HIV InfectionsNCT00543803
Observational Non-interventional Study With Viramune® in Combination With Truvada® in HIV-infected Patients
An observational study of HIV Infections, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 63 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
This observational study is supposed to assess (under conditions of clinical practice in daily routine) whether treatment with Viramune (nevirapine) in combination with Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) will durably suppress viral load below the limit of detection or will maintain suppression of viral replication… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- How many people
- 334 participants
- Where
- 63 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Feb 2006to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: HIV Patients
Who may be able to join
- male and female adult HIV type 1 infected patients, who have either not been treated previously, whose previous combination treatment with PIs has failed, or who have to switch their previous treatment from protease inhibitors (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRT)I due to side effects or intolerability after achieving suppression of viral load below the limit of detection.
- Viramune (nevirapine) is indicated as part of combination therapy for the antiviral treatment of HIV-1 infected patients with advanced or progressive immunodeficiency.
- Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) is indicated in antiretroviral combination therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infected adults.
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- Pregnant female patients
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of Viramune (nevirapine) or Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine).
- Viramune (nevirapine) should not be readministered to patients who have required permanent discontinuation for severe rash, rash accompanied by constitutional symptoms, hypersensitivity reactions, or clinical hepatitis due to nevirapine.
- Viramune (nevirapine) should not be used in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) or pre-treatment aspartine transaminase (ASAT) or alanine transaminase (ALAT) > 5 upper limit normal (ULN) until baseline ASAT/ALAT are stabilised < 5 ULN.
- Viramune (nevirapine) should not be readministered in patients who previously had ASAT or ALAT > 5 ULN during Viramune (nevirapine) therapy and had recurrence of liver function abnormalities upon readministration of Viramune (nevirapine)
- Herbal preparations containing St Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum) must not be used while taking Viramune (nevirapine) due to the risk of decreased plasma concentrations and reduced clinical effects of nevirapine
- The available pharmacokinetic data suggest that the concomitant use of rifampicin and Viramune (nevirapine) is not recommended.
Trial locations and contacts
63 sites in 1 country.
63 sites in 1 country
Germany63 sites
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aachen
1100.1492.1 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 10
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 11
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 12
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 13
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 14
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 6
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 7
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 8
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 9
Berlin
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Cologne
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Cologne
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
Cologne
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dortmund
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Duisburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Düsseldorf
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Düsseldorf
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Frankfurt (Oder)
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Frankfurt am Main
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Frankfurt am Main
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
Frankfurt am Main
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
Frankfurt am Main
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Hamburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Hamburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
Hamburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
Hamburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Hanover
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Hanover
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Karlsruhe
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koblenz
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Leipzig
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Leipzig
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Magdeburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mainz
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mannheim
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
München
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
München
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
München
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
München
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5
München
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Münster
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Münster
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
Münster
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
Münster
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Nuremberg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Nuremberg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oldenburg
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Osnabrück
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Potsdam
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Saarbrücken
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
Stuttgart
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
Stuttgart
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
Stuttgart
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Troisdorf
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wiesbaden
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wuppertal
About this study
Official title: Observational Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Truvada + Nevirapine
This observational study is supposed to assess (under conditions of clinical practice in daily routine) whether treatment with Viramune (nevirapine) in combination with Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) will durably suppress viral load below the limit of detection or will maintain suppression of viral replication (HIV-RNA below limit of detection) achieved under previous anti-retroviral combination therapy after switch to combination treatment of Viramune (nevirapine) and Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine).
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Summary of Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) to Last Value on Treatment
The change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Asparate Aminotransferase (AST) to Last Value on Treatment
The change in asparate aminotransferase (AST) from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (Gamma-GT) to Last Value on Treatment
The change in Gamma-glutamyl transferase (Gamma-GT) from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Creatinine to Last Value on Treatment
The change in Creatinine from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol to Last Value on Treatment
The change in total cholesterol from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol to Last Value on Treatment
The change in High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol to Last Value on Treatment
The change in Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Triglycerides to Last Value on Treatment
The change in triglycerides from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in Glucose to Last Value on Treatment
The change in Glucose from baseline to the last value in treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Summary of Log10 Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Last Value on Treatment
For calculation of this measure switch patients are included in the total which had no viral load decrease.
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in CD4+ Count to Last Value on Treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Number of Patients With Non-serious Drug-related AEs as Judged by the Investigator
Total number of patients with investigator defined non-serious drug-related AEs was reported.
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Investigator's Global Clinical Assessment of Patient General Health Status
Investigators opinion of patients general health condition at baseline versus last evaluation on treatment
Measured: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2006
- Primary completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 334 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00543803
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1100.1492
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 20 May 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observational Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Truvada + Nevirapine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00543803
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1100.1492
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 334 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jan 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational study is supposed to assess (under conditions of clinical practice in daily routine) whether treatment with Viramune (nevirapine) in combination with Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) will durably suppress viral load below the limit of detection or will maintain suppression of viral replication (HIV-RNA below limit of detection) achieved under previous anti-retroviral combination therapy after switch to combination treatment of Viramune (nevirapine) and Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- HIV Patients
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- male and female adult HIV type 1 infected patients, who have either not been treated previously, whose previous combination treatment with PIs has failed, or who have to switch their previous treatment from protease inhibitors (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRT)I due to side effects or intolerability after achieving suppression of viral load below the limit of detection.
- Viramune (nevirapine) is indicated as part of combination therapy for the antiviral treatment of HIV-1 infected patients with advanced or progressive immunodeficiency.
- Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) is indicated in antiretroviral combination therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infected adults.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- Pregnant female patients
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of Viramune (nevirapine) or Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine).
- Viramune (nevirapine) should not be readministered to patients who have required permanent discontinuation for severe rash, rash accompanied by constitutional symptoms, hypersensitivity reactions, or clinical hepatitis due to nevirapine.
- Viramune (nevirapine) should not be used in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) or pre-treatment aspartine transaminase (ASAT) or alanine transaminase (ALAT) > 5 upper limit normal (ULN) until baseline ASAT/ALAT are stabilised < 5 ULN.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Summary of Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Asparate Aminotransferase (AST) to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in asparate aminotransferase (AST) from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (Gamma-GT) to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in Gamma-glutamyl transferase (Gamma-GT) from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Creatinine to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in Creatinine from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in total cholesterol from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Triglycerides to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in triglycerides from baseline to the last value in treatment
Summary of Change From Baseline in Glucose to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
The change in Glucose from baseline to the last value in treatment
4 secondary outcomes
Summary of Log10 Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Summary of Change From Baseline in CD4+ Count to Last Value on Treatment
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Number of Patients With Non-serious Drug-related AEs as Judged by the Investigator
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Investigator's Global Clinical Assessment of Patient General Health Status
Time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV Infections
RecruitingPhase 2
Imaging and Biopsy of People With HIV-1 Undergoing Analytic Treatment Interruption
HIV
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for TA Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS5 Rwanda
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Not yet recruiting
Combating HIV Stigma in Healthcare Settings: A Standardized Patient Approach
Hiv
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS9 South Africa
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive Women Living With HIV in C1001P-CS7 Zimbabwe
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
63 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of HIV Infections, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 63 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 63 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Summary of Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) to Last Value on Treatment (time frame: from baseline to last value on treatment in between 36 months). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2014.