Non-Small Cell Lung CarcinomaPhase 3NCT00540514
Albumin-bound Paclitaxel (ABI-007) for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Celgene at 37 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare disease response of Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) plus Carboplatin versus Taxol and Carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,052 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2007to 1 Feb 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female, and equal or greater than age 18
- If a female patient is of child-bearing potential, as evidence by regular menstrual periods, she must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta human chorionic gonadotropin [βhCG]) documented within 72 hours of the first administration of study drug
- If sexually active, the patient must agree to utilize contraception considered adequate and appropriate by the investigator
- No other current active malignancy
- Radiographically-documented measurable disease (defined by the presence of at least 1 radiographically documented measurable lesion)
Show all 18Show fewer
- Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy permitted providing cytotoxic chemotherapy was completed 12 months prior to starting the study
- Patient has the following blood counts at baseline:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5x10^9/L
- Platelets greater than or equal to 100x10^9/L
- Hemoglobin (Hgb) greater than or equal to 9 g/dL
- Patient has the following blood chemistry levels at baseline:
- Aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit of normal range (ULN) or less than or equal to 5.0 x ULN if liver metastases;
- Total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN
- Creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL
- Expected survival of greater than 12 weeks
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
- Patient or his/her legally authorized representative or guardian has been informed about the nature of the study, and has agreed to participate in the study, and signed the Informed Consent form prior to participation in any study-related activities
Who cannot join
- Evidence of active brain metastases, including leptomeningeal involvement. Prior evidence of brain metastasis permitted only if treated and stable and off therapy for greater than or equal to 1 month
- The only evidence of disease is non-measurable
- Patient has pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2, 3, or 4 (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] Version 3).
- Patient received radiotherapy in the last 4 weeks, except if to a non-target lesion only. Prior radiation to a target lesion is permitted only if there has been clear progression of the lesion since radiation was completed
- Patient has a clinically significant concurrent illness
- Patient has received treatment with any investigational drug within the previous 4 weeks
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient has a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs
- Patient has serious medical risk factors involving any of the major organ systems such that the investigator considers it unsafe for the patient to receive an experimental research drug
- Patient is enrolled in any other clinical protocol or investigational trial that involves administration of experimental therapy and/or therapeutic devices.
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 2 countries.
37 sites in 2 countries
United States31 sites
Cancer Outreach Associates, PC
Abingdon, Virginia, 24211
Phoebe Cancer Center
Albany, Georgia, 31701
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, 92801
Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Mercy Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21202
Essex Oncology of North Jersey
Belleville, New Jersey, 07109
Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, 05405
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital
Cooperstown, New York, 13326
Dallas Oncology Consultants, PA
Duncanville, Texas, 75137
Southwest Cancer Care
Escondido, California, 92064
The Center for Cancers and Blood Disorders
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Robert A. Moss, MD, FACP, Inc.
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Genesis Cancer Center- Hot Springs
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Clearview Cancer Institute Oncology Specialties, P.C.
Huntsville, Alabama, 35805
St. Mary Medical Center- Oncology, Hematology PC
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, 19047
Little Rock Hematology Oncology Associates
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Pacific Shores Medical Group
Long Beach, California, 90813
Kentuckiana Cancer Institute, PLLC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists
Oxnard, California, 93030
Comprehensice Cancer Ctr.
Palms Springs, California, 92262
Mercy Hospital
Portland, Maine, 04101
Maine Center for Cancer Medicine
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
St. Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Gulf Coast Oncology Associates
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Lake County Oncology and Hematology, PA
Tavares, Florida, 32778
Blood and Cancer Center of East Texas
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Tyler Hematology Oncology
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Cancer Center of Kansas
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Canada6 sites
William Osler Health Centre, Brampton Clinic
Brampton, Ontario, L6R 3J7
McGill University- Dept. of Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W4
Toronto East General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M4C3E7
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Phase III Trial of ABI-007 and Carboplatin Compared With Taxol and Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
The purpose of this study is to compare disease response of Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) plus Carboplatin versus Taxol and Carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Paclitaxel, Carboplatin
- Keywords
- Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Albumin-bound paclitaxelDrug
Also called ABI-007, ABRAXANE®, nab®-paclitaxel
Administered by intravenous infusion.
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Taxol®
Administered by intravenous infusion.
CarboplatinDrug
Administered by intravenous infusion. Dosing was based on the Calvert formula: carboplatin dose (mg) = (Target AUC) x (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] + 25). For the purposes of this protocol, the GFR is considered to be equivalent to creatinine clearance (calculated by the method of Cockcroft and Gault, 1976).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Albumin-bound paclitaxel + Carboplatin | Experimental | Participants received albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®) 100 mg/m^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was given at an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 only of each 21-day cycle, beginning immediately after the completion of albumin-bound paclitaxel administration. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Receives: Drug: Albumin-bound paclitaxel; Drug: Carboplatin |
| Paclitaxel + Carboplatin | Active comparator | Participants received 200 mg/m^2 paclitaxel (Taxol®) administered by intravenous infusion followed by carboplatin at AUC = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: Carboplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0.
