Coronary ArteriosclerosisNCT00549796
Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people with Coronary Arteriosclerosis and Angina Pectoris, run by Johns Hopkins University at 60 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Angina Pectoris
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18,876 participants
- Where
- 60 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2006to Feb 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pre-catheterization:
- Must be undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization for suspected CAD
- Be at least 18 years of age
- Must not be pregnant (negative pregnancy test) or must not be of childbearing potential must be able to give informed consent.
- Post-catheterization:
- Coronary artery disease judged to be clinically and angiographically significant
- Ability to perform PCI with equipment available at the local site
- Procedure risk judged to be not high (see below)
Who cannot join
- Pre-catheterization:
- Inability to give informed consent
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- Pregnancy
- Post-catheterization:
- High likelihood of requiring a device not available at the hospitals without SOS
Show all 13Show fewer
- No need for PCI
- Need for coronary artery bypass surgery
- High procedural risk (see below)
- High procedural risk criteria are:
- PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery
- PCI of left circulation lesion in the presence of critical (>70%) unprotected left main coronary artery lesion
- Poor left ventricular function (EF< 20%) and need to perform PCI in a vessel supplying significant myocardium
Trial locations and contacts
60 sites in 1 country.
60 sites in 1 country
United States60 sites
Sacred Heart Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania
Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland
Wellstar Cobb Hospital
Austell, Georgia
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland
St. Agnes Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland
Bayonne Medical Center
Bayonne, New Jersey, 07002
Clara Maas Medical Center
Belleville, New Jersey
Southeast Georgia Health System
Brunswick, Georgia
Community Health and Wellness Center
Bryan, Ohio, 43506
Tanner Medical Center
Carrollton, Georgia
Chambersburg Hospital
Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
University Hospitals Case Medical Center / Geauga Medical Center
Chardon, Ohio
Southern Maryland Hospital Center
Clinton, Maryland
University Hospital East Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio
Hamilton Medical Center
Dalton, Georgia, 30722
Southview Medical Center
Dayton, Ohio
Fairview Park Hospital
Dublin, Georgia, 31021
JFK Medical Center
Edison, New Jersey
Trinitas Hospital
Elizabeth, New Jersey
Little Company of Mary Hospital
Evergreen Park, Illinois
Frederick Memorial Hospital
Frederick, Maryland
Baltimore Washington Medical Center
Glen Burnie, Maryland
Spalding Regional Medical Center
Griffin, Georgia
Meritus Medical Center
Hagerstown, Maryland
Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center
Hamilton, New Jersey
Fort Hamilton Hospital
Hamilton, Ohio
Advocate South Suburban Hospital
Hazel Crest, Illinois, 60429
Crestwood Medical Center
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Kingwood Medical Center
Kingwood, Texas
Armstrong County Memorial Hospital
Kittanning, Pennsylvania
West Georgia Health
La Grange, Georgia
Evangelical Community Hospital
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania
Monmouth Medical Center
Long Branch, New Jersey
Marietta Memorial Hospital
Marietta, Ohio
Virtua-West Jersey Hospital Marlton
Marlton, New Jersey
UPMC McKeesport
McKeesport, Pennsylvania
Meadville Medical Center
Meadville, Pennsylvania
Monongahela Valley Hospital
Monongahela, Pennsylvania
Knox Community Hospital
Mount Vernon, Ohio
Licking Memorial Hospital
Newark, Ohio
Raritan Bay Medical Center
Perth Amboy, New Jersey
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital
Portland, Oregon
Southern Ohio Medical Center
Portsmouth, Ohio
Duke Health Raleigh Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Riverview Medical Center
Red Bank, New Jersey
Southern Regional Medical Center
Riverdale, Georgia
Shady Grove Adventist Hospital
Rockville, Maryland
Rowan Regional Medical Center
Salisbury, North Carolina
Holy Cross Hospital
Silver Spring, Maryland
Somerset Medical Center
Somerville, New Jersey
Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center
South Plainfield, New Jersey
Overlook Medical Center
Summit, New Jersey
Holy Name Hospital
Teaneck, New Jersey
Mainland Medical Center
Texas City, Texas
Archbold Memorial Hospital
Thomasville, Georgia, 31792
Tift Regional Medical Center
Tifton, Georgia
Community Medical Center
Toms River, New Jersey
West Chester Hospital
West Chester, Pennsylvania
Mt. Carmel St. Ann's Hospital
Westerville, Ohio
Memorial Hospital
York, Pennsylvania
About this study
Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. The reason for this is that there is a risk that angioplasty can cause injury to the heart artery that might require open heart surgery to fix. Open heart surgery is a backup in case it is needed. The risk that open heart surgery will be needed is very small. Nevertheless, without more research, many state Departments of Health and all national heart organizations do not want to change the requirement for having on-site open heart surgery wherever angioplasty is performed. Some States already allow this; and European heart organizations already allow it, as well.
This study is designed to determine whether the safety and benefits of angioplasty are the same at hospitals that perform angioplasty either with or without open heart surgery backup.
Read more
Patient who enter the study have a heart catheterization at a hospital without a heart surgery program. If they need angioplasty, then they are randomized to either stay at the hospital without heart surgery for their angioplasty or to be transferred for the procedure to a hospital with heart surgery. For every four patients, three stay at the hospital without heart surgery and one is transferred.
The study is designed to show that there is no detectable difference between the safety and benefits of the procedure at the two types of hospital (with and without heart surgery). The cost of the procedure at the two hospital types is also compared.
