Diabetic Neuropathy, PainfulNCT00539175
Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With Photon Stimulation
A study testing infrared light in people with Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful and Diabetic Neuralgia, run by East Bay Institute for Research and Education at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
1. Objectives: 1. To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. 2. To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, Diabetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Polyneuropathy
- What is being tested?
- infrared light
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Oct 2006
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with diabetes mellitus with painful neuropathy, defined as foot pain >/ 3 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, chronic foot pain of at least 6 months' duration, and pain characterized as burning, shooting, or stabbing in nature.
- Patients needed to have capacity to provide informed consent and be able to make serial visits for scheduled treatments.
Who cannot join
- A history of peripheral vascular disease
- Vitamin B12 deficiency
- Low back pain with radiculopathy; Or
- Another painful condition that was difficult to distinguish from painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
VA Northern California Health Care System
Martinez, California, 94553
About this study
- Objectives:
- To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.
- To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. The latter will be explored by an extensive search of the literature and from an equal number of patients being treated in traditional medical practices using traditional medical interventions. At the conclusion of the study the data will be analyzed for cost-benefits and the possibility of crafting a best-practices approach to treat these syndromes that cost billions of dollars a year in health care expenses and lost productivity.
- Research Design
This is a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 120 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. These 120 will be randomly assigned treatments utilizing Photon Therapy, using a defined treatment protocol. We expect that some patients will drop out, and our goal is 100 treated patients, for statistical purposes. The Photon Therapy group will be split into two groups, one group that receives Active Photon Therapy and one group that will be treated with the same type of equipment that has been modified to emit no infrared photons (Non Active Photon Therapy Group ("Placebo")). The patients in the "Non Active Photon Therapy Group" will be offered an Active Photon Treatment Session after completion of the study. The patients in the Photon Therapy Groups will be randomized. There will also be an Historical Control Group of patients, fifty, will have received traditional medical interventions (e.g., narcotics, seizure medications) in traditional medical practices. Data from these individuals will be used to calculate potential cost savings.
Read more
- Methodology:
Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed a valid informed consent will be eligible to participate in the study. After screening, subjects in the Photon Therapy groups (both active and nonactive) will undergo four treatment sessions. The first treatment session will vary from the second, third and fourth. During all treatment session, each patient will be imaged with the TIP Infrared Camera before, and after treatment. Infrared imaging can visualize skin temperature changes in a noninvasive manner (2). The first treatment will utilize slightly different protocol than subsequent visits, reduced Photon dosage, 120 instead of 240 joules. Proprioception and protective sensation, characterized by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and visual and analog pain scoring will also be evaluated before and after each Photon Therapy treatment.
- Finding:
To date, we have just completed 120 patients, using a block randomization scheme not previously reported in this field. We have collected data on nerve function, pain, quality of life, and skin circulation. The data will remain stored until the study is complete to preserve the blinded nature of the project. Data analysis is still incomplete.
- Clinical Significance
Diabetic neuropathy is a chronic and progressive condition that potentially leads to disabling pain, and worse, amputation, for many individuals in the United States each year. Present treatments utilize antiseizure medications, opiate analgesics, and antidepressants, and are inconsistently effective. Development of a new treatment strategy potentially could have significant benefit for a great many patients.
Read the detailed description
- PURPOSE, METHODS, AND PROCEDURES:
- Purpose:
- To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.
- To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. The latter will be explored by an extensive search of the literature and from an equal number of patients being treated in traditional medical practices using traditional medical interventions. At the conclusion of the study the data will be analyzed for cost-benefits and the possibility of crafting a best-practices approach to treat these syndromes that cost billions of dollars a year in health care expenses and lost productivity.
