HIV InfectionsPhase 3NCT00537394
Optimizing Treatment for Treatment-Experienced, HIV-Infected People
A Phase 3 study testing Enfuvirtide, Raltegravir and Darunavir in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 64 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of anti-HIV therapy is to prevent HIV from replicating. Long-term control of HIV requires at least two anti-HIV drugs that are active against the virus. Drug resistance is a problem for many treatment-experienced, HIV-infected people. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Enfuvirtide, Raltegravir and Darunavir
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 517 participants
- Where
- 64 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 infection
- Triple-class drug experience or resistance. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
- Currently on a failing PI-containing regimen that includes 2 other ARVs with no regimen change for 8 weeks prior to study screening
- HIV viral load of 1000 copies/ml or more
- Hepatitis B surface antigen negative within 90 days of study entry
- Able to obtain NRTIs and ritonavir and have required ARVs at time of starting study intervention
Show all 13Show fewer
- Willing to use acceptable forms of contraception
- Parent or legal guardian willing to provide consent, if applicable
- CD4 count result from a specimen drawn within 120 days prior to study entry
- If any previous HIV-1 viral co-receptor tropism result is available, then most recent specimen date and the tropism result of that specimen AND specimen date and tropism result of any test with either X4 or D/M result, if different from the first specimen, must be available
- Receipt of successful phenotype/genotype resistance results within 105 days prior to study treatment intervention assignment
- Study team identification of a study regimen and at least 2 NRTIs for participant to take
- Certain abnormal laboratory values. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
Who cannot join
- Chronic, active hepatitis B virus infection (hepatitis B surface antigen positive or HBV DNA positive)
- Taking certain medications. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
- Known allergy/sensitivity to components of two or more of the study-provided drugs or their formulations. For maraviroc, this includes hypersensitivity or history of allergy to soy lecithin or peanuts.
- Active drug or alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Use of any immunomodulator (interferons, interleukins, systemic corticosteroids, or cyclosporine), vaccine, or investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study treatment allocation/assignment
- Require certain medications prohibited with study treatment
- Serious illness requiring systemic treatment or hospitalization. Participants who complete therapy or are clinically stable on therapy for at least 14 days prior to study treatment allocation are not excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
64 sites in 2 countries.
64 sites in 2 countries
United States61 sites
The Ponce de Leon Center CRS
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308-2012
University of Colorado Hospital CRS
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
IHV Baltimore Treatment CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins University CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
Alabama Therapeutics CRS
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-2050
Massachusetts General Hospital CRS (MGH CRS)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hospital Therapeutics Clinical Research Site (BWH TCRS) CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Bmc Actg Crs
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Boston Medical Center Ped. HIV Program NICHD CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Beth Israel Deaconess Med. Ctr., ACTG CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Cooper Univ. Hosp. CRS
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Chapel Hill CRS
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514
Northwestern University CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush University CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Cincinnati CRS
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0405
Case Clinical Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
MetroHealth CRS
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Ohio State University CRS
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Trinity Health and Wellness Center CRS
Dallas, Texas, 75208
Denver Public Health CRS
Denver, Colorado, 80204
Wayne State Univ. CRS
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Henry Ford Hosp. CRS
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke Univ. Med. Ctr. Adult CRS
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Houston AIDS Research Team CRS
Houston, Texas, 77030
Texas Children's Hospital CRS
Houston, Texas, 77030
Miller Children's Hosp. Long Beach CA NICHD CRS
Long Beach, California, 90806
University of Southern California CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Usc La Nichd Crs
Los Angeles, California, 90033
UCLA CARE Center CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90035
UCLA-Los Angeles/Brazil AIDS Consortium (LABAC) CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1752
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital CRS
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
Pediatric Perinatal HIV Clinical Trials Unit CRS
