LymphomaPhase 2NCT00553501
Epratuzumab and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing epratuzumab and rituximab in people with Lymphoma, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 43 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as epratuzumab and rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- epratuzumab and rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 43 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2008to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically* confirmed follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)
- Previously untreated disease
- WHO classification grade 1, 2, or 3a (> 15 centroblasts per high power field with centrocytes present) that is stage III, IV, or bulky (i.e., single mass ≥ 7 cm in any unidimensional measurement) stage II disease NOTE: *Bone marrow biopsies as the sole means of diagnosis are not acceptable, but they may be submitted in conjunction with nodal biopsies; fine-needle aspirates are not acceptable for diagnosis
- Confirmed CD20 antigen expression by flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry
- Measurable disease by physical examination or imaging studies
- Any tumor mass > 1 cm is acceptable
- No nonmeasurable disease only, including any of the following:
- Bone lesions
- Ascites
- Pleural/pericardial effusion
- Lymphangitis cutis/pulmonis
- Bone marrow (involvement by NHL should be noted)
- No known CNS involvement by lymphoma
- Required to participate in companion FDG-PET imaging study CALGB 580701
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status ≤ 2
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000/μL
- Platelet count ≥ 50,000/μL
- Patients with HIV infection are eligible provided they meet the following criteria:
- No evidence of coinfection with hepatitis B or C
- CD4+ cell count ≥ 400/mm^3
- No evidence of resistant strains of HIV
- If not on anti-HIV therapy, HIV viral load < 10,000 copies HIV RNA/mL
- If on anti-HIV therapy, HIV viral load < 50 copies HIV RNA/mL
- No history of AIDS-defining conditions
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 3 months after completion of study therapy
- No known Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA)-positivity
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior therapy for NHL including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy (e.g., monoclonal antibody-based therapy)
- More than 2 weeks since prior corticosteroids except for maintenance therapy for non-malignant disease
- No concurrent dexamethasone or other steroids as antiemetics except for the following circumstances:
- Treatment of acute infusion reactions according to institutional procedures
- No concurrent hormonal therapy except steroids for adrenal failure OR hormones for non-disease-related conditions (e.g., insulin for diabetes)
- No other concurrent chemotherapeutic agents
Trial locations and contacts
43 sites in 1 country.
43 sites in 1 country
United States43 sites
Mountainview Medical
Berlin Corners, Vermont, 05602
Hematology Oncology Associates of the Quad Cities
Bettendorf, Iowa, 52722
Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Fletcher Allen Health Care - University Health Center Campus
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
University of Illinois Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-7243
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Ellis Fischel Cancer Center at University of Missouri - Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, 65203
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
New Hampshire Oncology - Hematology, PA at Payson Center for Cancer Care
Concord, New Hampshire, 03301
Danville Regional Medical Center
Danville, Virginia, 24541
CCOP - Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York
East Syracuse, New York, 13057
Elkhart General Hospital
Elkhart, Indiana, 46515
Union Hospital Cancer Program at Union Hospital
Elkton MD, Maryland, 21921
Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845
Wayne Memorial Hospital, Incorporated
Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27534
New Hampshire Oncology - Hematology, PA - Hooksett
Hooksett, New Hampshire, 03106
St. Mary's Regional Cancer Center at St. Mary's Medical Center
Huntington, West Virginia, 25702
Kinston Medical Specialists
Kinston, North Carolina, 28501
Howard Community Hospital
Kokomo, Indiana, 46904
Center for Cancer Therapy at LaPorte Hospital and Health Services
La Porte, Indiana, 46350
Lakes Region General Hospital
Laconia, New Hampshire, 03246
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002
Tunnell Cancer Center at Beebe Medical Center
Lewes, Delaware, 19958
Ravenel Oncology Center at Memorial Hospital of Martinsville and Henry County
Martinsville, Virginia, 24115
Middlesex Hospital Cancer Center
Middletown, Connecticut, 06457
New York Weill Cornell Cancer Center at Cornell University
New York, New York, 10021
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298-0037
Lakeland Regional Cancer Care Center - St. Joseph
Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085
Oncology Care Associates, PLLC
Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085
Kaiser Permanente Medical Office -Vandever Medical Office
San Diego, California, 92120
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
CCOP - Northern Indiana CR Consortium
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
Memorial Hospital of South Bend
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center
South Bend, Indiana, 46617
South Bend Clinic
South Bend, Indiana, 46617
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Iredell Memorial Hospital
Statesville, North Carolina, 28677
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at Cooper - Voorhees
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20307-5001
Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1096
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Trial of Extended Induction Epratuzumab (Anti-CD22 Monoclonal Antibody) (CALGB IND #XXXXX) Plus Rituximab in Previously Untreated Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as epratuzumab and rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Giving epratuzumab and rituximab together may be more effective in treating follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving epratuzumab together with rituximab works in treating patients with previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine the response rate (overall and complete) after extended induction therapy comprising epratuzumab and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CD20+ follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
- To determine the time to progression after extended induction therapy comprising epratuzumab and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CD20+ follicular NHL.