- Methods
This is a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of approximately 170 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. The study sample size is 170 patients. Of these 120 will be given treatments utilizing Photon Therapy, using a defined treatment protocol. We plan to recruit 120 patients to allow for drop out, and to provide 100 completed patients, as requested by FDA. The Photon Therapy group will be split into two groups, one group that receives Active Photon Therapy and one group that will be treated with the same type of equipment that has been modified to emit no infrared photons (Non Active Photon Therapy Group ("Placebo")). The patients in the "Non Active Photon Therapy Group" will be offered an Active Photon Treatment Session after completion of the study. The patients in the Photon Therapy Groups will be randomized. The Historical Control Group of patients, fifty, will have received traditional medical interventions (e.g., narcotics, seizure medications) in traditional medical practices.
- Procedures: Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed a valid informed consent will be eligible to participate in the study. After screening, subjects in the Photon Therapy groups (both active and nonactive) will undergo four treatment sessions. The first treatment session will vary from the second, third and fourth. During all treatment session, each patient will be imaged with the TIP Infrared Camera before, and after treatment. Infrared imaging can visualize skin temperature changes in a noninvasive manner (2). The first treatment will utilize slightly different protocol than subsequent visits, reduced Photon dosage, 120 instead of 240 joules. Proprioception and protective sensation, characterized by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and visual and analog pain scoring will also be evaluated before and after each Photon Therapy treatment.
- SUBJECT SELECTION: Subjects were initially recruited from the PI's clinic, from a list of patients diagnosed by Dr. Beckley (Electromyographer) with painful diabetic neuropathy, and from local referrals. In October 2004, we received permission to post flyers and solicit patients (identified by Dr Beckley) from primary providers (flyer and letter attached). We also recruited by posting flyers in VANCHCS facilities, and with VANCHCS diabetes educators. Word of mouth also provided many subjects. In September 2006 we modified the flyer to reflect a focused recruitment at Mather. Vulnerable populations will not be studied.
- RISKS: The potential risks to subjects include physical, psychological, social and economic. These are not likely: The physical risks include discomfort from the photon machine. The psychological risks include boredom. The social risks include being labeled as having a chronic illness, and the risk of loss of privacy. The economic risk includes time off from work that may be needed to participate in the treatment program. Confidentiality will be maintained as much as possible, by storing paper data in locked offices, without name identifiers, and electronic data on spreadsheets on password-protected computers in locked offices.
- BENEFITS: Individual subjects may derive benefit via pain relief; this would also obtain to the whole group of patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
- RISK-BENEFIT RATIO: The risk is minimal, and the benefit minimal to moderate (potentially greater).
- SAFETY MONITORING: Research staff will monitor for safety.
- INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES: The PI (Dr. Swislocki) and his staff (Ms. Orth, Ms. Weisshaupt) will conduct, obtain, and document informed consent within VANCHCS facilities.
- PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIONS: Confidentiality will be maintained as much as possible, by storing paper data in locked offices, without name identifiers, and electronic data on spreadsheets on password-protected computers in locked offices.
- COSTS TO SUBJECTS: No added expenses are expected. No compensation is proposed.
- DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL AND FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE RESEARCH STUDY AND SPONSOR: The Principal Investigator has no personal or financial interests in the research or personal or financial interest in the entity.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, Diabetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Diabetic Mononeuropathy
- Being tested
- infrared light, infrared light; placebo
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
infrared lightDevice
pulsed infrared light will be applied to feet, ankles and popliteal fossae of patients with diabetic neuropathy
infrared light; placeboDevice
patients will be exposed to the same machine used to provide pulsed infrared light, but the light emitting diodes will not be activated. All other aspects of the treatment will be the same. The patient and investigator will be blind to treatment assignment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Active comparator | active treatment with infrared light Receives: Device: infrared light |
| 1 | Placebo comparator | sham (placebo) treatment without infrared light Receives: Device: infrared light; placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pain intensity
Measured: 1 week
Secondary outcomes (1)
Semmes-Weinstein sensation, proprioception, quality of life
Measured: one week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Study completionOct 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Neuropathy, PainfulStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- East Bay Institute for Research and Education
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Arthur LM Swislocki, MD, Principal investigator, VA Northern California Health Care System; UC Davis School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00539175
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Swislocki-1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With Photon Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00539175
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Swislocki-1
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful, Diabetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Diabetic Mononeuropathy
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- East Bay Institute for Research and EducationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Study completion
- Oct 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Objectives:
- To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.
