Severe SepsisPhase 3MaxSepNCT00534287
Comparison of Two Antibiotic Regimen (Meropenem Versus Meropenem+Moxifloxacin)in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
A Phase 3 study testing meropenem and meropenem, moxifloxacin in people with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by Kompetenznetz Sepsis at 52 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Severe sepsis and septic shock are diseases of infectious origin with a high risk of death. Antibiotic therapy is mandatory but it is unknown whether one antibiotic alone is sufficient for initial therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Severe Sepsis, Septic Shock
- What is being tested?
- meropenem and meropenem, moxifloxacin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Severe sepsis or septic shock according to ACCP/SCCM criteria
- Onset of severe sepsis or septic shock <24 h
- Informed consent
- Effective contraception in fertile women
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Pregnancy
- Breast-feeding women
- Pretreatment with meropenem, imipenem, or ertapenem within the last 4 weeks (>1 daily dosage)
- Pretreatment with moxifloxacin,ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin within the last 4 weeks (>1 daily dosage)
- Pretreatment with a pseudomonas effective cephalosporin (cefepime, ceftazidim, cefpirom) or piperacillin within the last 48 hours (>1 daily dosage).
Show all 22Show fewer
- Pretreatment with other chinolones within the last 4 weeks (>1 daily dosage)
- Presence of infection where guidelines recommend another antimicrobial therapy than the study medication (i.e. endocarditis)
- Evidence or strong clinical suspicion of a microorganism where the study medication is known to be ineffective (i.e. tuberculosis, MRSA- or VRE-infection)
- Known allergy against meropenem or moxifloxacin
- Tendon disease or injury due to past quinolone therapy
- Congenital or acquired prolongation of QT-interval
- Concomitant medication which prolongs the QT-interval
- Electrolyte imbalance, especially uncorrected hypokalemia
- Clinically relevant bradycardia
- Clinically relevant cardiac dysfunction with reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction
- Symptomatic arrhythmias in the medical history
- Significant hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) or elevation of liver enzymes >5x the upper normal range
- No commitment to full patient support (i.e. DNR order)
- Patient's death is considered imminent due to coexisting disease
- Concomitant participation in another study or study participation with in the last 30 days.
- Relationship of the patient to study team member (i.e. colleague, relative)
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 1 country.
52 sites in 1 country
Germany52 sites
University Hospital Aachen - Dep. of Anesthesiology
Aachen, 52074
Klinikum Augsburg - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Augsburg, 86156
Charité Berlin - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Berlin, 10117
Charité Berlin - Dep. of Medicine (Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology)
Berlin, 10117
Charité Campus Mitte -Dep.of Infectiology and Pneumonology
Berlin, 10117
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin - Dep. of Medicine IV
Berlin, 12203
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln - Cardiology
Berlin, 12313
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln - Dep. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
Berlin, 12313
Charité Berlin - Campus Virchow-Klinikum - Dep. of Nephrology
Berlin, 13353
Ev. Krankenhaus Gilead I - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Bielefeld, 33617
University Hospital Bonn - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Bonn, 53105
Städtisches Klinikum Brandenburg - Intensive Care Unit
Brandenburg, 14770
University Hospital Köln - Dep. of Internal Medicine I
Cologne, 50924
Hospital Merheim - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Cologne, 51109
Klinikum Darmstadt - Dep. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
Darmstadt, 64283
Klinikum Dessau - Dep. of Medicine
Dessau, 06847
Hospital Lippe-Detmold - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Detmold, 32756
Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt
Dresden, 01067
University Hospital Dresden - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Med.
