IgA NephropathyPhase 3STOP-IgANNCT00554502
Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment Of Progressive IgA Nephropathy
A Phase 3 study testing supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin and supportive and immunosuppressive therapy in people with IgA Nephropathy, run by RWTH Aachen University at 34 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Evaluation of the efficacy of an immunosuppressive therapy added to a comprehensive supportive therapy to induce a clinical remission in patients at risk for progressive IgAN Investigation of differences between the treatments regarding the number of patients loosing more than 15 ml/min of GFR. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- IgA Nephropathy
- What is being tested?
- supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin and supportive and immunosuppressive therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients from 18-70 years with histologically proven primary IgAN with typical mesangioproliferative features. Diagnosis has to be made by a neuropathologist.
- Proteinuria above 0.75 g/day within 12 weeks prior to or at the first visit in the run-in phase (month -6)and presence of at least one further risk factor for the development of end stage renal disease
- arterial hypertension, defined as ambulatory blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or the use of antihypertensive medication or
- impaired renal function, defined as creatinine clearance or estimated GFR <90 ml/min.
Who cannot join
- Known allergy or intolerance to study medication (except in case of ACE-inhibitor, in which case a change to an angiotensin receptor blocker is possible).
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding and women without sufficient contraception.
- Any prior immunosuppressive therapy.
- Variants of primary IgAN (e.g. rapidly progressive IgAN with crescents in >50% of glomeruli or minimal change GN with glomerular IgA deposits).
- Significant liver dysfunction (more than three fold increased GPT compared to norm)
- Contraindication for immunosuppressive therapy, like
Show all 21Show fewer
- acute or chronic infectious disease incl. hepatitis and HIV positive patients
- any malignancy
- leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or known allergy against prednisolone, cyclophosphamide or azathioprine
- active intestinal bleeding, active gastric or duodenal ulcer
- Need of permanent immunosuppression, (e.g. transplanted patients, steroid-dependent inflammatory diseases)
- Secondary IgAN or diseases associated with glomerular deposits of IgA.
- Additional other chronic renal disease.
- Creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min (mean of 3 measurements).
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study
- Subject unlikely to comply with protocol, e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikelihood of completing the study
- Participation in a parallel clinical trial or participation in another clinical trial within the last 3 months.
- Subjects who are in any state of dependency to the sponsor or the investigators.
- Employees of the sponsor or the investigators.
- Subjects who have been committed to an institution by legal or regulatory order.
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 1 country.
34 sites in 1 country
Germany34 sites
Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Aachen
Aachen
2. Medizinische Klinik, Nephrologie, Klinikum Augsburg
Augsburg
Campus Charité Mitte, Medizinische Klinik - Schwerpunkt Nephrologie, Centrum 13
Berlin
Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik / Nephrologie
Berlin
Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Nephrologie Charité CCB
Berlin
St. Joseph Krankenhaus Medizinische Klinik II
Berlin
Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Medizinische Klinik III
Bremen
Uniklinik Köln, Klinik IV für Innere Medizin, Nephrologie und Allgemeine Innere Medizin
Cologne
Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Medizinische Klinik III, Bereich Nephrologie
Dresden
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Nephrologie
Düsseldorf
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik IV
Erlangen
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten
Essen
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Innere Medizin IV
Freiburg im Breisgau
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II
Giessen
Universitätsklinikum Göttingen, Zentrum Innere Medizin, Abteilung für Nephrologie und Rheumatologie
Göttingen
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 3. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik
Hamburg
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Abteilung Nephrologie
Hanover
Med. Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Nierenzentrum Heidelberg, Sektion Nephrologie
Heidelberg
Universitätsklinikum Jena, Medizinische Klinik III
Jena
Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH, Abteilung für Nephrologie und Transplantationsmedizin
Kaiserslautern
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Nephrologie, Zentrum für Innere Medizin
Magdeburg
Dialysezentrum am Brand
Mainz
Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, V. Medizinische Klinik
Mannheim
Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Nephrologie
Marburg
KfH Nierenzentrum
München
Klinikum der LMU, Nephrologisches Zentrum
München
Klinikum rechts der Isar, Medizinische Klinik II, Abteilung für Nephrologie
München
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik D
Münster
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II
Regensburg
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Abteilung Innere Medizin II
Trier
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Medizinische Klinik IV, Sektion für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten
Tübingen
Dialyse-Zentrum Dres.med. PD H. Reichel, Th. Weinreich u. C.
