Lung CancerPhase 3NCT00533949
High-Dose or Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
A Phase 3 study testing Cetuximab, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in people with Lung Cancer and Radiation Toxicity, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 213 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, carboplatin work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Radiation Toxicity
- What is being tested?
- Cetuximab, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 544 participants
- Where
- 213 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2007to 20 May 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathologically proven (either histologic or cytologic) diagnosis of Stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); excluding patients with N3 disease based on supraclavicular or contralateral hilar adenopathy, [according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging, 6th edition; see appendix III] within 12 weeks of registration; patients who present with N2 or N3 disease and an undetectable NSCLC primary tumor also are eligible.
- Patients must be considered unresectable or inoperable; Note: Patients who have had a nodal recurrence after surgery for an early-stage NSCLC are eligible if the following criteria are met:
- Nodal recurrence must be N1 or N2; N3 is not eligible.
- The initial primary must have been staged as T1-2, N0, M0.
- The node must be biopsied within 12 weeks of registration.
- The node must be measurable.
Show all 32Show fewer
- The patient must not have received prior chemotherapy or radiation for this lung cancer.
- Prior curative surgery must have been at least 6 months prior to the nodal recurrence.
- The exception to a prior invasive malignancy does not apply to the initial lung primary.
- Stage III A or B disease, including no distant metastases, based upon the following minimum diagnostic workup are acceptable:
- History/physical examination, including documentation of height, weight, body surface area (BSA), and vital signs within 8 weeks prior to registration;
- Computed tomographic (CT)/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) imaging of the lung and upper abdomen through the adrenal glands within 6 weeks prior to registration;
- An MRI of the brain with contrast (or CT with contrast if MRI is medically contraindicated) within 6 weeks prior to registration; Note: The use of intravenous contrast is required for the MRI or CT. An MRI without contrast is only permitted if the patient has a contrast allergy.
- Whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) - Positron Emission Tomography(PET) or PET/CT or if no PET is available, a bone scan is required within 6 weeks prior to registration; Note: If a PET is done that shows clear adrenals and lungs, then a CT scan of chest only is permitted.
- If a pleural effusion is present, the following criteria must be met to exclude malignant involvement (incurable T4 disease):
- When pleural fluid is visible on both the CT scan and on a chest x-ray, a pleuracentesis is required to confirm that the pleural fluid is cytologically negative.
- Exudative pleural effusions are excluded, regardless of cytology;
- Effusions that are minimal (i.e. not visible on chest x-ray) that are too small to safely tap are eligible.
- Patients must have measurable or evaluable disease.
- Patients with post-obstructive pneumonia are eligible.
- Patients must be at least 3 weeks from prior thoracotomy (if performed).
- Zubrod Performance Status 0-1;
- Age ≥ 18;
- Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) within 12 weeks prior to registration; for FEV1, the best value obtained pre- or post bronchodilator must be ≥ 1.2 liters/second or ≥ 50% predicted.
- Complete blood count (CBC)/differential obtained within 2 weeks prior to registration on study, with adequate bone marrow function defined as follows:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,800 cells/mm3;
- Platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/mm3;
- Hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dl (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 10.0 g/dl is acceptable.)
- Serum creatinine within normal institutional limits or creatinine clearance ≥60 ml/min;
- Bilirubin must be within or below normal institutional limits;
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 2.5 x the institutional upper limit of normal (IULN);
- Patient must sign study specific informed consent prior to study entry.
Who cannot join
- N3 supraclavicular disease;
- Greater than minimal, exudative, or cytologically positive pleural effusions;
- Involved contralateral hilar nodes (i.e. greater than 1.5 cm on short axis or positive on PET scan);
- ≥ 10% weight loss within the past month;
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years; non-invasive conditions such as carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible.
- Prior systemic chemotherapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields;
- Prior therapy that specifically and directly targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway;
- Prior severe infusion reaction to a monoclonal antibody;
- Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows:
- Significant history of uncontrolled cardiac disease; i.e., uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, myocardial infarction within the last 6 months, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, and cardiomyopathy with decreased ejection fraction.
- Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months;
- Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration;
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy within 30 days before registration;
- Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects;
- Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition; note, however, that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is not required for entry into this protocol. The need to exclude patients with AIDS from this protocol is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may be significantly immunosuppressive. Protocol-specific requirements may also exclude immuno-compromised patients.
- Pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic.
- Any history of allergic reaction to paclitaxel or other taxanes, or to carboplatin;
- Uncontrolled neuropathy grade 2 or greater regardless of cause.
Trial locations and contacts
213 sites in 2 countries.
