AzTrials
AzTrials

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingPhase 2NCT00540033

Probiotics Reduce Incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis for Very Low Birth Weight Infants

A Phase 2 study testing infloran in people with Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We investigate the efficacy of probiotics in reducing the incidence and severity of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.A prospective, masked, multi-center randomized control trial will be conducted level III neonatal center to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics for NEC… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 3 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
What is being tested?
infloran
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
217 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
Feb 2005to Jun 2007
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 3 weeks
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm VLBW infants (birth weight < 1500 gm) who are enterally fed are eligible for the trial.

Who cannot join

  • Preterm VLBW infants who have severe asphyxia (stage III), fetal chromosome anomalies, fetal cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital intestine atresia, gastroschisis and omphalocele are excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Department of Pediatrics, Children Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Taichung, Taichung,, 404

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Phase 2 Study of Oral Probiotics Reduce the Incidence and Severity of Necrotizing Enterocolitis for Very Low Birth Weight Infants -Multi-Center Randomized Control Trial

We investigate the efficacy of probiotics in reducing the incidence and severity of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.A prospective, masked, multi-center randomized control trial will be conducted level III neonatal center to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics for NEC among VLBW (<1500 g) infants. VLBW infants who start to feed enterally are eligible and are randomized into 2 groups after parental informed consents were obtained. Infants in the study group are fed with Infloran (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidus) with breast or formula milk twice daily for 6 weeks. Infants in the control group are fed with breast or formula milk alone. The clinicians caring for the infants are blinded to the group assignment. The primary outcome measurement is death or NEC (≧stage 2).

Read the detailed description

Introduction NEC is a worldwide problem in preterm very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with highly variable incidence affecting 2.6% to 28% of these infants; 1.2.Recent reports suggest increasing occurrence of NEC, estimating up to 9000 cases of NEC in the United States every year, with death occurring in 20 % to 40% of affected individuals. [1.3] As the number of very low-birth-weight infants increases, NEC remains a critical eminent problem. 3[4] The pathogenesis of NEC is unknown, but is widely considered as a multi-factorial disease; prematurity, enteral feeding, intestinal hypoxia-ischemia, and bacterial colonization are considered major risk factors. [4] Researches showed that proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1.6.8. (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- ) 5-711-13 and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor- (TGF- ) 8-1014-16 by intestinal epithelial cells is highly relevant to be involved in the final common pathway of pathogen of NEC.5-10 11-16.In mature bowel, the intestinal environment is capable of producing an array of cytokines important in the development and control of inflammatory responses11 8. In contrast, the immaturity of the neonatal intestinal immune system is evidenced by decreased numbers of immune cells 12.13 9.10. Recently, it has bee thought that inappropriate, accentuated inflammatory response to colonizing pathogenic flora at premature gut plays a major role, the inflammatory cascade further promotes spread of bacteria or toxin, and end up with ischemia, necrosis and even perforation. 14-1617.18.19 We and Bin-Nun had proved that probitics reduces the incidence and severity of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm VLBW infants. 17.18 Nevertheless, there is no solid data in the literature as to the optima strains, timing, dosage and duration of probiotics administering to preterm VLBW infants at preset; and these need further investigate.

Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli are commonly found in breast-fed infants; 19 and most of the NEC in VLBW infants occurred before 6-8 weeks of age; 20 therefore, we hypothesized that early oral probiotics contains Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli fed to preterm VLBW infants for 6 weeks could reduce the incidence and severity of NEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS From July 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2006, a prospective masked randomized control trial will be conducted at the level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of eight neonatal centers in Taiwan. Study is approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of each hospital. Preterm VLBW infants (birth weight < 1500 gm) who were enterally fed are eligible for the trial. They are randomized into the study or control group by a random number table sequence after informed parental consents were obtained. The allocations are contained in opaque sequentially numbered and sealed envelopes. Preterm VLBW infants who have severe asphyxia (stage III), fetal chromosome anomalies, fetal cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital intestine atresia, gastroschisis and omphalocele were excluded.

The clinicians who provided care to the infants are blinded to the grouping. Investigators were not involved in the care of these infants. Study group is fed with infloran (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidus, Swiss Serum and Vaccine Institute Berne, Switzerland) 125mg/kg/dose (CFU 109) twice daily with breast milk for 6 weeks; the control group is fed with breast milk alone. Infloran was stored in refrigerator at a tempreture between 2 -80 C and mixed with breast milk before feeding. Breast milk was either from infant's own mother's milk or from breast milk bank. Both breast milk of the study and control group are prepared by breast milk team who were not involved in the care of the infant and follow the order from a sealed envelop. Feeding is started when the infant*s vital signs were stable, have active bowel movement, without abdominal distension, without bile or blood from the nasogastric tube, and did not have an umbilical artery or umbilical venous catheter in place for at least 24 hours.

