Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Phase 3NCT00547521
Phase IIIB Subcutaneous Abatacept Monotherapy Study
A Phase 3 study testing abatacept and Methotrexate (MTX) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 22 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
To evaluate safety and immunogenicity of abatacept when used with or without methotrexate in the absence of an IV loading dose of abatacept Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- What is being tested?
- abatacept and Methotrexate (MTX)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 119 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Feb 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Subjects Global Disease Assessment of greater than equal to 20 mm on a visual analog scale
- Discontinue all Biologics and Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) except for methotrexate
Who cannot join
- Received treatment with rituximab
- Subjects who have received treatment with immunoadsorbtion columns (such as Prosorba columns), mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept®), cyclosporine A or other calcineurin inhibitors, or D-Penicillamine
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 4 countries.
22 sites in 4 countries
United States15 sites
East Penn Rheumatology Associates
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Regional Rheumatology Associates
Binghamton, New York, 13905
Boulder Medical Center
Boulder, Colorado, 80304
Low Country Rheumatology, Pa
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Columbia Arthritis Center
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Altoona Center For Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Rheumatic Disease Center
Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217
Physicians East, Pa
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Rheumatology Associates Of North Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Medical Towers South
Louisville, Kentucky, 40298
Coastal Clinical Research Inc
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Westroads Medical Group
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
The Arthritis Center
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Stanford University School Of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Healthcare Research Consultants
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Australia3 sites
Local Institution
Hobart, Tasmania, 7001
Local Institution
Malvern, Victoria, 3144
Local Institution
Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558
Mexico2 sites
Local Institution
D.f., Mexico City, 06700
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44100
South Africa2 sites
Local Institution
Berea, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001
Local Institution
Panorama, Western Cape, 7500
About this study
Official title: A Phase IIIb, Multi-center, Stratified, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Steady State Trough Level, and Safety of Subcutaneous Abatacept (BMS-188667) in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Administered With or Without Background Methotrexate
To evaluate safety and immunogenicity of abatacept when used with or without methotrexate in the absence of an IV loading dose of abatacept
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Being tested
- abatacept, Methotrexate (MTX)
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
abataceptDrug
Also called BMS-188667, Orencia®
solution, subcutaneous injection, 125 mg/kg, weekly, 106 days in short term; long term is open
Methotrexate (MTX)Drug
Participants who were currently receiving methotrexate at a stable dose ≥ 10 mg for at least 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept + Methotrexate (MTX) Cohort | Experimental | In the ST period, participants were administered a dose of 125 mg abatacept SC, once weekly, for 4 months. Participants were also administered a stable MTX dose of greater than or equal to 10 mg once weekly for at least 4 weeks prior to first injection of SC abatacept. Receives: Drug: abatacept; Drug: Methotrexate (MTX) |
| SC Abatacept Monotherapy Cohort | Experimental | In the ST period, participants were administered a dose of 125 mg abatacept SC, once weekly, for 4 months. Participants did not receive MTX at screening i.e., MTX naive, or discontinued MTX due to lack of efficacy or tolerability at least 4 weeks prior to first injection of SC abatacept. Receives: Drug: abatacept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay [ELISA] Method) at Day 113 of the ST Study
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Measured: Day 113
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses (ELISA Method) Over Time During the ST Study
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Measured: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85,113 and 28, 56, and 85 days post last dose.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept Responses to Abatacept (Meso-Scale Discovery [MSD] Electrochemiluminescence [ECL] Assay Method) Over Time During the ST Study
The ECL (MSD) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than ELISA method. For the anti-abatacept antibody ECL (MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10.
Measured: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85,113 and 28, 56 and 85 days post last dose.
Immunogenicity in MTX Naive and MTX-previous Users in Cohort 1 at Day 113 of the ST Study (for ELISA Results)
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Measured: Day 113.
Immunogenicity in MTX Naive and MTX-previous Users in Cohort 1 at Day 113 of the ST Study (for MSD Results)
The ECL (MSD) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than the ELISA method. For anti-abatacept antibody ECL (MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10.
Measured: Day 113.