213 sites in 2 countries
United States207 sites
McDowell Cancer Center at Akron General Medical Center
Akron, Ohio, 44307
Summa Center for Cancer Care at Akron City Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44309-2090
New York Oncology Hematology, PC at Albany Regional Cancer Care
Albany, New York, 12206
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Albany
Albany, New York, 12208
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-5636
Tulane Cancer Center Office of Clinical Research
Alexandria, Louisiana, 71315-3198
Morgan Cancer Center at Lehigh Valley Hospital - Cedar Crest
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18105
Harrington Cancer Center
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
Saint Joseph Mercy Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106-0995
Theda Care Cancer Institute
Appleton, Wisconsin, 54911
Texas Oncology, PA at Texas Cancer Center - Arlington South
Arlington, Texas, 76014
Georgia Cancer Center for Excellence at Grady Memorial Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Emory Crawford Long Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
Barberton Citizens Hospital
Barberton, Ohio, 44203
Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center - Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Texas Oncology, PA at Harris Center HEB
Bedford, Texas, 76022
Billings Clinic - Downtown
Billings, Montana, 59107-7000
UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center at Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, 83706
Mountain States Tumor Institute at St. Luke's Regional Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Bryn Mawr Hospital
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010
Alamance Cancer Center at Alamance Regional Medical Center
Burlington, North Carolina, 27216
Fletcher Allen Health Care - University Health Center Campus
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Fairview Ridges Hospital
Burnsville, Minnesota, 55337
Sands Cancer Center
Canandaigua, New York, 14424
Aultman Cancer Center at Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, 44710-1799
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Carmichael, California, 95608
Mercy Regional Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28232-2861
Presbyterian Cancer Center at Presbyterian Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28233-3549
University of Virginia Cancer Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Enloe Cancer Center at Enloe Medical Center
Chico, California, 95926
Adena Regional Medical Center
Chillicothe, Ohio, 45601
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital - St. Peters
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center at Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Penrose Cancer Center at Penrose Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80933
Riverside Methodist Hospital Cancer Care
Columbus, Ohio, 43214-3998
Cancer Care Center at John Muir Health - Concord Campus
Concord, California, 94524-4110
Payson Center for Cancer Care at Concord Hospital
Concord, New Hampshire, 03301
Geisinger Cancer Institute at Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-0001
Charles B. Eberhart Cancer Center at DeKalb Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Texas Oncology, PA at Texas Cancer Center - Denton South
Denton, Texas, 76210
John Stoddard Cancer Center at Iowa Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201-1379
Josephine Ford Cancer Center at Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Northeast Radiation Oncology Center
Dunmore, Pennsylvania, 18512
Dale and Frances Hughes Cancer Center at Pocono Medical Center
East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 18301
Shore Regional Cancer Center at Memorial Hospital - Easton
Easton, Maryland, 21601
Midelfort Clinic - Luther
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54703-1510
Luther Midlelfort Hospital
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54703
Swedish Medical Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80110
Regional Cancer Center - Erie
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16505
Willamette Valley Cancer Center - Eugene
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Center for Cancer Care at Exeter Hospital
Exeter, New Hampshire, 03833
CCOP - MeritCare Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Poudre Valley Radiation Oncology
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
Broward General Medical Center Cancer Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
Radiation Oncology Associates Southwest
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804
Parkview Regional Cancer Center at Parkview Health
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805
Klabzuba Cancer Center at Harris Methodist Fort Worth Hospital
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Saint Agnes Cancer Center at Saint Agnes Medical Center
Fresno, California, 93720
University of Florida Shands Cancer Center
Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0232
Center for Cancer Care at Goshen General Hospital
Goshen, Indiana, 46526
Altru Cancer Center at Altru Hospital
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201
Lacks Cancer Center at Saint Mary's Health Care
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Bellin Memorial Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
St. Mary's Hospital Medical Center - Green Bay
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54303
St. Vincent Hospital Regional Cancer Center
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54307-3508
Cancer Centers of the Carolinas - Faris Road
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
CCOP - Greenville
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Van Elslander Cancer Center at St. John Hospital and Medical Center
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, 48236
Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
Memorial Cancer Institute at Memorial Regional Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center
Independence, Ohio, 44131
Central Indiana Cancer Centers - East
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219
Community Regional Cancer Care at Community Hospital East
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219
Community Regional Cancer Care at Community Hospital North
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
University of Mississippi Cancer Clinic
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Integrated Community Oncology Network at Southside Cancer Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Baptist Medical Center South
Jacksonville, Florida, 32258
Integrated Community Oncology Network
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, 32250
Ella Milbank Foshay Cancer Center at Jupiter Medical Center
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731
Good Samaritan Cancer Center at Good Samaritan Hospital
Kearney, Nebraska, 68848-1990
Christine LaGuardia Phillips Cancer Center at Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37662
Kinston Medical Specialists
Kinston, North Carolina, 28501
Gundersen Lutheran Center for Cancer and Blood
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0658
CCOP - Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503-9985
Saint Elizabeth Cancer Institute at Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
St. Mary Mercy Hospital
Livonia, Michigan, 48154
Longview Cancer Center
Longview, Texas, 75601
Elliot Regional Cancer Center at Elliot Hospital
Manchester, New Hampshire, 03103
Minnesota Oncology Hematology, PA - Maplewood
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Bay Area Cancer Care Center at Bay Area Medical Center
Marinette, Wisconsin, 54143
Fox Chase Virtua Health Cancer Program at Virtua Memorial Hospital Marlton
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center - North Iowa
Mason City, Iowa, 50401
Hillcrest Cancer Center at Hillcrest Hospital
