HypertensionPhase 3NCT00547300
Study to Evaluate Symptoms in Patients Treated With Nebivolol or Metoprolol Extended-release (ER) for Hypertension
A Phase 3 study testing Metoprolol ER and Nebivolol in people with Hypertension, run by Forest Laboratories at 24 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability of nebivolol to metoprolol ER in a general population of patients with mild to moderate hypertension receiving hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Metoprolol ER and Nebivolol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2007to 2 Jan 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, ambulatory outpatients
- History of hypertension being treated with two medications, one of which must be HCTZ and the other of which must not be a beta-blocker or clonidine
- SBP of 135-155 mm Hg and/or DBP of >85 mm Hg at screening (Visit 1)
- SBP of 140-165 mm Hg and DBP > 90 mmHg at randomization (Visit 3)
Who cannot join
- Treatment with a beta-blocker or clonidine within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- Clinically significant respiratory disease (e.g., bronchial asthma, reactive airways disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Coronary artery disease requiring treatment with a calcium channel blocker or nitrates
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, significant arrhythmia) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- History of severe mental illness (including Major Depressive Disorder, psychosis, dementia, bipolar disorder) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- Use of antipsychotic medication (e.g., dopamine receptor antagonists, serotonin dopamine receptor antagonists) or antidepressants
Show all 10Show fewer
- Diabetes mellitus, type I or II
- Participation in a previous investigational study of nebivolol at any time
- Receipt of treatment with an investigational study drug within 30 days of screening (Visit 1)
- History of hypersensitivity to nebivolol, metoprolol ER, other beta-blockers, HCTZ, or other sulfonamide-derived drugs
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 1 country.
24 sites in 1 country
United States24 sites
Forest Research Institute 009
Atlanta, Georgia, 30338
Forest Research Institute 028
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Forest Research Institute 014
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Forest Research Institute 040
Bountiful, Utah, 84010
Forest Research Institute 003
Carrollton, Texas, 75006
Forest Investigative Site 002
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Forest Research Institute 010
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Forest Research Institute 054
Encinitas, California, 92024
Forest Research Institute 032
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Forest Research Institute 019
Holly Hill, Florida, 32117
Forest Research Institute 036
Hollywood, Florida, 33023
Forest Research Institute 027
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Forest Research Institute 008
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Forest Research Institute 006
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745
Forest Research Institute 007
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024
Forest Research Institute 025
Roseville, California, 95661
Forest Research Institute 050
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Forest Research Institute 012
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Forest Research Institute 048
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Forest Research Institute 013
Tustin, California, 92780
Forest Research Institute 053
Vista, California, 92083
Forest Research Institute 052
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Forest Research Institute 033
Westlake Village, California, 91361
Forest Research Institute 039
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
About this study
Official title: Tolerability of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol ER in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Taking Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability of nebivolol to metoprolol ER in a general population of patients with mild to moderate hypertension receiving hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
Read the detailed description
This study was an 18-week study to evaluate the tolerability of nebivolol compared to metoprolol ER in outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension taking HCTZ. It is a multi-center, randomized, double blind (DB), active-control, parallel-group study, starting with a 4-week HCTZ run-in phase, followed by a 12-week DB treatment phase. Patients meeting the entry criteria at the end of run-in are randomized to one of two treatment groups, nebivolol or metoprolol ER. Up-titration of dose of study drug will occur if needed during the first 4 weeks of the DB phase, after which there is an 8-week stable-dose period of treatment. A 2-week double-blind withdrawal phase follows, during which tapering off study drug occurs.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- Metoprolol ER, Nebivolol
- Keywords
- Hypertension, Nebivolol, Beta blocker, Tolerability
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Metoprolol ERDrug
Metoprolol ER once daily, oral administration
NebivololDrug
Nebivolol once daily, oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nebivolol | Experimental | Nebivolol 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg Receives: Drug: Nebivolol |
| Metoprolol ER | Active comparator | Metoprolol ER 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg Receives: Drug: Metoprolol ER |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Patient Symptoms Questionnaire (PSQ) Derived Score
The PSQ contained 44 possible symptoms rated from 0 (no discomfort) to 5 (extreme discomfort).
Measured: Measurements occured over a 14 week period, from Visit 2 (Week -2) to Visit 10 (Week 12)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Peripheral Blood Pressure (BP)
Measured: Measurements occured over a 18 week period, from Visit 1 (Week -4) through Visit 11 (Week 14)
Pulse Rate
Measured: Measurements occured over a 18 week period, from Visit 1 (Week -4) through Visit 11 (Week 14)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study start31 Oct 2007
- Primary completion2 Jan 2008
- Study completion2 Jan 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Mylan Laboratories
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00547300
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEB-MD-03
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 21 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tolerability of Nebivolol Compared With Metoprolol ER in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Taking Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00547300
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEB-MD-03
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Hypertension, Nebivolol, Beta blocker, Tolerability
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Forest LaboratoriesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Mylan Laboratories
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jan 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jan 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability of nebivolol to metoprolol ER in a general population of patients with mild to moderate hypertension receiving hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)
Detailed description
This study was an 18-week study to evaluate the tolerability of nebivolol compared to metoprolol ER in outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension taking HCTZ. It is a multi-center, randomized, double blind (DB), active-control, parallel-group study, starting with a 4-week HCTZ run-in phase, followed by a 12-week DB treatment phase. Patients meeting the entry criteria at the end of run-in are randomized to one of two treatment groups, nebivolol or metoprolol ER. Up-titration of dose of study drug will occur if needed during the first 4 weeks of the DB phase, after which there is an 8-week stable-dose period of treatment. A 2-week double-blind withdrawal phase follows, during which tapering off study drug occurs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nebivolol | Experimental | Drug: NebivololNebivolol 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg |
| Metoprolol ER | Active comparator | Drug: Metoprolol ERMetoprolol ER 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female, ambulatory outpatients
- History of hypertension being treated with two medications, one of which must be HCTZ and the other of which must not be a beta-blocker or clonidine
- SBP of 135-155 mm Hg and/or DBP of >85 mm Hg at screening (Visit 1)
- SBP of 140-165 mm Hg and DBP > 90 mmHg at randomization (Visit 3)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Treatment with a beta-blocker or clonidine within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- Clinically significant respiratory disease (e.g., bronchial asthma, reactive airways disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Coronary artery disease requiring treatment with a calcium channel blocker or nitrates
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, significant arrhythmia) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
- History of severe mental illness (including Major Depressive Disorder, psychosis, dementia, bipolar disorder) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol ERMetoprolol ER once daily, oral administration | Drug | Metoprolol ER |
| NebivololNebivolol once daily, oral administration | Drug | Nebivolol |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Patient Symptoms Questionnaire (PSQ) Derived Score
Time frame: Measurements occured over a 14 week period, from Visit 2 (Week -2) to Visit 10 (Week 12)
The PSQ contained 44 possible symptoms rated from 0 (no discomfort) to 5 (extreme discomfort).
2 secondary outcomes
Peripheral Blood Pressure (BP)
Time frame: Measurements occured over a 18 week period, from Visit 1 (Week -4) through Visit 11 (Week 14)
Pulse Rate
Time frame: Measurements occured over a 18 week period, from Visit 1 (Week -4) through Visit 11 (Week 14)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
24 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Metoprolol ER and Nebivolol in people with Hypertension, run by Forest Laboratories at 24 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Patient Symptoms Questionnaire (PSQ) Derived Score (time frame: Measurements occured over a 14 week period, from Visit 2 (Week -2) to Visit 10 (Week 12)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2019.