Miami, Florida, 33136
Vanderbilt Therapeutics (VT) CRS
Nashville, Tennessee, 37204
Tulane Univ. New Orleans NICHD CRS
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112-2699
Weill Cornell Chelsea CRS
New York, New York, 10011
NY Univ. HIV/AIDS CRS
New York, New York, 10016
Nyu Ny Nichd Crs
New York, New York, 10016
Metropolitan Hosp. NICHD CRS
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia P&S CRS
New York, New York, 10032-3732
Columbia IMPAACT CRS
New York, New York, 10032
Harlem ACTG CRS
New York, New York, 10037
New Jersey Medical School Clinical Research Center CRS
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School CRS
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Stanford AIDS Clinical Trials Unit CRS
Palo Alto, California, 94304-5350
Penn Therapeutics, CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Thomas Jefferson Univ. Med. Ctr. CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
University of Pittsburgh CRS
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-2582
The Research & Education Group-Portland CRS
Portland, Oregon, 97210
The Miriam Hospital Clinical Research Site (TMH CRS) CRS
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Virginia Commonwealth Univ. Medical Ctr. CRS
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
Trillium Health ACTG CRS
Rochester, New York, 14607
Univ. of Rochester ACTG CRS
Rochester, New York, 14642
UCSD Antiviral Research Center CRS
San Diego, California, 92103
Ucsf Hiv/Aids Crs
San Francisco, California, 94110
Univ. of California San Francisco NICHD CRS
San Francisco, California, 94143
University of Washington AIDS CRS
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Washington University Therapeutics (WT) CRS
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr. CRS
The Bronx, New York, 10457
Georgetown University CRS (GU CRS)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Children's National Med. Ctr. ATN CRS
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Howard Univ. Washington DC NICHD CRS
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20060
Puerto Rico3 sites
Puerto Rico AIDS Clinical Trials Unit CRS
San Juan, 00935
University of Puerto Rico Pediatric HIV/AIDS Research Program CRS
San Juan, 00935
San Juan City Hosp. PR NICHD CRS
San Juan, 00936
About this study
Official title: The Optimized Treatment That Includes or Omits NRTIs Trial: A Randomized Strategy Study for HIV-1-Infected Treatment-Experienced Subjects Using the cPSS to Select an Effective Regimen
The goal of anti-HIV therapy is to prevent HIV from replicating. Long-term control of HIV requires at least two anti-HIV drugs that are active against the virus. Drug resistance is a problem for many treatment-experienced, HIV-infected people. The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit of adding a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) to a new anti-HIV drug regimen for the suppression of HIV.
Read the detailed description
Two or more fully active antiretrovirals (ARVs) are recommended for successful suppression of HIV. In people infected with resistant HIV virus, finding two drugs that are fully active against HIV can be a challenge. However, the new generation of anti-HIV drugs has been designed to suppress drug-resistant HIV. These drugs include the FDA-approved protease inhibitors (PIs) darunavir and tipranavir, the investigational non-nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor (nNRTI) etravirine, the FDA-approved fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide, the recently FDA-approved CCR5 inhibitor maraviroc, and the investigational integrase inhibitor raltegravir. Also, it is not yet known whether multiple, partially-active drugs have the same rate of success in suppressing HIV. The purpose of this study was to use HIV resistance testing to predict the potency of a suggested ARV regimen using second generation ARVs and determine if the benefits of adding NRTIs to this new drug regimen outweigh the risks of drug toxicity and pill burden. All participants had treatment experience or resistance to NRTIs, nNRTIs, and PIs, and received novel agents.
An active screening period (after enrollment but before randomization or treatment dispensation), occurred for up to 75 days for all participants, and study participation lasted an additional 96 weeks for those who qualified for either randomization or assignment (i.e. not randomized), to the study intervention. During active screening, all participants remained on their current drug regimen. During screening, phenotypic and genotypic HIV resistance tests were performed on participants' blood samples, as well as a coreceptor tropism assay. Using this information and medication history, the study team determined the best new regimen options for each participant. Each clinician, along with the study participant, then chose a new regimen based on the recommendations of the study team and the participant's preference.
Evaluation for study outcomes began when participants started their new regimen as assigned by either randomization or determined assignment. Stratification between Arms A (Add NRTIs) and B (Omit NRTIs) or Arm C (Non-randomized to Add NRTIs) was based on predicted activity of the new regimen. Those assigned to a regimen with higher predicted activity were randomly assigned to Arm A (Add NRTIs) or B (Omit NRTIs); those assigned a regimen predicted to have lower activity were not randomized, but were assigned to Arm C (Add NRTIs).