Dresden, 01307
HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Erfurt, 99089
University Erlangen-Nürnberg - Dep. of Medicine IV
Erlangen, 91054
University Hospital Freiburg - Dep. of Medicine III
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Klinik am Eichert - Dep. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy
Göppingen, 73035
Georg August Universität Göttingen - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Göttingen, 37075
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Greifswald, 17475
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Dep. of Internal Medicine B
Greifswald, 17475
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Halle, 06097
Hospital Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau gGmbH - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Halle, 06120
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf - Dep. of Intensive Care Medicine
Hamburg, 20246
Klinikum Hannover Nordstadt - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Hanover, 30167
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Dep. of Internal Medicine/ Pneumology
Hanover, 30625
Westküstenklinikum Heide - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Heide, 25746
University Hospital Heidelberg - Dep. of Medicine IV
Heidelberg, 69120
University Hospital Heidelberg - Dep. of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
Heidelberg, 69120
University Hospital Saarland - Deop. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy
Homburg/Saar, 66421
University Hospital Jena, Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Jena, 07747
University Hospital Kiel - Dep. of. Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Kiel, 24105
University Hospital Leipzig - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Leipzig, 04103
Klinikum Lüdenscheid - Dep. of Anesthesiology
Lüdenscheid, 58515
Hospital Ludwigshafen am Rhein - Dep. of Cardiac Surgery
Ludwigshafen, 67063
University Hospital Mannheim - Dep. of Medicine I
Mannheim, 68167
University Hospital Munich - Dep. of Internal Medicine
Munich, 80336
Hospital Munich Harlaching - Dep. of Internal Acute Medicine and Prevention
Munich, 81545
Klinikum rechts der Isar - Dep. of Anesthesiology
Munich, 81675
University Hospital Münster - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Münster, 48149
Klinikum Oldenburg - Dep. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy
Oldenburg, 26133
Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Potsdam, 14467
University Hospital Rostock - Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Rostock, 18057
Ev. Jung-Stilling-Krankenhaus - Dep. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
Siegen, 57074
University Hospital Tübingen - Dep. of Medicine
Tübingen, 72076
University Hospital Ulm - Dep. of Internal Medicine II
Ulm, 89081
Stiftung Juliusspital Würzburg - Dep. of Medicine (Cardiology)
Würzburg, 97070
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicentre Study About the Effect of an Empirical Antibiotic Monotherapy With Meropenem (Meronem®) Versus a Combination Therapy With Moxifloxacin (Avalox®) on Organ Dysfunction in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Severe sepsis and septic shock are diseases of infectious origin with a high risk of death. Antibiotic therapy is mandatory but it is unknown whether one antibiotic alone is sufficient for initial therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare a therapy with meropenem alone or the combination of meropenem plus moxifloxacin in the treatment of severe sepsis/ septic shock. Patients randomly receive one of the two treatments for at least 7 days but not longer than 14 days.
Read the detailed description
Early intravenous empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is an essential part of sepsis therapy. Inadequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy is associated with an increased mortality rate. Carbapenems are designed for empirical antimicrobial monotherapy. Combination therapy has been suggested but efficiency remains to be proven. In this study, antimicrobial monotherapy with meropenem is compared with a combination therapy of meropenem and moxifloxacin. It is hypothesized that the superior antibiotic therapy is associated with a lower overall organ dysfunction in sepsis. Study therapy lasts for at least 7 days unless microbiological results suggest otherwise. Study therapy may be extended to 14 days. Follow up examinations occur at 28 and 90 days. This investigator initiated study is supported by the German government (bmbf) and unrestricted industrial grants.
- Conditions
- Severe Sepsis, Septic Shock
- Being tested
- meropenem, meropenem, moxifloxacin
- Keywords
- sepsis, antibiotics, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, Severe sepsis and septic shock
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Shock, Septic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
meropenemDrug
Also called Meronem® (meropenem)
Empirical antibiotic therapy with 3 x 1 g intravenous meropenem. Dosage is adjusted in case of renal dysfunction. Recommended duration of therapy is 7 days but can be extended up to 14 days.
meropenem, moxifloxacinDrug
Also called Meronem® (meropenem), Avalox® (moxifloxacin)
Empirical antibiotic therapy with 3 x 1 g intravenous meropenem plus 1 x 400 mg intravenous moxifloxacin. Dosage of meropenem is adjusted in case of renal dysfunction. Recommended duration of therapy is 7 days but can be extended up to 14 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MeroMono | Active comparator | Monotherapy with meropenem Receives: Drug: meropenem |
| MeroMoxi | Active comparator | Combination therapy with meropenem + moxifloxacin Receives: Drug: meropenem, moxifloxacin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean total SOFA score
Measured: study duration but not longer than 14 days
Secondary outcomes (13)
Mortality
Measured: 28 and 90 days
ICU and hospital length of stay
Response to therapy
Measured: day 7 and day 10
Clinical and microbiological cure
Measured: End of study therapy (day 7-14) and release from ICU (max. day 21)
Frequency of adverse events (AEs, SAEs, SUSARs)
Ventilator free days
Measured: 28 and 90 days
Days without renal replacement therapy
Measured: 28 and 90 days
Vasopressor free days
Measured: 28 and 90 days
SOFA-subscores
Antibiotics free days
Measured: 28 and 90 days
Costs of antibiotic therapy
Measured: ICU stay
Frequency of resistances to antibiotics
Measured: ICU stay
Frequency of new infections
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Severe SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kompetenznetz Sepsis
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, Bayer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Konrad Reinhart, MD, Study chair, University Hospital Jena; Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineMarkus Löffler, MD, Study director, University Leipzig; Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien Leipzig (KKSL)Thomas Deufel, MD, Study director, University Hopitel Jena, Institute for Medical Chemistry
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00534287
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EudraCT 2006-006984-21
- Other IDs
- bmbf grant: 01 KI 01 06
- Acronym
- MaxSep
- Status last verified
- Jun 2012
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74.