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Baptist-South Miami Regional Cancer Program
Miami, Florida, 33176
CCOP - Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Southwest General Health Center
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295
Virginia Piper Cancer Institute at Abbott - Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Trinity CancerCare Center
Minot, North Dakota, 58701
Memorial Medical Center
Modesto, California, 95355
D.N. Greenwald Center
Mukwonago, Wisconsin, 53149
Cancer Center at Ball Memorial Hospital
Muncie, Indiana, 47303-3499
Jon and Karen Huntsman Cancer Center at Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84157
MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
St. Luke's - Roosevelt Hospital Center - St.Luke's Division
New York, New York, 10025
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713
UMDNJ University Hospital
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Community Cancer Center
Normal, Illinois, 61761
West Texas Cancer Center
Odessa, Texas, 79761
Oklahoma University Cancer Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
St. Joseph Hospital Regional Cancer Center - Orange
Orange, California, 92868
UHHS Chagrin Highlands Medical Center
Orange, Ohio, 44122
Integrated Community Oncology Network - Orange Park
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
St. Charles Mercy Hospital
Oregon, Ohio, 43616
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Florida Cancer Center - Palatka
Palatka, Florida, 32177
Cancer Center of Paoli Memorial Hospital
Paoli, Pennsylvania, 19301-1792
Feather River Hospital Cancer Center
Paradise, California, 95969
Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital
Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39581
Cancer Treatment Center at Pekin Hospital
Pekin, Illinois, 61554
Sacred Heart Cancer Center at Sacred Heart Hospital
Pensacola, Florida, 32504
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois
Peoria, Illinois, 61636
OSF St. Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61637
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541
Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
Frankford Hospital Cancer Center - Torresdale Campus
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Albert Einstein Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
FirstHealth Moore Regional Community Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374
Mercy Regional Cancer Center at Mercy Hospital
Port Huron, Michigan, 48060
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center - Provo
Provo, Utah, 84604
All Saints Cancer Center at Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare
Racine, Wisconsin, 53405
Cancer Centers of North Carolina - Raleigh
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
McGlinn Family Regional Cancer Center at Reading Hospital and Medical Center
Reading, Pennsylvania, 19612-6052
Renown Institute for Cancer at Renown Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Saint Mary's Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89503
Humphrey Cancer Center at North Memorial Outpatient Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, 55422-2900
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Highland Hospital of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14620
University Radiation Oncology at Parkridge Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14626
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Radiation Oncology Center - Roseville
Roseville, California, 95661
Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Incorporated
Sacramento, California, 95815
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Flagler Cancer Center
Saint Augustine, Florida, 32086
CentraCare Clinic - River Campus
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
Regions Hospital Cancer Care Center
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
Peninsula Regional Medical Center
Salisbury, Maryland, 21801
Utah Cancer Specialists at UCS Cancer Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas - Northeast
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
North Coast Cancer Care, Incorporated
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5499
CCOP - Virginia Mason Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Cancer Centers of the Carolinas - Seneca
Seneca, South Carolina, 29672
Texas Oncology, PA at Texas Cancer Center - Sherman
Sherman, Texas, 75090
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology Associates, LLP
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101
Sanford Cancer Center at Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117-5039
Gibbs Regional Cancer Center at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Cancer Care Northwest - Spokane South
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Baystate Regional Cancer Program at D'Amour Center for Cancer Care
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Barnes-Jewish West County Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Dixie Regional Medical Center - East Campus
St. George, Utah, 84770
Saint Helena Hospital
St. Helena, California, 94574
Stanford Cancer Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5824
Door County Cancer Center at Door County Memorial Hospital
Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, 54235-1495
Texas Oncology, PA at Texas Oncology Cancer Center Sugar Land
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Flower Hospital Cancer Center
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital
Syracuse, New York, 13210
North Suburban Medical Center
Thornton, Colorado, 80229
St. Anne Mercy Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
J. Phillip Citta Regional Cancer Center at Community Medical Center
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Arizona Oncology - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Natalie Warren Bryant Cancer Center at St. Francis Hospital
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Tyler Cancer Center
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at Cooper - Voorhees
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Washington Cancer Institute at Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Waukesha Memorial Hospital Regional Cancer Center
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
UHHS Westlake Medical Center
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
Frank M. and Dorothea Henry Cancer Center at Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711
Riverview UW Cancer Center at Riverview Hospital
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, 54494
Cleveland Clinic - Wooster
Wooster, Ohio, 44691
Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Canada6 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Allan Blair Cancer Centre at Pasqua Hospital
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Saskatoon Cancer Centre at the University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Comparison of Standard-Dose (60 Gy) Versus High-Dose (74 Gy) Conformal Radiotherapy With Concurrent and Consolidation Carboplatin/Paclitaxel +/- Cetuximab (IND #103444) in Patients With Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, carboplatin work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known whether high-dose radiation therapy is more effective than standard-dose radiation therapy when given together with combination chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying high-dose or standard-dose radiation therapy given together with chemotherapy with or without cetuximab to see how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed stage III non-small cell lung cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare the overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed, unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer treated with high- versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy comprising carboplatin and paclitaxel.
