CancerPhase 4NCT00533143
Non-invasive Ventilation in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients
A Phase 4 study testing non invasive ventilation (NIV) in people with Cancer, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The occurrence of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is often seen by oncologists as a terminal phase of the disease, this view being based on studies reporting limited survival at considerable costs in such patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- non invasive ventilation (NIV)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major criteria for enrollment into the study were one of the following:
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 250 + one of the two following:
- dyspnea with recruitment of the accessory muscles and/or abdominal muscles recruitment; and
- respiratory rate > 30 b/ min. Hypercapnia per se is not a criteria of inclusion, but it is not an exclusion criteria if chronic.
Who cannot join
- Potentially reversible causes of exacerbation such as (CPE, pneumonia or exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disorders) coma
- Refusal of treatment
- Inability to protect the airways
- An agitated or uncooperative patient
- Anatomical abnormalities interfering with mask fit
- Uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias
- Failure of more than two organs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Multicenter, Randomised Study of the Use of Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Versus Oxygen Therapy (O2) in Reducing Dyspnea in End-stage Solid Cancer Patients With Respiratory Failure and Distress
The occurrence of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is often seen by oncologists as a terminal phase of the disease, this view being based on studies reporting limited survival at considerable costs in such patients. A large proportion of cancer patients with severe respiratory failure are denied admission to an ICU because intensive care specialists are aware that intubation and mechanical ventilation are both strong predictors of mortality in critically ill cancer patients. This holds particularly true in the subset of patients who are not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy because of the advanced stage of their disease, and who are also not affected by an episode of ARF, related to a reversible cause.
These patients often receive oxygen therapy and morphine in an attempt to improve oxygenation and/or relieve the ensuing dyspnea.
Read more
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is now the first line treatment of ARF in selected populations (e.g., those with COPD) and has been used sporadically as a potential treatment of acute respiratory failure in patients with a "do-not-intubate" order. The International Consensus Conference on Intensive Care Medicine stated that "the use of NIV may be justified in selected patients who are "not to be intubated" and may provide patient comfort and facilitate physician-patient interaction." "Early" NIV has been successfully used so far in cancer patients only to prevent intubation among those with hematologic malignancies, while a pilot study has assessed the feasibility of NIV also as a "palliative" treatment of end-stage solid cancer patients. So far we are lacking data about the "pure palliative" effects of NIV,in patients with end-stage solid cancer.
The aim of this multicenter randomised study will be to evaluate on a large scale the feasibility, clinical efficacy and impact on quality of life and dyspnea of NIV versus standard medical in patients with respiratory failure, not related to a reversible cause, and solid cancer needing palliative care treatment.
Read the detailed description
Rationale:
The occurrence of ARF is often seen by oncologists as a terminal phase of the disease, this view being based on studies reporting limited survival at considerable costs in such patients (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). A large proportion of cancer patients with severe respiratory failure are denied admission to an ICU because intensive care specialists are aware that intubation and mechanical ventilation are both strong predictors of mortality in critically ill cancer patients (1, 3, 5, 7). This holds particularly true in the subset of patients who are not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy because of the advanced stage of their disease, and who are also not affected by an episode of ARF, related to a reversible cause.
These patients often receive oxygen therapy and morphine in an attempt to improve oxygenation and/or relief the ensuing dyspnea.
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is now the first line treatment of ARF in selected populations (e.g. those with COPD) (8) and has been used sporadically as a potential treatment of acute respiratory failure in patients with a "do-not-intubate" order (9). The International Consensus Conference on Intensive Care Medicine stated that "the use of NIV may be justified in selected patients who are "not to be intubated" and may provide patient comfort and facilitate physician-patient interaction" (8). "Early" NIV has been successfully used so far in cancer patients only to prevent intubation among those with hematologic malignancies (10), while a pilot study has assessed the feasibility of NIV also as a "palliative" treatment of end-stage solid cancer patients (11). So far we are lacking data about the "pure palliative" effects of NIV,in patients with end-stage solid cancer.
