Postmenopausal OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT00541658
A Study of a 35 mg Delayed Release Formulation of Risedronate for Osteoporosis
A Phase 3 study testing risedronate in people with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, run by Warner Chilcott at 45 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to study the efficacy of a 35 mg delayed release weekly dosing regimen as compared to the standard daily dosing regimen of risedronate 5 mg daily. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- risedronate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 923 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female: 50 years of age or older
- >5 years since last menses natural or surgical
- have lumbar spine or total hip BMD more that 2.5 SD below the young adult mean, or have lumbar spine or total hip BMD more than 2.0 SD below the young adult female mean value and also have at least one prevalent vertebral body fracture
Who cannot join
- history of uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, osteomalacia
- BMI >32 kg/m
- use of medications within 3 months of starting study drug that impact bone metabolism such as glucocorticoids, estrogens, calcitonin, calcitriol, other bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone
- hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia of any cause
- markedly abnormal clinical laboratory measurements that are assessed as clinically significant by the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 8 countries.
45 sites in 8 countries
United States20 sites
Research Site
Bethesda, Maryland
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama
Research Site
Brockton, Massachusetts
Research Site
Champaign, Illinois
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois
Research Site
Gainesville, Georgia
Research Site
Greenville, North Carolina
Research Site
Lakewood, Colorado
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Research Site
Leesburg, Florida
Research Site
Madison, Wisconsin
Research Site
Melbourne, Florida
Research Site
Oakland, California
Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska
Research Site
Portland, Oregon
Research Site
San Diego, California
Research Site
Seattle, Washington
Research Site
South Miami, Florida
Research Facility
Walnut Creek, California
Research Site
Walnut Creek, California
Canada7 sites
Research Site
Hamilton, Ontario
Research Site
Kitchener, Ontario
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec
Research Site
Newmarket, Ontario
Research Site
Québec, Quebec
Research Site
Saint-Eustache, Quebec
Research Site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Hungary5 sites
Research Site
Balatonfüred
Research Site
Debrecen
Research Site
Eger
Research Site
Győr
Research Site
Koranyi Sandor
France4 sites
Research Site
Amiens
Research Site
Lyon
Research Site
Orléans
Research Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Belgium3 sites
Research Facility
Diepenbeek
Research Site
Ghent
Research Site
Leuven
About this study
Official title: A Non-inferiority Comparison of 35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate, Given Once-weekly Either Before or After Breakfast, & 5 mg Immediate-release Risedronate, Given Once-daily Before Breakfast, in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
The purpose of this trial is to study the efficacy of a 35 mg delayed release weekly dosing regimen as compared to the standard daily dosing regimen of risedronate 5 mg daily.
Read the detailed description
The comparator arms of this risedronate study are 35 mg delayed release given weekly and 5 mg immediate release given daily.
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- risedronate
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
risedronateDrug
Also called IRBB
5 mg Immediate-release Risedronate Administered At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast Daily
risedronateDrug
Also called DRFB
35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate Administered Immediately Following Breakfast Weekly
risedronateDrug
Also called DRBB
35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate Administered At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast Weekly
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mg Before Breakfast | Active comparator | 5 mg / Immediate-release Risedronate (At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast) Receives: Drug: risedronate |
| 35 mg After Breakfast | Experimental | 35 mg / Delayed-release Risedronate (Immediately Following Breakfast) Receives: Drug: risedronate |
| 35 mg Before Breakfast | Experimental | 35 mg / Delayed-release Risedronate (At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast) Receives: Drug: risedronate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: 52 weeks / Endpoint
Secondary outcomes (50)
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD for Combined 35 mg Delayed-Release Weekly Treatment Group, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD at Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD at Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD), Week 52, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Measured: Week 52
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 104, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Measured: Week 52
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Responder = a patient showing a positive change (>0 g/cm2) in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to the timepoint.