Cross Tabulations of the Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Immunogenicity Status at Baseline and Each Visit During the ST Study (for ELISA Results)
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Measured: Baseline and on day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85 and 113
Cross Tabulations of the Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Immunogenicity Status at Baseline and Each Visit During the ST Study (for MSD Results)
The ECL (MSD) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum . It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than the ELISA method. For anti-abatacept antibody ECL(MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10.
Measured: Baseline and day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85 and 113.
Secondary outcomes (33)
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score at End of 4-month (Day 113) of the ST Study
DAS28-CRP is a continuous variable which is a composite of 4 variables: the number of tender joint out of 28, the number of swollen joint out of 28, C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams/Liter (mg/L) and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100mm. DAS 28 = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28 * sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * VAS + 0.96.
Measured: Baseline and Month 4 (Day113).
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement at End of 4-month (Day 113) of the ST Study
A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to 1.2 reduction in DAS28-CRP score from baseline.
Measured: Day 113.
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (HAQ-DI) at End of the 4-month Treatment Period (Day 113) of the ST Study
HAQ-DI takes into account participant's use of aids or devices or assistance in scoring algorithm for a disability category. The questionnaire includes 20 questions assessing physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty and 3 = unable to do. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. The score is calculated by summing worst scores in each domain and dividing by the number of domains answered.
Measured: Baseline and Month 4 (Day 113).
Change From Baseline in All HAQ-DI Components at End of the 4-month Treatment Period (Day 113) of the ST Study
HAQ-DI takes into account participant's use of aids or devices or assistance in scoring algorithm for a disability category. The questionnaire includes 20 questions assessing physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty and 3 = unable to do. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. The score is calculated by summing worst scores in each domain and dividing by the number of domains answered.
Measured: Baseline and Month 4 (Day113).
Cross Tabulations of Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Status for RF at Day 113 With Baseline, in the ST Study
RF is an autoantibody that is usually present in the serum of people with rheumatoid arthritis. The cut-point value for seroconversion was 15 IU/mL (>= 15 IU/mL resulted in a positive result). Cross-tabulation of frequency of seroconversion of RF at Day 113 with baseline, in the ST period, was provided.
Measured: Baseline and Day 113.
Number of Participants Who Died, Experienced SAEs, Experienced AEs or Who Discontinued Due to AEs During the ST Study
AEs: any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an overdose. Participants who discontinued the study due to any AEs or SAEs were recorded.
Measured: Continuously through ST period (upto Day 113). Includes the data from start of study drug therapy up to 56 days after the last dose (Day 113) or start of the long-term period whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Drug-related SAEs and Drug-related AEs During the ST Study
Drug-related AEs are those events with a relationship to the study therapy of certain; probable; possible; or missing. Drug-related SAEs are those events with any relationship to the study therapy.
Measured: Continuously through ST period (upto Day 113). Includes the data from start of study drug therapy up to 56 days after the last dose (Day 113) or start of the long-term period whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the ST Study
An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, AEs of particular importance were associated with the use of immunomodulatory agents: infections, autoimmune disorders, malignancies, and injection reaction AEs (systemic AEs occurring within 24 hours of SC injection and local injection site reactions) were recorded.
Measured: Continuously through ST period (up to Day 113). Includes the data from start of study drug therapy up to 56 days after the last dose (Day 113) or start of the long-term period whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities (MAs) in Hematology During the ST Study: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet Count, Erythrocytes and Leukocytes
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following hematology MA definitions specify the criteria for the data presented. Hemoglobin: >3 g/dL decrease from pre-treatment (pre Rx); hematocrit: <0.75 * pre-Rx value; platelet count: <0.67 * (LLN -lower limit of normal) (or, if pre-Rx value <LLN, then <0.5 * pre-Rx value and <100,000/mm^3); leukocytes: <0.75 * LLN or >1.25 * ULN (or, if pre-Rx value <LLN, then <0.8 * pre-Rx or >(ULN -upper limit of normal) ; erythrocytes: <0.75 * pre Rx.
