Ankylosing SpondylitisNCT00544557
Study Evaluating The Use Of Etanercept In Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- What is being tested?
- Etanercept
- How many people
- 1,715 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to May 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with an established diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
Who cannot join
- Hypersensitivity to etanercept
- Active infection including chronic or localised infection
- Sepsis or risk of sepsis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Observational Study Of The Use Of Enbrel (Registered) (Etanercept) In Routine Clinical Practice To Treat Ankylosing Spondylitis (as) Patients: An Effectiveness, Safety, And Health Economic Evaluation
This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting.
Read the detailed description
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Being tested
- Etanercept
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EtanerceptDrug
Also called Enbrel
The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of etanercept in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis | Not described Receives: Drug: Etanercept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (26)
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly. Percentage of participants with AEs included participants affected with both SAEs and non--SAEs.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS. Utilizing a 11-point Likert-scale (0= none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The index was computed by adding questions 1 to 4 plus the mean of questions 5 and 6. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0-10 BASDAI score (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem).
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Participants answered 10 questions, consisting of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the participant's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question was answered on a 0-10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem), the sum of which (divided by 10) resulted in the BASFI score (0-10).
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52
Occiput-to-wall distance is the distance between the occiput (posterior or back portion of the head) and the wall when the participant stood with heels and shoulder against the wall and the back straight.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52
Lateral lumbar flexion was determined by the difference of the finger-floor-distance in normal position and in lateral bending position.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52
Participants were asked to assess their global pain intensity within the past 7 days. Pain was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Participants were asked to assess their disease activity within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Physicians were asked to assess the disease activity of participants within the past 7 days. Disease activity was evaluated on an 11-point Likert scale: min = 0 (best), max = 10 (worst).
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness
Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. A significant reduction of duration of morning stiffness is defined as a reduction of the duration in minutes by at least 20 percent or reduction to 'no morning stiffness' (absence of morning stiffness).
Measured: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis
Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52
Peripheral arthritis is the inflammation of joints that involved asymmetrically. It involved the hips, shoulder girdle (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular joints), joints of the chest wall (costovertebral joints, costosternal junctions) and symphysis pubis. In case of no presence of peripheral arthritis the number of affected joints was set to 0.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis
Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52
Enthesitis is the inflammation of the enthesis, where the joint capsules, ligaments or tendons attach to the bone. This inflammation can lead to severe pain and discomfort. In case of no presence of enthesitis the number of affected body parts was set to 0.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in AS participants. ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20= at least >= 20 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change >=1 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Measured: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants. ASAS =4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40= at least (>=) 40 percent improvement from baseline and an absolute change >=2 unit on a 0-10 numeric scale (0=no disease activity; 10=high disease activity) in at least 3 of the domains (on a 0-10 numerical scale): Global assessment of disease activity by participant, participant's global pain intensity, function measured by BASFI and inflammation measured by the average of the last two Likert-scales in BASDAI concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration and no worsening in the remaining domain.
Measured: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)
EQ 5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (extreme problems). Score of each domain is transformed into a single TTO value using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range -0.205 to 0.999, higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health. State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicate worst health state. Score of each domain is transformed into a single VAS score using formula developed by Greiner et al and results in a total score range of 0 to 100, where higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)
WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Participants utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization
Participants duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Participants taking any non-study medications which were administered either prior to or during the study treatment for AS were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankylosing SpondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,715 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00544557
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0881X1-4463
- Other IDs
- B1801087
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 12 May 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Druce KL, Aikman L, Dilleen M, Burden A, Szczypa P, Basu N. Fatigue independently predicts different work disability dimensions in etanercept-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 May 29;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1598-8.
PubMed 29843776
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observational Study Of The Use Of Enbrel (Registered) (Etanercept) In Routine Clinical Practice To Treat Ankylosing Spondylitis (as) Patients: An Effectiveness, Safety, And Health Economic Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00544557
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0881X1-4463
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,715 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 May 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real-world setting.
Detailed description
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis | – | Drug: Etanercept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with an established diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Hypersensitivity to etanercept
- Active infection including chronic or localised infection
- Sepsis or risk of sepsis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EtanerceptAlso: EnbrelThe patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of etanercept in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment. | Drug | Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria. Partial remission was defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving partial remission was determined by ASAS criteria. Partial remission defined as a score of less than 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) in each of the 4 assessment in ASAS domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation.
26 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) or Adverse Events (AEs) by Co-morbidity
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Lateral Lumbar Flexion at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Pain at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Significant Reduction of Morning Stiffness
Time frame: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Peripheral Arthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Joints by Peripheral Arthritis at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Enthesitis
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Change From Baseline in Number of Affected Body Parts by Enthesitis at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS-20) Response
Time frame: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 40 (ASAS-40) Response
Time frame: Week 12, 26, 38, 52
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Euro Quality of Life (EQ--5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Percentage of Participants With Prior or Concomitant Medication Use for Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29843776Druce KL, Aikman L, Dilleen M, Burden A, Szczypa P, Basu N. Fatigue independently predicts different work disability dimensions in etanercept-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 May 29;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1598-8.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neuropathic Spinal Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of GKL-006Allo Injection in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase Ia Study of MST-931 in Healthy Adult Subjects
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 May 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Partial Remission at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00544557, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2015.