Stomach NeoplasmsPhase 1NCT00539877
Phase I Study of Interperitoneal Chenotherapy in Patients With Gastric Adenocarainoma With Peritoneal Seeding
A Phase 1 study testing irinotecan in people with Stomach Neoplasms, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Stomach cancer is the most common cancer, and is still leading cause of death in Korea. Peritoneal seeding is the most common metastases of gastric cancer, and is the most frequent cause of death from this disease. In addition, there is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stomach Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- irinotecan
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Aug 2007
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Myocardial infarction within preceding 6 months or symptomatic heart disease, including unstable angina, congestive heart failure or uncontrolled arrhythmia
- Serious concomitant infection
- Second primary malignancy (except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or prior malignancy treated more than 5 years ago without recurrence)
- History of significant neurologic or psychiatric disorders
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Women of child bearing potential not using a contraceptive method
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Stomach cancer is the most common cancer, and is still leading cause of death in Korea. Peritoneal seeding is the most common metastases of gastric cancer, and is the most frequent cause of death from this disease. In addition, there is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination. Even though systemic intravenous chemotherapy is the standard treatment for metastatic stomach cancer at present, it does not improve the survival of patients with peritoneal dissemination. Because intraperitoneal(IP) administration results in high concentration locally with low systemic toxicity, clinical investigators have confirmed the safety and pharmacokinetic advantage associated with IP delivery of a number of antineoplastic agents with known activity in cancer. In ovarian cancer, a large randomized trial demonstrated a small but statistically and clinically significant survival advantage for women receiving a portion of their therapy intraperitoneally. Drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin-C, paclitaxel and docetaxel are used for IP chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Even the small number of phase III trials reported, some studies showed improvement in survival for patients randomized to IP therapy compared to those receiving no postoperative treatment. Irinotecan(7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-pipperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxy camptothecin; CPT-11), clinically effective in the treatment of colorectal, lung and gastric cancer, is a carbamate prodrug metabolized to its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). In mouse model, IP administration of CPT-11 was significantly more effective than intravenous administration for control of both peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis. However, phamacokinetics of CPT-11 with peritoneal administration in human beings is not well studied. Although Japanese investigators reported pharmacokinetic data of CPT-11 with few patients, there is no data about maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 intraperitoneally.
Read the detailed description
Objectives : The objectives of this study are to assess the feasibility, to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and to assess the toxicities of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.
Methods : This is open-labeled, non-randomized phase I study in the patients eligible for the following criteria. Patients more than 18 years old with gastric adenocarcinoma, histologically proven, will be enrolled at the time of surgery, and the signed informed consent will be obtained prior to surgery. Preoperative studies should have resectable advanced disease. The operative finding and biopsy of suspected peritoneum must show peritoneal involvement of adenocarcinoma. The subjects should not have any previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy and any major biological abnormalities. Prior to the initiation of study, patient will receive palliative gastrectomy(total or subtotal) and has a CAPD catheter. Postoperative day 1, IP chemotherapy will be given by CAPD catheter. For dose level 1, CPT-11(provided by CJ Pharmaceutical Company) 50mg/m2 in 1L of normal saline, prewarmed to 37°C will be given intraperitoneally. Plasma samples will be collected prior IP chemotherapy, and samples of plasma, peritoneal fluid and urine will be obtained at 0.5, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 8, 12, and 25.5, 49, 56 hours following chemotherapy. Three patients will be accrued to each dose level. If none of these three patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose will be increased in a subsequent group of three patients to 100 mg/m2.If one of the first three patients experienced DLT, three more patients will be accrued to that dose level. If none of these additional three patients experienced DLT, then the dose will be escalated. If one of the additional three patients experienced DLT, then either an additional cohort of patients could be added or escalation terminated. If two or more of the second group of three patients experienced DLT, then accrual is stopped. If two of the first three patients experienced DLT, then an additional three patients could be accrued at that dose level, but dose escalation could take place only if none of the additional cohort experienced DLT. The last planned dose escalation is to 300 mg/m2. Cohorts of at least 3 patients will be entered at each dose level and monitored for at least 4 weeks after treatment before dose escalation. Intrapatient dose escalation is not permitted.
Dose level Dose of IP CPT-11(mg/m2)
- 50
- 100
- 150
- 200
- 300
In this study, DLT is defined as follows: any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity or as noted below; ≥ grade 3 diarrhea or stomatitis lasting ≥ 7 days despite optimal supportive care; hematologic dose-limiting toxicity is defined grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever ≥ 38°C; grade 4 hemorrhage or thrombocytopenia; failure to recover neutrophils (≥ 1500/ mm3) or platelets (≥ 100 000/ mm3) by day 28. The maximal tolerated dose is defined as that dose level that produced dose-limiting toxicity in ≥ 50% of patients. The recommended dose is one level below that. During the study, the evaluation of toxicities will be done daily of postoperative 6 days then weekly using National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC). Physical examination, complete blood count, and blood chemistry, and serum electrolytes will be measured. Pharmacokinetic study : Plasma, peritoneal fluid and urine samples will be assayed for irinotecan and its metabolites: SN-38, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino] carbonyl camptothecin (APC), and SN-38 glucuronide(SN-38G).