Measured: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Hematology During the ST Study: Neutrophils + Bands (Absolute), Lymphocytes (Absolute), Monocytes (Absolute), Basophils (Absolute) and Eosinophils (Absolute)
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following hematology MA definitions specify the criteria for the data presented. Neutrophils + bands (absolute): <1.00 * 10^3cells/microlitre (uL); lymphocytes (absolute): <0.75 * 10^3 cells/uL or >7.50 * 10^3 cells/uL; monocytes (absolute): >2.00 * 10^3 cells/uL; basophils (absolute): >0.40 * 10^3 cells/uL; eosinophils (absolute): >0.75 * 10^3 cells/uL.
Measured: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry During the ST Study: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin (Total), G-Glutamyl Transferase (G-GT) and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following serum chemistry MA definitions specify MA criteria. ALP: >2.0 * ULN (if pre-Rx > ULN, then >3 * pre-Rx); AST, ALT: > 3 * ULN (if pre-Rx > ULN, then > 4 * pre-Rx); bilirubin (total): >2 * ULN, or if pre Rx > ULN then >4 * Pre Rx; BUN : >2 * pre Rx; GGT : >2 * ULN, or if pre Rx > ULN then >3 * pre Rx.
Measured: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry During the ST Study: Creatinine, Sodium (Serum), Potassium (Serum), Chloride (Serum), Calcium (Total) and Protein (Total)
MAs= laboratory measurements marked as abnormal: creatinine: >1.5 * pre-Rx; sodium (serum):<0.95 * LLN or >1.05 * ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.95 * pre-Rx or >1.05 * ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >0.95 * pre-Rx or < ULN); potassium (serum):<0.9 * LLN or >1.1 * ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.9 * pre-Rx or > ULN; chloride (serum),protein (total):<0.9 * LLN or >1.1 8 ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.9 * pre-Rx or > ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >1.1 * pre-Rx or < LLN); calcium (total): <0.8 * LLN or >1.2 * ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.9 * pre-Rx or > ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >0.75 * pre-Rx or < ULN).
Measured: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry During the ST Study: Glucose (Fasting Serum), Albumin, Glucose (Serum), Phosphorous (Inorganic) and Uric Acid
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following serum chemistry MA definitions specify MA criteria. Glucose (fasting serum): <0.8 * LLN or >1.5 ULN (if pre-Rx <LLN, then <2.0 * pre-Rx or >ULN; albumin: <0.9 * LLN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.75 * pre-Rx); uric acid: >1.5 * ULN (if pre-Rx > ULN, then >2.0 * pre-Rx); phosphorous (inorganic):<0.75 * LLN or >1.25 * ULN (if pre-Rx < ULN, then <0.67 * pre-Rx or < ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >1.33 * re-Rx or < LLN); glucose (serum): <65 mg/dL or >220 mg/dL.
Measured: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Urinalysis During the ST Study: Protein, Glucose, Blood, Leukocyte Esterase, Red Blood Cells (RBC) and White Blood Cells (WBC)
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following definitions specify the criteria for MAs in urinalysis: protein, glucose, blood, leukocyte esterase, RBC, WBC: >= 2+ (or, if value >= 4, or if pre-Rx value = 0 or 0.5, then >= 2x or if pre-Rx value =1, then >= 3, or if pre-Rx = 2 or 3, then >= 4).
Measured: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Anti-nuclear Antibody (ANA) Category at Day 113 of the ST Study
ANA status was categorized as negative or positive corresponding to the following dilutions: less than 1:160 and greater than equal to 1:160.
Measured: Day 113.
Number of Participants With Anti-double Stranded DNA (dsDNA) Category at Day 113 of the ST Study
Anti-dsDNA antibody status was categorized as negative or positive based upon assay-specific numeric cut-off values.
Measured: Day 113.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Vital Signs During the ST Study
Vital signs measurements (including seated blood pressure, heart rate and temperature) were recorded. The investigator used his/her clinical judgment to decide whether or not abnormalities in vital signs/physical examination were clinically meaningful.
Measured: At screening and on days 1,15,29,43, 57, 85 and 113.
Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) at Each Visit During the 4 Month Treatment Period of the ST Study
Cmin serum abatacept concentration was obtained directly from the concentration-time data.
Measured: Days 1, 15, 29, 43, 57, 85 and 113.