Aim. The aim of this multicenter randomised study will be to evaluate on a large scale the feasibility, clinical efficacy and impact on quality of life and dyspnea of NIV vs standard medical in patients with respiratory failure, not related to a reversible cause, and solid cancer needing palliative care treatment.
Study design Multicenter randomised study. The sample size has been estimated on about 50 patients for each group (i.e. hypercapnic and hypoxic ARF, with different randomisation) , TOTAL= 200 pts based on the survival rate of cancer patients with acute respiratory failure and DNR order (18%) (2) versus that of patients treated with NIV in a pilot study (57%) (14).
You will receive separate random sequence according to the degree of PaCO2. Methods Consecutive solid cancer patients with ARF, in which palliative treatment is the only one indicated, and: 1) have signed or expressed a DNI order or 2) judged by the attending physician having < 6 months or life expectancy (Mc Crabe index= class 3-4) or PPI > 5 (Palliative Prognostic Index) and not deserve to be intubated by a "blind" ICU physician.
A brief trial lasting < 5 minutes will be performed before randomization using either NIV or Venturi mask to assess the willing of the patient to be enroll in the protocol (since they are not familiar with both techniques).
Major criteria for enrollment into the study were one of the following: 1) PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 250 + one of the two following: 1) dyspnea with recruitment of the accessory muscles and/or abdominal muscles recruitment and 2) respiratory rate > 30 b/ min. Hypercapnia per se is not a criteria of inclusion, but it is not an exclusion criteria if chronic.
Exclusion criteria were: potentially reversible causes of exacerbation such as (CPE, pneumonia or exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disorders) coma, refusal of treatment, inability to protect the airways, an agitated or uncooperative patient, anatomical abnormalities interfering with mask fit, uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias, failure of more than two organs.
NIV settings. The positive end-expiratory pressure initially set at 5 cm H2O and could be increased by 1 cm H2O until a brisk increase in oxygen saturation (SaO2) is observed, whereas the inspiratory pressure support is initially set at 10 cm H2O and then increased in increments of 2 cm H2O up to the maximum tolerated.
For patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure the inspiratory pressure is adjusted according to the patient's tolerance, with the external PEEP not exceeding 6 cm H2O.
In any case both settings are aimed to achieve a respiratory rate < 25 breaths/min, no evident sign of wasted respiratory efforts on the flow trace, expired VT > 6 mL/kg and < 10 mL/kg and satisfactory gas exchange (i.e. SaO2 > 90%, with pH > 7.35). The inspiratory trigger is set at the minimal level to avoid auto-triggering or that delivered by default by the ventilator, while the initial pressurization rate was adjusted according to subjective comfort. The fractional concentration of oxygen is such to achieve an SaO2 > 90%.
Standard Medical Therapy The usual standard of care. Sedatives and morphine could be administrated, but the dosage should be recorded in a data sheet (se data base)
The following variables will be recorded:
- Age, sex, chronic health care status measured using the McCrabe index, the number of co-morbid conditions, and the SAPS II index (Simplified Acute Physiology Score). Neurological status was assessed by the Kelly and Matthay scale, which is specifically designed for respiratory patients and Glasgow coma scale
- Causes of ARF (if apparent)
- Type and cancer status before respiratory failure
- Arterial blood was withdrawn from a radial artery at baseline and at fixed intervals (see protocol) and analyzed immediately (ABL 300 and ABL 625 Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark)
- Breathing frequency and hemodynamic variables (i.e. heart rate and blood pressure)
- Dyspnea score measured with a modified Borg scale
- Symptom Distress Scale (at enrollment and at discharge) as a surrogate of QoL "easy" measurements
- Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI)
- Types and dosages of sedatives or morphine
- Total days on NIV
- Total days of hospital stay
- Mortality at hospital discharge, at 6 and 12 months
- Causes of death ABG, respiratory rate and hemodynamic variables, Kelly score, Glasgow scale, PPI, Mc Cabe and dyspnea will be recorded at fixed intervals: baseline (T0), 1 h after beginning the treatment (T1), after 3 h (T2), after 24 h (T3), after 48 h (T4) and at discharge from the hospital (T5).