- Conditions
- Stomach Neoplasms
- Being tested
- irinotecan
- Keywords
- Gstric cancer, Pritoneal seeding, Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, Irinotecan
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
irinotecanDrug
Postoperative day 1, IP CPT-11 chemotherapy will be given by CAPD catheter. CPT-11 in 1L of normal saline, prewarmed to 37°C will be given intraperitoneally.
If there is no DLT and patients agree with the treatment, patients can receive 3 more times of IP chemotherapy with same dose of CPT-11 at 3 weeks interval. After total 4 cycles of IP chemotherapy, peritoneal disease will be reassessed with abdominal-pelvis CT. Pharmacokinetic study is not planned with this treatment.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The objectives of this study are to assess the feasibility, to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and to assess the toxicities of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Primary completionDec 2006
- Study completionAug 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stomach NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Samsung Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Young Suk Park, M.D.,Ph.D., Principal investigator, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00539877
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2004-05-017
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Guichard S, Chatelut E, Lochon I, Bugat R, Mahjoubi M, Canal P. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of irinotecan after administration by the intravenous versus intraperitoneal route in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;42(2):165-70. doi: 10.1007/s002800050801.
PubMed 9654118Maruyama M, Nagahama T, Yuasa Y. Intraperitoneal versus intravenous CPT-11 for peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis. Anticancer Res. 1999 Sep-Oct;19(5B):4187-91.
PubMed 10628373Rosen HR, Jatzko G, Repse S, Potrc S, Neudorfer H, Sandbichler P, Zacherl J, Rabl H, Holzberger P, Lisborg P, Czeijka M. Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with carbon-adsorbed mitomycin in patients with gastric cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial of the Austrian Working Group for Surgical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2733-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2733.
PubMed 9704725Rothenberg ML, Liu PY, Braly PS, Wilczynski SP, Hannigan EV, Wadler S, Stuart G, Jiang C, Markman M, Alberts DS. Combined intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer: results from an intergroup phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 1;21(7):1313-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.031.
PubMed 12663720
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase I Study of Interperitoneal Chenotherapy in Patients With Gastric Adenocarainoma With Peritoneal Seeding
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00539877
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2004-05-017
- Conditions
- Stomach Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Gstric cancer, Pritoneal seeding, Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, Irinotecan
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Primary completion
- Dec 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stomach cancer is the most common cancer, and is still leading cause of death in Korea. Peritoneal seeding is the most common metastases of gastric cancer, and is the most frequent cause of death from this disease. In addition, there is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination. Even though systemic intravenous chemotherapy is the standard treatment for metastatic stomach cancer at present, it does not improve the survival of patients with peritoneal dissemination. Because intraperitoneal(IP) administration results in high concentration locally with low systemic toxicity, clinical investigators have confirmed the safety and pharmacokinetic advantage associated with IP delivery of a number of antineoplastic agents with known activity in cancer. In ovarian cancer, a large randomized trial demonstrated a small but statistically and clinically significant survival advantage for women receiving a portion of their therapy intraperitoneally. Drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin-C, paclitaxel and docetaxel are used for IP chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Even the small number of phase III trials reported, some studies showed improvement in survival for patients randomized to IP therapy compared to those receiving no postoperative treatment. Irinotecan(7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-pipperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxy camptothecin; CPT-11), clinically effective in the treatment of colorectal, lung and gastric cancer, is a carbamate prodrug metabolized to its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). In mouse model, IP administration of CPT-11 was significantly more effective than intravenous administration for control of both peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis. However, phamacokinetics of CPT-11 with peritoneal administration in human beings is not well studied. Although Japanese investigators reported pharmacokinetic data of CPT-11 with few patients, there is no data about maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 intraperitoneally.
Detailed description
Objectives : The objectives of this study are to assess the feasibility, to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and to assess the toxicities of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.
