AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Heart DiseasePhase 4NCT00539604

Non Invasive Multicenter Italian Study for Coronary Artery Disease

A Phase 4 study testing MDCT and Coronary Angiography in people with Coronary Heart Disease, run by Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica at 20 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine if 16-64 slice multidetector CT (MDCT) can replace the invasive procedure in patients scheduled for coronary angiography in order to exclude the presence of CAD Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Heart Disease
What is being tested?
MDCT and Coronary Angiography
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
350 participants
Where
20 sitesItaly
Study dates
Jul 2004to Jun 2006
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients (men or women of any ethnic group) scheduled for a coronary angiography evaluation for a diagnostic work up.
  • Patients will be expected to undergo coronary angiography within 2 weeks after the MDCT study procedure. The coronary angiography must meet the minimum standard laid down in the protocol (see section 8.3.3).
  • Patients must have HDL and total cholesterol performed within the last year.
  • Patients must be willing and able to continue study participation following the reference test to ensure completion of all procedures and observations required by the study.
  • Fully informed and signed consent must be obtained from each patient.
  • -

Who cannot join

  • Patients under 18 years of age.
  • Patients who have received any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to entering this study.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients who have any contraindication to MDCT examination with iodinate contrast media.
  • Patients with heart rate >70 bpm despite of β-blocker treatment (see section 8.2.4.1).
  • Patients with no sinus rhythm.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with NYHA III or IV class.
  • Patients who have previously undergone CABG or stenting.
  • Patients with a creatinine value > 2 mg/dl.
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 1 country.

20 sites in 1 country

Italy20 sites
  • Policlinico di Bari Istituto di Radiologia

    Bari, Ba, 70124

  • Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi Istituto di Radiologia III

    Bologna, Bo, 40138

  • Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri U.O. Radiologia

    Cremona, CR, 26100

  • Ospedale G. Pasquinucci Unità Operativa di Radiologia

    Massa, Ms, 54100

  • Ospedale San Raffaele Istituto di Radiologia

    Milan, MI, 20132

  • Centro Cardiologico Monzino Servizio di Radiologia

    Milan, MI, 20138

  • Policlinico di Modena Istituto di Radiologia

    Modena, Mo, 41100

  • A.O.R.N. Cardarelli Radiologia Generale I Sez.

    Naples, 80131

  • Policlinico P. Giaccone Dip. Scienze Radiologiche

    Palermo, Pa, 90134

  • A.O. Riuniti Unità Operativa di Radiologia

    Reggio Calabria, R.C., 89126

  • Policlinico Tor Vergata Istituto di Radiologia

    Roma, 00133

  • Policlinico Umberto I Radiologia D.E.A.

    Roma, 00161

  • Policlinico Umberto I Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" Dip. Scienze Radiologiche

    Roma, 00161

  • Policlinico Gemelli Istituto di Radiologia

    Roma, 00168

  • Istituti clinici Humanitas

    Rozzano, Milano, 20089

  • Policlinico Le Scotte DAI dell' Immagine

    Siena, SI, 53100

  • A.O. S. Maria Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini

    Terni, TN, 05100

  • Ospedale Molinette Istituto di Radiologia

    Torino, To, 10126

  • Ospedale S. Chiara Dipartimento di Radiologia

    Trento, TN, 38100

  • Ospedale S. Maria di Ca' Foncello U.C. Radiologia

    Treviso, TV, 31100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Phase IV Multicenter, Intra-Individually Controlled, Comparison Study to Evaluate the Negative Predictive Value of 16-64 Slice MDCT Imaging in Patients Scheduled for Coronary Angiography

To determine if 16-64 slice multidetector CT (MDCT) can replace the invasive procedure in patients scheduled for coronary angiography in order to exclude the presence of CAD

Read the detailed description

Because coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most frequent cause of death in industrialized nations and its onset is currently unpredictable, there is a need for new methods of screening apparently healthy individuals to identify those at increased risk.

Several imaging techniques are in use to visualize coronary arteries. These include both invasive procedure as x-ray coronary angiography and those non invasive like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Among these imaging modalities, selective cardiac catheterization and x-ray angiography is the current gold standard for visualization of coronaries and detection of their stenoses, providing for optimal spatial resolution, a general "road map" of the coronary tree for interventions. The replacement of even a fraction of these procedures with non-invasive modalities would constitute an important advance in the care of patients with suspected coronary artery disease Preliminary results reported in literature addressing the study of coronary arteries by multidetector-CT (MDCT) appear to be interesting. Several studies have been performed firstly using Electron beam CT (EBCT).EBCT provides high temporal resolution and enables quantitative assessment of the coronary artery calcium, but because of limited spatial resolution as a result of limited z axis resolution, it does not permit direct visualisation in multi-reformation of the whole coronary artery system.

With the introduction of 4-row MDCT there have now been several studies aimed to compare the MDCT with a standard invasive angiography. Data published for over 200 subjects from 4 studies demonstrated that patient compliance at breath-hold, heart rate and rhythm are crucial limitation to this procedure. In the Nieman and Achembach papers not all the coronary segments were assessable because of the limited temporal resolution of 4-slice MDCT. With this machine it is mandatory to select patients carefully, considering only those with baseline hearth rate < 65 bpm (also obtained by pre-treatment with β-blockers in order to slow hearth rate).

Being tested
MDCT and Coronary Angiography
Keywords
Comparison study between MDCT and coronary angiography
Medical subject headings
Coronary Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MDCT and Coronary AngiographyProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. to determine if 16-64 slice multidetector CT (MDCT) can replace the invasive procedure in patients scheduled for coronary angiography in order to exclude the presence of CAD

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. the efficacy in terms of performance of the MDCT in each single coronary segment and

  2. the safety in terms of AE related to both procedures

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2004
  3. Study completionJun 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
350 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00539604
Sponsor's protocol ID
NIMIS-CAD
Status last verified
Nov 2006
First submitted
3 Oct 2007
Last updated
4 Oct 2007
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing MDCT and Coronary Angiography in people with Coronary Heart Disease, run by Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica at 20 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

to determine if 16-64 slice multidetector CT (MDCT) can replace the invasive procedure in patients scheduled for coronary angiography in order to exclude the presence of CAD. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in