Number of Participants With Abatacept Induced Antibody Responses Over Time During the LTE Study (ECL Method) - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
The Meso-Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than ELISA method. For the anti-abatacept antibody ECL (MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10. Antibody responses included CTLA4 and possibly immune globulin (IG), IG and/or junction region.
Measured: Days 197, 281, 365, 449, 533, 617, 729, 813, 897, 981, 1093, 1177, 1261, 1345, 1457, 1541, 1625, 1709, 1821, 1989, days post dose: 28, 56, 85, 168
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
DAS28-CRP is a continuous variable which is a composite of 4 variables: the number of tender joints out of 28, the number of swollen joints out of 28, C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams/Liter (mg/L) and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100mm. DAS 28 = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28 * sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * VAS + 0.96. Baseline was Day 1 of the ST Study; Day 113 was the end of the ST Study.
Measured: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement From Baseline in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to 1.2 reduction in DAS28-CRP score from baseline. Baseline was Day 1 of the ST Study. Day 113 was the end of the ST Study.
Measured: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants in DAS28-CRP Remission and Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in the LTE
DAS28-CRP remission was defined as DAS28-CRP less than 2.6 and LDA was defined as DAS28-CRP less than, equal to 3.2. End of ST Study was Day 113.
Measured: Day 113, Day 1345
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
HAQ-DI takes into account participant's use of aids or devices or assistance in scoring algorithm for a disability category. The questionnaire includes 20 questions assessing physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty and 3 = unable to do. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. The score is calculated by summing worst scores in each domain and dividing by the number of domains answered. Baseline was Day 1 in the ST Study and Day 113 was the last day of the ST Study.
Measured: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants With HAQ Responses in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in the LTE STudy
HAQ response was defined as an improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline in the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ DI). Baseline was Day 1 of the ST Study and Day 113 was the last day of the ST Study.
Measured: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants With Negative Status for RF up to 7 Days After Last Dose of Abatacept in the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
RF is an autoantibody that is usually present in the serum of people with rheumatoid arthritis. The cut-point value for seroconversion was 15 IU/mL (>= 15 IU/mL resulted in a positive result).
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE period up to 7 days post the last dose
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score and Physical Function (HAQ-DI) Score in the LTE Study - Abatacept Monotherapy Subgroup
Abatacept Monotherapy Subgroup consisted of participants who received SC abatacept and did not receive MTX in the ST and LTE Studies. DAS28-CRP: continuous variable which is a composite of 4 variables:number of tender joints out of 28, number of swollen joints out of 28, C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L and self assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100mm. DAS 28 = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28 * sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * VAS + 0.96. HAQ-DI includes 20 questions assessing physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty and 3 = unable to do. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. The score sums worst scores in each domain and divides by the number of domains answered. Baseline was Day 1 of Short Term Study. Day 113 was the last day of the Short Term Study.
Measured: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants in DAS 28-CRP Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) in the LTE Study - Abatacept Monotherapy Subgroup
Remission was defined as DAS 28-CRP < 2.6 and LDA was defined as DAS 28-CRP <= 3.2. End of ST Study was Day 113. Abatacept Monotherapy Subgroup was defined as those participants who received as at least 1 dose of abatacept and did not receive MTX in the ST and LTE Studies.
Measured: Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants Who Died, Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), or Discontinued Due to AEs and/or SAEs During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
AEs: any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an overdose. Drug-related AEs/SAEs are those events with a relationship to the study therapy of certain; probable; possible; or missing.
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, AEs of particular importance were associated with the use of immunomodulatory agents: infections, autoimmune disorders, malignancies, and injection reaction AEs (systemic AEs occurring within 24 hours of SC injection and local injection site reactions) were recorded.
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities (MAs) in Hematology During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following hematology MA definitions specify the criteria for the data presented. Hemoglobin: >3 g/dL decrease from pre-treatment (pre Rx); hematocrit: <0.75 * pre-Rx value; platelet count: <0.67 * (LLN -lower limit of normal) (or, if pre-Rx value <LLN, then <0.5 * pre-Rx value and <100,000/mm^3); leukocytes: <0.75 * LLN or >1.25 * ULN (or, if pre-Rx value <LLN, then <0.8 * pre-Rx or >(ULN -upper limit of normal) ; erythrocytes: <0.75 * pre Rx. Neutrophils + bands (absolute): <1.00 * 10^3cells/microlitre (uL); lymphocytes (absolute): <0.75 * 10^3 cells/uL or >7.50 * 10^3 cells/uL; monocytes (absolute): >2.00 * 10^3 cells/uL; basophils (absolute): >0.40 * 10^3 cells/uL; eosinophils (absolute): >0.75 * 10^3 cells/uL.
