Graft-vs-Host DiseasePhase 2NCT00548717
Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib as Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis After Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
A Phase 2 study testing Sirolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil and Bortezomib in people with Graft-vs-Host Disease, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This trial will test the hypothesis that the combination of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and bortezomib will be effective in preventing both acute and chronic GVHD after reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Graft-vs-Host Disease
- What is being tested?
- Sirolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil and Bortezomib
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2007to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with hematologic malignancies, who are at high risk of complications after conventional myeloablative transplantation
- Patients must have a 6/6 matched, related donor. Matching at HLA Class II will be based on PCR of sequence specific primers (SSP). Among family member transplants, serologic matching at Class I is sufficient
- Patient age greater than 18
- Performance status 0-2
- Life expectancy of > 100 days without transplantation
- Written informed consent must be obtained in all cases from the patient
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Prior Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from any donor
- Evidence of HIV infection or active Hepatitis B or C infection
- Heart failure uncontrolled by medications
- Total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dl that is due to hepatocellular dysfunction
- AST > 90
Show all 9Show fewer
- Cholesterol > 300 mg/dl or Triglycerides > 400 mg/dl while adequately treated
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection
- Requirement for voriconazole at the time of hospital admission
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
This trial will test the hypothesis that the combination of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and bortezomib will be effective in preventing both acute and chronic GVHD after reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Read the detailed description
The combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate is standard therapy for prevention of GVHD, however, our recent experience has demonstrated that the substitution of sirolimus for methotrexate provides superior GVHD control with reduced transplant-related toxicity. One limitation to the use of calcineurin inhibitors in GVHD prevention is the disruption in Treg function and proliferation. Based on our evolving understanding of the role of Treg in the development of chronic GVHD, we propose a GVHD prophylactic regimen that is effective in prevention of acute GVHD, but by virtue of the maintenance of Treg activity may be able to prevent chronic GVHD. We hypothesize that the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for tacrolimus as well as the addition of bortezomib may provide similar protection against acute GVHD and prevent chronic GVHD while minimizing renal toxicity after transplantation.
- Conditions
- Graft-vs-Host Disease
- Being tested
- Sirolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil, Bortezomib
- Keywords
- GVHD, Stem cell transplantation, Sirolimus
- Medical subject headings
- Graft vs Host Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SirolimusDrug
Also called Rapamycin
Also called Cellcept
BortezomibDrug
Also called Velcade
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Siro/MMF | Experimental | Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as GVHD Prophylaxis Sirolimus (Rapamycin); Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Receives: Drug: Sirolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil |
| Siro/MMF/Bort | Experimental | Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Bortezomib as GVHD Prophylaxis Sirolimus (Rapamycin); Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Bortezomib (Velcade) *added with study reopening in 2012 Receives: Drug: Sirolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil; Drug: Bortezomib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To Determine the Rate of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD When Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil or Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib is Used for GVHD Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Measured: 150 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Donor Stem Cell Engraftment, Including Donor-host Hematopoietic Chimerism Studies Post Transplant
Engraftment of donor cells by week 4 after transplantation. Assessment of donor stem cell engraftment will include donor-host hematopoietic chimerism analyses at 4 weeks and every 3 months after transplantation. Chimerism measured from peripheral blood or from bone marrow.
Measured: 30 days
The Rate of Renal Insufficiency
Renal function will be measured weekly after transplant for 4 weeks, at 8 weeks and then at 3 month intervals from transplantation. Sentinel renal events such as the occurrence of thrombotic microangiopathy will be noted.
The rationale for the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for tacrolimus is to continue to prevent acute GVHD, but minimize renal toxicity after transplantation. We will thus monitor renal toxicity closely in this study. In our previous experience, the rate of grade III-V renal toxicity by day 100 after transplantation was about 10%. Here, grade III is defined as a creatinine level between 3.1 to 6 times the normal level, grade IV is defined as a creatinine level 6 times or more the normal level, and grade V is defined as a fatality due to renal toxicity.
Measured: 1 year
To Correlate the Serum Concentrations of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Its Metabolites With Acute GVHD Incidence
This outcome measure was presented as a comparison between incidence of Grade 0-I aGVHD and Grade II-IV aGVHD across 5 time points (Weeks 1,2,3,8, and 12).