The SAPS II score is recorded at the end of the first day of admission. QoL questionnaire will be recorded at enrollment and hospital discharge Primary outcomes of the study were: hospital death, treatment failure, use of morphine or other sedatives and dyspnea and QoL scores. Treatment failure will be considered the "theoretical need of intubation"= MEET the INTUBATION CRITERIA defined as: 1) intolerance to NIV (only NIV group clearly) 2) no changes or worsening of ABG after 2 h of ventilation (pH < 7.35 or 20% decrease in PaO2/FiO2 ratio) 3) alteration of neurological status (1 point higher than admission in the Kelly score) 4) gasping for air or come. Secondary outcomes were: 6-month and 12-month mortality, the duration of hospital stay, changes of some physiological variables over time (i.e. ABG, respiratory rate) and QoL.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- non invasive ventilation (NIV)
- Keywords
- Solid cancer patient, Non-invasive ventilation, Acute Respiratory Failure
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
non invasive ventilation (NIV)Other
Also called oxygen therapy
NIV is a form of mechanical ventilation delivered through a face or nasal mask and therefore not requiring endotracheal intubation. It will be delivered according to the compliance and tolerance of the patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Experimental | Non-invasive ventilation Receives: Other: non invasive ventilation (NIV) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
dyspnea
Measured: 48 hours
morphine dosage
Measured: 48 hours
Quality of Life
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Arterial Blood Gases
Measured: 48 hours
Survival
Measured: 48 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, dr. Stefano Nava, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
- Investigators
- Stefano Nava, Principal investigator, San'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna ITALY
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00533143
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 322 CEC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nava S, Ferrer M, Esquinas A, Scala R, Groff P, Cosentini R, Guido D, Lin CH, Cuomo AM, Grassi M. Palliative use of non-invasive ventilation in end-of-life patients with solid tumours: a randomised feasibility trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):219-27. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70009-3. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
PubMed 23406914
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter, Randomised Study of the Use of Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Versus Oxygen Therapy (O2) in Reducing Dyspnea in End-stage Solid Cancer Patients With Respiratory Failure and Distress
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00533143
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 322 CEC
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- Solid cancer patient, Non-invasive ventilation, Acute Respiratory Failure
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The occurrence of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is often seen by oncologists as a terminal phase of the disease, this view being based on studies reporting limited survival at considerable costs in such patients. A large proportion of cancer patients with severe respiratory failure are denied admission to an ICU because intensive care specialists are aware that intubation and mechanical ventilation are both strong predictors of mortality in critically ill cancer patients. This holds particularly true in the subset of patients who are not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy because of the advanced stage of their disease, and who are also not affected by an episode of ARF, related to a reversible cause.
These patients often receive oxygen therapy and morphine in an attempt to improve oxygenation and/or relieve the ensuing dyspnea.
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is now the first line treatment of ARF in selected populations (e.g., those with COPD) and has been used sporadically as a potential treatment of acute respiratory failure in patients with a "do-not-intubate" order. The International Consensus Conference on Intensive Care Medicine stated that "the use of NIV may be justified in selected patients who are "not to be intubated" and may provide patient comfort and facilitate physician-patient interaction." "Early" NIV has been successfully used so far in cancer patients only to prevent intubation among those with hematologic malignancies, while a pilot study has assessed the feasibility of NIV also as a "palliative" treatment of end-stage solid cancer patients. So far we are lacking data about the "pure palliative" effects of NIV,in patients with end-stage solid cancer.