- To compare the overall survival of patients treated with versus without cetuximab in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy
Secondary
- To compare progression-free survival and local-regional tumor control in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the toxicity of high- versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with versus without cetuximab in these patients.
- To investigate the prognostic and predictive effects of gross tumor volume on overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- To correlate outcomes (i.e., survival, toxicity, or QOL) in these patients with biological parameters.
- To analyze the predictive value of pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET) scan in predicting survival, distant metastasis, and local-regional control in patients treated with these regimens.
- To explore biological markers to predict clinical outcome including survival, distant metastasis, local-regional control, and QOL (including toxicity) in patients treated with these regimens.
- To prospectively collect and bank tissue, blood, and urine specimens for future biomarker analyses in predicting clinical outcome in patients treated with these regimens.
- To investigate associations between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and toxicity, response, overall survival, and progression-free survival.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to PET staging (yes vs no), radiotherapy technique (3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy), Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1), and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. (Arms II and IV closed to accrual effective 6/17/11)
Patients may undergo tumor tissue, blood, and urine collection periodically during study for tissue banking or biomarker correlative studies.
Patients may undergo quality-of-life assessment at baseline and periodically during study.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 5 years and then annually thereafter.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Radiation Toxicity
- Being tested
- Cetuximab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, 60 Gy RT, 74 Gy RT
- Keywords
- radiation toxicity, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Radiation Injuries, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CetuximabBiological
Also called Erbitux
Loading dose: 400 mg/m2, IV, one week prior to start of radiation therapy (RT). Then, beginning day 1 of RT, 250 mg/m2, IV, weekly; for 60 Gy arm for 15 weeks, for 74 Gy arm for 16 weeks.
CarboplatinDrug
Also called Paraplatin
Concurrent: AUC=2, IV, days 1, 8, 14, 22, 29, and 36 of radiation therapy; for 74 Gy arms, on day 43 as well.
Consolidation, 3 weeks after completion of RT, AUC=6, IV, days 1 and 22.
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Taxol, Abraxane
Concurrent: 45 mg/m2, IV, days 1, 8, 14, 22, 29, and 36 of radiation therapy (RT); for 74 Gy arms, on day 43 as well.
Consolidation, 3 weeks after completion of RT, 200 mg/m2, IV, days 1 and 22.
60 Gy RTRadiation
Also called RT
Radiation therapy (RT) in once-daily, 2 Gy fractions, given in 30 fractions over the course of 6 weeks.