Villingen-Schwenningen
Zentrum für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten
Wiesbaden
Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Würzburg
About this study
- Evaluation of the efficacy of an immunosuppressive therapy added to a comprehensive supportive therapy to induce a clinical remission in patients at risk for progressive IgAN
- Investigation of differences between the treatments regarding the number of patients loosing more than 15 ml/min of GFR.
Read the detailed description
The best treatment of glomerular diseases of the kidney is currently not well defined. This study aims to answer if in patients with IgA nephropathy, the most common type of glomerulonephritis an immunosuppressive treatment (with the use of steroids and chemotherapy) added to a supportive treatment is more effective than a supportive treatment alone (with the use of drugs lowering the blood pressure and the urinary protein loss).
- Conditions
- IgA Nephropathy
- Being tested
- supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin, supportive and immunosuppressive therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Glomerulonephritis, IGA
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / StatinDrug
- Antihypertensive therapy with a target blood pressure below 125/75 mmHg (following current clinical guidelines).
- ACE-inhibitors (ARB when an ACE-inhibitor is not tolerated)
- Other antihypertensive medications depending on the clinical decision and following current guidelines.
- Statin therapy
- Dietary counseling for a low-sodium diet and, if GFR is below 60 ml/min, for a protein intake of 0.8 g/kg/day.
supportive and immunosuppressive therapyDrug
- supportive therapy as outlined above
- depending on GFR:
- methylprednisolone and prednisolone
- cyclophosphamide and prednisolone; after 3 months azathioprine with prednisolone
- Concomitant medication with the immunosuppressive treatment following current clinical practice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin |
| B | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: supportive and immunosuppressive therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients reaching full clinical remission of their disease
Measured: at the end of the 3 year study period.
GFR loss of 15 ml/min or higher from baseline GFR
Measured: at the end of the 3 year study period
Secondary outcomes (6)
-Absolute GFR-change.
Measured: at the end of the 3 years study period
GFR loss >=30 ml/min from baseline GFR
Measured: at the end of the 3 year study period
-Onset of end stage renal disease.
Measured: at the end of the 3 years study period
Mean annual change in one over serum creatinine concentration
Measured: at the end of the 3 years study period
Proteinuria at 12 and 36 months
Measured: 12 and 36 months
Disappearance of microhematuria
Measured: at the end of the 3 years study period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for IgA NephropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- RWTH Aachen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Juergen Floege, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Aachen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00554502
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STOP-IgAN
- Acronym
- STOP-IgAN
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2007
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Alladin A, Hahn D, Hodson EM, Ravani P, Pfister K, Quinn RR, Samuel SM. Immunosuppressive therapy for IgA nephropathy in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 12;6(6):CD015060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015060.pub2.
PubMed 38864363Tunnicliffe DJ, Reid S, Craig JC, Samuels JA, Molony DA, Strippoli GF. Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 1;2(2):CD003962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003962.pub3.
PubMed 38299639Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, Panzer U, Peters H, Benck U, Mertens PR, Kuhlmann U, Witzke O, Gross O, Vielhauer V, Mann JF, Hilgers RD, Floege J; STOP-IgAN Investigators. Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2225-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463.
PubMed 26630142Yeo SC, Liew A, Barratt J. Emerging therapies in immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 Nov;20(11):788-800. doi: 10.1111/nep.12527.
PubMed 26032537Eitner F, Ackermann D, Hilgers RD, Floege J. Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy of Progressive IgA nephropathy (STOP) IgAN trial: rationale and study protocol. J Nephrol. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):284-9.
PubMed 18587715
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment Of Progressive IgA Nephropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00554502
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STOP-IgAN / STOP-IgAN
- Conditions
- IgA Nephropathy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- RWTH Aachen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Evaluation of the efficacy of an immunosuppressive therapy added to a comprehensive supportive therapy to induce a clinical remission in patients at risk for progressive IgAN
- Investigation of differences between the treatments regarding the number of patients loosing more than 15 ml/min of GFR.