A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions.
Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions).
Measured: Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Progression free survival time was defined as the time from the day of randomization to the start of disease progression or death (any cause), whichever occurred first, based on the blinded radiological review response assessment. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the SLD of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the presence of one or more new lesions, or the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesion(s).
Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last visit they were documented as progression free. If palliative radiotherapy or surgery at lesion sites occurred, the participant was censored at the last date without documented progression prior to radiotherapy or surgery. In follow-up, participants who began new therapy prior to progression were censored at the last documented date as progression-free.
Measured: Assessed every 6 weeks until progression or death, up to 38 months
Overall Participant Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to participant death (due to any cause), as assessed by post study follow-up performed monthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter for 12 months. All participants who were lost to the follow-up prior to the end of the trial or who completed the 18 month follow up phase were censored at last known time the participant was alive.
Measured: Up to 38 months
Percentage of Participants With Controlled Disease
Controlled disease was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks or confirmed complete or partial overall response, based on blinded radiological assessment. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage of target lesions to qualify for Partial Response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease, or the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for Complete Response or Progressive Disease.
Measured: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 22 months
Duration of Response in Responding Patients
Duration of response was assessed by progression free survival for participants who achieved a confirmed complete response or partial response based on blinded radiological assessment.
Measured: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 38 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
A Treatment-emergent AE was any AE that began or worsened in grade after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. Treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Measured: Up to 38 months
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters
Measured: Blood samples for PK analyses were taken during Cycle 1 at 0.25, 3.5 and 24 hours post-infusion.
SPARC Status and Correlation With Overall Survival
The expression and cellular distribution of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in cysteine (SPARC) in biopsies of lung tumor was examined by immunohistochemistry using a 2 antibody system by an approved central laboratory and analyzed by 2 pathologists. The following tissue components were scored: tumor cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, acellular stroma/matrix, and blood vessels.
To classify participants into "high-SPARC" and "low-SPARC" groups, an average z-score was calculated across variables and classified "high-SPARC" (average z-scores ≥0) and "low-SPARC" (average z-scores <0) groups.
SPARC status was then correlated with overall survival (the time from the day of randomization to participant death due to any cause).
Measured: Archival tissue samples were used for SPARC analysis. Survival was assessed for up to 38 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study start1 Nov 2007
- Primary completion1 Oct 2009
- Study completion1 Feb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,052 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark A Socinski, MD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00540514
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA031
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hirsh V. nab-paclitaxel for the management of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Feb;14(2):129-41. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.881719.
PubMed 24467217Langer CJ, Hirsh V, Ko A, Renschler MF, Socinski MA. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of safety and efficacy in patients with renal impairment. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Mar;16(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
PubMed 25572008Langer CJ, Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Lin FJ, Wan Y, Whiting S, Ong TJ, Renschler MF, Botteman MF. Survival, quality-adjusted survival, and other clinical end points in older advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):20-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.181. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
PubMed 26035702Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, Makhson AM, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias JL, Renschler MF. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2055-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5848. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
PubMed 22547591Socinski MA, Langer CJ, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Dakhil SR, Page RD, Orsini J, Zhang H, Renschler MF. Safety and efficacy of weekly nab(R)-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):314-321. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds461. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
PubMed 23123509Satouchi M, Okamoto I, Sakai H, Yamamoto N, Ichinose Y, Ohmatsu H, Nogami N, Takeda K, Mitsudomi T, Kasahara K, Negoro S. Efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013 Jul;81(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
PubMed 23545279Socinski MA, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Dakhil SR, Page RD, Orsini J, Yamamoto N, Zhang H, Renschler MF. Safety and efficacy analysis by histology of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2390-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt235. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
PubMed 23842283Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Page RD, Orsini J, Sakai H, Zhang H, Renschler MF, Socinski MA. Patient-reported neuropathy and taxane-associated symptoms in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jan;9(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000011.
PubMed 24346096Loureiro H, Kolben TM, Kiermaier A, Ruttinger D, Ahmidi N, Becker T, Bauer-Mehren A. Correlation Between Early Trends of a Prognostic Biomarker and Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300062. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00062.