74 Gy RTRadiation
Radiation therapy (RT) in once-daily, 2 Gy fractions, given in 37 fractions over the course of 7.5 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 60 Gy RT | Active comparator | 60 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by consolidation paclitaxel and carboplatin Receives: Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Radiation: 60 Gy RT |
| 74 Gy RT | Experimental | 74 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by consolidation paclitaxel and carboplatin Receives: Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Radiation: 74 Gy RT |
| 60 Gy RT + Cetuximab | Experimental | 60 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by consolidation cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin Receives: Biological: Cetuximab; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Radiation: 60 Gy RT |
| 74 Gy RT + Cetuximab | Experimental | 74 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by consolidation cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin Receives: Biological: Cetuximab; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Radiation: 74 Gy RT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Secondary outcomes (12)
Progression-free Survival
A failure for progression-free survival (PFS) is the first occurrence of local or regional progression, distant metastases, or death from any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a nontarget lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Time is measured from the date of randomization to the date of first failure. Patients without failure are censored at the date of last follow-up.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Local-regional Failure (Reported as Two-year Estimates)
A failure for local-regional failure is the first occurrence of local or regional progression. Time is measured from the date of randomization to the date of first failure. Patients alive without local or regional failure at the time of last follow-up are censored. Patients who died without local or regional failure are considered as having competing risk at the time of death. Local-regional failure was estimated by the cumulative incidence method and 2 year estimates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3-5 Esophagitis and Pneumonitis Adverse Events as Assessed by NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v3.0
Treatment-related esophagitis and pneumonitis were assessed graded using the CTCAE v3.0. Comparisons are only made between radiation therapy dosing levels because the cetuximab regimen was known to be safe in combination with radiation therapy.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Percentage of Participants With Other Grade 3-5 Adverse Events as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
Treatment-related adverse events other than esophagitis and pneumonitis were assessed graded using the CTCAE v3.0. Comparisons are only made between radiation therapy dosing levels because the cetuximab regimen was known to be safe in combination with radiation therapy.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Death During or Within 30 Days of Discontinuation of Protocol Treatment
Deaths regardless of cause and occuring during or within 30 days of discontinuation of protocol treatment were evaluated.
Measured: From start of protocol treatment to 24 months.
Percentage of Patients With Decline From Baseline to 3 Months in the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) of the Functional Assessment of the Cancer Therapy Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI).
A decline of 2 points in the LCS from baseline to 3 months was considered a clinically meaningful change indicating a decline in quality of life. Comparisons are only made between radiation therapy dosing levels because the cetuximab regimen was known to be safe in combination with radiation therapy.
Measured: At baseline and 3 months.
Patient-reported Swallowing Score (Area Under the Curve)
Patients completed a swallowing diary prior to the start of treatment and then daily during treatment. Patients recorded a score to indicate problems with swallowing on that day (1-None, 2-Mild soreness only, 3-Can swallow solids with some difficulty, 4-Cannot swallow solids, 5-Cannot swallow liquids). These scores were then plotted across time and the area under the curve from baseline until the end of week 6 was calculated. A lower area under the curve indicates better swallowing ability. Comparisons are only made between radiation therapy dosing levels because the cetuximab regimen was known to be safe in combination with radiation therapy.
Measured: From randomization to 6 weeks after start of radiation therapy (6-10 weeks from randomization)
EuroQoL (EQ5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Through One Year (Area Under the Curve)
The visual analogue scale is a self-assessment of current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The area under the curve of each subject's EQ5D visual analog scale (VAS) response trajectory within 1 year was calculated. The EQ5D VAS utility was normalized by the baseline score. The trajectory included all available time points through one year. If a subject died within one year, the EQ5D VAS was reduced to 0 at the time of death. If subject was censored within one year, the EQ5D utility curve was truncated at the time of censoring. The scores were plotted across time and the area under the curve was calculated. A greater area under the curve indicates a better health state. Comparisons are only made between radiation therapy dosing levels because the cetuximab regimen was known to be safe in combination with radiation
Measured: From randomization to one year
Overall Survival and Local-regional Failure by Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Group
EGFR is a protein that is present on the surface of both normal cells and cancer cancer cells. EGFR H-Score is a measure of staining intensity ranging from 0 to 300 where a higher value indicates greater intensity of EGFR. Available tumor samples were evaluated for EGFR and given an H-Score. Patients were divided into two groups based on H-Score values dichotomized at 200. All event times are time from randomization to date of event or censoring. A survival event is death from any cause, patients without events are censored at the date of last contact, and survival rates are estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. A local-regional event is the first development of progressive disease locally or regionally, patients who do not have an event are censored at the date of death or last contact, and event rates are estimated by cumulative incidence. Two-year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3+ Adverse Events by Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Group
EGFR is a protein that is present on the surface of both normal cells and cancer cancer cells. EGFR H-Score is a measure of staining intensity ranging from 0 to 300 where a higher value indicates greater intensity of EGFR. Available tumor samples were evaluated for EGFR and given an H-Score. Patients were divided into two groups based on H-Score values dichotomized at 200. Worst toxicity as determined by adverse events was used as a measure of a patient's quality of life (QOL). Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to AE. Highest grade (worst) adverse event (AE) per subject was counted.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Prognostic and Predictive Effects of Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) on Overall Survival