- To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. The latter will be explored by an extensive search of the literature and from an equal number of patients being treated in traditional medical practices using traditional medical interventions. At the conclusion of the study the data will be analyzed for cost-benefits and the possibility of crafting a best-practices approach to treat these syndromes that cost billions of dollars a year in health care expenses and lost productivity.
- Research Design
This is a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 120 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. These 120 will be randomly assigned treatments utilizing Photon Therapy, using a defined treatment protocol. We expect that some patients will drop out, and our goal is 100 treated patients, for statistical purposes. The Photon Therapy group will be split into two groups, one group that receives Active Photon Therapy and one group that will be treated with the same type of equipment that has been modified to emit no infrared photons (Non Active Photon Therapy Group ("Placebo")). The patients in the "Non Active Photon Therapy Group" will be offered an Active Photon Treatment Session after completion of the study. The patients in the Photon Therapy Groups will be randomized. There will also be an Historical Control Group of patients, fifty, will have received traditional medical interventions (e.g., narcotics, seizure medications) in traditional medical practices. Data from these individuals will be used to calculate potential cost savings.
- Methodology:
Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed a valid informed consent will be eligible to participate in the study. After screening, subjects in the Photon Therapy groups (both active and nonactive) will undergo four treatment sessions. The first treatment session will vary from the second, third and fourth. During all treatment session, each patient will be imaged with the TIP Infrared Camera before, and after treatment. Infrared imaging can visualize skin temperature changes in a noninvasive manner (2). The first treatment will utilize slightly different protocol than subsequent visits, reduced Photon dosage, 120 instead of 240 joules. Proprioception and protective sensation, characterized by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and visual and analog pain scoring will also be evaluated before and after each Photon Therapy treatment.
- Finding:
To date, we have just completed 120 patients, using a block randomization scheme not previously reported in this field. We have collected data on nerve function, pain, quality of life, and skin circulation. The data will remain stored until the study is complete to preserve the blinded nature of the project. Data analysis is still incomplete.
- Clinical Significance
Diabetic neuropathy is a chronic and progressive condition that potentially leads to disabling pain, and worse, amputation, for many individuals in the United States each year. Present treatments utilize antiseizure medications, opiate analgesics, and antidepressants, and are inconsistently effective. Development of a new treatment strategy potentially could have significant benefit for a great many patients.
Detailed description
- PURPOSE, METHODS, AND PROCEDURES:
- Purpose:
- To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.
- To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. The latter will be explored by an extensive search of the literature and from an equal number of patients being treated in traditional medical practices using traditional medical interventions. At the conclusion of the study the data will be analyzed for cost-benefits and the possibility of crafting a best-practices approach to treat these syndromes that cost billions of dollars a year in health care expenses and lost productivity.
- Methods
This is a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of approximately 170 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. The study sample size is 170 patients. Of these 120 will be given treatments utilizing Photon Therapy, using a defined treatment protocol. We plan to recruit 120 patients to allow for drop out, and to provide 100 completed patients, as requested by FDA. The Photon Therapy group will be split into two groups, one group that receives Active Photon Therapy and one group that will be treated with the same type of equipment that has been modified to emit no infrared photons (Non Active Photon Therapy Group ("Placebo")). The patients in the "Non Active Photon Therapy Group" will be offered an Active Photon Treatment Session after completion of the study. The patients in the Photon Therapy Groups will be randomized. The Historical Control Group of patients, fifty, will have received traditional medical interventions (e.g., narcotics, seizure medications) in traditional medical practices.
