Respiratory DepressionNCT00544947
Observation of Respiration Following Regional Anaesthesia With Intrathecal Opioids for Caesarean Section
An observational study of Respiratory Depression, run by NHS Greater Clyde and Glasgow at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Spinal Administration of opioids offers segmental analgesia, but has side effects including pruritus, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, hypotension, and respiratory depression, both early and delayed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Depression
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Elective caesarean section Healthy pregnant women
Who may be able to join
- 1st patient on list
- ASA I or II
- BMI <40 at booking
- Term pregnancy +/- 2 weeks gestation
Who cannot join
- ASA>II
- BMI>40 at booking
- History of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)
- Need for supplementation with intravenous Opioids intraoperatively
- Conversion to GA
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Observation of Respiration Following Regional Anaesthesia With Intrathecal Opioids: a Comparison Between Diamorphine and Fentanyl Combined With Postoperative Morphine PCA Using a Carbon Dioxide Tension and Pulse Oximetry Sensor (TOSCA)
Spinal Administration of opioids offers segmental analgesia, but has side effects including pruritus, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, hypotension, and respiratory depression, both early and delayed. Many Centres in the UK now routinely use supplementation of spinal anaesthesia from bupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl or diamorphine. If Fentanyl is used, this is usually accompanied by connection to a i.v. Morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-device in the postoperative period, whereas the use of intrathecal diamorphine seems to result in a reduction in post-operative morphine requirements, which has obviated the need for PCA devices in many centres. There has been recent controversy over which opioid is safer to use with regards to the risk of respiratory depression.1,2 The investigators want to investigate, whether intrathecal diamorphine causes less or more post-operative respiratory depression in healthy mothers undergoing elective caesarean section than intrathecal fentanyl plus post-operative morphine PCA.
Read the detailed description
Method:
We will use transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension as our primary outcome measure of respiratory depression. Secondary outcome measures will be the oxygen-saturation, the respiratory rare, neurological status assessed by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the need for administration of naloxone and/or active airway management.
PtCO2 and SpO2 will be measured transcutaneously using the Linde TOSCA 500 Monitoring System, which is a relatively new miniaturized single sensor, that is applied to the earlobe.
There will be 2 study groups.
Group D will be patients at Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal diamorphine 300mcg is the current anaesthetic technique of choice.
Group F will be patients at the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal fentanyl 15mcg plus post-operative morphine PCA is the current anaesthetic technique of choice for elective caesarean section.
Additional postoperative Analgesia will be given as per local guidelines.
We will recruit 40 patients to each group.
Patients will receive verbal and written information prior to written consent before being included.
Information Gathering:
The TOSCA monitor will be connected in recovery following the end of caesarean section (with PCA connection at QMMH). Monitoring will be continuous until 0800hrs the following morning giving approx. 20 hours data for each patient.
Data will then be downloaded to a database for subsequent analysis. We will also note the total dose of morphine used in each patient and any complications that occurred or interventions carried out.
We plan to recruit an SHO on each site to help with information gathering.
Ethics Approval:
Ethics Approval has been obtained by application to the Research Ethics Committee of the Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
Statistical Analysis
For both CO2 and O2 parameters the mean area under the curve (AUC) will be compared between the diamorphine and fentanyl groups using a normal linear model. This will enable the analysis to adjust for any demographic and clinical variables, which are known to influence either of these indicators of respiratory depression.
There is no previous information in the literature on the variability in area under the curve for either CO2 concentration or O2 saturation. Any specification of effect size must therefore be in terms of a number of standard deviations, where the standard deviation is not known.
We assume that the primary endpoint is the measurement of CO2 over a period of 24 hours and that this will be quantified in the analysis using area under the curve (AUC). If we compare the mean AUC between the diamorphine and fentanyl groups using a two sample t-test (with two-sided significance level 5%) then a study including 40 patients per group would have 80% power to detect a mean AUC difference between groups of 0.634 standard deviations and 90% power to detect a mean AUC difference of and 0.851 standard deviations.