Gross tumor volume (GTV) is defined as the combined volume (cubic centimeters) of the primary tumor and clinically positive lymph nodes seen either on the planning computed tomography (CT) scan or the pretreatment positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. GTV was evaluated as a continuous variable therefore overall survival time is not summarized by GTV. "Prognostic" refers to the main effect and "predictive" refers to the interaction between GTV and treatment arm.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Prognostic Value of Pre-treatment Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan in Predicting Survival, Distant Metastasis, and Local-regional Failure
Standardized uptake value (SUV) is a simple way of determining activity in PET imaging. It is a mathematically derived ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at a point in time and the injected dose of radioactivity per kilogram of the patient's body weight. All event times are time from randomization to date of event or censoring. A survival event is death from any cause, patients without events are censored at the date of last contact, and survival rates are estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Local-regional and distant metastasis events are the first development of progressive disease locally/regionally or distant metastasis, respectively, patients who do not have an event are censored at the date of death or last contact, and event rates are estimated by cumulative incidence. Two-year rates are presented. PET SUV was evaluated as a continuous variable therefore the outcome variables are not summarized by PET SUV.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2007
- Primary completionJun 2013
- Study completion20 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- This study was revised 06/18/08 to a 2x2 factorial design to evaluate the addition of cetuximab to the radiation therapy regimens.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 544 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, NRG Oncology
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Bradley, MD, Principal investigator, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University Medical CenterHak Choy, MD, Study chair, Simmons Cancer CenterGregory A. Masters, MD, Study chair, CCOP - Christiana Care Health ServicesSteven E. Schild, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicAlex A. Adjei, MD, PhD, Study chair, Roswell Park Cancer InstituteJeffrey A. Bogart, MD, Study chair, State University of New York - Upstate Medical UniversityArthur William Blackstock, MD, Study chair, Wake Forest University Health SciencesMark A. Socinski, MD, Study chair, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00533949
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTOG 0617
- Other IDs
- CDR0000564240, NCCTG-N0628, CALGB-30609, NCI-2013-01762
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bradley JD, Hu C, Komaki RR, Masters GA, Blumenschein GR, Schild SE, Bogart JA, Forster KM, Magliocco AM, Kavadi VS, Narayan S, Iyengar P, Robinson CG, Wynn RB, Koprowski CD, Olson MR, Meng J, Paulus R, Curran WJ Jr, Choy H. Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0617: Standard- Versus High-Dose Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):706-714. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01162. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
PubMed 31841363Chun SG, Hu C, Komaki RU, Timmerman RD, Schild SE, Bogart JA, Dobelbower MC, Bosch W, Kavadi VS, Narayan S, Iyengar P, Robinson C, Rothman J, Raben A, Augspurger ME, MacRae RM, Paulus R, Bradley JD. Long-Term Prospective Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;10(8):1111-1115. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1841.
PubMed 38935373Zhang Z, Wang Z, Luo T, Yan M, Dekker A, De Ruysscher D, Traverso A, Wee L, Zhao L. Computed tomography and radiation dose images-based deep-learning model for predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients after radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2023 May;182:109581. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109581. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
PubMed 36842666McWilliam A, Abravan A, Banfill K, Faivre-Finn C, van Herk M. Demystifying the Results of RTOG 0617: Identification of Dose Sensitive Cardiac Subregions Associated With Overall Survival. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 May;18(5):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.085. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
PubMed 36738929McKenzie E, Zhang S, Zakariaee R, Guthier CV, Hakimian B, Mirhadi A, Kamrava M, Padda SK, Lewis JH, Nikolova A, Mak RH, Atkins KM. Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Radiation Dose Association With All-Cause Mortality in NRG Oncology Trial RTOG 0617. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Apr 1;115(5):1138-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.033. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
PubMed 36436615Movsas B, Hu C, Sloan J, Bradley J, Komaki R, Masters G, Kavadi V, Narayan S, Michalski J, Johnson DW, Koprowski C, Curran WJ Jr, Garces YI, Gaur R, Wynn RB, Schallenkamp J, Gelblum DY, MacRae RM, Paulus R, Choy H. Quality of Life Analysis of a Radiation Dose-Escalation Study of Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0617 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar;2(3):359-67. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3969.
PubMed 26606200Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, Masters G, Blumenschein G, Schild S, Bogart J, Hu C, Forster K, Magliocco A, Kavadi V, Garces YI, Narayan S, Iyengar P, Robinson C, Wynn RB, Koprowski C, Meng J, Beitler J, Gaur R, Curran W Jr, Choy H. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):187-99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71207-0. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
PubMed 25601342
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Comparison of Standard-Dose (60 Gy) Versus High-Dose (74 Gy) Conformal Radiotherapy With Concurrent and Consolidation Carboplatin/Paclitaxel +/- Cetuximab (IND #103444) in Patients With Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00533949
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RTOG 0617
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer, Radiation Toxicity
- Keywords
- radiation toxicity, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 544 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, NRG Oncology
- Study start
- Nov 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, carboplatin work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known whether high-dose radiation therapy is more effective than standard-dose radiation therapy when given together with combination chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying high-dose or standard-dose radiation therapy given together with chemotherapy with or without cetuximab to see how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed stage III non-small cell lung cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare the overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed, unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer treated with high- versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy comprising carboplatin and paclitaxel.