Detailed description
The best treatment of glomerular diseases of the kidney is currently not well defined. This study aims to answer if in patients with IgA nephropathy, the most common type of glomerulonephritis an immunosuppressive treatment (with the use of steroids and chemotherapy) added to a supportive treatment is more effective than a supportive treatment alone (with the use of drugs lowering the blood pressure and the urinary protein loss).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Drug: supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: supportive and immunosuppressive therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female patients from 18-70 years with histologically proven primary IgAN with typical mesangioproliferative features. Diagnosis has to be made by a neuropathologist.
- Proteinuria above 0.75 g/day within 12 weeks prior to or at the first visit in the run-in phase (month -6)and presence of at least one further risk factor for the development of end stage renal disease
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Known allergy or intolerance to study medication (except in case of ACE-inhibitor, in which case a change to an angiotensin receptor blocker is possible).
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding and women without sufficient contraception.
- Any prior immunosuppressive therapy.
- Variants of primary IgAN (e.g. rapidly progressive IgAN with crescents in >50% of glomeruli or minimal change GN with glomerular IgA deposits).
- Significant liver dysfunction (more than three fold increased GPT compared to norm)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin* Antihypertensive therapy with a target blood pressure below 125/75 mmHg (following current clinical guidelines). * ACE-inhibitors (ARB when an ACE-inhibitor is not tolerated) * Other antihypertensive medications depending on the clinical decision and following current guidelines. * Statin therapy * Dietary counseling for a low-sodium diet and, if GFR is below 60 ml/min, for a protein intake of 0.8 g/kg/day. | Drug | A |
| supportive and immunosuppressive therapy* supportive therapy as outlined above * depending on GFR: * methylprednisolone and prednisolone * cyclophosphamide and prednisolone; after 3 months azathioprine with prednisolone * Concomitant medication with the immunosuppressive treatment following current clinical practice | Drug | B |
Primary outcome
Patients reaching full clinical remission of their disease
Time frame: at the end of the 3 year study period.
GFR loss of 15 ml/min or higher from baseline GFR
Time frame: at the end of the 3 year study period
6 secondary outcomes
-Absolute GFR-change.
Time frame: at the end of the 3 years study period
GFR loss >=30 ml/min from baseline GFR
Time frame: at the end of the 3 year study period
-Onset of end stage renal disease.
Time frame: at the end of the 3 years study period
Mean annual change in one over serum creatinine concentration
Time frame: at the end of the 3 years study period
Proteinuria at 12 and 36 months
Time frame: 12 and 36 months
Disappearance of microhematuria
Time frame: at the end of the 3 years study period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38864363Alladin A, Hahn D, Hodson EM, Ravani P, Pfister K, Quinn RR, Samuel SM. Immunosuppressive therapy for IgA nephropathy in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 12;6(6):CD015060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015060.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38299639Tunnicliffe DJ, Reid S, Craig JC, Samuels JA, Molony DA, Strippoli GF. Non-immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 1;2(2):CD003962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003962.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26630142Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, Panzer U, Peters H, Benck U, Mertens PR, Kuhlmann U, Witzke O, Gross O, Vielhauer V, Mann JF, Hilgers RD, Floege J; STOP-IgAN Investigators. Intensive Supportive Care plus Immunosuppression in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2225-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26032537Yeo SC, Liew A, Barratt J. Emerging therapies in immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 Nov;20(11):788-800. doi: 10.1111/nep.12527.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18587715Eitner F, Ackermann D, Hilgers RD, Floege J. Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy of Progressive IgA nephropathy (STOP) IgAN trial: rationale and study protocol. J Nephrol. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):284-9.
Related trials for IgA Nephropathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Kidney Condition Called IgA Nephropathy
Kidney Disease
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
RecruitingPhase 2
Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of KP104 to Treat Glomerulonephritis
Glomerulonephritis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Blinded Study of JADE101 in Participants With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy
IgA Nephropathy (IgAN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juergen Floege, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Aachen
34 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing supportive therapy with: ACE-inhibitor / ARB / Statin and supportive and immunosuppressive therapy in people with IgA Nephropathy, run by RWTH Aachen University at 34 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients reaching full clinical remission of their disease (time frame: at the end of the 3 year study period.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00554502, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2015.