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of 100 Day Mortality
Measured: 100 days
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
Chronic GVHD will be graded according to the modified Seattle criteria. Chronic GVHD divided into limited and extensive and evaluated across the following systems: skin, cutaneous structures, liver, mouth, eyes, esophagus, intestines, lung, musculoskeletal, serous, nervous, urologic, vagina, hematopoietic, and immune.
Localized skin involvement with or without hepatic dysfunction is classified as limited disease.
Generalized skin involvement or limited disease plus eye involvement, oral involvement, hepatic dysfunction with abnormal liver histology, or involvement of any other target organ was classified as extensive disease.
Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.
2003;9:215-33.
Measured: 1 year
Overall Survival
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2007
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Why it stopped: First two patients enrolled after trial reopened, developed grade III-IV acute GVHD and subsequently passed away.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Graft-vs-Host DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer, PDL BioPharma, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Corey S. Cutler, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Investigators
- Corey Cutler, MD, Principal investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00548717
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DFCI 07-197
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00548717
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DFCI 07-197
- Conditions
- Graft-vs-Host Disease
- Keywords
- GVHD, Stem cell transplantation, Sirolimus
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: First two patients enrolled after trial reopened, developed grade III-IV acute GVHD and subsequently passed away.
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer, PDL BioPharma, Inc.
- Study start
- Oct 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial will test the hypothesis that the combination of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and bortezomib will be effective in preventing both acute and chronic GVHD after reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Detailed description
The combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate is standard therapy for prevention of GVHD, however, our recent experience has demonstrated that the substitution of sirolimus for methotrexate provides superior GVHD control with reduced transplant-related toxicity. One limitation to the use of calcineurin inhibitors in GVHD prevention is the disruption in Treg function and proliferation. Based on our evolving understanding of the role of Treg in the development of chronic GVHD, we propose a GVHD prophylactic regimen that is effective in prevention of acute GVHD, but by virtue of the maintenance of Treg activity may be able to prevent chronic GVHD. We hypothesize that the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for tacrolimus as well as the addition of bortezomib may provide similar protection against acute GVHD and prevent chronic GVHD while minimizing renal toxicity after transplantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Siro/MMF | Experimental | Drug: Sirolimus, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetilSirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as GVHD Prophylaxis Sirolimus (Rapamycin); Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) |
| Siro/MMF/Bort | Experimental | Drug: Sirolimus, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil, Drug: BortezomibSirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Bortezomib as GVHD Prophylaxis Sirolimus (Rapamycin); Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Bortezomib (Velcade) *added with study reopening in 2012 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with hematologic malignancies, who are at high risk of complications after conventional myeloablative transplantation
- Patients must have a 6/6 matched, related donor. Matching at HLA Class II will be based on PCR of sequence specific primers (SSP). Among family member transplants, serologic matching at Class I is sufficient
- Patient age greater than 18
- Performance status 0-2
- Life expectancy of > 100 days without transplantation
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Prior Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from any donor
- Evidence of HIV infection or active Hepatitis B or C infection
- Heart failure uncontrolled by medications
- Total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dl that is due to hepatocellular dysfunction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SirolimusAlso: Rapamycin | Drug | Siro/MMF, Siro/MMF/Bort |
| Mycophenolate mofetilAlso: Cellcept | Drug | Siro/MMF, Siro/MMF/Bort |
| BortezomibAlso: Velcade | Drug | Siro/MMF/Bort |
Primary outcome
To Determine the Rate of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD When Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil or Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib is Used for GVHD Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Time frame: 150 days
6 secondary outcomes
Donor Stem Cell Engraftment, Including Donor-host Hematopoietic Chimerism Studies Post Transplant
Time frame: 30 days
The Rate of Renal Insufficiency
Time frame: 1 year
To Correlate the Serum Concentrations of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Its Metabolites With Acute GVHD Incidence
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of 100 Day Mortality
Time frame: 100 days
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
Time frame: 1 year
Overall Survival
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Graft-vs-Host Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
De-escalated Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Ruxolitinib for Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis
Graft-versus-host Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
HMCT/CT2401: Abatacept GVHD Prophylaxis Following Omidubicel HCT
Hematologic Malignancy
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Lowest Effective Dose of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Combination With Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of Pacritinib, A JAK2/IRAK1/CSF1R Inhibitor, in Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Graft vs Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Corey Cutler, MD principal investigator
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sirolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil and Bortezomib in people with Graft-vs-Host Disease, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To Determine the Rate of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD When Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil or Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib is Used for GVHD Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies (time frame: 150 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2014.