A strict feeding protocol is followed for all study infants. Depending on the birth weight and gestational age, a certain amount of breast milk is initiated after the infant tolerated one trial of distilled water. On the first day, 1 mL/kg - distilled water was given twice, followed by breast milk. The amount of feeding was advanced slowly if tolerated, with no more than 20 mL/kg/day of increment per feed. An oral intake of 100 mL/kg/d is defined as complete enteral feeding. Feeding was stopped if there was any sign of feeding intolerance, defined as the presence of gastric aspirate in the amount that was more than half of the previous feeding, twice, with abdominal distension. Infants who weighed under 1,000gm received total parenteral nutrition (TPN) until half of the calories were supplied by oral route. The same attending physician is in charge of the care of the infants during their hospital stay. The residents who rotated through the NICU provided the care following established protocols in the unit. Definition of prenatal steroid, small for gestational age, prolonged rupture of amniotic membrane, chorioamnionitis, asphyxia, respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), sepsis; indication of surfactant and indomethacin are described as in our previous study. [16 ] There were no modifications in any management protocols, clinical practices, equipment, infrastructure, or any other elements in the unit during the study period, and all the protocols got consensus in the eight centers after several discussion.

NEC is classified by modified Bell's classification. 21[39] The final determination of the diagnosis of NEC (≧ stage2) is made by two independent attending physicians who did not know the group assignment of the infant. Demographic and clinical variables that are potential risk factors for NEC were prospectively abstracted from the medical records. These factors included chorioamnionitis, prolonged rupture of amniotic membrane (PROM) >18 hours, pre-eclampsia, use of prenatal steroid, multiple -pregnancy, mode of delivery, gender, gestational age, birth weight, small for gestational age, Apgar score at 5 minutes, asphyxia, initial Hb, initial body temperature, use of surfactant, use of indomethacin, dosage of indomethacin, days of UAC and UVC, days of fasting, use of dopamine, days of antibiotics use, days of dopamine use, incidence and grading of IVH, incidence of pneumothorax, days of mechanical ventilation and oxygen supplement, days of TPN before and after NEC; weight gain per week, lengthy of stay are prospectively abstracted from the medical records.

Primary outcome measurement was the incidence and severity of NEC (≧ stage2); and death. Secondary outcome were, culture proved sepsis, chronic lung disease, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) , weight gain per week, duration of TPN, lengthy of stay, cost effective analysis.

SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION AND STATISTICS According to the unpublished data of Premature Baby Foundation of Taiwan and Bravura of National Health Insurance (2003-2004), the recent data showed that the combined incidence of NEC (≧stage 2) or death for preterm VLBW infants was about 25 % for level III neonatal center in Taiwan. Setting the α error at 0.05 and β error at 0.1; and an absolute reduction of the incidence of NEC or death by 50%, the number needed to verify our hypothesis was 203 for each arm.

Being tested
infloran
Keywords
probiotics, necrotizing enterocolitis, preterm very low birth weight infants (VLBW)
Medical subject headings
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • infloranDietary supplement

    Study group was fed with probiotics as infloran 125mg/kg/dose twice daily by adding it to breast milk or mixed feeding (breast and formula) for 6 weeks;

  • infloranDietary supplement

    Study group was fed with infloran [Lactobacilli acidophilus (CFU 109 NCDO 1748, obtained from the National Collection of Dairy Organisms)] and Bifidobacteria bifidum [(CFU 109, NCDO 1453 obtained from the National Collection of Dairy Organisms)]; Laboratorio Farmaceutico S.I.T S.r.I ITALY] 125mg/kg/dose twice daily by adding it to breast milk or mixed feeding (breast and formula) for 6 weeks;

Study groups in NCT00540033
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
2ExperimentalStudy arm was fed with probiotics as infloran 125mg/kg/dose twice daily by adding it to breast milk or mixed feeding (breast and formula) for 6 weeks; the control arm was fed with breast milk or mixed feeding without probiotics.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: infloran

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome measurement was death or NEC (≧stage 2)

    Measured: From April 1, 2005 to May 30, 2007

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary outcome were culture proved sepsis, chronic lung disease, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) , weight gain per week, duration of TPN, lengthy of stay, cost effective analysis.

    Measured: From April 1, 2005 to May 30, 2007,

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2005
  3. Study completionJun 2007

Why it stopped: terminated because of enough case number

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
217 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00540033
Sponsor's protocol ID
DMR94-IRB-14
Status last verified
Oct 2007
First submitted
3 Oct 2007
Last updated
5 Oct 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Lin HC, Hsu CH, Chen HL, Chung MY, Hsu JF, Lien RI, Tsao LY, Chen CH, Su BH. Oral probiotics prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight preterm infants: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):693-700. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3007.

    PubMed 18829790

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing infloran in people with Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: terminated because of enough case number). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome measurement was death or NEC (≧stage 2) (time frame: From April 1, 2005 to May 30, 2007). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00540033, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in