very high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: major operative procedure, venous injury, ventilator days >3, 2 or more high risk factors). These patients will receive fondaparinux 2.5mg SubQ daily and mechanical compression. |
| 2B | Active comparator | Device: sequential compression devicesPatients at very high risk for venous thromboembolism (criteria: major operative procedure, venous injury, ventilator days >3, 2 or more high risk factors) who also have a contraindication to anticoagulant(enoxaparin)administration such as renal failure creatine clearance <30 mL/min, head injury with head AIS >=3), uncontrolled hemorrhage, uncorrected coagulopathy, persistent thrombocytopenia. These patients will receive mechanical compression and possibly temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter(as determined by the patient's care givers). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients age ≥ 18 years old admitted to San Francisco General Hospital for injury with at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE).
- Risk factors are: Age ≥ 40 years, pelvic fracture, lower extremity fracture, spinal cord injury, shock or head injury, major operative procedure, mechanical ventilation > 3 days, venous injury
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- prisoners
- pregnant patients
- patients who are anticipated to have a < 5 day length of stay as determined by the admitting trauma surgeon
- patients who decline to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| fondaparinux sodiumAlso: Arixtrafondaparinux 2.5mg SubQ daily for DVT prophylaxis to be started by treating physicians once deemed safe and to be discontinued once patient in discharged from the hospital or at discretion of treating physicians. | Drug | 1A, 2A |
| sequential compression devicesAlso: ArixtraSequential compression devices at all times during the patient's hospital admission will be used in patients who have a contraindication to pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis. This is already the current standard of care. | Device | 1B, 2B |
Primary outcome
Presence of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or Pulmonary Embolus (PE)
Time frame: within 3 weeks post injury
Color-flow duplex venous ultrasonography examinations of upper and lower extremities were performed within 48 hours of injury, and then weekly until discharge or 3 weeks. DVT was defined as any clot occurring in the subclavian, iliac, femoral, or popliteal location. Patients were examined daily for clinical signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and PE. Small, nonocclusive clots discovered in other locations were observed for progression on sequential ultrasonography examinations.
2 secondary outcomes
Normal Trough and Peak Fondaparinux Concentration
Time frame: Day 3
Increased Bleeding Attributed to Fondaparinux
Time frame: 3 weeks post injury
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16175516Agnelli G, Bergqvist D, Cohen AT, Gallus AS, Gent M; PEGASUS investigators. Randomized clinical trial of postoperative fondaparinux versus perioperative dalteparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1212-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5154.
- Background: PubMed 8703169Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI, Chen E, Szalai JP, Saibil EA, Hamilton PA. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 5;335(10):701-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351003.
- Background: PubMed 16568226Velmahos GC. Posttraumatic thromboprophylaxis revisited: an argument against the current methods of DVT and PE prophylaxis after injury. World J Surg. 2006 Apr;30(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0427-9.
- Background: PubMed 12174986Hill AB, Garber B, Dervin G, Howard A. Heparin prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in a patient with multiple injuries: an evidence-based approach to a clinical problem. Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):282-7.
- Background: PubMed 15383478Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.338S.
- Background: PubMed 12049860Turpie AG, Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, Lassen MR; PENTATHALON 2000 Study Steering Committee. Postoperative fondaparinux versus postoperative enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip-replacement surgery: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1721-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08648-8.
- Background: PubMed 2589580Kudsk KA, Fabian TC, Baum S, Gold RE, Mangiante E, Voeller G. Silent deep vein thrombosis in immobilized multiple trauma patients. Am J Surg. 1989 Dec;158(6):515-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90182-7.
- Background: PubMed 15616398Knudson MM, Ikossi DG. Venous thromboembolism after trauma. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Dec;10(6):539-48. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000144941.09650.9f.
- Background: PubMed 12383039Donat F, Duret JP, Santoni A, Cariou R, Necciari J, Magnani H, de Greef R. The pharmacokinetics of fondaparinux sodium in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41 Suppl 2:1-9. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241002-00001.
- Background: PubMed 15319720Knudson MM, Ikossi DG, Khaw L, Morabito D, Speetzen LS. Thromboembolism after trauma: an analysis of 1602 episodes from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):490-6; discussion 496-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137138.40116.6c.
- Background: PubMed 11794148Eriksson BI, Bauer KA, Lassen MR, Turpie AG; Steering Committee of the Pentasaccharide in Hip-Fracture Surgery Study. Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip-fracture surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 1;345(18):1298-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011100.
- Background: PubMed 11794149Bauer KA, Eriksson BI, Lassen MR, Turpie AG; Steering Committee of the Pentasaccharide in Major Knee Surgery Study. Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective major knee surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 1;345(18):1305-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011099.
Related trials for Venous Thromboembolism
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
M. Margaret Knudson, MD principal investigator
The University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing fondaparinux sodium and sequential compression devices in people with Venous Thromboembolism, run by Mary Knudson, M.D. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Dec 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or Pulmonary Embolus (PE) (time frame: within 3 weeks post injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00531843, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2013.