AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaPhase 1NCT00538382

Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Artesunate in Pregnant Women in the Democratic Republic of Congo

A Phase 1 study testing Artesunate in people with Malaria, run by NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a standard dose of orally administered artesunate, in order to determine if the current adult dose (200 mg) is appropriate in parasitemic pregnant women when compared to the same women at three months postpartum and to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Malaria
What is being tested?
Artesunate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
51 participants
Where
1 siteDemocratic Republic of the Congo
Study dates
May 2007to Dec 2008
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 2nd trimester (22-26 weeks) or 3rd trimester (32-36 weeks) of pregnancy, based on an ultrasound conducted at <22 weeks gestation (composite of BPD, HC, AC, FL)
  • Singleton pregnancy documented by ultrasound
  • Parasitemic (> 500 parasites/μl)
  • Afebrile and asymptomatic
  • Hematocrit ≥ 30%
  • Negative HIV test result
Show all 18Show fewer
  • At least 18 years of age and less than 40 years of age
  • Able to spend three days in the clinic following their laboratory screening visit and again at three months postpartum
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test
  • Parasitemic (> 500 parasites/μl)
  • Afebrile and asymptomatic
  • Hematocrit ≥ 30%
  • Negative Determine® HIV test result
  • At least 18 years of age and less than 40 years of age
  • Able to spend three days in the clinic following screening
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test

Who cannot join

  • Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or symptomatic malaria
  • Medical contraindications to participation or medical disorders (known high blood pressure, diabetes, sickle cell disease or tuberculosis)
  • Have taken artesunate or any medicine containing artesunate during the current pregnancy
  • Have taken any antimalarial in the past two weeks
  • Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
  • Have a fetus with any ultrasonographically visible structural fetal abnormalities identified on entry by ultrasound
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Past or present pregnancy complications that would preclude participation in the study (gestational diabetes/diabetes, incompetent cervix, pre-eclampsia/ eclampsia, and high blood pressure)
  • Between 32-36 weeks gestation and have already participated in the study at 22-26 weeks gestation
  • Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or have symptomatic malaria
  • Medical contraindications to participation or medical disorders (known high blood pressure, diabetes, sickle cell disease or tuberculosis)
  • Have taken any antimalarial in the past two weeks
  • Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
  • Parasitemia > 300,000 parasites/μl or have symptomatic malaria
  • Have taken antimalarial medication in the past two weeks.
  • Have taken any medication in the past two weeks other than antipyretics (e.g., acetyl- salicylic acid, acetaminophen), folic acid or iron
  • Pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Democratic Republic of the Congo1 site
  • Kingasani Maternity Clinic

    Kinshasa

Other trials in Democratic Republic of the Congo

About this study

Official title: Phase I Study of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Artesunate in Pregnant Women in the Democratic Republic of Congo

The objective of this study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a standard dose of orally administered artesunate, in order to determine if the current adult dose (200 mg) is appropriate in parasitemic pregnant women when compared to the same women at three months postpartum and to parasitemic non-pregnant women. Preliminary evidence on safety, tolerability and efficacy will be gathered.

Read the detailed description

Annually, approximately 25 million African women become pregnant and are at risk of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection during pregnancy [WHO]. The adverse effects of malaria during pregnancy include increased risk of maternal anemia, low birth weight (LBW) and infant death. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) of malaria be used routinely in pregnant women living in areas of Africa where malaria infection is endemic. IPT involves the periodic presumptive administration of antimalarial treatment to all pregnant women as part of routine antenatal care.

This strategy has proven to be effective in much of sub-Saharan Africa where diagnostic facilities are often unavailable and pregnant woman are at high risk for malaria infection [WHO 2005]. This is representative of our study site in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where a 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research (GN) revealed that the prevalence of malaria in pregnant women was 34.3% [personal communication, Tshefu]. Currently sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is the WHO-recommended drug for prevention of malaria during pregnancy where transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria is stable and where resistance to SP is low.

The DRC is an area of stable malaria transmission. In stable areas of transmission, non-pregnant adults have high levels of immunity to malaria and usually do not become severely ill with infection. However, pregnant women, especially primigravidas, have increased susceptibility to malaria. Pregnant women are not protected by immunity acquired in the non-pregnant state because parasites are exposed to different antigens in pregnancy than in the non-pregnant state. In addition, Plasmodium falciparum infection in pregnancy can lead to anemia and can affect placental nutrient transport, resulting in the birth of low birth weight infants with an increased risk for infant mortality [Steketee, 2001]. In a 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network in two large maternity clinics in Kinshasa, DRC, 34.3% (182/530) of pregnant women were thick smear positive for malaria [personal communication, Tshefu].

Currently, in Kinshasa, DRC the standard of care for IPT treatment of malaria during pregnancy is to administer 1500 mg sulfadoxine with 75 mg pyrimethamine during the second trimester (after the fourth month and usually in association with the mother's report of fetal quickening) and again during the third trimester, between 28-32 weeks gestation. SP has proven to be safe when used as IPT in pregnant women; clinical studies have shown no serious adverse events or cases of kernicterus nor has there been a significant difference in the rate of spontaneous abortions, premature deliveries, or neonatal deaths between IPT/SP and other interventions [Newman, 2004].