Participants in Arms A and C were instructed to take their newly assigned study regimen plus at least 2 NRTIs (personalized from expert recommendation and choice by local provider and participant) for 96 weeks. Participants in Arm B were instructed to take their newly assigned study regimen with no NRTIs for 96 weeks. Participants in all arms who met the primary efficacy outcome of regimen failure remained in the study in order to be followed for important secondary outcomes.
All participants were scheduled to have 13 clinical visits, which included blood collection. At some visits, urine collection and quality of life and adherence questionnaires occurred. A neurocognitive assessment was performed for all participants at time of starting the new study regimen. Participants may also have consented to have cerebrospinal fluid collected via lumbar puncture following study treatment assignment and/or at Week 24. Those participants who consented to cerebrospinal fluid collection also had neurocognitive assessments at the times of collections. Participants were responsible for obtaining certain ARVs not provided by the study, including the ARVs they during the active screening period.
The primary and secondary study objectives and comparisons relate to the randomized arms, and therefore, results are not provided for the non-randomized arm (C). The purpose of the non-randomized arm (C) was to include persons higher baseline resistance (and thus, lower activity scores) in order to address an exploratory objective related to the predictive power of these activity scores (and thus a larger range of scores by inclusion of arm C), on certain, virologic outcomes.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Enfuvirtide, Raltegravir, Darunavir, Tipranavir, Etravirine
- Keywords
- Treatment Experienced
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EnfuvirtideDrug
90mg subcutaneously twice daily
RaltegravirDrug
400 mg twice daily
DarunavirDrug
Two 300-mg tablets twice daily, given with ritonavir 100mg twice daily (ritonavir not provided by the study)
TipranavirDrug
Two 250-mg capsules twice daily, given with ritonavir 100mg twice daily (ritonavir not provided by the study)
EtravirineDrug
Two 100-mg tablets twice daily
MaravirocDrug
Dosage dependent on regimen in which maraviroc is included
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Regimen with higher predicted activity assigned by the study plus at least 2 NRTIs (personalized choice from expert recommendation) for 96 weeks. A 3-4 drug regimen was selected from the drugs listed to the right. Receives: Drug: Enfuvirtide; Drug: Raltegravir; Drug: Darunavir; Drug: Tipranavir; Drug: Etravirine; Drug: Maraviroc |
| B | Experimental | Regimen with higher predicted activity assigned by the study without NRTIs for 96 weeks. A 3-4 drug regimen was selected from the drugs listed to the right. Receives: Drug: Enfuvirtide; Drug: Raltegravir; Drug: Darunavir; Drug: Tipranavir; Drug: Etravirine; Drug: Maraviroc |
| C | Other | Regimen with lower predicted activity assigned plus at least 2 NRTIs (personalized choice from expert recommendation) for 96 weeks. A 3-4 drug regimen was selected from the drugs listed to the right. Receives: Drug: Enfuvirtide; Drug: Raltegravir; Drug: Darunavir; Drug: Tipranavir; Drug: Etravirine; Drug: Maraviroc |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants With Regimen Failure, Defined as a Confirmed Virologic Failure or Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI Component of Study Treatment
Virologic failure defined as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA meeting 1 of the following 4 criteria: < 1.0 log10 copies/mL reduction from baseline level and >= 200 copies/mL at or after week 12 evaluation; >= 200 copies/mL after 1 measurement < 200 copies/mL; absence of any values < 200 copies/mL by and including week 24 evaluation; >= 200 copies/mL at week 48 evaluation. Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI component of Study Treatment is defined as permanently stopping all NRTIs among those randomized to add NRTIs, or starting any NRTI among those randomized to omit NRTIs. Subjects leaving the study for reasons other than death, relocation, incarceration, or site closure were reviewed for the discontinuation outcome by a blinded, independent panel. Additionally, any participant failing to start study treatment after randomization and prior to closure was also reviewed. Results report percent of participants reaching regimen failure outcome by week 48 evaluation using Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From study entry to end of Week 48 evaluation window
Secondary outcomes (14)
Time From Treatment Dispensation to First Grade 3 or Higher (and at Least One Grade Higher Than Baseline) Signs/Symptom or Laboratory Abnormality
Events following permanent discontinuation of NRTI assignment are excluded (i.e. censoring at time of this event, if applicable). Week 96 study visit could occur up to 110 weeks following randomization. Censoring time was the latest study visit when participant was evaluated or when NRTI assignment was discontinued (when applicable). Event time was the exact number of weeks following treatment initiation when the qualifying sign/symptom started (for those safety events triggered by a sign/symptom), or exact number of weeks following treatment initiation when specimen from qualifying laboratory result was drawn (for those safety events triggered by a laboratory abnormality).