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry (Liver and Kidney Function) During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin (Total), G-Glutamyl Transferase (G-GT), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Creatinine MA criteria: ALP: >2.0 * ULN (if pre-Rx > ULN, then >3 * pre-Rx); AST, ALT: > 3 * ULN (if pre-Rx > ULN, then > 4 * pre-Rx); bilirubin (total): >2 * ULN, or if pre Rx > ULN then >4 * Pre Rx; BUN : >2 * pre Rx; GGT : >2 * ULN, or if pre Rx > ULN then >3 * pre Rx; creatinine: >1.5 * pre-Rx.
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry (Electrolytes, Glucose, Protein, and Metabolite) During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Sodium (serum):<0.95 * LLN or >1.05 * ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.95 * pre-Rx or >1.05 * ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >0.95 * pre-Rx or < ULN); potassium (serum):<0.9 * LLN or >1.1 * ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.9 * pre-Rx or > ULN; chloride (serum),protein (total):<0.9 * LLN or >1.1 8 ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.9 * pre-Rx or > ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >1.1 * pre-Rx or < LLN); calcium (total): <0.8 * LLN or >1.2 * ULN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.9 * pre-Rx or > ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >0.75 * pre-Rx or < ULN); phosphorous (inorganic):<0.75 * LLN or >1.25 * ULN (if pre-Rx < ULN, then <0.67 * pre-Rx or < ULN. If pre-Rx > ULN, then >1.33 * re-Rx or <LLN); glucose (serum): <65 mg/dL or >220 mg/dL; Glucose (fasting serum): <0.8 * LLN or >1.5 ULN (if pre-Rx <LLN, then <2.0 * pre-Rx or >ULN; albumin: <0.9 * LLN (if pre-Rx < LLN, then <0.75 * pre-Rx); uric acid: >1.5 * ULN (if pre-Rx > ULN, then >2.0 * pre-Rx).
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With MAs in Urinalysis During the LTE Period: Protein, Glucose, Blood, Leukocyte Esterase, Red Blood Cells (RBC) and White Blood Cells (WBC) - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
MAs are laboratory measurements marked as abnormal, per pre-defined study criteria, at any study time point. The following definitions specify the criteria for MAs in urinalysis: protein, glucose, blood, leukocyte esterase, RBC, WBC: >= 2+ (or, if value >= 4, or if pre-Rx value = 0 or 0.5, then >= 2x or if pre-Rx value =1, then >= 3, or if pre-Rx = 2 or 3, then >= 4).
Measured: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionDec 2008
- Study completionFeb 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00547521
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-173
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Nash P, Nayiager S, Genovese MC, Kivitz AJ, Oelke K, Ludivico C, Palmer W, Rodriguez C, Delaet I, Elegbe A, Corbo M. Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase III, international, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 May;65(5):718-28. doi: 10.1002/acr.21876.