Since the 1980's, SP resistance in Africa and Asia has been steadily increasing. The 1999-2000 data from the East African Network for Monitoring Anti-malarial Treatment indicated that in vivo SP failure at some sites in Kenya was greater than 25% and had reached 45% at one site in Tanzania. Focal areas of low- to moderate-level SP resistance exist throughout Africa [Bilj, 2000; Deloron 1989; Landgraf, 1994; Nizla, 2000]. Resistance is likely to progress geographically and rapidly if nothing is done to interrupt this course. One of the reasons for the increasingly high SP failure rates may be the recently observed cross-resistance between SP and cotrimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) in Plasmodium falciparum [Lyer, 2001]. A second possible reason is that the long half-life of the drug may result in prolonged maintenance of subtherapeutic concentrations of the drug in the plasma [Nzila, 2000].

Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to SP in Kinshasa appears to be low, but on the verge of increasing with selective pressure. In 2000, an in vivo drug efficacy trial in children found that 94.5% of the subjects responded adequately to SP [Kazadi, 2003]. These results have been corroborated by the genotyping of clinical samples from pregnant women in the 2004 pilot study conducted by the Global Network in Kinshasa for molecular markers for drug resistance [personal communication, Tshefu]. Molecular markers are used to survey the development and evolution of drug resistance. SP resistance is associated with mutations in the genes DHFR and DHPS. Presence of a quintuplet mutation (51, 59, 108, 437, and 540) is most strongly associated with SP resistance. Only 4.1% of the clinical samples in the pilot study contained the quintuplet mutation, which suggests that drug resistance was minimal at the time the study was conducted. However, 33.2% of the samples were found to be one mutation away from having the quintuplet mutation, indicating that full SP resistance (5 mutations) is likely to occur soon. Therefore, if adequate selective pressure were applied, e.g. by widespread use of SP, as is currently being practiced in the DRC, the prevalence of the quintuplet mutation and treatment failure due to drug resistance would increase dramatically.

Drug resistance to SP has spread more rapidly in the eastern part of the DRC, some 2000 kilometers (km) from Kinshasa. A report from a 2001 in vivo drug efficacy study in Bukavu, located on the Rwandan border in Eastern DRC, reported that 85.0% of the children responded adequately to SP [Kazadi, 2003]; however, a subsequent drug efficacy study in Rutshuru, also located on the Rwanda/Uganda border of Eastern DRC approximately 200 km south of Bukavu, demonstrated that only 39.4% of children responded adequately to treatment [Kazadi, personal communication]. In addition, 43.4% of these clinical samples contained the quintuplet mutation [Alker, personal communication]. Given this rise in resistance to SP in eastern DRC and the likelihood of increased resistance in Kinshasa, it is necessary to begin to explore other alternatives for SP.

While the pharmacokinetics of artemisinin is well known in non-pregnant adults, little is known about the specific pharmacokinetics of artemisinin in pregnant women, particularly pregnant women in developing countries. Dosages of drugs often need to be adjusted because of physiological and metabolic changes associated with pregnancy. The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate dosage of artesunate to use in pregnant women in order to begin to investigate artesunate and artesunate combinations as options for IPT.

Conditions
Malaria
Being tested
Artesunate
Keywords
Malaria, Pregnancy, Artesunate, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Democratic Republic of Congo
Medical subject headings
Malaria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ArtesunateDrug

    Also called Arsumax®

    A 200 mg dose of orally administered artesunate at the beginning of a 48-hour clinical sampling period.

Study groups in NCT00538382
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CaseExperimentalCases are defined as parasitemic pregnant women during the second trimester (22-26 weeks gestation) and the third trimester (32-36 weeks gestation).
Receives: Drug: Artesunate
Non-pregnant ControlActive comparatorNon-pregnant controls are defined as parasitemic non-pregnant women recruited from the same community as the cases.
Receives: Drug: Artesunate
Internal ControlActive comparatorInternal controls are defined as the same women(cases)at three months postpartum.
Receives: Drug: Artesunate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Levels of the unbound active major metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA), will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women during their 2nd and 3rd trimesters vs. the same women 3 months postpartum

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The levels of unbound DHA will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the second and third trimesters) vs. parasitemic non-pregnant women.

    Measured: 48 hours after drug administration

  2. The pharmacokinetics of ARTS and total DHA will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the second and third trimesters) vs. the same women three months postpartum and parasitemic non-pregnant women.

    Measured: 48 hours after drug administration

  3. The pharmacodynamics of therapy will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women (during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters) vs. parasitemic non-pregnant women. Pharmacodynamics will be determined by measuring the parasite clearance time (PCT), PC50, and PC90.

    Measured: 48 hours after drug administration

  4. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic outcomes (as elaborated above) will be similar between the 2nd and 3rd trimester in parasitemic pregnant women.

    Measured: 48 hours after drug administration

  5. Description of safety and tolerability of Artesunate in the target population (pregnant women in the 2nd and 3rd trimester).

    Measured: 0ne year postpartum

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2007
  3. Primary completionNov 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
51 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00538382
Sponsor's protocol ID
GN02- PK/PD of artesunate
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
28 Sep 2007
Last updated
31 Jul 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Onyamboko MA, Meshnick SR, Fleckenstein L, Koch MA, Atibu J, Lokomba V, Douoguih M, Hemingway-Foday J, Wesche D, Ryder RW, Bose C, Wright LL, Tshefu AK, Capparelli EV. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin following oral treatment in pregnant women with asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in Kinshasa DRC. Malar J. 2011 Feb 28;10:49. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-49.

    PubMed 21352601

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Artesunate in people with Malaria, run by NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health at 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Levels of the unbound active major metabolite, dihydroartemisinin (DHA), will be similar for parasitemic pregnant women during their 2nd and 3rd trimesters vs. the same women 3 months postpartum (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00538382, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in