Secondary
- To determine the toxicity profile of epratuzumab and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CD20+ follicular NHL.
- To establish whether the therapeutic effects of the combination of epratuzumab and rituximab are sufficiently promising to warrant evaluation in a subsequent randomized trial (in comparison to rituximab alone).
- To determine the relationship between the change in fludeoxyglucose F 18 uptake early after epratuzumab and rituximab treatment with response rate and time to progression.
OUTLINE:
- Induction therapy (month 1): Patients receive epratuzumab IV over 5-30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and rituximab IV on days 3, 8, 15, and 22 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Extended induction therapy (months 3, 5, 7, and 9): Patients receive epratuzumab IV over 5-30 minutes followed by rituximab IV in weeks 12, 20, 28, and 36 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients receive fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) subcutaneously and undergo positron emission tomography at baseline and after induction therapy to assess the degree of FDG uptake.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years then every 6 months for up to 10 years.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- epratuzumab, rituximab
- Keywords
- stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
epratuzumabBiological
Days 1, 8, 15, 22 and weeks 12, 20, 28, \& 36: 360mg/sq m IV
rituximabBiological
Day 3, 8, 15, 22 and weeks 12, 20, 28, \& 36: 375mg/sq m IV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Epratuzumab Plus Rituximab | Experimental | Induction Therapy (Month 1): Epratuzumab 360 mg/m^2 by IV days 1, 8, 15 \& 22; Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 by IV day 3, 8, 15 \& 22
Extended Induction (Weeks 12, 20, 28 \& 36) Epratuzumab 360 mg/m^2 by IV weeks 12, 20, 28 \& 36; Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 by IV weeks 12, 20, 28 \& 36 Receives: Biological: epratuzumab; Biological: rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Overall Response
Overall response is defined as achievement of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as defined by the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma.
CR: complete disappearance of all detectable disease PR: >=50% decrease in the sum of the product of diameters of indicator lesions
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Progression Free Survival
Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from registration to progression or death of any cause. Progression free and alive patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median PFS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.
Measured: Duration of study (up to 10 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2008
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barbara Grant, MD, Study chair, University of Vermont
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00553501
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CALGB-50701
- Other IDs
- U10CA031946, CALGB-50701, CDR0000572604
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 6 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Grant BW, Jung SH, Johnson JL, Kostakoglu L, Hsi E, Byrd JC, Jones J, Leonard JP, Martin SE, Cheson BD. A phase 2 trial of extended induction epratuzumab and rituximab for previously untreated follicular lymphoma: CALGB 50701. Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3797-804. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28299. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PubMed 23922187Rutherford SC, Yin J, Pederson L, Perez Burbano G, LaPlant B, Shadman M, Li H, LeBlanc ML, Kenkre VP, Hong F, Blum KA, Dockter T, Martin P, Jung SH, Grant B, Rosenbaum C, Ujjani C, Barr PM, Unger JM, Cheson BD, Bartlett NL, Kahl B, Friedberg JW, Mandrekar SJ, Leonard JP. Relevance of Bone Marrow Biopsies for Response Assessment in US National Cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network Follicular Lymphoma Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):336-342. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02301. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
PubMed 35787017Lansigan F, Barak I, Pitcher B, Jung SH, Cheson BD, Czuczman M, Martin P, Hsi E, Schoder H, Smith S, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, Blum KA. The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials. Cancer Med. 2019 Jan;8(1):165-173. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1918. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
PubMed 30575311
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Trial of Extended Induction Epratuzumab (Anti-CD22 Monoclonal Antibody) (CALGB IND #XXXXX) Plus Rituximab in Previously Untreated Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00553501
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALGB-50701
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2008
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jul 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as epratuzumab and rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Giving epratuzumab and rituximab together may be more effective in treating follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving epratuzumab together with rituximab works in treating patients with previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To determine the response rate (overall and complete) after extended induction therapy comprising epratuzumab and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CD20+ follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
- To determine the time to progression after extended induction therapy comprising epratuzumab and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CD20+ follicular NHL.