- Conditions
- Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Angina Pectoris
- Being tested
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, angioplasty, stent, percutaneous coronary intervention, on-site cardiac surgery, randomized trial
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Angina Pectoris
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Other
Patients undergo routine, clinically indicated PCI
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | PCI performed at a hospital with co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery Receives: Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) |
| 2 | Other | PCI performed at a hospitals without co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery Receives: Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality
Measured: 6 weeks
MACE = death + MI + TVR
Measured: 9 Months
Secondary outcomes (18)
emergency CABG
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
myocardial infarction
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
any subsequent revascularization (ASR)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
heart failure and class
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angina and class
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
stroke
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
composite adverse endpoint (MACE)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
MACE = death + MI + TVR
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
MACE = death + MI + ASR
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angiographic (end-procedure) complications (embolization, dissection, no reflow, etc)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angiographic (procedural) success (<20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
completeness of revascularization
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
percent of patients with complete or partial revascularization
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
bleeding (non-CABG transfusion, vascular repair)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
length of stay
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
total direct medical cost
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
major resource consumption patterns (hospital and ICU days, surgeries, hospitalizations)
Measured: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2006
- Primary completionFeb 2012
- Study completionFeb 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary ArteriosclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18,876 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Duke University, Maryland Medical Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thomas Aversano, Johns Hopkins University
- Investigators
- Thomas Aversano, MD, Study director, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00549796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NA_000230
- Other IDs
- C-PORT E Trial
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hiremath PG, Aversano T, Spertus JA, Lemmon CC, Naiman DQ, Czarny MJ. Sex Differences in Health Status and Clinical Outcomes After Nonprimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011308. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011308. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
PubMed 35067071Aversano T, Lemmon CC, Liu L; Atlantic CPORT Investigators. Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1792-802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114540. Epub 2012 Mar 25.
PubMed 22443460
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Comparison Angioplasty Outcomes at Hospitals With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00549796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NA_000230
- Conditions
- Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Angina Pectoris
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, angioplasty, stent, percutaneous coronary intervention, on-site cardiac surgery, randomized trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18,876 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Duke University, Maryland Medical Research Institute
- Study start
- Apr 2006
- Primary completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Angioplasty is a procedure which opens blocked heart arteries using balloons and/or stents. Most U.S. states and all national heart organizations require that angioplasty be done only at hospitals that can also perform open heart surgery. The reason for this is that there is a risk that angioplasty can cause injury to the heart artery that might require open heart surgery to fix. Open heart surgery is a backup in case it is needed. The risk that open heart surgery will be needed is very small. Nevertheless, without more research, many state Departments of Health and all national heart organizations do not want to change the requirement for having on-site open heart surgery wherever angioplasty is performed. Some States already allow this; and European heart organizations already allow it, as well.
This study is designed to determine whether the safety and benefits of angioplasty are the same at hospitals that perform angioplasty either with or without open heart surgery backup.
Patient who enter the study have a heart catheterization at a hospital without a heart surgery program. If they need angioplasty, then they are randomized to either stay at the hospital without heart surgery for their angioplasty or to be transferred for the procedure to a hospital with heart surgery. For every four patients, three stay at the hospital without heart surgery and one is transferred.
The study is designed to show that there is no detectable difference between the safety and benefits of the procedure at the two types of hospital (with and without heart surgery). The cost of the procedure at the two hospital types is also compared.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)PCI performed at a hospital with co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery |
| 2 | Other | Other: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)PCI performed at a hospitals without co-located (on-site) cardiac surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Must be undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization for suspected CAD
- Be at least 18 years of age
- Must not be pregnant (negative pregnancy test) or must not be of childbearing potential must be able to give informed consent.
- Coronary artery disease judged to be clinically and angiographically significant
- Ability to perform PCI with equipment available at the local site
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Inability to give informed consent
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- Pregnancy
- High likelihood of requiring a device not available at the hospitals without SOS
- No need for PCI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Patients undergo routine, clinically indicated PCI | Other | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
Mortality
Time frame: 6 weeks
MACE = death + MI + TVR
Time frame: 9 Months
18 secondary outcomes
emergency CABG
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
myocardial infarction
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
any subsequent revascularization (ASR)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
heart failure and class
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angina and class
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
stroke
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
composite adverse endpoint (MACE)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
MACE = death + MI + TVR
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
MACE = death + MI + ASR
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angiographic (end-procedure) complications (embolization, dissection, no reflow, etc)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
angiographic (procedural) success (<20% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
completeness of revascularization
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
percent of patients with complete or partial revascularization
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
bleeding (non-CABG transfusion, vascular repair)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
length of stay
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
total direct medical cost
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
major resource consumption patterns (hospital and ICU days, surgeries, hospitalizations)
Time frame: hosp DC, 6 wks, 3, 6 and 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35067071Hiremath PG, Aversano T, Spertus JA, Lemmon CC, Naiman DQ, Czarny MJ. Sex Differences in Health Status and Clinical Outcomes After Nonprimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011308. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011308. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22443460Aversano T, Lemmon CC, Liu L; Atlantic CPORT Investigators. Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1792-802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114540. Epub 2012 Mar 25.
Related trials for Coronary Arteriosclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Aversano, MD study director
Johns Hopkins University
60 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in people with Coronary Arteriosclerosis and Angina Pectoris, run by Johns Hopkins University at 60 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 60 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00549796, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2014.