Methods : This is open-labeled, non-randomized phase I study in the patients eligible for the following criteria. Patients more than 18 years old with gastric adenocarcinoma, histologically proven, will be enrolled at the time of surgery, and the signed informed consent will be obtained prior to surgery. Preoperative studies should have resectable advanced disease. The operative finding and biopsy of suspected peritoneum must show peritoneal involvement of adenocarcinoma. The subjects should not have any previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy and any major biological abnormalities. Prior to the initiation of study, patient will receive palliative gastrectomy(total or subtotal) and has a CAPD catheter. Postoperative day 1, IP chemotherapy will be given by CAPD catheter. For dose level 1, CPT-11(provided by CJ Pharmaceutical Company) 50mg/m2 in 1L of normal saline, prewarmed to 37°C will be given intraperitoneally. Plasma samples will be collected prior IP chemotherapy, and samples of plasma, peritoneal fluid and urine will be obtained at 0.5, 1.5, 2, 3.5, 8, 12, and 25.5, 49, 56 hours following chemotherapy. Three patients will be accrued to each dose level. If none of these three patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose will be increased in a subsequent group of three patients to 100 mg/m2.If one of the first three patients experienced DLT, three more patients will be accrued to that dose level. If none of these additional three patients experienced DLT, then the dose will be escalated. If one of the additional three patients experienced DLT, then either an additional cohort of patients could be added or escalation terminated. If two or more of the second group of three patients experienced DLT, then accrual is stopped. If two of the first three patients experienced DLT, then an additional three patients could be accrued at that dose level, but dose escalation could take place only if none of the additional cohort experienced DLT. The last planned dose escalation is to 300 mg/m2. Cohorts of at least 3 patients will be entered at each dose level and monitored for at least 4 weeks after treatment before dose escalation. Intrapatient dose escalation is not permitted.
Dose level Dose of IP CPT-11(mg/m2)
- 50
- 100
- 150
- 200
- 300
In this study, DLT is defined as follows: any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity or as noted below; ≥ grade 3 diarrhea or stomatitis lasting ≥ 7 days despite optimal supportive care; hematologic dose-limiting toxicity is defined grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever ≥ 38°C; grade 4 hemorrhage or thrombocytopenia; failure to recover neutrophils (≥ 1500/ mm3) or platelets (≥ 100 000/ mm3) by day 28. The maximal tolerated dose is defined as that dose level that produced dose-limiting toxicity in ≥ 50% of patients. The recommended dose is one level below that. During the study, the evaluation of toxicities will be done daily of postoperative 6 days then weekly using National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC). Physical examination, complete blood count, and blood chemistry, and serum electrolytes will be measured. Pharmacokinetic study : Plasma, peritoneal fluid and urine samples will be assayed for irinotecan and its metabolites: SN-38, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino] carbonyl camptothecin (APC), and SN-38 glucuronide(SN-38G).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Myocardial infarction within preceding 6 months or symptomatic heart disease, including unstable angina, congestive heart failure or uncontrolled arrhythmia
- Serious concomitant infection
- Second primary malignancy (except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or prior malignancy treated more than 5 years ago without recurrence)
- History of significant neurologic or psychiatric disorders
- Pregnant or lactating women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| irinotecanPostoperative day 1, IP CPT-11 chemotherapy will be given by CAPD catheter. CPT-11 in 1L of normal saline, prewarmed to 37°C will be given intraperitoneally. If there is no DLT and patients agree with the treatment, patients can receive 3 more times of IP chemotherapy with same dose of CPT-11 at 3 weeks interval. After total 4 cycles of IP chemotherapy, peritoneal disease will be reassessed with abdominal-pelvis CT. Pharmacokinetic study is not planned with this treatment. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The objectives of this study are to assess the feasibility, to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and to assess the toxicities of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2010.
- Results publication: PubMed 9654118Guichard S, Chatelut E, Lochon I, Bugat R, Mahjoubi M, Canal P. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of irinotecan after administration by the intravenous versus intraperitoneal route in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;42(2):165-70. doi: 10.1007/s002800050801.
- Results publication: PubMed 10628373Maruyama M, Nagahama T, Yuasa Y. Intraperitoneal versus intravenous CPT-11 for peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis. Anticancer Res. 1999 Sep-Oct;19(5B):4187-91.
- Results publication: PubMed 9704725Rosen HR, Jatzko G, Repse S, Potrc S, Neudorfer H, Sandbichler P, Zacherl J, Rabl H, Holzberger P, Lisborg P, Czeijka M. Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with carbon-adsorbed mitomycin in patients with gastric cancer: results of a randomized multicenter trial of the Austrian Working Group for Surgical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(8):2733-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2733.
- Results publication: PubMed 12663720Rothenberg ML, Liu PY, Braly PS, Wilczynski SP, Hannigan EV, Wadler S, Stuart G, Jiang C, Markman M, Alberts DS. Combined intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer: results from an intergroup phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 1;21(7):1313-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.031.
Related trials for Stomach Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Young Suk Park, M.D.,Ph.D. principal investigator
Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing irinotecan in people with Stomach Neoplasms, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The objectives of this study are to assess the feasibility, to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and to assess the toxicities of intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding. (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00539877, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2010.