Secondary
- To determine the toxicity profile of epratuzumab and rituximab in patients with previously untreated CD20+ follicular NHL.
- To establish whether the therapeutic effects of the combination of epratuzumab and rituximab are sufficiently promising to warrant evaluation in a subsequent randomized trial (in comparison to rituximab alone).
- To determine the relationship between the change in fludeoxyglucose F 18 uptake early after epratuzumab and rituximab treatment with response rate and time to progression.
OUTLINE:
- Induction therapy (month 1): Patients receive epratuzumab IV over 5-30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and rituximab IV on days 3, 8, 15, and 22 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Extended induction therapy (months 3, 5, 7, and 9): Patients receive epratuzumab IV over 5-30 minutes followed by rituximab IV in weeks 12, 20, 28, and 36 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients receive fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) subcutaneously and undergo positron emission tomography at baseline and after induction therapy to assess the degree of FDG uptake.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years then every 6 months for up to 10 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Epratuzumab Plus Rituximab | Experimental | Biological: epratuzumab, Biological: rituximabInduction Therapy (Month 1): Epratuzumab 360 mg/m^2 by IV days 1, 8, 15 \& 22; Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 by IV day 3, 8, 15 \& 22 Extended Induction (Weeks 12, 20, 28 \& 36) Epratuzumab 360 mg/m^2 by IV weeks 12, 20, 28 \& 36; Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 by IV weeks 12, 20, 28 \& 36 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| epratuzumabDays 1, 8, 15, 22 and weeks 12, 20, 28, \& 36: 360mg/sq m IV | Biological | Epratuzumab Plus Rituximab |
| rituximabDay 3, 8, 15, 22 and weeks 12, 20, 28, \& 36: 375mg/sq m IV | Biological | Epratuzumab Plus Rituximab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Overall Response
Time frame: 12 months
Overall response is defined as achievement of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as defined by the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. CR: complete disappearance of all detectable disease PR: >=50% decrease in the sum of the product of diameters of indicator lesions
1 secondary outcome
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Duration of study (up to 10 years)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jul 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 23922187Grant BW, Jung SH, Johnson JL, Kostakoglu L, Hsi E, Byrd JC, Jones J, Leonard JP, Martin SE, Cheson BD. A phase 2 trial of extended induction epratuzumab and rituximab for previously untreated follicular lymphoma: CALGB 50701. Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3797-804. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28299. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35787017Rutherford SC, Yin J, Pederson L, Perez Burbano G, LaPlant B, Shadman M, Li H, LeBlanc ML, Kenkre VP, Hong F, Blum KA, Dockter T, Martin P, Jung SH, Grant B, Rosenbaum C, Ujjani C, Barr PM, Unger JM, Cheson BD, Bartlett NL, Kahl B, Friedberg JW, Mandrekar SJ, Leonard JP. Relevance of Bone Marrow Biopsies for Response Assessment in US National Cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network Follicular Lymphoma Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):336-342. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02301. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30575311Lansigan F, Barak I, Pitcher B, Jung SH, Cheson BD, Czuczman M, Martin P, Hsi E, Schoder H, Smith S, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, Blum KA. The prognostic significance of PFS24 in follicular lymphoma following firstline immunotherapy: A combined analysis of 3 CALGB trials. Cancer Med. 2019 Jan;8(1):165-173. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1918. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barbara Grant, MD study chair
University of Vermont
43 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing epratuzumab and rituximab in people with Lymphoma, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 43 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 43 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jul 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Overall Response (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00553501, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2016.