Measured: From treatment dispensation to week 96 study visit
Time From Treatment Dispensation to First Study ARV Modification (Excluding NRTIs, if Applicable)
First study ARV modification included any discontinuation or substitution of any chosen and initiated ARV for any reason. Events prompting study medication change could include protocol required (e.g. safety), protocol recommended but not required (e.g. virologic failure), or participant motivated (such as non-adherence, loss to follow-up or death; in other words, not protocol recommended or required). Event times were the exact weeks from treatment initiation to the time of qualifying regimen modification. Censoring times were the exact weeks from treatment initiation to the last date of study drugs. The week 96 (final study visit) could occur up through 110 weeks following randomization.
Measured: From treatment dispensation to week 96 study visit
Time From Randomization to Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI Component of Study Treatment
Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI component of Study Treatment is defined as permanently stopping all NRTIs among those randomized to add NRTIs, or starting any NRTI among those randomized to omit NRTIs. Subjects leaving the study for reasons other than death, relocation, incarceration, or site closure were reviewed for meeting this outcome by a blinded, independent panel. Additionally, any participant failing to start study treatment after randomization and prior to closure was also reviewed. Event times were scheduled study weeks when discontinuation events occurred. Censoring times were latest scheduled study visit weeks with evaluation.
Measured: From randomization to week 96 study visit
Time From Randomization to Confirmed Virological Failure
Virologic failure defined as confirmed (two consecutive) plasma HIV-1 RNA meeting 1 of the following 4 criteria: < 1.0 log10 copies/mL reduction from baseline level and >= 200 copies/mL at or after week 12 evaluation; >= 200 copies/mL after 1 measurement < 200 copies/mL; absence of any values < 200 copies/mL by and including week 24 evaluation; >= 200 copies/mL at week 48 evaluation. Event time was the scheduled study visit week when the initial plasma HIV-1 RNA specimen meeting the failure definition was collected. Censoring time was the latest scheduled study visit week when a plasma HIV-1 RNA specimen was collected and tested.
Measured: From randomization to week 96 study visit
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load < 50 Copies/ml
Number of participants with plasma HIV-1 Viral load < 50 copies/mL at study visit weeks 24, 48, and 96. Closest observed result between 20 and up to 30 weeks (for week 24), between 42 and up to 54 (for week 48), and between 90 and up to 110 (for week 96) used if multiple results available. Missing values excluded.
Measured: At Weeks 24, 48, 96
Change in Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load From Baseline to Week 1
Method of Kaplan and Meier used to accommodate left-censoring for those whose week 1 levels < 50 copies/mL.
Measured: From baseline to Week 1 evaluation
Change in Summarized Quality of Life Score
Quality-of-life score at each evaluation based upon a single question assessing participants' self-report of general health with a range of 0 (representing worst health status) to 100 (representing perfect health).
Measured: At study entry and Weeks 24, 48, 96
Number of Participants Self-reporting Non-adherence to Assigned Study ARVS (Excluding NRTIs, if Applicable)
Results represent self-report of non-adherence during the 4-day period prior to the outcome evaluation visit. Participants in follow-up for whom these data are missing for any reason are inferred as not-adherent.