The aim of this multicenter randomised study will be to evaluate on a large scale the feasibility, clinical efficacy and impact on quality of life and dyspnea of NIV versus standard medical in patients with respiratory failure, not related to a reversible cause, and solid cancer needing palliative care treatment.
Detailed description
Rationale:
The occurrence of ARF is often seen by oncologists as a terminal phase of the disease, this view being based on studies reporting limited survival at considerable costs in such patients (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). A large proportion of cancer patients with severe respiratory failure are denied admission to an ICU because intensive care specialists are aware that intubation and mechanical ventilation are both strong predictors of mortality in critically ill cancer patients (1, 3, 5, 7). This holds particularly true in the subset of patients who are not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy because of the advanced stage of their disease, and who are also not affected by an episode of ARF, related to a reversible cause.
These patients often receive oxygen therapy and morphine in an attempt to improve oxygenation and/or relief the ensuing dyspnea.
Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is now the first line treatment of ARF in selected populations (e.g. those with COPD) (8) and has been used sporadically as a potential treatment of acute respiratory failure in patients with a "do-not-intubate" order (9). The International Consensus Conference on Intensive Care Medicine stated that "the use of NIV may be justified in selected patients who are "not to be intubated" and may provide patient comfort and facilitate physician-patient interaction" (8). "Early" NIV has been successfully used so far in cancer patients only to prevent intubation among those with hematologic malignancies (10), while a pilot study has assessed the feasibility of NIV also as a "palliative" treatment of end-stage solid cancer patients (11). So far we are lacking data about the "pure palliative" effects of NIV,in patients with end-stage solid cancer.
Aim. The aim of this multicenter randomised study will be to evaluate on a large scale the feasibility, clinical efficacy and impact on quality of life and dyspnea of NIV vs standard medical in patients with respiratory failure, not related to a reversible cause, and solid cancer needing palliative care treatment.
Study design Multicenter randomised study. The sample size has been estimated on about 50 patients for each group (i.e. hypercapnic and hypoxic ARF, with different randomisation) , TOTAL= 200 pts based on the survival rate of cancer patients with acute respiratory failure and DNR order (18%) (2) versus that of patients treated with NIV in a pilot study (57%) (14).
You will receive separate random sequence according to the degree of PaCO2. Methods Consecutive solid cancer patients with ARF, in which palliative treatment is the only one indicated, and: 1) have signed or expressed a DNI order or 2) judged by the attending physician having < 6 months or life expectancy (Mc Crabe index= class 3-4) or PPI > 5 (Palliative Prognostic Index) and not deserve to be intubated by a "blind" ICU physician.
A brief trial lasting < 5 minutes will be performed before randomization using either NIV or Venturi mask to assess the willing of the patient to be enroll in the protocol (since they are not familiar with both techniques).
Major criteria for enrollment into the study were one of the following: 1) PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 250 + one of the two following: 1) dyspnea with recruitment of the accessory muscles and/or abdominal muscles recruitment and 2) respiratory rate > 30 b/ min. Hypercapnia per se is not a criteria of inclusion, but it is not an exclusion criteria if chronic.
Exclusion criteria were: potentially reversible causes of exacerbation such as (CPE, pneumonia or exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disorders) coma, refusal of treatment, inability to protect the airways, an agitated or uncooperative patient, anatomical abnormalities interfering with mask fit, uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias, failure of more than two organs.
NIV settings. The positive end-expiratory pressure initially set at 5 cm H2O and could be increased by 1 cm H2O until a brisk increase in oxygen saturation (SaO2) is observed, whereas the inspiratory pressure support is initially set at 10 cm H2O and then increased in increments of 2 cm H2O up to the maximum tolerated.
For patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure the inspiratory pressure is adjusted according to the patient's tolerance, with the external PEEP not exceeding 6 cm H2O.