PubMed 37922432
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Phase III Trial of ABI-007 and Carboplatin Compared With Taxol and Carboplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00540514
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CA031
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,052 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Aug 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare disease response of Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) plus Carboplatin versus Taxol and Carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Albumin-bound paclitaxel + Carboplatin | Experimental | Drug: Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Drug: CarboplatinParticipants received albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®) 100 mg/m^2 administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was given at an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 only of each 21-day cycle, beginning immediately after the completion of albumin-bound paclitaxel administration. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. |
| Paclitaxel + Carboplatin | Active comparator | Drug: Paclitaxel, Drug: CarboplatinParticipants received 200 mg/m^2 paclitaxel (Taxol®) administered by intravenous infusion followed by carboplatin at AUC = 6 mg*min/mL on Day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Participants could continue treatment at the investigator's discretion until disease progression, development of an unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Male or non-pregnant and non-lactating female, and equal or greater than age 18
- No other current active malignancy
- Radiographically-documented measurable disease (defined by the presence of at least 1 radiographically documented measurable lesion)
- Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy permitted providing cytotoxic chemotherapy was completed 12 months prior to starting the study
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Evidence of active brain metastases, including leptomeningeal involvement. Prior evidence of brain metastasis permitted only if treated and stable and off therapy for greater than or equal to 1 month
- The only evidence of disease is non-measurable
- Patient has pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2, 3, or 4 (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] Version 3).
- Patient received radiotherapy in the last 4 weeks, except if to a non-target lesion only. Prior radiation to a target lesion is permitted only if there has been clear progression of the lesion since radiation was completed
- Patient has a clinically significant concurrent illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Albumin-bound paclitaxelAlso: ABI-007, ABRAXANE®, nab®-paclitaxelAdministered by intravenous infusion. | Drug | Albumin-bound paclitaxel + Carboplatin |
| PaclitaxelAlso: Taxol®Administered by intravenous infusion. | Drug | Paclitaxel + Carboplatin |
| CarboplatinAdministered by intravenous infusion. Dosing was based on the Calvert formula: carboplatin dose (mg) = (Target AUC) x (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] + 25). For the purposes of this protocol, the GFR is considered to be equivalent to creatinine clearance (calculated by the method of Cockcroft and Gault, 1976). | Drug | Albumin-bound paclitaxel + Carboplatin, Paclitaxel + Carboplatin |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Time frame: Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.
Antitumor response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response (Confirmed Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]), confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Response was based on the blinded radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response guidelines, Version 1.0. A complete response was defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial response was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, and the persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for CR or Progressive Disease (the "unequivocal progression" of existing non-target lesion(s) or appearance of one or more new lesions).
7 secondary outcomes
Progression-free Survival by Blinded Radiology Assessment
Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks until progression or death, up to 38 months
Overall Participant Survival
Time frame: Up to 38 months
Percentage of Participants With Controlled Disease
Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 22 months
Duration of Response in Responding Patients
Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks, up to 38 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to 38 months
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters
Time frame: Blood samples for PK analyses were taken during Cycle 1 at 0.25, 3.5 and 24 hours post-infusion.
SPARC Status and Correlation With Overall Survival
Time frame: Archival tissue samples were used for SPARC analysis. Survival was assessed for up to 38 months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24467217Hirsh V. nab-paclitaxel for the management of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Feb;14(2):129-41. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.881719.
- Background: PubMed 25572008Langer CJ, Hirsh V, Ko A, Renschler MF, Socinski MA. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of safety and efficacy in patients with renal impairment. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Mar;16(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 26035702Langer CJ, Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Lin FJ, Wan Y, Whiting S, Ong TJ, Renschler MF, Botteman MF. Survival, quality-adjusted survival, and other clinical end points in older advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):20-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.181. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 22547591Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, Makhson AM, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias JL, Renschler MF. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2055-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5848. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 23123509Socinski MA, Langer CJ, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Dakhil SR, Page RD, Orsini J, Zhang H, Renschler MF. Safety and efficacy of weekly nab(R)-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):314-321. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds461. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 23545279Satouchi M, Okamoto I, Sakai H, Yamamoto N, Ichinose Y, Ohmatsu H, Nogami N, Takeda K, Mitsudomi T, Kasahara K, Negoro S. Efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013 Jul;81(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 23842283Socinski MA, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Dakhil SR, Page RD, Orsini J, Yamamoto N, Zhang H, Renschler MF. Safety and efficacy analysis by histology of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2390-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt235. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 24346096Hirsh V, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Page RD, Orsini J, Sakai H, Zhang H, Renschler MF, Socinski MA. Patient-reported neuropathy and taxane-associated symptoms in a phase 3 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jan;9(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37922432Loureiro H, Kolben TM, Kiermaier A, Ruttinger D, Ahmidi N, Becker T, Bauer-Mehren A. Correlation Between Early Trends of a Prognostic Biomarker and Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300062. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00062.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark A Socinski, MD principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
37 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Celgene at 37 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete Response or Partial Response by Blinded Radiology Assessment (time frame: Objective response was evaluated every 6 weeks until progression or new anti-cancer therapy initiation, up to 22 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00540514, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2019.