- Procedures: Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed a valid informed consent will be eligible to participate in the study. After screening, subjects in the Photon Therapy groups (both active and nonactive) will undergo four treatment sessions. The first treatment session will vary from the second, third and fourth. During all treatment session, each patient will be imaged with the TIP Infrared Camera before, and after treatment. Infrared imaging can visualize skin temperature changes in a noninvasive manner (2). The first treatment will utilize slightly different protocol than subsequent visits, reduced Photon dosage, 120 instead of 240 joules. Proprioception and protective sensation, characterized by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and visual and analog pain scoring will also be evaluated before and after each Photon Therapy treatment.
- SUBJECT SELECTION: Subjects were initially recruited from the PI's clinic, from a list of patients diagnosed by Dr. Beckley (Electromyographer) with painful diabetic neuropathy, and from local referrals. In October 2004, we received permission to post flyers and solicit patients (identified by Dr Beckley) from primary providers (flyer and letter attached). We also recruited by posting flyers in VANCHCS facilities, and with VANCHCS diabetes educators. Word of mouth also provided many subjects. In September 2006 we modified the flyer to reflect a focused recruitment at Mather. Vulnerable populations will not be studied.
- RISKS: The potential risks to subjects include physical, psychological, social and economic. These are not likely: The physical risks include discomfort from the photon machine. The psychological risks include boredom. The social risks include being labeled as having a chronic illness, and the risk of loss of privacy. The economic risk includes time off from work that may be needed to participate in the treatment program. Confidentiality will be maintained as much as possible, by storing paper data in locked offices, without name identifiers, and electronic data on spreadsheets on password-protected computers in locked offices.
- BENEFITS: Individual subjects may derive benefit via pain relief; this would also obtain to the whole group of patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
- RISK-BENEFIT RATIO: The risk is minimal, and the benefit minimal to moderate (potentially greater).
- SAFETY MONITORING: Research staff will monitor for safety.
- INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES: The PI (Dr. Swislocki) and his staff (Ms. Orth, Ms. Weisshaupt) will conduct, obtain, and document informed consent within VANCHCS facilities.
- PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIONS: Confidentiality will be maintained as much as possible, by storing paper data in locked offices, without name identifiers, and electronic data on spreadsheets on password-protected computers in locked offices.
- COSTS TO SUBJECTS: No added expenses are expected. No compensation is proposed.
- DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL AND FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE RESEARCH STUDY AND SPONSOR: The Principal Investigator has no personal or financial interests in the research or personal or financial interest in the entity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Active comparator | Device: infrared lightactive treatment with infrared light |
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Device: infrared light; placebosham (placebo) treatment without infrared light |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with diabetes mellitus with painful neuropathy, defined as foot pain >/ 3 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, chronic foot pain of at least 6 months' duration, and pain characterized as burning, shooting, or stabbing in nature.
- Patients needed to have capacity to provide informed consent and be able to make serial visits for scheduled treatments.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A history of peripheral vascular disease
- Vitamin B12 deficiency
- Low back pain with radiculopathy; Or
- Another painful condition that was difficult to distinguish from painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| infrared lightpulsed infrared light will be applied to feet, ankles and popliteal fossae of patients with diabetic neuropathy | Device | 2 |
| infrared light; placebopatients will be exposed to the same machine used to provide pulsed infrared light, but the light emitting diodes will not be activated. All other aspects of the treatment will be the same. The patient and investigator will be blind to treatment assignment. | Device | 1 |
Primary outcome
pain intensity
Time frame: 1 week
1 secondary outcome
Semmes-Weinstein sensation, proprioception, quality of life
Time frame: one week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2007.
Related trials for Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of tDCS and tACS on Pain, Dexterity, and Strength in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Effect of Peripheral Nerve Decompression Combined With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Diabetes Complication
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Suzetrigine (SUZ) in Participants With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Modality Choice Before and After Failure for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN), Diabetic Nephropathies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arthur LM Swislocki, MD principal investigator
VA Northern California Health Care System; UC Davis School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing infrared light in people with Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful and Diabetic Neuralgia, run by East Bay Institute for Research and Education at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pain intensity (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2007.