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide/ Creatinine (NTX/Cr), Week 13, ITT Population
Measured: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 13, ITT Population
Measured: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 13, ITT Population
Measured: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 26, ITT Population
Measured: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 52, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104
Number of Patients With at Least One New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 52 / Endpoint
Measured: Week 52 / Endpoint
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104
Measured: Week 104
Number of Patients With No New Fractured Vertebra, Week 104 / Endpoint
Measured: Week 104 / Endpoint
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionApr 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postmenopausal OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 923 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Warner Chilcott
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ana Balske, MD, PhD, Study director, Procter and Gamble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00541658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2007008
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
McClung MR, Miller PD, Brown JP, Zanchetta J, Bolognese MA, Benhamou CL, Balske A, Burgio DE, Sarley J, McCullough LK, Recker RR. Efficacy and safety of a novel delayed-release risedronate 35 mg once-a-week tablet. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jan;23(1):267-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1791-y. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PubMed 21947137
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Non-inferiority Comparison of 35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate, Given Once-weekly Either Before or After Breakfast, & 5 mg Immediate-release Risedronate, Given Once-daily Before Breakfast, in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00541658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2007008
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 923 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Warner ChilcottIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to study the efficacy of a 35 mg delayed release weekly dosing regimen as compared to the standard daily dosing regimen of risedronate 5 mg daily.
Detailed description
The comparator arms of this risedronate study are 35 mg delayed release given weekly and 5 mg immediate release given daily.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mg Before Breakfast | Active comparator | Drug: risedronate5 mg / Immediate-release Risedronate (At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast) |
| 35 mg After Breakfast | Experimental | Drug: risedronate35 mg / Delayed-release Risedronate (Immediately Following Breakfast) |
| 35 mg Before Breakfast | Experimental | Drug: risedronate35 mg / Delayed-release Risedronate (At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female: 50 years of age or older
- >5 years since last menses natural or surgical
- have lumbar spine or total hip BMD more that 2.5 SD below the young adult mean, or have lumbar spine or total hip BMD more than 2.0 SD below the young adult female mean value and also have at least one prevalent vertebral body fracture
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- history of uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, osteomalacia
- BMI >32 kg/m
- use of medications within 3 months of starting study drug that impact bone metabolism such as glucocorticoids, estrogens, calcitonin, calcitriol, other bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone
- hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia of any cause
- markedly abnormal clinical laboratory measurements that are assessed as clinically significant by the investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| risedronateAlso: IRBB5 mg Immediate-release Risedronate Administered At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast Daily | Drug | 5 mg Before Breakfast |
| risedronateAlso: DRFB35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate Administered Immediately Following Breakfast Weekly | Drug | 35 mg After Breakfast |
| risedronateAlso: DRBB35 mg Delayed-release Risedronate Administered At Least 30 Minutes Before Breakfast Weekly | Drug | 35 mg Before Breakfast |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: 52 weeks / Endpoint
50 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD for Combined 35 mg Delayed-Release Weekly Treatment Group, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD at Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine BMD at Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD), Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Responders to Treatment (>0% Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD) at Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Total Proximal Femur BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 52 / Endpoint
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Greater Trochanter BMD, Week 104 / Endpoint
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide/ Creatinine (NTX/Cr), Week 13, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline Urine Type-I Collagen N-telopeptide / Creatinine (NTX / Cr), Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 13, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 104, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Type-I Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX), Week 104 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 104 / Endpoint
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 13, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 13
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 26, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 52, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase, Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population
Time frame: Week 52 / Endpoint
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21947137McClung MR, Miller PD, Brown JP, Zanchetta J, Bolognese MA, Benhamou CL, Balske A, Burgio DE, Sarley J, McCullough LK, Recker RR. Efficacy and safety of a novel delayed-release risedronate 35 mg once-a-week tablet. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jan;23(1):267-76. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1791-y. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
Related trials for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Sensorimotor Balance Training vs Digitally Augmented Core Stabilization in Women With Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Abaloparatide Added to Ongoing Denosumab vs Continued Denosumab Alone
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
RecruitingPhase 4
Combined Anabolic Therapy
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Osteoporosis
Recruiting
Study of the Impact of Mother-of-pearl Nutritional Supplementation on the Prevention of Post-menopausal Osteoporosis
Post Menopausal Osteoporosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of TST002 Injection in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis or Low Bone Mass
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, Low Bone Mass
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ana Balske, MD, PhD study director
Procter and Gamble
45 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing risedronate in people with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, run by Warner Chilcott at 45 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in United States, Canada, Hungary, France, Belgium and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52 / Endpoint, ITT Population (time frame: 52 weeks / Endpoint). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00541658, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2013.