Measured: At Weeks 24 and 48
Change in Cardiovascular Risk Score From Baseline
Cardiovascular risk score defined by Framingham providing an estimate of the probability of developing cardiovascular disease over the next 10-year period. Persons with a historical cardiovascular event (CAD, cerebro- or peripheral- vascular disorder, MI or stroke), were excluded, and scores were not calculated at follow-up times after individuals had a cardiovascular event. Missing values for input data (e.g. smoking status) resulted in a missing value for Framingham score.
Measured: At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Change in CD4 Count From Baseline
Baseline CD4 calculated as average of pre-entry and entry values. Closest observed result between 42 and up to 54 weeks (for week 48) or between 90 and up to 110 weeks (for week 96), used if multiple results available. Missing values excluded.
Measured: From study entry to Weeks 48 and 96
Time From Treatment Dispensation to Serious Non-AIDS-defining Events
Serious Non-AIDS defining Events were adjudicated by independent and blinded review and possible events included serious diagnoses in the following disease areas: liver, cardiovascular, end-stage renal, non-AIDS malignancy, and diabetes mellitus. Week 96 study visit could take place up to 110 weeks following randomization. Event times were the exact weeks following treatment initiation corresponding to the diagnosis dates of the qualifying serious non-AIDS defining events. Censoring times were the weeks following treatment initiation corresponding to the latest study visit.
Measured: From treatment initiation to week 96 study visit
Number of Participants With Change in Virus Co-receptor Tropism Among Those With R5-only Tropic Virus at Study Entry
HIV Co-receptor tropism test result of either dual/mixed or evidence of X4 using virus from sample collected at confirmed virologic failure.
Measured: From study entry to time of confirmed virological failure (up to 96 weeks)
Change in Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline
Fasting non-HDL cholesterol calculated from difference between fasting total cholesterol and fasting HDL level. Missing values and non-fasting values excluded.
Measured: From study entry to Weeks 24, 48
Participants With Newly Acquired HIV Drug Resistance Between Study Entry and Confirmed Virologic Failure
Defined among the subgroup of participants experiencing the outcome of confirmed virologic failure. Newly acquired HIV drug resistance is defined as one or more ARVs with partial resistance or resistance when pre-entry resistance was fully sensitive or resistant when pre-entry resistance was fully sensitive or partially sensitive. The ARVs included for resistance acquisition included the following: darunavir/ritonavir; etravirine, tipranavir, tenofovir, emtracitabine, lamivudine, zidovudine, abacavir.
Measured: Between baseline and confirmed virologic failure (up to 96 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 517 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Karen T. Tashima, MD, Study chair, Brown UniversityRichard H. Haubrich, MD, Study chair, Division of Infectious Diseases, UCSD Antiviral Research Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00537394
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A5241
- Other IDs
- 10395, ACTG A5241, OPTIONS
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2007
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Altmann A, Beerenwinkel N, Sing T, Savenkov I, Doumer M, Kaiser R, Rhee SY, Fessel WJ, Shafer RW, Lengauer T. Improved prediction of response to antiretroviral combination therapy using the genetic barrier to drug resistance. Antivir Ther. 2007;12(2):169-78. doi: 10.1177/135965350701200202.
PubMed 17503659Eshleman SH, Husnik M, Hudelson S, Donnell D, Huang Y, Huang W, Hart S, Jackson B, Coates T, Chesney M, Koblin B. Antiretroviral drug resistance, HIV-1 tropism, and HIV-1 subtype among men who have sex with men with recent HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2007 May 31;21(9):1165-74. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32810fd72e.
PubMed 17502727Geretti AM. Clinical implications of HIV drug resistance to nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. AIDS Rev. 2006 Oct-Dec;8(4):210-20.
PubMed 17219736Mallolas J, Blanco J, Labarga P, Vergara A, Ocampo A, Sarasa M, Arnedo M, Lopez-Pua Y, Garcia J, Juega J, Guelar A, Terron A, Dalmau D, Garcia I, Zarraga M, Martinez E, Carne X, Pumarola T, Escayola R, Gatell J. Inhibitory quotient as a prognostic factor of response to a salvage antiretroviral therapy containing ritonavir-boosted saquinavir. The CIVSA Study. HIV Med. 2007 May;8(4):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00464.x.