PubMed 1597042Reinhart K, Brunkhorst F, Bone H, Gerlach H, Grundling M, Kreymann G, Kujath P, Marggraf G, Mayer K, Meier-Hellmann A, Peckelsen C, Putensen C, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Stuber F, Weiler N, Welte T, Werdan K; Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. [Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis: guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine]. Anaesthesist. 2006 Jun;55 Suppl 1:43-56. German.
PubMed 17051663Bochud PY, Bonten M, Marchetti O, Calandra T. Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11 Suppl):S495-512. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000143118.41100.14.
PubMed 15542958Harbarth S, Garbino J, Pugin J, Romand JA, Lew D, Pittet D. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis. Am J Med. 2003 Nov;115(7):529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.005.
PubMed 14599631Safdar N, Handelsman J, Maki DG. Does combination antimicrobial therapy reduce mortality in Gram-negative bacteraemia? A meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;4(8):519-27. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01108-9.
PubMed 15288826Engel C, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, Brunkhorst R, Gerlach H, Grond S, Gruendling M, Huhle G, Jaschinski U, John S, Mayer K, Oppert M, Olthoff D, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Stuber F, Weiler N, Welte T, Bogatsch H, Hartog C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K. Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):606-18. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0517-7. Epub 2007 Feb 24.
PubMed 17323051Pletz MW, Bloos F, Burkhardt O, Brunkhorst FM, Bode-Boger SM, Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Greer MW, Stass H, Welte T. Pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1864-y. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
PubMed 20336279Brunkhorst FM, Oppert M, Marx G, Bloos F, Ludewig K, Putensen C, Nierhaus A, Jaschinski U, Meier-Hellmann A, Weyland A, Grundling M, Moerer O, Riessen R, Seibel A, Ragaller M, Buchler MW, John S, Bach F, Spies C, Reill L, Fritz H, Kiehntopf M, Kuhnt E, Bogatsch H, Engel C, Loeffler M, Kollef MH, Reinhart K, Welte T; German Study Group Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet). Effect of empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and meropenem vs meropenem on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2390-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5833.
PubMed 22692171
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicentre Study About the Effect of an Empirical Antibiotic Monotherapy With Meropenem (Meronem®) Versus a Combination Therapy With Moxifloxacin (Avalox®) on Organ Dysfunction in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00534287
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MaxSep / EudraCT 2006-006984-21
- Conditions
- Severe Sepsis, Septic Shock
- Keywords
- sepsis, antibiotics, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, Severe sepsis and septic shock
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kompetenznetz SepsisResearch network
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca, Bayer
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Severe sepsis and septic shock are diseases of infectious origin with a high risk of death. Antibiotic therapy is mandatory but it is unknown whether one antibiotic alone is sufficient for initial therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare a therapy with meropenem alone or the combination of meropenem plus moxifloxacin in the treatment of severe sepsis/ septic shock. Patients randomly receive one of the two treatments for at least 7 days but not longer than 14 days.