- To compare the overall survival of patients treated with versus without cetuximab in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy
Secondary
- To compare progression-free survival and local-regional tumor control in patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the toxicity of high- versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with versus without cetuximab in these patients.
- To investigate the prognostic and predictive effects of gross tumor volume on overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- To compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- To correlate outcomes (i.e., survival, toxicity, or QOL) in these patients with biological parameters.
- To analyze the predictive value of pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET) scan in predicting survival, distant metastasis, and local-regional control in patients treated with these regimens.
- To explore biological markers to predict clinical outcome including survival, distant metastasis, local-regional control, and QOL (including toxicity) in patients treated with these regimens.
- To prospectively collect and bank tissue, blood, and urine specimens for future biomarker analyses in predicting clinical outcome in patients treated with these regimens.
- To investigate associations between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and toxicity, response, overall survival, and progression-free survival.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to PET staging (yes vs no), radiotherapy technique (3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy), Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1), and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. (Arms II and IV closed to accrual effective 6/17/11)
Patients may undergo tumor tissue, blood, and urine collection periodically during study for tissue banking or biomarker correlative studies.
Patients may undergo quality-of-life assessment at baseline and periodically during study.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for 5 years and then annually thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- This study was revised 06/18/08 to a 2x2 factorial design to evaluate the addition of cetuximab to the radiation therapy regimens.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 60 Gy RT | Active comparator | Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Radiation: 60 Gy RT60 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by consolidation paclitaxel and carboplatin |
| 74 Gy RT | Experimental | Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Radiation: 74 Gy RT74 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by consolidation paclitaxel and carboplatin |
| 60 Gy RT + Cetuximab | Experimental | Biological: Cetuximab, Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Radiation: 60 Gy RT60 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by consolidation cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin |
| 74 Gy RT + Cetuximab | Experimental | Biological: Cetuximab, Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: Paclitaxel, Radiation: 74 Gy RT74 Gy Radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by consolidation cetuximab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (32 listed)
- Pathologically proven (either histologic or cytologic) diagnosis of Stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); excluding patients with N3 disease based on supraclavicular or contralateral hilar adenopathy, [according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging, 6th edition; see appendix III] within 12 weeks of registration; patients who present with N2 or N3 disease and an undetectable NSCLC primary tumor also are eligible.
- Patients must be considered unresectable or inoperable; Note: Patients who have had a nodal recurrence after surgery for an early-stage NSCLC are eligible if the following criteria are met:
- Stage III A or B disease, including no distant metastases, based upon the following minimum diagnostic workup are acceptable:
- If a pleural effusion is present, the following criteria must be met to exclude malignant involvement (incurable T4 disease):
- Patients must have measurable or evaluable disease.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- N3 supraclavicular disease;
- Greater than minimal, exudative, or cytologically positive pleural effusions;
- Involved contralateral hilar nodes (i.e. greater than 1.5 cm on short axis or positive on PET scan);
- ≥ 10% weight loss within the past month;
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years; non-invasive conditions such as carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CetuximabAlso: ErbituxLoading dose: 400 mg/m2, IV, one week prior to start of radiation therapy (RT). Then, beginning day 1 of RT, 250 mg/m2, IV, weekly; for 60 Gy arm for 15 weeks, for 74 Gy arm for 16 weeks. | Biological | 60 Gy RT + Cetuximab, 74 Gy RT + Cetuximab |
| CarboplatinAlso: ParaplatinConcurrent: AUC=2, IV, days 1, 8, 14, 22, 29, and 36 of radiation therapy; for 74 Gy arms, on day 43 as well. Consolidation, 3 weeks after completion of RT, AUC=6, IV, days 1 and 22. | Drug | 60 Gy RT, 60 Gy RT + Cetuximab, 74 Gy RT, 74 Gy RT + Cetuximab |
| PaclitaxelAlso: Taxol, AbraxaneConcurrent: 45 mg/m2, IV, days 1, 8, 14, 22, 29, and 36 of radiation therapy (RT); for 74 Gy arms, on day 43 as well. Consolidation, 3 weeks after completion of RT, 200 mg/m2, IV, days 1 and 22. | Drug | 60 Gy RT, 60 Gy RT + Cetuximab, 74 Gy RT, 74 Gy RT + Cetuximab |
| 60 Gy RTAlso: RTRadiation therapy (RT) in once-daily, 2 Gy fractions, given in 30 fractions over the course of 6 weeks. | Radiation | 60 Gy RT, 60 Gy RT + Cetuximab |
| 74 Gy RTRadiation therapy (RT) in once-daily, 2 Gy fractions, given in 37 fractions over the course of 7.5 weeks. | Radiation | 74 Gy RT, 74 Gy RT + Cetuximab |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact.