PubMed 23097311
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase IIIb, Multi-center, Stratified, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Steady State Trough Level, and Safety of Subcutaneous Abatacept (BMS-188667) in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Administered With or Without Background Methotrexate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00547521
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM101-173
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jan 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate safety and immunogenicity of abatacept when used with or without methotrexate in the absence of an IV loading dose of abatacept
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept + Methotrexate (MTX) Cohort | Experimental | Drug: abatacept, Drug: Methotrexate (MTX)In the ST period, participants were administered a dose of 125 mg abatacept SC, once weekly, for 4 months. Participants were also administered a stable MTX dose of greater than or equal to 10 mg once weekly for at least 4 weeks prior to first injection of SC abatacept. |
| SC Abatacept Monotherapy Cohort | Experimental | Drug: abataceptIn the ST period, participants were administered a dose of 125 mg abatacept SC, once weekly, for 4 months. Participants did not receive MTX at screening i.e., MTX naive, or discontinued MTX due to lack of efficacy or tolerability at least 4 weeks prior to first injection of SC abatacept. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Subjects Global Disease Assessment of greater than equal to 20 mm on a visual analog scale
- Discontinue all Biologics and Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) except for methotrexate
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Received treatment with rituximab
- Subjects who have received treatment with immunoadsorbtion columns (such as Prosorba columns), mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept®), cyclosporine A or other calcineurin inhibitors, or D-Penicillamine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| abataceptAlso: BMS-188667, Orencia®solution, subcutaneous injection, 125 mg/kg, weekly, 106 days in short term; long term is open | Drug | SC Abatacept Monotherapy Cohort, Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept + Methotrexate (MTX) Cohort |
| Methotrexate (MTX)Participants who were currently receiving methotrexate at a stable dose ≥ 10 mg for at least 4 weeks | Drug | Subcutaneous (SC) Abatacept + Methotrexate (MTX) Cohort |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay [ELISA] Method) at Day 113 of the ST Study
Time frame: Day 113
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses (ELISA Method) Over Time During the ST Study
Time frame: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85,113 and 28, 56, and 85 days post last dose.
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-abatacept Responses to Abatacept (Meso-Scale Discovery [MSD] Electrochemiluminescence [ECL] Assay Method) Over Time During the ST Study
Time frame: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85,113 and 28, 56 and 85 days post last dose.
The ECL (MSD) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than ELISA method. For the anti-abatacept antibody ECL (MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10.
Immunogenicity in MTX Naive and MTX-previous Users in Cohort 1 at Day 113 of the ST Study (for ELISA Results)
Time frame: Day 113.
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Immunogenicity in MTX Naive and MTX-previous Users in Cohort 1 at Day 113 of the ST Study (for MSD Results)
Time frame: Day 113.
The ECL (MSD) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than the ELISA method. For anti-abatacept antibody ECL (MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10.
Cross Tabulations of the Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Immunogenicity Status at Baseline and Each Visit During the ST Study (for ELISA Results)
Time frame: Baseline and on day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85 and 113
ELISA is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum. For anti-abatacept antibody ELISA, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 400 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 400. A sample was considered positive in CTLA4-T antibody ELISA if it had a titer of 25 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed. The responses that were negative in initial screen were reported as seronegative with a value of < 25.
Cross Tabulations of the Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Immunogenicity Status at Baseline and Each Visit During the ST Study (for MSD Results)
Time frame: Baseline and day 15, 29, 43, 57, 85 and 113.
The ECL (MSD) assay method is a validated, sensitive assay technique used to analyze presence of abatacept-specific antibodies in serum . It is more sensitive and has a higher drug tolerance than the ELISA method. For anti-abatacept antibody ECL(MSD) assay, a sample was considered seropositive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept, or abatacept and CTLA4-T. Those responses that were not positive in the initial screen or were not confirmed to be positive based on immunodepletion were reported as seronegative and were assigned a value of < 10.
33 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score at End of 4-month (Day 113) of the ST Study
Time frame: Baseline and Month 4 (Day113).
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement at End of 4-month (Day 113) of the ST Study
Time frame: Day 113.
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (HAQ-DI) at End of the 4-month Treatment Period (Day 113) of the ST Study
Time frame: Baseline and Month 4 (Day 113).
Change From Baseline in All HAQ-DI Components at End of the 4-month Treatment Period (Day 113) of the ST Study
Time frame: Baseline and Month 4 (Day113).
Cross Tabulations of Number of Participants With Positive and Negative Status for RF at Day 113 With Baseline, in the ST Study
Time frame: Baseline and Day 113.