PubMed 17461850Gandhi RT, Tashima KT, Smeaton LM, Vu V, Ritz J, Andrade A, Eron JJ, Hogg E, Fichtenbaum CJ. Long-term Outcomes in a Large Randomized Trial of HIV-1 Salvage Therapy: 96-Week Results of AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5241 (OPTIONS). J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 7;221(9):1407-1415. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz281.
PubMed 31135883Tashima KT, Smeaton LM, Fichtenbaum CJ, Andrade A, Eron JJ, Gandhi RT, Johnson VA, Klingman KL, Ritz J, Hodder S, Santana JL, Wilkin T, Haubrich RH; A5241 Study Team. HIV Salvage Therapy Does Not Require Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 15;163(12):908-17. doi: 10.7326/M15-0949. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
PubMed 26595748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Optimized Treatment That Includes or Omits NRTIs Trial: A Randomized Strategy Study for HIV-1-Infected Treatment-Experienced Subjects Using the cPSS to Select an Effective Regimen
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00537394
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A5241
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Treatment Experienced
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 517 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Aug 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of anti-HIV therapy is to prevent HIV from replicating. Long-term control of HIV requires at least two anti-HIV drugs that are active against the virus. Drug resistance is a problem for many treatment-experienced, HIV-infected people. The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit of adding a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) to a new anti-HIV drug regimen for the suppression of HIV.
Detailed description
Two or more fully active antiretrovirals (ARVs) are recommended for successful suppression of HIV. In people infected with resistant HIV virus, finding two drugs that are fully active against HIV can be a challenge. However, the new generation of anti-HIV drugs has been designed to suppress drug-resistant HIV. These drugs include the FDA-approved protease inhibitors (PIs) darunavir and tipranavir, the investigational non-nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor (nNRTI) etravirine, the FDA-approved fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide, the recently FDA-approved CCR5 inhibitor maraviroc, and the investigational integrase inhibitor raltegravir. Also, it is not yet known whether multiple, partially-active drugs have the same rate of success in suppressing HIV. The purpose of this study was to use HIV resistance testing to predict the potency of a suggested ARV regimen using second generation ARVs and determine if the benefits of adding NRTIs to this new drug regimen outweigh the risks of drug toxicity and pill burden. All participants had treatment experience or resistance to NRTIs, nNRTIs, and PIs, and received novel agents.
An active screening period (after enrollment but before randomization or treatment dispensation), occurred for up to 75 days for all participants, and study participation lasted an additional 96 weeks for those who qualified for either randomization or assignment (i.e. not randomized), to the study intervention. During active screening, all participants remained on their current drug regimen. During screening, phenotypic and genotypic HIV resistance tests were performed on participants' blood samples, as well as a coreceptor tropism assay. Using this information and medication history, the study team determined the best new regimen options for each participant. Each clinician, along with the study participant, then chose a new regimen based on the recommendations of the study team and the participant's preference.
Evaluation for study outcomes began when participants started their new regimen as assigned by either randomization or determined assignment. Stratification between Arms A (Add NRTIs) and B (Omit NRTIs) or Arm C (Non-randomized to Add NRTIs) was based on predicted activity of the new regimen. Those assigned to a regimen with higher predicted activity were randomly assigned to Arm A (Add NRTIs) or B (Omit NRTIs); those assigned a regimen predicted to have lower activity were not randomized, but were assigned to Arm C (Add NRTIs).
Participants in Arms A and C were instructed to take their newly assigned study regimen plus at least 2 NRTIs (personalized from expert recommendation and choice by local provider and participant) for 96 weeks. Participants in Arm B were instructed to take their newly assigned study regimen with no NRTIs for 96 weeks. Participants in all arms who met the primary efficacy outcome of regimen failure remained in the study in order to be followed for important secondary outcomes.
All participants were scheduled to have 13 clinical visits, which included blood collection. At some visits, urine collection and quality of life and adherence questionnaires occurred. A neurocognitive assessment was performed for all participants at time of starting the new study regimen. Participants may also have consented to have cerebrospinal fluid collected via lumbar puncture following study treatment assignment and/or at Week 24. Those participants who consented to cerebrospinal fluid collection also had neurocognitive assessments at the times of collections. Participants were responsible for obtaining certain ARVs not provided by the study, including the ARVs they during the active screening period.