Final Statistical Analysis will be carried out in cooperation with Dr Chris Weir from the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics at the University of Glasgow.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Depression
- Keywords
- Respiratory Depression, Caesarean Section, Diamorphine, Fentanyl
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| D, F | Group D will be patients at Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal diamorphine 300mcg is the current anaesthetic technique of choice. Group F will be patients at the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal fentanyl 15mcg plus post-operative morphine PCA is the current anaesthetic technique of choice for elective caesarean section. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension
Measured: within the first 24 hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
oxygen-saturation, respiratory rate, neurological status, need for administration of naloxone and/or active airway management
Measured: within first 24 hours after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Respiratory DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Clyde and Glasgow
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Stephan Dalchow, FRCA, Principal investigator, National Health Service
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00544947
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07/S0704/67
- Status last verified
- Feb 2009
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observation of Respiration Following Regional Anaesthesia With Intrathecal Opioids: a Comparison Between Diamorphine and Fentanyl Combined With Postoperative Morphine PCA Using a Carbon Dioxide Tension and Pulse Oximetry Sensor (TOSCA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00544947
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07/S0704/67
- Conditions
- Respiratory Depression
- Keywords
- Respiratory Depression, Caesarean Section, Diamorphine, Fentanyl
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Greater Clyde and GlasgowUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal Administration of opioids offers segmental analgesia, but has side effects including pruritus, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, hypotension, and respiratory depression, both early and delayed. Many Centres in the UK now routinely use supplementation of spinal anaesthesia from bupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl or diamorphine. If Fentanyl is used, this is usually accompanied by connection to a i.v. Morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)-device in the postoperative period, whereas the use of intrathecal diamorphine seems to result in a reduction in post-operative morphine requirements, which has obviated the need for PCA devices in many centres. There has been recent controversy over which opioid is safer to use with regards to the risk of respiratory depression.1,2 The investigators want to investigate, whether intrathecal diamorphine causes less or more post-operative respiratory depression in healthy mothers undergoing elective caesarean section than intrathecal fentanyl plus post-operative morphine PCA.
Detailed description
Method:
We will use transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension as our primary outcome measure of respiratory depression. Secondary outcome measures will be the oxygen-saturation, the respiratory rare, neurological status assessed by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the need for administration of naloxone and/or active airway management.
PtCO2 and SpO2 will be measured transcutaneously using the Linde TOSCA 500 Monitoring System, which is a relatively new miniaturized single sensor, that is applied to the earlobe.
There will be 2 study groups.
Group D will be patients at Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal diamorphine 300mcg is the current anaesthetic technique of choice.
Group F will be patients at the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal fentanyl 15mcg plus post-operative morphine PCA is the current anaesthetic technique of choice for elective caesarean section.
Additional postoperative Analgesia will be given as per local guidelines.
We will recruit 40 patients to each group.
Patients will receive verbal and written information prior to written consent before being included.
Information Gathering:
The TOSCA monitor will be connected in recovery following the end of caesarean section (with PCA connection at QMMH). Monitoring will be continuous until 0800hrs the following morning giving approx. 20 hours data for each patient.
Data will then be downloaded to a database for subsequent analysis. We will also note the total dose of morphine used in each patient and any complications that occurred or interventions carried out.
We plan to recruit an SHO on each site to help with information gathering.
Ethics Approval:
Ethics Approval has been obtained by application to the Research Ethics Committee of the Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
Statistical Analysis
For both CO2 and O2 parameters the mean area under the curve (AUC) will be compared between the diamorphine and fentanyl groups using a normal linear model. This will enable the analysis to adjust for any demographic and clinical variables, which are known to influence either of these indicators of respiratory depression.
There is no previous information in the literature on the variability in area under the curve for either CO2 concentration or O2 saturation. Any specification of effect size must therefore be in terms of a number of standard deviations, where the standard deviation is not known.
We assume that the primary endpoint is the measurement of CO2 over a period of 24 hours and that this will be quantified in the analysis using area under the curve (AUC). If we compare the mean AUC between the diamorphine and fentanyl groups using a two sample t-test (with two-sided significance level 5%) then a study including 40 patients per group would have 80% power to detect a mean AUC difference between groups of 0.634 standard deviations and 90% power to detect a mean AUC difference of and 0.851 standard deviations.
Final Statistical Analysis will be carried out in cooperation with Dr Chris Weir from the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics at the University of Glasgow.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| D, F | – | –Group D will be patients at Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal diamorphine 300mcg is the current anaesthetic technique of choice. Group F will be patients at the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital in Glasgow, where supplementation with intrathecal fentanyl 15mcg plus post-operative morphine PCA is the current anaesthetic technique of choice for elective caesarean section. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Elective caesarean section Healthy pregnant women
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 1st patient on list
- ASA I or II
- BMI <40 at booking
- Term pregnancy +/- 2 weeks gestation
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ASA>II
- BMI>40 at booking
- History of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)
- Need for supplementation with intravenous Opioids intraoperatively
- Conversion to GA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension
Time frame: within the first 24 hours after surgery
1 secondary outcome
oxygen-saturation, respiratory rate, neurological status, need for administration of naloxone and/or active airway management
Time frame: within first 24 hours after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2009.
Related trials for Respiratory Depression
Not yet recruiting
Lung Cancer and Aging: Improving Well-being for Older Adults With Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
TIDES 2.0: Prevalence and Longitudinal Course of Depression, Anxiety, and Behavior Problems in Children With Cystic Fibrosis Under 12 Years of Age
Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Respiratory Compromise and Hypoventilation Induced by Drugs
Obesity & Overweight, Respiratory Depression
Not yet recruiting
R34 Asthma Depression
Asthma, Depression
Recruiting
The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises on Pain, Dyspnea, Posture, Body Awareness, Anxiety, and Depression in Young Adults
Young
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephan Dalchow, FRCA principal investigator
National Health Service
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Respiratory Depression, run by NHS Greater Clyde and Glasgow at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (time frame: within the first 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2009.