AzTrials
AzTrials

Tetralogy of FallotNCT00536432

Early Re-intervention in Infants and Small Children After Correction of Tetralogy of Fallot

An observational study of Tetralogy of Fallot, run by Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects at 14 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the most frequent congenital heart malformations. In many cases re-interventions, surgical or catheter-based, are necessary after the repair of tetralogy of Fallot in infancy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 7 years
Conditions the study is for
Tetralogy of Fallot
How many people
93 participants
Where
14 sitesGermany
Study dates
Sep 2007to Jun 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: children, <8 years, with tetralogy of Fallot

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent of the patient's legal representatives
  • Patients with tetralogy of Fallot (including pulmonary atresia with vsd) after corrective operation
  • Patients < 8 years with corrective surgery and necessary re-intervention (e.g.cardiac catheter intervention or re-operation )

Who cannot join

  • DORV (if there is another VSD than subaortic)
  • Associated severe heart defects (e. g. AV canal)
  • Other clinically relevant diseases, such as malignant tumor (in the investigating physician's assessment)
  • MRI contraindication, e.g. cardiac pacemaker, implanted neurostimulators and other magnetizable foreign bodies

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 1 country.

14 sites in 1 country

Germany14 sites
  • Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen

    Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-32545

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin

    Berlin, State of Berlin, D-13353

  • Universitätsklinikum Charite, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Otto-Heubner-Centrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin

    Berlin, State of Berlin, D-13353

  • Herzzentrum Duisburg, Kinderkardiologie

    Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-47137

  • Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-45122

  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik III Päd. Kardiologie

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, D-79106

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Pädiatrische Kardiologie und Intensivmedizin

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, D-30625

  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Pädiatrische Kardiologie

    Homburg/Saar, Saarland, D-66421

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie

    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, D-24105

  • Herzzentrum Leipzig, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie

    Leipzig, Saxony, D-04289

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

    Munich, Bavaria, D-80636

  • Universitätsklinikum Muenster, Klinik für Kinderkardiologie

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-48149

  • Deutsches Kinderherzzentrum St. Augustin

    Sankt Augustin, North Rhine-Westphalia, D-53757

  • Universitätsklinikum Tuebingen, Klinik für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin

    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, D-72076

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Early Re-intervention in Infants and Small Children After Correction of Tetralogy of Fallot: Prospective Analysis of Myocardial Benefit Using Cardiac MRI and Echocardiography

Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the most frequent congenital heart malformations. In many cases re-interventions, surgical or catheter-based, are necessary after the repair of tetralogy of Fallot in infancy. At present, informations in the literature about the myocardial benefit and the timing of re-interventions are missing in this age group. On the other hand, Fallot patients are dependent on solid criteria for re-interventions, because further interventions like replacement of the pulmonary valve or balloon dilatations of peripheral pulmonary stenoses are common.

The objective of this study is to assess the benefit of such interventions for the right ventricular function. By performing extensive standardised examinations (including MRI, echocardiography, tissue Doppler,,3D-echocardiography, holter monitoring and quality of life assessments) before and 6 to 9 months after the re-intervention data of the right ventricular function are collected. Based on these quantitative data predictive parameters concerning the right ventricular recovery and information about the time of re-intervention should be determined.

Read the detailed description

In the repair of tetralogy of Fallot, pulmonary insufficiency used to be tacitly accepted as a result of extensive transannular patching (TAP) and considered unobjectionable. In fact, this is well tolerated during the first postoperative years, but today there is increasing evidence that the resulting chronic volume stress to the right ventricle is harmful on the long run, in particular if there are stenoses of the pulmonary artery in addition. Such stenoses, partly due to distortions after shunt surgery, together with pulmonary insufficiency, lead to a combined volume and pressure load of the right ventricle. The chronic volume stress results in a decrease in biventricular function and exercise tolerance, associated with increasing electrical instability with frequent, mostly ventricular, dysrhythmias. This constellation brings about a significantly increased risk of cardiac death.

Pulmonary valve replacement can improve haemodynamics, exercise tolerance and dysrhythmia. However, it is still unclear, which criteria best indicate the need for re-intervention, such as balloon dilatations of peripheral pulmonary stenoses, and what may be the best point in time in infancy.

The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of such interventions to the right ventricular function in small children. The data obtained are supposed to determine predictive parameters of the right ventricular recovery and to help to establish criteria for the necessity and time of re-intervention.

Medical subject headings
Tetralogy of Fallot

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
93 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00536432
Sponsor's protocol ID
MP 4.2
Status last verified
Oct 2010
First submitted
26 Sep 2007
Last updated
6 Jun 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Tetralogy of Fallot, run by Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects at 14 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in