The primary and secondary study objectives and comparisons relate to the randomized arms, and therefore, results are not provided for the non-randomized arm (C). The purpose of the non-randomized arm (C) was to include persons higher baseline resistance (and thus, lower activity scores) in order to address an exploratory objective related to the predictive power of these activity scores (and thus a larger range of scores by inclusion of arm C), on certain, virologic outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: Enfuvirtide, Drug: Raltegravir, Drug: Darunavir, Drug: Tipranavir, Drug: Etravirine, Drug: MaravirocRegimen with higher predicted activity assigned by the study plus at least 2 NRTIs (personalized choice from expert recommendation) for 96 weeks. A 3-4 drug regimen was selected from the drugs listed to the right. |
| B | Experimental | Drug: Enfuvirtide, Drug: Raltegravir, Drug: Darunavir, Drug: Tipranavir, Drug: Etravirine, Drug: MaravirocRegimen with higher predicted activity assigned by the study without NRTIs for 96 weeks. A 3-4 drug regimen was selected from the drugs listed to the right. |
| C | Other | Drug: Enfuvirtide, Drug: Raltegravir, Drug: Darunavir, Drug: Tipranavir, Drug: Etravirine, Drug: MaravirocRegimen with lower predicted activity assigned plus at least 2 NRTIs (personalized choice from expert recommendation) for 96 weeks. A 3-4 drug regimen was selected from the drugs listed to the right. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- HIV-1 infection
- Triple-class drug experience or resistance. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
- Currently on a failing PI-containing regimen that includes 2 other ARVs with no regimen change for 8 weeks prior to study screening
- HIV viral load of 1000 copies/ml or more
- Hepatitis B surface antigen negative within 90 days of study entry
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Chronic, active hepatitis B virus infection (hepatitis B surface antigen positive or HBV DNA positive)
- Taking certain medications. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
- Known allergy/sensitivity to components of two or more of the study-provided drugs or their formulations. For maraviroc, this includes hypersensitivity or history of allergy to soy lecithin or peanuts.
- Active drug or alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enfuvirtide90mg subcutaneously twice daily | Drug | A, B, C |
| Raltegravir400 mg twice daily | Drug | A, B, C |
| DarunavirTwo 300-mg tablets twice daily, given with ritonavir 100mg twice daily (ritonavir not provided by the study) | Drug | A, B, C |
| TipranavirTwo 250-mg capsules twice daily, given with ritonavir 100mg twice daily (ritonavir not provided by the study) | Drug | A, B, C |
| EtravirineTwo 100-mg tablets twice daily | Drug | A, B, C |
| MaravirocDosage dependent on regimen in which maraviroc is included | Drug | A, B, C |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants With Regimen Failure, Defined as a Confirmed Virologic Failure or Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI Component of Study Treatment
Time frame: From study entry to end of Week 48 evaluation window
Virologic failure defined as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA meeting 1 of the following 4 criteria: < 1.0 log10 copies/mL reduction from baseline level and >= 200 copies/mL at or after week 12 evaluation; >= 200 copies/mL after 1 measurement < 200 copies/mL; absence of any values < 200 copies/mL by and including week 24 evaluation; >= 200 copies/mL at week 48 evaluation. Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI component of Study Treatment is defined as permanently stopping all NRTIs among those randomized to add NRTIs, or starting any NRTI among those randomized to omit NRTIs. Subjects leaving the study for reasons other than death, relocation, incarceration, or site closure were reviewed for the discontinuation outcome by a blinded, independent panel. Additionally, any participant failing to start study treatment after randomization and prior to closure was also reviewed. Results report percent of participants reaching regimen failure outcome by week 48 evaluation using Kaplan-Meier method.