In any case both settings are aimed to achieve a respiratory rate < 25 breaths/min, no evident sign of wasted respiratory efforts on the flow trace, expired VT > 6 mL/kg and < 10 mL/kg and satisfactory gas exchange (i.e. SaO2 > 90%, with pH > 7.35). The inspiratory trigger is set at the minimal level to avoid auto-triggering or that delivered by default by the ventilator, while the initial pressurization rate was adjusted according to subjective comfort. The fractional concentration of oxygen is such to achieve an SaO2 > 90%.
Standard Medical Therapy The usual standard of care. Sedatives and morphine could be administrated, but the dosage should be recorded in a data sheet (se data base)
The following variables will be recorded:
- Age, sex, chronic health care status measured using the McCrabe index, the number of co-morbid conditions, and the SAPS II index (Simplified Acute Physiology Score). Neurological status was assessed by the Kelly and Matthay scale, which is specifically designed for respiratory patients and Glasgow coma scale
- Causes of ARF (if apparent)
- Type and cancer status before respiratory failure
- Arterial blood was withdrawn from a radial artery at baseline and at fixed intervals (see protocol) and analyzed immediately (ABL 300 and ABL 625 Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark)
- Breathing frequency and hemodynamic variables (i.e. heart rate and blood pressure)
- Dyspnea score measured with a modified Borg scale
- Symptom Distress Scale (at enrollment and at discharge) as a surrogate of QoL "easy" measurements
- Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI)
- Types and dosages of sedatives or morphine
- Total days on NIV
- Total days of hospital stay
- Mortality at hospital discharge, at 6 and 12 months
- Causes of death ABG, respiratory rate and hemodynamic variables, Kelly score, Glasgow scale, PPI, Mc Cabe and dyspnea will be recorded at fixed intervals: baseline (T0), 1 h after beginning the treatment (T1), after 3 h (T2), after 24 h (T3), after 48 h (T4) and at discharge from the hospital (T5).
The SAPS II score is recorded at the end of the first day of admission. QoL questionnaire will be recorded at enrollment and hospital discharge Primary outcomes of the study were: hospital death, treatment failure, use of morphine or other sedatives and dyspnea and QoL scores. Treatment failure will be considered the "theoretical need of intubation"= MEET the INTUBATION CRITERIA defined as: 1) intolerance to NIV (only NIV group clearly) 2) no changes or worsening of ABG after 2 h of ventilation (pH < 7.35 or 20% decrease in PaO2/FiO2 ratio) 3) alteration of neurological status (1 point higher than admission in the Kelly score) 4) gasping for air or come. Secondary outcomes were: 6-month and 12-month mortality, the duration of hospital stay, changes of some physiological variables over time (i.e. ABG, respiratory rate) and QoL.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Experimental | Other: non invasive ventilation (NIV)Non-invasive ventilation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 250 + one of the two following:
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Potentially reversible causes of exacerbation such as (CPE, pneumonia or exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disorders) coma
- Refusal of treatment
- Inability to protect the airways
- An agitated or uncooperative patient
- Anatomical abnormalities interfering with mask fit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| non invasive ventilation (NIV)Also: oxygen therapyNIV is a form of mechanical ventilation delivered through a face or nasal mask and therefore not requiring endotracheal intubation. It will be delivered according to the compliance and tolerance of the patients. | Other | 2 |
Primary outcome
dyspnea
Time frame: 48 hours
morphine dosage
Time frame: 48 hours
Quality of Life
Time frame: 48 hours
2 secondary outcomes
Arterial Blood Gases
Time frame: 48 hours
Survival
Time frame: 48 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23406914Nava S, Ferrer M, Esquinas A, Scala R, Groff P, Cosentini R, Guido D, Lin CH, Cuomo AM, Grassi M. Palliative use of non-invasive ventilation in end-of-life patients with solid tumours: a randomised feasibility trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):219-27. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70009-3. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stefano Nava principal investigator
San'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna ITALY
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing non invasive ventilation (NIV) in people with Cancer, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
dyspnea (time frame: 48 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00533143, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2012.