Number of Participants Who Died, Experienced SAEs, Experienced AEs or Who Discontinued Due to AEs During the ST Study
Time frame: Continuously through ST period (upto Day 113). Includes the data from start of study drug therapy up to 56 days after the last dose (Day 113) or start of the long-term period whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Drug-related SAEs and Drug-related AEs During the ST Study
Time frame: Continuously through ST period (upto Day 113). Includes the data from start of study drug therapy up to 56 days after the last dose (Day 113) or start of the long-term period whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the ST Study
Time frame: Continuously through ST period (up to Day 113). Includes the data from start of study drug therapy up to 56 days after the last dose (Day 113) or start of the long-term period whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities (MAs) in Hematology During the ST Study: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Platelet Count, Erythrocytes and Leukocytes
Time frame: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Hematology During the ST Study: Neutrophils + Bands (Absolute), Lymphocytes (Absolute), Monocytes (Absolute), Basophils (Absolute) and Eosinophils (Absolute)
Time frame: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry During the ST Study: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Bilirubin (Total), G-Glutamyl Transferase (G-GT) and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
Time frame: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry During the ST Study: Creatinine, Sodium (Serum), Potassium (Serum), Chloride (Serum), Calcium (Total) and Protein (Total)
Time frame: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry During the ST Study: Glucose (Fasting Serum), Albumin, Glucose (Serum), Phosphorous (Inorganic) and Uric Acid
Time frame: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With MAs in Urinalysis During the ST Study: Protein, Glucose, Blood, Leukocyte Esterase, Red Blood Cells (RBC) and White Blood Cells (WBC)
Time frame: Continuously from start of ST period up to 56 days post the last dose in the short-term period or start of the long-term period, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Anti-nuclear Antibody (ANA) Category at Day 113 of the ST Study
Time frame: Day 113.
Number of Participants With Anti-double Stranded DNA (dsDNA) Category at Day 113 of the ST Study
Time frame: Day 113.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Vital Signs During the ST Study
Time frame: At screening and on days 1,15,29,43, 57, 85 and 113.
Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) at Each Visit During the 4 Month Treatment Period of the ST Study
Time frame: Days 1, 15, 29, 43, 57, 85 and 113.
Number of Participants With Abatacept Induced Antibody Responses Over Time During the LTE Study (ECL Method) - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Days 197, 281, 365, 449, 533, 617, 729, 813, 897, 981, 1093, 1177, 1261, 1345, 1457, 1541, 1625, 1709, 1821, 1989, days post dose: 28, 56, 85, 168
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement From Baseline in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants in DAS28-CRP Remission and Number of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in the LTE
Time frame: Day 113, Day 1345
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants With HAQ Responses in the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in the LTE STudy
Time frame: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants With Negative Status for RF up to 7 Days After Last Dose of Abatacept in the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE period up to 7 days post the last dose
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Score and Physical Function (HAQ-DI) Score in the LTE Study - Abatacept Monotherapy Subgroup
Time frame: Baseline, Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants in DAS 28-CRP Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) in the LTE Study - Abatacept Monotherapy Subgroup
Time frame: Day 113, Day 1345
Number of Participants Who Died, Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), or Discontinued Due to AEs and/or SAEs During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the LTE Study - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities (MAs) in Hematology During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry (Liver and Kidney Function) During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With MAs in Serum Chemistry (Electrolytes, Glucose, Protein, and Metabolite) During the LTE Period - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Number of Participants With MAs in Urinalysis During the LTE Period: Protein, Glucose, Blood, Leukocyte Esterase, Red Blood Cells (RBC) and White Blood Cells (WBC) - All Treated Participants in LTE Study
Time frame: Continuously from start of LTE Study up to 56 days post the last dose
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23097311Nash P, Nayiager S, Genovese MC, Kivitz AJ, Oelke K, Ludivico C, Palmer W, Rodriguez C, Delaet I, Elegbe A, Corbo M. Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of abatacept administered subcutaneously with or without background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a phase III, international, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 May;65(5):718-28. doi: 10.1002/acr.21876.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingPhase 2
COVID-19 Booster and IIV Schedule in Immunocompromised Hosts
COVID 19, Influenza
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Airway, Blood and/or Urine Specimens From Subjects for Research Studies
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Smoking
Enrolling by invitation
Nutrition in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Not yet recruiting
Acceptability of a Nurse-led Telehealth Remote Self-monitoring Model of Care in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Study of YTS109 Cell in R/R Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
22 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing abatacept and Methotrexate (MTX) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 22 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in United States, Australia, Mexico, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jan 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay [ELISA] Method) at Day 113 of the ST Study (time frame: Day 113). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00547521, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2015.