Detailed description
Early intravenous empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is an essential part of sepsis therapy. Inadequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy is associated with an increased mortality rate. Carbapenems are designed for empirical antimicrobial monotherapy. Combination therapy has been suggested but efficiency remains to be proven. In this study, antimicrobial monotherapy with meropenem is compared with a combination therapy of meropenem and moxifloxacin. It is hypothesized that the superior antibiotic therapy is associated with a lower overall organ dysfunction in sepsis. Study therapy lasts for at least 7 days unless microbiological results suggest otherwise. Study therapy may be extended to 14 days. Follow up examinations occur at 28 and 90 days. This investigator initiated study is supported by the German government (bmbf) and unrestricted industrial grants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MeroMono | Active comparator | Drug: meropenemMonotherapy with meropenem |
| MeroMoxi | Active comparator | Drug: meropenem, moxifloxacinCombination therapy with meropenem + moxifloxacin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Severe sepsis or septic shock according to ACCP/SCCM criteria
- Onset of severe sepsis or septic shock <24 h
- Informed consent
- Effective contraception in fertile women
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Pregnancy
- Breast-feeding women
- Pretreatment with meropenem, imipenem, or ertapenem within the last 4 weeks (>1 daily dosage)
- Pretreatment with moxifloxacin,ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin within the last 4 weeks (>1 daily dosage)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| meropenemAlso: Meronem® (meropenem)Empirical antibiotic therapy with 3 x 1 g intravenous meropenem. Dosage is adjusted in case of renal dysfunction. Recommended duration of therapy is 7 days but can be extended up to 14 days. | Drug | MeroMono |
| meropenem, moxifloxacinAlso: Meronem® (meropenem), Avalox® (moxifloxacin)Empirical antibiotic therapy with 3 x 1 g intravenous meropenem plus 1 x 400 mg intravenous moxifloxacin. Dosage of meropenem is adjusted in case of renal dysfunction. Recommended duration of therapy is 7 days but can be extended up to 14 days. | Drug | MeroMoxi |
Primary outcome
Mean total SOFA score
Time frame: study duration but not longer than 14 days
13 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 28 and 90 days
ICU and hospital length of stay
Response to therapy
Time frame: day 7 and day 10
Clinical and microbiological cure
Time frame: End of study therapy (day 7-14) and release from ICU (max. day 21)
Frequency of adverse events (AEs, SAEs, SUSARs)
Ventilator free days
Time frame: 28 and 90 days
Days without renal replacement therapy
Time frame: 28 and 90 days
Vasopressor free days
Time frame: 28 and 90 days
SOFA-subscores
Antibiotics free days
Time frame: 28 and 90 days
Costs of antibiotic therapy
Time frame: ICU stay
Frequency of resistances to antibiotics
Time frame: ICU stay
Frequency of new infections
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2012.
- Background: PubMed 1597042American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74.
- Background: PubMed 17051663Reinhart K, Brunkhorst F, Bone H, Gerlach H, Grundling M, Kreymann G, Kujath P, Marggraf G, Mayer K, Meier-Hellmann A, Peckelsen C, Putensen C, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Stuber F, Weiler N, Welte T, Werdan K; Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. [Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis: guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine]. Anaesthesist. 2006 Jun;55 Suppl 1:43-56. German.
- Background: PubMed 15542958Bochud PY, Bonten M, Marchetti O, Calandra T. Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11 Suppl):S495-512. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000143118.41100.14.
- Background: PubMed 14599631Harbarth S, Garbino J, Pugin J, Romand JA, Lew D, Pittet D. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis. Am J Med. 2003 Nov;115(7):529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.07.005.
- Background: PubMed 15288826Safdar N, Handelsman J, Maki DG. Does combination antimicrobial therapy reduce mortality in Gram-negative bacteraemia? A meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;4(8):519-27. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01108-9.
- Background: PubMed 17323051Engel C, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, Brunkhorst R, Gerlach H, Grond S, Gruendling M, Huhle G, Jaschinski U, John S, Mayer K, Oppert M, Olthoff D, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Stuber F, Weiler N, Welte T, Bogatsch H, Hartog C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K. Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):606-18. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0517-7. Epub 2007 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 20336279Pletz MW, Bloos F, Burkhardt O, Brunkhorst FM, Bode-Boger SM, Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Greer MW, Stass H, Welte T. Pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1864-y. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 22692171Brunkhorst FM, Oppert M, Marx G, Bloos F, Ludewig K, Putensen C, Nierhaus A, Jaschinski U, Meier-Hellmann A, Weyland A, Grundling M, Moerer O, Riessen R, Seibel A, Ragaller M, Buchler MW, John S, Bach F, Spies C, Reill L, Fritz H, Kiehntopf M, Kuhnt E, Bogatsch H, Engel C, Loeffler M, Kollef MH, Reinhart K, Welte T; German Study Group Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet). Effect of empirical treatment with moxifloxacin and meropenem vs meropenem on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2390-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5833.
- Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet)Link provided by the sponsor.
- German Sepsis SocietyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Severe Sepsis
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Sepsis, Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Peer Bullying Intervention, Vodcast
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Blood Pressure Goal in Preterm Preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy, Preeclampsia
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
25BT056: Basket Study of Viral Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
EBV Viremia, CMV Viremia
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Methylene Blue in the Treatment of Severe Septic Shock
Septic Shock, Methylene Blue
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Konrad Reinhart, MD study chair
University Hospital Jena; Dep. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Markus Löffler, MD study director
University Leipzig; Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien Leipzig (KKSL)
Thomas Deufel, MD study director
University Hopitel Jena, Institute for Medical Chemistry
52 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing meropenem and meropenem, moxifloxacin in people with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by Kompetenznetz Sepsis at 52 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean total SOFA score (time frame: study duration but not longer than 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00534287, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2012.