AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT00548574

Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of SPD476 (Mesalazine) 2.4g and 4.8g Once Daily, With Reference to Asacol 0.8g Three Times Daily in Subjects With Acute, Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 3 study testing SPD476 is a polymeric matrix formulation that displays both delayed- and extended-release of mesalazine and Mesalazine in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Shire at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of subjects in remission after 8 weeks of treatment with SPD476, 2.4 g/day once daily vs placebo and SPD476 4.8 g/day once daily versus placebo Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis
What is being tested?
SPD476 is a polymeric matrix formulation that displays both delayed- and extended-release of mesalazine and Mesalazine
How many people
343 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
4 Dec 2003to 20 Oct 2004
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • newly diagnosed or relapsing mild to moderate UC (score of 4-10 (inclusive) on the UC-DAI scale, with a sigmoidoscopy score of => 1 and a PGA <=2) with compatible histology
  • females eligible if post--menopausal, surgically sterile or if they had a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and were on adequate contraception

Who cannot join

  • subjects with relapsing UC who were in relapse for > 6 weeks prior to baseline
  • subjects who relapsed on maintenace therapy with doses of mesalazine => 2g/day
  • subjects who had unsuccessfully treated their current relapse with steroids or a mesalazine dose of > 2g/day
  • subjects with Crohn's disease, proctitis, bleeding disorders, active peptic ulcer disease, previous colonic surgery, or those at an immediate risk of toxic megacolon or a stool culture positive for enteric pathogens
  • subjects who had used systemic or rectal steroids within the last 4 weeks, immunosuppressants wihtin the last 6 weeks or anti-inflammatory drugs on a repeat basis within 7 days prior to the baseline visit
  • subjects with hypersensitivity to salicylates and subjects with moderate/severe renal impairment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Imelda General Hospital Dept of Gastroenterology

    Bonheiden

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Centre, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of SPD476 (Mesalazine) 2.4g and 4.8g Once Daily, With Reference to ASACOL 0.8g Three Times Daily, in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis

The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of subjects in remission after 8 weeks of treatment with SPD476, 2.4 g/day once daily vs placebo and SPD476 4.8 g/day once daily versus placebo

Being tested
SPD476 is a polymeric matrix formulation that displays both delayed- and extended-release of mesalazine, Mesalazine
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SPD476 is a polymeric matrix formulation that displays both delayed- and extended-release of mesalazineDrug

    Also called LIALDA

  • MesalazineDrug

    Also called ASACOL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of subjects in remission (UC-DAI score <=1, with scores of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency and a sigmoidoscopy score reduction of 1 point or more from baseline)

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Clinical improvement as defined by a drop of => 3 points from baseline in the overall UC-DAI score

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Change from baseine in UC-DAI score, symptoms, sigmoidscopy score, and PGA

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. Clinical remission defined as subjects who scored 0 for both the total stool frequency and the total rectal bleeding score

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Treatment failure defined as unchanged, worsened missing or imcomplete UC-DAI score

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Oct 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study start4 Dec 2003
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2004
  4. Study completion20 Oct 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
343 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00548574
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPD476-302
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
23 Oct 2007
Last updated
11 Jun 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kamm MA, Sandborn WJ, Gassull M, Schreiber S, Jackowski L, Butler T, Lyne A, Stephenson D, Palmen M, Joseph RE. Once-daily, high-concentration MMX mesalamine in active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007 Jan;132(1):66-75; quiz 432-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Oct 12.

    PubMed 17241860

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing SPD476 is a polymeric matrix formulation that displays both delayed- and extended-release of mesalazine and Mesalazine in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Shire at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of subjects in remission (UC-DAI score <=1, with scores of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency and a sigmoidoscopy score reduction of 1 point or more from baseline) (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00548574, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in