14 secondary outcomes
Time From Treatment Dispensation to First Grade 3 or Higher (and at Least One Grade Higher Than Baseline) Signs/Symptom or Laboratory Abnormality
Time frame: From treatment dispensation to week 96 study visit
Time From Treatment Dispensation to First Study ARV Modification (Excluding NRTIs, if Applicable)
Time frame: From treatment dispensation to week 96 study visit
Time From Randomization to Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI Component of Study Treatment
Time frame: From randomization to week 96 study visit
Time From Randomization to Confirmed Virological Failure
Time frame: From randomization to week 96 study visit
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load < 50 Copies/ml
Time frame: At Weeks 24, 48, 96
Change in Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load From Baseline to Week 1
Time frame: From baseline to Week 1 evaluation
Change in Summarized Quality of Life Score
Time frame: At study entry and Weeks 24, 48, 96
Number of Participants Self-reporting Non-adherence to Assigned Study ARVS (Excluding NRTIs, if Applicable)
Time frame: At Weeks 24 and 48
Change in Cardiovascular Risk Score From Baseline
Time frame: At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Change in CD4 Count From Baseline
Time frame: From study entry to Weeks 48 and 96
Time From Treatment Dispensation to Serious Non-AIDS-defining Events
Time frame: From treatment initiation to week 96 study visit
Number of Participants With Change in Virus Co-receptor Tropism Among Those With R5-only Tropic Virus at Study Entry
Time frame: From study entry to time of confirmed virological failure (up to 96 weeks)
Change in Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol From Baseline
Time frame: From study entry to Weeks 24, 48
Participants With Newly Acquired HIV Drug Resistance Between Study Entry and Confirmed Virologic Failure
Time frame: Between baseline and confirmed virologic failure (up to 96 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17503659Altmann A, Beerenwinkel N, Sing T, Savenkov I, Doumer M, Kaiser R, Rhee SY, Fessel WJ, Shafer RW, Lengauer T. Improved prediction of response to antiretroviral combination therapy using the genetic barrier to drug resistance. Antivir Ther. 2007;12(2):169-78. doi: 10.1177/135965350701200202.
- Background: PubMed 17502727Eshleman SH, Husnik M, Hudelson S, Donnell D, Huang Y, Huang W, Hart S, Jackson B, Coates T, Chesney M, Koblin B. Antiretroviral drug resistance, HIV-1 tropism, and HIV-1 subtype among men who have sex with men with recent HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2007 May 31;21(9):1165-74. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32810fd72e.
- Background: PubMed 17219736Geretti AM. Clinical implications of HIV drug resistance to nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. AIDS Rev. 2006 Oct-Dec;8(4):210-20.
- Background: PubMed 17461850Mallolas J, Blanco J, Labarga P, Vergara A, Ocampo A, Sarasa M, Arnedo M, Lopez-Pua Y, Garcia J, Juega J, Guelar A, Terron A, Dalmau D, Garcia I, Zarraga M, Martinez E, Carne X, Pumarola T, Escayola R, Gatell J. Inhibitory quotient as a prognostic factor of response to a salvage antiretroviral therapy containing ritonavir-boosted saquinavir. The CIVSA Study. HIV Med. 2007 May;8(4):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00464.x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31135883Gandhi RT, Tashima KT, Smeaton LM, Vu V, Ritz J, Andrade A, Eron JJ, Hogg E, Fichtenbaum CJ. Long-term Outcomes in a Large Randomized Trial of HIV-1 Salvage Therapy: 96-Week Results of AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5241 (OPTIONS). J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 7;221(9):1407-1415. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz281.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26595748Tashima KT, Smeaton LM, Fichtenbaum CJ, Andrade A, Eron JJ, Gandhi RT, Johnson VA, Klingman KL, Ritz J, Hodder S, Santana JL, Wilkin T, Haubrich RH; A5241 Study Team. HIV Salvage Therapy Does Not Require Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 15;163(12):908-17. doi: 10.7326/M15-0949. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karen T. Tashima, MD study chair
Brown University
Richard H. Haubrich, MD study chair
Division of Infectious Diseases, UCSD Antiviral Research Center
64 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Enfuvirtide, Raltegravir and Darunavir in people with HIV Infections, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 64 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 64 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Aug 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants With Regimen Failure, Defined as a Confirmed Virologic Failure or Discontinuation of Randomized NRTI Component of Study Treatment (time frame: From study entry to end of Week 48 evaluation window). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00537394, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2021.