12 secondary outcomes
Progression-free Survival
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Local-regional Failure (Reported as Two-year Estimates)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3-5 Esophagitis and Pneumonitis Adverse Events as Assessed by NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v3.0
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Percentage of Participants With Other Grade 3-5 Adverse Events as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Death During or Within 30 Days of Discontinuation of Protocol Treatment
Time frame: From start of protocol treatment to 24 months.
Percentage of Patients With Decline From Baseline to 3 Months in the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) of the Functional Assessment of the Cancer Therapy Trial Outcome Index (FACT-TOI).
Time frame: At baseline and 3 months.
Patient-reported Swallowing Score (Area Under the Curve)
Time frame: From randomization to 6 weeks after start of radiation therapy (6-10 weeks from randomization)
EuroQoL (EQ5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Through One Year (Area Under the Curve)
Time frame: From randomization to one year
Overall Survival and Local-regional Failure by Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Group
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Percentage of Patients With Grade 3+ Adverse Events by Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Group
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Prognostic and Predictive Effects of Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) on Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Prognostic Value of Pre-treatment Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan in Predicting Survival, Distant Metastasis, and Local-regional Failure
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 31841363Bradley JD, Hu C, Komaki RR, Masters GA, Blumenschein GR, Schild SE, Bogart JA, Forster KM, Magliocco AM, Kavadi VS, Narayan S, Iyengar P, Robinson CG, Wynn RB, Koprowski CD, Olson MR, Meng J, Paulus R, Curran WJ Jr, Choy H. Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0617: Standard- Versus High-Dose Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):706-714. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01162. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38935373Chun SG, Hu C, Komaki RU, Timmerman RD, Schild SE, Bogart JA, Dobelbower MC, Bosch W, Kavadi VS, Narayan S, Iyengar P, Robinson C, Rothman J, Raben A, Augspurger ME, MacRae RM, Paulus R, Bradley JD. Long-Term Prospective Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;10(8):1111-1115. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1841.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36842666Zhang Z, Wang Z, Luo T, Yan M, Dekker A, De Ruysscher D, Traverso A, Wee L, Zhao L. Computed tomography and radiation dose images-based deep-learning model for predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients after radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2023 May;182:109581. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109581. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36738929McWilliam A, Abravan A, Banfill K, Faivre-Finn C, van Herk M. Demystifying the Results of RTOG 0617: Identification of Dose Sensitive Cardiac Subregions Associated With Overall Survival. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 May;18(5):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.085. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36436615McKenzie E, Zhang S, Zakariaee R, Guthier CV, Hakimian B, Mirhadi A, Kamrava M, Padda SK, Lewis JH, Nikolova A, Mak RH, Atkins KM. Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Radiation Dose Association With All-Cause Mortality in NRG Oncology Trial RTOG 0617. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Apr 1;115(5):1138-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.033. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26606200Movsas B, Hu C, Sloan J, Bradley J, Komaki R, Masters G, Kavadi V, Narayan S, Michalski J, Johnson DW, Koprowski C, Curran WJ Jr, Garces YI, Gaur R, Wynn RB, Schallenkamp J, Gelblum DY, MacRae RM, Paulus R, Choy H. Quality of Life Analysis of a Radiation Dose-Escalation Study of Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0617 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar;2(3):359-67. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3969.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25601342Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, Masters G, Blumenschein G, Schild S, Bogart J, Hu C, Forster K, Magliocco A, Kavadi V, Garces YI, Narayan S, Iyengar P, Robinson C, Wynn RB, Koprowski C, Meng J, Beitler J, Gaur R, Curran W Jr, Choy H. Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):187-99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71207-0. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
- Data Available: Select individual patient-level data from this trial can be requested from the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Bradley, MD principal investigator
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University Medical Center
Hak Choy, MD study chair
Simmons Cancer Center
Gregory A. Masters, MD study chair
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
213 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cetuximab, Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in people with Lung Cancer and Radiation Toxicity, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 213 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 32 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 213 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occured after all patients were on study for 18 months. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 61.5 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00533949, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2022.